4
EPH_6_10-16 4 points ago +4 / -0

Canada's government is lying, see here: https://greatawakening.win/p/19AKOy1SGl/

6
EPH_6_10-16 6 points ago +6 / -0

Can you help me? I am trying to get posts out there but i have too low a comment score, it's 36. I have to keep asking mods to help make these posts visible, and i can only hope they will Please mods! u/Fatality can you help me again?

16
EPH_6_10-16 16 points ago +16 / -0

This makes me so mad!! Our government is lying about everything!!!!

Trump KNOWS they are lying and this shows it:

🇨🇦’s public safety minister just said less than 1% of 🇺🇸’s fentanyl is from 🇨🇦, and ditto for illegal immigrants.

Here's why that's a whopper of a lie. Warning: Your opinion of 🇨🇦 will irreversibly change.

<thread> 🧵👇

2/ Last year 🇺🇸’s border seized ~19.6k lbs of fentanyl.

🇨🇦 busts in Q4:

  • a lab in BC was producing ~4% that volume per year
  • a lab in AB produced ~1% of that volume

In 🇨🇦, just these 4 busts in Q4 represented over $1 billion of drug profits. Image

3/ I doubt that was hand-crafted, artisanal fentanyl destined for sale at local farmers markets. 🇨🇦 has been well aware of this for decades.

The DEA alleged that El Chapo stated 🇨🇦 was more lucrative than the 🇺🇸 & sent a lieutenant as a student.

4/ Quick sidebar on immigration. 🇨🇦 claims it has robust screening, but literally anyone that showed up could get a student visa with an acceptance letter until last year.

No background checks. The letter was never verified. Popular w/organized crime.

5/ back to fentanyl. I'm not a housing guy by trade, my team fell into housing when we were confused by Vancouver real estate prices.

I'm actually a quant by training that specializes in tracking capital flows, legal or otherwise. Money is zero sum, so there's always a source.

6/ when we crunched the numbers back in 2016/17, we identified one party—an organized crime group that stopped laundering in it's traditional region. The flows were too similar to ignore.

We published it. Facebook banned it. Old twitter wouldn't even let it pass in DMs.

7/ after being branded a racist, I get a call from the former director of the RCMP who is dumbfounded by the fact we nailed it right down to the gang.

@scoopercooper dug & uncovered the Vancouver Model—yes, a money laundering model is named after a city in 🇨🇦.

8/ The Vancouver Model is simple:

  • drug money is traded for casino chips
  • cash out w/a casino cheque
  • deposit "tax free winnings" at a bank
  • buy a house w/the proceeds & pay the mortgage w/"rent"
  • repeat

guys literally went to high roller tables w/grocery bags of cash

9/ fun side note—Cooper did an interview w/a person on my staff, describing the inquiry & the Vancouver Model.

Facebook immediately banned everyone at my company, and I was labeled a critic of China despite me not saying anything, Shout out to the 🇺🇸 billionaire who fixed it.

10/ Money laundering is like cockroaches—a place doesn't just have one. So it was time to look at Greater Toronto real estate.

The fine folks at Transparency International let me help w/a study where we found $25.4b in mortgages w/blatant laundering flags & anon ownership.

11/ Politicians pretended to crack down, but then generated liquidity. Their primary concern wasn't the laundering, but a bust pushing prices down.

Toronto went on to become the fentanyl control center of the world, according to 🇺🇸 (under BIDEN!).

12/ How corrupt is 🇨🇦? One of the world's biggest fentanyl dealers was running his operations using a prison mail system.

That would be absurd in Jalisco, but it didn't even make the news in 🇨🇦. I wonder why. 🤷‍♂️

13/ Most folks don't know 🇨🇦's gov orders media bans, preventing discussion of a case.

A recent case involving the RCMP director of intel (🇨🇦's FBI). The Five Eyes director allegedly leaked to a "kingpin launderer" representing Sinaloa cartel, & terror orgs.

