Hi, i know this site is mainly a USA focus, but i read your site every day from Canada, and i am really mad 🤬 today!!!

In Canada the PPC is the Peoples Party of Canada, lead by Maxime Bernier.

He spoke in the 2019 leaders debate in Canada, and against mass immigration. All the other parties, Liberal (LPC), Conservative (CPC), New Democrat Party (NDP), Green (GRN) all rebuked him as "racist" and "xenophobic" for questioning the plans for mass immigration, insisting it would be good.

Fast forward to today in Canada it's become a 3rd world shit hole with the worst from all of the worst countries, thanks to the globalist LPC CPC NDP and GRN all agreeing blindly to do this. They were all wrong and it didn't turn out to be good.

The one who proved to be right was Maxime Bernier of the PPC.

In the 2021 leaders debate the Election Committee excluded him from the debates stating that "he didn't get 4% of the 2019 vote", and after the 2021 election it turned out he got 4.9% of the vote.

So we all thought he would be in the leaders debate this year (2025).

But they have just changed the rules AGAIN and now the condition is that 'at the time the election is called the party must have 4% of the polling. I know you know, like me, that polling is garbage, and the election of trump showed us that, but they want to now use these ineffective polls as justification to keep Maxime Bernier out of the debates.

here's the news release, please help share it far and wide so we can see how corrupt the Canadian politics is!

https://www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca/news/press-release-the-leaders-debates-commission-is-again-trying-to-exclude-maxime-bernier

Ottawa, ON, January 15, 2025 — The Leaders’ Debates Commission has once again changed its criteria so they can easily exclude the leader of the People’s Party on the basis of dubious polls, as they did in 2021.

In 2021, parties needed to meet one of three criteria to qualify: 1) have at least one MP; 2) have had at least 4% of the total vote in the previous election; or 3) have at least 4% on average in polls at the beginning of the campaign.

The PPC did not meet 1) and 2), and its leader was disqualified on 3) by using dubious polling results in which the PPC barely registered, which gave the party an average of only 3.27%, even though its support was clearly much higher and it ended up scoring 4.9% on election day.

Mr. Bernier would automatically qualify to take part in this year’s debates on the basis of criterion 2) if the Commission had kept the same criteria.

However, yesterday, the Commission announced a key change, dropping that criterion and requiring that parties must now meet not one, but two of these three criteria: 1) have at least one MP; 2) have at least 4% on average in the polls at the beginning of the campaign; or 3) run candidates in at least 90% of ridings.

Moreover, the Commission states in its document that when consulting the parties about the new rules last year, “The Commission received submissions from the Bloc Quebecois, the Conservative Party of Canada, the Green Party of Canada, the Liberal Party of Canada, and the New Democratic Party of Canada.”

This is not true. A PPC staffer sent a submission to Michel Cormier, the Commission’s Executive Director, on July 3 2024, two days before the deadline, in which it was argued that the Commission should keep the same criteria as in 2021. Not only is the Commission trying to exclude Mr. Bernier from the debates, but it seems like it did not take the PPC submission into account. The PPC is still awaiting an explanation from the Commission as of Wednesday 1:00 pm.

Maxime Bernier commented:

“This change only has one obvious purpose, one that unites the whole political establishment in Ottawa: Making it easier to exclude the PPC. These new rules only affect me, the leader of the only new party to emerge forcefully on the federal political scene in decades, and none of the other leaders expected to participate. They want to deny a voice to 840,000 Canadian voters who supported the PPC in 2021.

It’s still possible for the PPC to qualify of course, but we are again at the mercy of dubious polls, some of which we know deliberately exclude the PPC from the list of potential responses, which inevitably understates our level of support.

Instead of using the hard data that are the results of the last election, which prove without doubt that the PPC is one of the major parties whose voice is essential in Canadian policy debates, and, the Commission has chosen to rely on fleeting data that can easily be manipulated and will be obsolete a few weeks later.

Why does the Commission need to change its criteria every electoral cycle? Isn’t it weird that a Commission is kept alive, and public funds are spent to carry consultations with experts and parties, only to come up every few years with new rules that make the participation of the PPC more difficult? Does it exist to facilitate democratic debates or to censor a populist voice?”

Contact: For more information, or to schedule an interview with Mr. Bernier, please write to: [email protected].

I would love to see a union between the USA and Canada, but I would settle for Canada getting rid of its "commonwealth" status.

I supported the PPC right at the start of the the party, Maxime has done a pretty shit job getting out there, most Canadians have no clue there is even a PPC party.

I ran for parliament with the best platform to represent the people of Canada. I got 329 votes. The average voter has no concept of the criminal activity at the federal election level of politics in Canada. Here’s a hint. Why did the wife of the Conservative party of Canada get the contract to produce all the covid test kits in Canada two years before covid was released? Why did the Liberal Prime Criminal receive a kick back royalty for every covid vax injected into a Canadian.why did the next Prime Criminals wife’s company get a 10 billion dollar contract from the Canadian Government?

The PPC would have been a lot more popular if the Conservatives stuck with Erin O'Toole

They are all grifters!

Voting in Canada Is Just as rigged as it was in the US.

These fucking bastards are at it again! They changed the rules to exclude him last time too. WHAT'S THE POINT OF RULES IF YOU CAN CHANGE THEM WILLY NILLY WHENEVER YOU WANT!

Yes they are. The PPC reached the legal threshold for inclusion in Canada's electoral debates.

The powers that be are trying to retroactively change the criteria for qualifying and it's amazing that they're doing this since it will all but ensure the Conservative Party of Canada nukes Trudeau's Party and the New Democrat Party from orbit.

All sitting parties are circling the wagons, to their own political detriment, so that the "right" doesn't get split.

The obvious reason is so that they can collude with the debate hosts to keep specific topics that the PPC would talk about out of the discourse. Immigration will be out so that the PPC's leader, Maxime Bernier, isn't there to bring up that doubling something then reducing by 25% is still increasing it by 50%. That Canadians will continue to drown. Beyond that, he'll bring up that Trudeau's invocation of martial law under the Emergency Act was illegal but that this got swept under the rug and the current Conservatives did nothing to put the genie back into the bottle.

Overall this is a BS attempt to control the Canadian election narrative and keep things that the people who control all of our parties want Out Of The Election Mandates. They do not want Poilievre having an immigration mandate. They do not want provinces to be able to trade with other provinces and disrupt their fiefdoms. They do not want to stop borrowing money to fund alt-left causes around the world.

Bernier would make very public noise about this and was set to be on the stage with these fuckers in a few months. This is last minute shit that is somehow being changed while our government is prorogued.

Taps the sign...

Dear conquered peoples,...

For those not in the know of who he is...

https://x.com/NewGenPPC_ON/status/1766112101972505086