0
GeoffreyDoorknob 0 points ago +2 / -2

It’s somewhat disappointing for us though is it not?

2
GeoffreyDoorknob 2 points ago +2 / -0

They probably have an indemnity clause in the contract with Mr Pillow, so that he agrees to take all the flak in case of a lawsuit in any case.

3
GeoffreyDoorknob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Work has gone into this

4
GeoffreyDoorknob 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hmm. I’m. Not convinced that the disclaimer they’re using would even be sufficient in any case.. maybe that’s why it’s 2 hours and not the 3 hours we were promised.

0
GeoffreyDoorknob 0 points ago +1 / -1

No. I’m saying that all language works the way it does and always has done regardless of anyone’s proscriptive wishes. That includes Q, the MSM, you, me and anyone else.

-1
GeoffreyDoorknob -1 points ago +1 / -2

Sure, but that’s simply not how language works. Widespread usage becomes ‘correct’ by definition, provided it’s widely understood. Obviously for us we can see who’s who by the specific nuances of how people refer to Q

2
GeoffreyDoorknob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure but why not? Why would they be airing it at all.

13
GeoffreyDoorknob 13 points ago +13 / -0

The thing is the Q team must be aware that Q followers are interpreting things a certain way, and are very sure of themselves. They may be playing the long game but we have their back but a clarification from time to time could be useful.

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is still another obvious explanation of course..

2
GeoffreyDoorknob 2 points ago +2 / -0

OAN may have viewed it but judged the hopium as being TOO STRONG.

2
GeoffreyDoorknob 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s important to send GOP a message here. We’re not coming back.

17
GeoffreyDoorknob 17 points ago +17 / -0

OAN are also issuing a disclaimer with it saying that it is paid programming or as they say ‘opinion only’ and that they don’t endorse statements such as those concerning Dominion and Smartmatic. Not sure what to make of that but not sure it’s helpful

2
GeoffreyDoorknob 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m not what all the fuss is about whether people say Q or Qanon or anons? It’s a straightforward shorthand. It may well be used mostly by people who haven’t sufficiently delved into Q but it’s just a name. Everyone understands more or less who they are talking about..

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has he undergone the Georgia Bar’s psychiatric evaluation yet or was all that just BS?

Edit: oh I see he refused

by TTP1776
0
GeoffreyDoorknob 0 points ago +1 / -1

It could have been really minor of course. Enough to mention, any news story about his health at that time would have been massive and inspired speculation. So hardly surprising it was a big story

2
GeoffreyDoorknob 2 points ago +2 / -0

In plain sight..

3
GeoffreyDoorknob 3 points ago +3 / -0

This post is discriminatory to the LGBTQANON+ faction.

1
GeoffreyDoorknob 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s the current thinking about Q’s identity. Obviously Q is actually a representative of a larger group, but who was actually posting and where are they now?

2
GeoffreyDoorknob 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t see how this helps

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›