80
24
172
11

Shout out: Nice to see the Journal finally admitting what we’ve known for a long time - /pol/ and the like are often just as competent (heck, sometimes better) than most/all nation state intel shops.

https://twitter.com/JoshuaSteinman/status/1602024758115151873

OSINT dig: The photo of the U.S. Air Force's new stealth aircraft is on the left, taken at night, with stars in the background. We can use them to find the exact location of the jet

https://twitter.com/johnmcelhone8/status/1600683623250030593

209

PIERRE, S.D. – Today, Governor Kristi Noem and legislators announced proposed legislation to restrict foreign purchases of agricultural land in South Dakota. The plan creates a new board, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States – South Dakota (CFIUS-SD), which will investigate proposed purchases of ag land by foreign interests and recommend either approval or denial to the Governor.

“With this new process, we will be able to prevent nations who hate us – like Communist China – from buying up our state’s agriculture land,” said Governor Kristi Noem. “We cannot allow the Chinese Communist Party to continue to buy up our nation’s food supply, so South Dakota will lead the charge on this vital national security issue.”

The prime sponsors of the legislation will be Senator Erin Tobin (R-Winner) and Representative-elect Gary Cammack (R-Union Center).

https://news.sd.gov/newsitem.aspx?id=31923

254
27
384
Q and Q+ JUSTICE 5 Year Delta (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by DRan ago by DRan
329
So, misinformation is causing side effects in the vaccine? kek (media.greatawakening.win) 🧠 These people are stupid!
posted ago by DRan ago by DRan
99
27
34
81
Don't use Wikipedia example. (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by DRan ago by DRan
477
133
131
313
Super Keks! (twitter.com) 🍑 FART POST 💨
posted ago by DRan ago by DRan
25

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28264497/

Natto, a fermented soybean product, has been consumed as a traditional food in Japan for thousands of years. Nattokinase (NK), a potent blood-clot dissolving protein used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, is produced by the bacterium Bacillus subtilis during the fermentation of soybeans to produce Natto. NK has been extensively studied in Japan, Korea, and China. Recently, the fibrinolytic (anti-clotting) capacity of NK has been recognized by Western medicine. The National Science Foundation in the United States has investigated and evaluated the safety of NK. NK is currently undergoing a clinical trial study (Phase II) in the USA for atherothrombotic prevention. Multiple NK genes have been cloned, characterized, and produced in various expression system studies. Recombinant technology represents a promising approach for the production of NK with high purity for its use in antithrombotic applications. This review covers the history, benefit, safety, and production of NK. Opportunities for utilizing plant systems for the large-scale production of NK, or for the production of edible plants that can be used to provide oral delivery of NK without extraction and purification are also discussed.

Moar: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=nattokinase

If I understand this correctly, it can also prevent the rona.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9458005/

386

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

WWG1WGA

"The Question: How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES."

—Question of Law in the Supreme Court case known as Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al. (Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)

They Broke Their Oaths

Loy, Raland, Deron, and Gaynor Brunson all witnessed what they believed to be the theft of the 2020 election and decided to file suit. However, the interesting approach that they have taken is not to make a formal complaint that the election was stolen; instead, they have chosen to sue members of the U.S. Congress who voted not to investigate whether any election irregularities may have occurred that could have affected the outcome. In other words, the Brunson Brothers were motivated to sue because these elected officials broke their oaths to protect the Constitution of the United States.

The Brunson Brothers believed that, to support and defend the Constitution, an investigation into possible fraud needed to take place. Otherwise, how could anyone know with certainty whether the election had been secure?

What shocked the Brunson Brothers was that only 147 members of the US Congress voted in support of the proposed ten-day audit of the election before certifying the ballot count of the Electoral College, while, according to the Washington Post, 377 members voted against the proposed ten-day investigation, and eight abstained.

Supreme Court Docket No. 22-380

Eventually, the case — Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al. — ended up on the docket of the Supreme Court . The "Questions Presented" section, in Raland J. Brunson's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, goes like this:

A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from this Court and lower appeal courts, along with constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case.

This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.

In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions.

These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.

Might the Supreme Court grant relief, not only to the Brunson Brothers, but to millions who are weary of being characterized as "election deniers" simply for wanting investigations to take place? Is it possible that some, or all, of those named in the lawsuit might be removed from office? Keep an eye on this one.

Paul Dowling has written about the Constitution, as well as articles for American Thinker, Independent Sentinel, Godfather Politics, Eagle Rising, and Free Thought Matters.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/11/is_this_the_supreme_court_case_that_will_drain_the_swamp.html

25
27
MSM’s workday (twitter.com)
posted ago by DRan ago by DRan
349
15

Experts: Transparency key to avoid controversy generated by Google-Ascension data deal By Robert King Nov 13, 2019 03:58pm

https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/experts-transparency-key-to-avoid-controversy-generated-by-google-ascension-data-deal

12/06/2019 Google letter to Senate

https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019.12.06%20Response%20to%20Letter%20to%20Google%20re%20Project%20Nightingale%20and%20Ascension%20Health.pdf

03/02/2020 Senate letter to Ascension CEO

https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2020.03.02%20Letter%20to%20Ascension%20re%20Project%20Nightingale%20Partnership.pdf

Google defends use of patient data on Capitol Hill among scrutiny of Ascension dealBy Heather Landi Mar 4, 2020 12:39pm

https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/tech/senators-pressing-ascension-google-data-deal-as-tech-giant-defends-its-use-patient-records

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center joins Ascension to pilot Google's EHR search tool By Heather Landi Apr 1, 2021 11:17am

https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/tech/beth-israel-deaconess-medical-center-joins-ascension-to-pilot-google-s-ehr-search-tool

In February, Google announced that it was expanding the program and gave it a name: Care Studio.

https://health.google/caregivers/care-studio/


141
175
posted ago by DRan ago by DRan
view more: ‹ Prev Next ›