45

Look, if many many many sued under small claims, that would require either a

  1. Request for consolidation, which is expensive or
  2. A response to each law suit.. Make the fuckers respond, cost them money, or let them ignore you and get a default judgment. Small claims is the most underutilized venue around, everyone sue for the max in your state, you need no attorney, sue against the government orbpolitician, bury the shit bags in paper. Do it in mass. REALISTICALLY, 10,000 individual suits works better than one class action suit representing 10,000 plaintiffs. DO it, SUE INDIVIDUALLY IN SMALL CLAIMS AND Do it IT OFTEN ... your fee to sue is a lot better spent than to donate to a politician to fight this, your suit fee = them having to hire a lawyer to respond.,. You may represent you and the defendant may represent himself, but he wont, he will pay someone to do it for him. Sue individually, , drain the bastards of funds!
32

CHINA SUX AS DOES BIDEN

162
YEP (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by Gooters ago by Gooters
420
YA THINK? (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by Gooters ago by Gooters
264
Frogs, kinda figures ? (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by Gooters ago by Gooters
37
42

It is a fact that evidence that may be used in a suit already filed, or used in contemplation of a suit MUST BE PRESERVED. the intentional destruction of that evidence is called Spoliation and in some states may be a separate charge in itself in a law suit. in other states, it is used as a charge to the jury, that the destroyed evidence may be used as evidence against the defendant. Either way, the destruction of the evidence is a stupid move by the defendant and has ramifications, and reconstituting the evidence itself is not really necessary. this of course assumes we have honest judges, which are becoming rare these days.

18

The standard answer to when is "soon". Is that to so frustrate the enemy that their vigilance is lost? Is that is the plan?

45
COMA JOE (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by Gooters ago by Gooters
22
51
Patton Quote (www.azquotes.com)
posted ago by Gooters ago by Gooters
42

Mel Gibson as "Jerry", turned out right in the movie. Spot on about the crooked CIA. He is STILL RIGHT! take a rewatch, entertainment then is truth now.

34

Both GATES and BEZOS live in "community property" states, meaning after the marriage, but for a pre nuptial, most property accumulated after the marriage, despite the actual "earner", are owned 50/50 by the couple. So Gates give "big nose" some stock, of which basically she already had a 50 % ownership in. To move assets in contemplation of hiding them allows for the creditor/judgement holder to trace those assets back before the nefarious action. Oh no this is a clue to buy bit coin, they are getting out of the stock market.... really? Bit Coin is "priced" by demand, it produces nothing, it has no intrinsic value. It is in fact a PONZI, it depends on demand to support its price. It is how Bernie Madoff did his scheme for so long, and yes, his early investors actually made a "profit", paid by the later investors. Now, tell me, if the market goes to shit, who is going to then run to buy bit coin in which to support its high price? Ok, who created Bit Coin? Who backs it? Don't know, neither do the others. Gold & Silver at least have some intrinsic value and it can be used in production. Tell me, you own a bar of gold? If things really get really messy, you cant eat it, drink it, or smoke it. The hyper inflation in Germany after WWI was met with investing in commodities, liquor, smokes, food... land.... if it reverts to the barter system in a collapse, get something you can barter with.

817
Nice to know... (media.greatawakening.win)
posted ago by Gooters ago by Gooters
55
15

Truth is, fines may sound like a lot, but compared to the mega bucks earned in the activity done getting the fine, the cost of the fine is simply added into the cost of doing business. Fines are often a pittance, not nearly enough to inhibit bad acting, in comes the plaintiff attorney, who could extract a hefty judgement which may include punitive damages. The true guardians of the people in commerce were NOT the regulator, but the lawyers aided by honest judges.

11

Enough of this crap about original filing with the USSC, take it to a based federal district judge. Get the ruling appropriate and the evidence out, if they want to fight it for removal to the USSC, let them, more attention and more exposure for the evidence. Ken Paxton (TX); did not sue to stop Biden an anything but a Federal District Level.