Haven't heard anything in months.

What are the main lefty talking points vs the movements on the ground at the moment?

Movements

• Domestic
  • Critical Race Theory
  • Vaccine push
  • Open borders
• Economic
  • Supply chain issues
  • Infrastructure bill
  • Periodic social media and internet blackouts
• Foreign
  • Sudan

Talking points

• "Open civil war"
• "Quick-Draw Baldwin"
• "Just get the vax bigot"

Is there anything I missed? Please let me know.

What is the differential (if any) between the rhetoric vs the movements?

What does the movements on the ground indicate?

The yesterday I listened to Michael Flynn on MikeTV and they were talking about Biden or someone saying there's a "new Isis named Isis K" General Flynn seems to think they were a distraction and not really a new group. I'm not disagreeing with him but I think they might be the same group of Isis fighters under a new leader in the DS. My guess is they're under Obama. IF Q IS RIGHT AND HE IS Kenyan then that potentially gives him experience with Al Shabab or it's predecessors. If that's the case he would know how to run insurgent terrorist groups. Even if the Kenyan thing is not true he might at least have experience running such groups as a terrible Anti-American President.

Pay attention to the audits. Afghanistan is just a distraction.

I was watching Pastor Shadilay' Salty Stream Replay earlier today and and Salty had made an off hand comment about how Jan. 6th didn't go off according to plan. He jokingly theorized that Swallowswell and Schiff may have been sacrificed had things gone the way the Dems wanted it to go. I thought about it critically. It makes sense. We now know that Trump used the FISA court to authorize surveillance on Schiff and Swalwell.

If it's true that one of the main objectives was to liquidate loose ends in Congress than that means;

1. The FISA court not only okayed the Russia Hoax BUT it also okayed the surveillance on those two clowns

2. There's a good chance that Nancy knew about Schiff and Swalwell (I don't care to spell his name right) before the rest of her party.

3. This would mean Nancy controls the FISA court on some level or the FISA court has a leak in it at the very least.

4. This could indicate that Nancy herself was behind the Russiagate and was using Schiff as a shield to deflect scrutiny.

   or

5. It could also indicate that the FISA court is rouge and operating at the behest of a third party possibly the FBI themselves.

   and

6. There is no FISA court. The FBI decides on a whim who they will spy on and they give it an Orwellian name to deflect it's true purpose.

7. Trump knew the "FISA court" would want to wash it's hands with those two. This is why it okayed the surveillance on those two.

In battle from the time of the Egyptian kings to Napoleonic times most of the casualties were sustained during the ensuing rout after a retreat and not during the battle itself. In short if our foes are dropping like flies then we won the BATTLE. Pressing the advantage might be a good thing.

I did. A Suburu forester commercial with dogs after a Pompeo interview.

Not necessarily Q Related (I'll get back to that eventually).

Someone posted this on GA.W several weeks ago. I thought it was interesting. I was at a funeral and had homework so I couldn't dig into it much at they time. With the recent Colonial pipeline hack I was reminded of this supposed group because it seems that because they claim to be responsible for the Solarwinds hack and they may be related to the Colonial Pipeline.

One of the links on the wiki leads to a video about how China is exercising an increasingly tight grip on Canada. One thing that interested me is the documents in the video mention Huawei's CFO, a woman named Meng Wanzhou. Apparently she's currently in Canada and is facing extradition to New York for violating sanctions because they were selling a company to a subsidiary of their in Iran back in 2008-ish. Just a week ago her extradition hearing in Canada was delayed.

I think this may be one of the reasons the Obama Administration was adamant on striking a nuclear deal with Iran. The deal was to provide [1.2 million worth of HP computing equipment to an Iranian university.] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-skycom-idUSBRE90U0CC20130131) Admittedly that's not a lot of money but it is enough to arm a whole research division at a university in a shitty little country like Iran. It's possible that the plan was to lift the sanctions and let the sale (and any other deals) go through without drawing too much scrutiny and then turn around and use the computers to aid in nuclear weapons research through the university.

I found this interesting that back on the CNASR wiki there are numerous mentions of Huawei. Do you think there is a relation? What do you think of the possibility that the Chinese military were in Canada to escort Meng Wanzhou back to China? Perhaps that military drill was the trade off for keeping her in Canada? Is it possible that CNASR is a break off group from the Chi-Coms from the military drills left behind with the intention of looking after Wanzhou and attempt to prevent her extradition? That seems plausible to me given that Huawei is a CCP apparatus Wanzhou would be a protected asset for the Chi-Coms and protection of her could be an objective. Regardless, It seems to me the faster she gets to New York the faster we'll know more about Iran and Obama. It's also obvious that the longer Trudeau is in power the smaller our chances of extradition become. It makes you wonder if most of the things going on in Canada are related to Wanzhou and why China appears to have Trudeau on a leash.

Some disclaimers. I'm aware this is on a conspiracy wiki. I thought it was interesting and I don't rule anything out at first glance. I at least give a night of decent research before I dismiss things. This seems very likely to me in comparison to most other conspiracies. This is just the first CNASR rabbit hole I'm going to jump into. I'm going to look into the supposed connections to the SolarWinds hack and the Nashville Bombing. I think it's a freaky prospect to have a covert Chinese organization actively operating within US borders. It could be related to Q as well. Who knows? Thought? Opinions?

It occurred to me while I was in the shower that what we need if the DOJ steps in is a legal distraction. Something that would pull away DOJ resources and maybe even some democrat resources from AZ. The Dems and DS are barreling down full force on our boys in AZ. This could be the legal equivalent to the Battle of Thermopylae for us. That didn't go too well for the Spartans. We need someone to run interference. The problem I ran into in the shower is that i couldn't think of something that would draw enough DOJ assets away from AZ. I was wondering if you pedes had any ideas on that as well as anything that would contribute to our cause.

Since Q says we're watching a movie. Who is your favorite character or characters? Also I know almost everyone would pick POTUS so he's off the table. We all know POTUS is the best.

Based Pillow Merchant- Hands down the best imo. He reminds me of all the used car dealers around where I live but I feel like that's his disguise because he's actually a secret agent fighting the Deep State.

Alex Jones- I know he's Mossad but every time a camera's not on him I imagine that he's into some crazy shit, like boarding alien ships and spying on Bohemian Grove

Steve Bannon- He's like the non-Mossad Alex Jones but I kind of picture him more as like Solid Snake or a veteran secret agent who's seen Alex Jones level shit on the job.

Kayleigh- I miss her making Jim Acosta cry and making the press corps all pissy when she hits 'em upside the head with her Binders of Knowledge.

MTG- I feel that if I was a female in Congress I would be her.

https://www.broadcastify.com/listen/ctid/100

Anyone listening to the radio in Maricopa country? Nothing's happening as far as I can tell but I thought I'd just put this here for my Audit Pedes.

If you're reading this piss off you twat.

1. How did Seth Rich know about the servers and how did he gain access to them? Was he working with this Schultz and Pearlman?

2. The documents reveal an initial drop of DNC emails called the "Schultz Drop". Who is this "Schultz" and how was Nathanial Goss Pearlman involved with it seeing as how Corsi concluded this initial drop came from servers he provided?

3. Who is the person/informant 1/4 of the way into the documents whose entire testimony has been redacted with only one half sentence which mentions a some kind of financial scam.

4. Did Assange provide proof that the hacks were an inside job in 2020? If so was he pardoned silently?

5. Who was mystery informant #2?

6. Who did Sekulow call and why was mystery informant #2 surprised Sekulow knew and called this other person?