14/ Speaking of the cartel, guess who their banker is?

Good old Toronto Dominion (TD) Bank.

They recently paid the largest penalty of its kind in 🇺🇸 history. That’s a frickin accomplishment.

15/ & speaking of laundry mats, HSBC Canada was recently acquired by RBC, w/odd terms such as lending to the small group of developers in BC.

The finance minister at the time must have forgot they were under investigation at the time of the rushed exit. So weird!

16/ that’s a lot about BC but what about Ontario? To start we know casinos were used for the same reason.

Why? 🇨🇦 was told by an intel agency that the world’s largest car theft gang arrived & is using casinos. 🇨🇦 ignores it, goes on to become a car theft capital. Sense a trend?

17/ after pressure to improve AML, 🇨🇦 hit casinos with new reporting regulations. Surely this will catch the laundering in Ontario, right?

Funny story. A regulator hit a casino with an allegation, and whoops! The AML reporting system for casinos went offline for 6 months. Darn!

18/ When places have low statistical corruption, it’s because:

  • it has low corruption; or
  • it’s too corrupt to even try enforcing

Ontario resembles the latter when it comes to drugs. No major drug lab busts, but 🇺🇸 seems to arrest a lot of smugglers from ON. 🤔 Image

19/ If you’re starting to think there’s something wrong with 🇨🇦’s government, 🇨🇦’s government feels the same way.

The country’s organized crime intelligence unit estimates 1 in 4k adults in 🇨🇦 are organized crime & 260 organized crime groups work in government.

20/ let’s gloss over the fact that Australia’s largest fentanyl bust was a shipment recently being smuggled from 🇨🇦.

Granted, it wasn’t as stylish as 🇨🇦’s coke/meth in a vintage Bentley that occurred a few days later.

21/ okay, I will admit—🇨🇦 provides less than 1% of 🇺🇸’s illegal immigrants. However, when it comes to supervillains? 🇨🇦 is the undisputed champ.

🇺🇸 border encounters w suspected terrorists are 500% higher on the 🇨🇦 border vs 🇲🇽. 1% of illegals, 80% of terror suspects.

22/ which shouldn’t be too much of a surprise. Remember those launderers above? They launder for terrorists and drug dealers, and business is booming.

🇨🇦 has a strange history as a major terror hub. Like the time CSIS destroyed evidence it had someone on the air India bombing.

23/ or why 🇨🇦 is ignoring a 27-year old Interpol red card notice for the alleged assassin of the Prime Minister of Bangladesh.

24/ Seems a little sketchier than most people would assume, eh?

And we’re only really discussing two provinces. Nova Scotia for instance has “no crime,” but is overrepresented for laundering activity. The port also makes frequent appearances in 🇺🇸 Intel reports. 🤷‍♂️

24/ anyway, I think you get the point.

🇨🇦’s reputation as a boring place where nothing happens has been a carefully constructed facade.

And for those who think that laundering has a small impact on 🇨🇦’s housing market, here’s a thread on why that’s just plain wrong.

9
EPH_6_10-16 9 points ago +9 / -0

can i get some help getting my comment score up? I come here and i think its why i can't post things and have to email mods

25
EPH_6_10-16 25 points ago +25 / -0

Hi, i know this site is mainly a USA focus, but i read your site every day from Canada, and i am really mad 🤬 today!!!

In Canada the PPC is the Peoples Party of Canada, lead by Maxime Bernier.

He spoke in the 2019 leaders debate in Canada, and against mass immigration. All the other parties, Liberal (LPC), Conservative (CPC), New Democrat Party (NDP), Green (GRN) all rebuked him as "racist" and "xenophobic" for questioning the plans for mass immigration, insisting it would be good.

Fast forward to today in Canada it's become a 3rd world shit hole with the worst from all of the worst countries, thanks to the globalist LPC CPC NDP and GRN all agreeing blindly to do this. They were all wrong and it didn't turn out to be good.

The one who proved to be right was Maxime Bernier of the PPC.

In the 2021 leaders debate the Election Committee excluded him from the debates stating that "he didn't get 4% of the 2019 vote", and after the 2021 election it turned out he got 4.9% of the vote.

So we all thought he would be in the leaders debate this year (2025).

But they have just changed the rules AGAIN and now the condition is that 'at the time the election is called the party must have 4% of the polling. I know you know, like me, that polling is garbage, and the election of trump showed us that, but they want to now use these ineffective polls as justification to keep Maxime Bernier out of the debates.

here's the news release, please help share it far and wide so we can see how corrupt the Canadian politics is!

https://www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca/news/press-release-the-leaders-debates-commission-is-again-trying-to-exclude-maxime-bernier

Ottawa, ON, January 15, 2025 — The Leaders’ Debates Commission has once again changed its criteria so they can easily exclude the leader of the People’s Party on the basis of dubious polls, as they did in 2021.

In 2021, parties needed to meet one of three criteria to qualify: 1) have at least one MP; 2) have had at least 4% of the total vote in the previous election; or 3) have at least 4% on average in polls at the beginning of the campaign.

The PPC did not meet 1) and 2), and its leader was disqualified on 3) by using dubious polling results in which the PPC barely registered, which gave the party an average of only 3.27%, even though its support was clearly much higher and it ended up scoring 4.9% on election day.

Mr. Bernier would automatically qualify to take part in this year’s debates on the basis of criterion 2) if the Commission had kept the same criteria.

However, yesterday, the Commission announced a key change, dropping that criterion and requiring that parties must now meet not one, but two of these three criteria: 1) have at least one MP; 2) have at least 4% on average in the polls at the beginning of the campaign; or 3) run candidates in at least 90% of ridings.

Moreover, the Commission states in its document that when consulting the parties about the new rules last year, “The Commission received submissions from the Bloc Quebecois, the Conservative Party of Canada, the Green Party of Canada, the Liberal Party of Canada, and the New Democratic Party of Canada.”

This is not true. A PPC staffer sent a submission to Michel Cormier, the Commission’s Executive Director, on July 3 2024, two days before the deadline, in which it was argued that the Commission should keep the same criteria as in 2021. Not only is the Commission trying to exclude Mr. Bernier from the debates, but it seems like it did not take the PPC submission into account. The PPC is still awaiting an explanation from the Commission as of Wednesday 1:00 pm.

Maxime Bernier commented:

“This change only has one obvious purpose, one that unites the whole political establishment in Ottawa: Making it easier to exclude the PPC. These new rules only affect me, the leader of the only new party to emerge forcefully on the federal political scene in decades, and none of the other leaders expected to participate. They want to deny a voice to 840,000 Canadian voters who supported the PPC in 2021.

It’s still possible for the PPC to qualify of course, but we are again at the mercy of dubious polls, some of which we know deliberately exclude the PPC from the list of potential responses, which inevitably understates our level of support.

Instead of using the hard data that are the results of the last election, which prove without doubt that the PPC is one of the major parties whose voice is essential in Canadian policy debates, and, the Commission has chosen to rely on fleeting data that can easily be manipulated and will be obsolete a few weeks later.

Why does the Commission need to change its criteria every electoral cycle? Isn’t it weird that a Commission is kept alive, and public funds are spent to carry consultations with experts and parties, only to come up every few years with new rules that make the participation of the PPC more difficult? Does it exist to facilitate democratic debates or to censor a populist voice?”

Contact: For more information, or to schedule an interview with Mr. Bernier, please write to: media@peoplespartyofcanada.ca.

4
EPH_6_10-16 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was looking at CBC this morning, and one of the articles had a user attacking the comments with 100's of the same comment over and over. It's literally a denial of service because their website is so bad it causes my browser to crash a bit.. i managed to capture a video of it.. it's at: https://files.catbox.moe/ol7tx0.mkv

The article is at https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/insurance-no-fault-injury-victims-premiums-reform-analysis-1.7391486