2
HellofAWoman99 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let you cold run it’s course. Nobody dies from a cold

1
HellofAWoman99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Results SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full-text

1
HellofAWoman99 1 point ago +1 / -0

“The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a ‘Don’t try this at home’ label,’ Science reported Thursday… The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.”> science.org

2
HellofAWoman99 2 points ago +2 / -0

How much evidence you need against this false propaganda you just posted here??????

2
HellofAWoman99 2 points ago +2 / -0

VAERS provides valuable insights into vaccine-induced anaphylaxis; however, it has limitations. Notably, VAERS is a passive reporting system requiring health care professionals to submit event reports that include vaccine lot numbers, which can be cumbersome to obtain and submit by treating clinicians. Additionally, the anaphylaxis case definition used by VAERS requires reactions to meet strict criteria, which can exclude mild reactions and some severe allergic reactions whose systemic involvement was limited by prompt treatment. Such treatment is more likely in health care workers who were overrepresented among the first wave of vaccinations, many of whom were vaccinated via occupational health programs in hospital settings. Hypervigilance toward adverse reactions to vaccines due to early publicized reports of vaccine-induced anaphylaxis and high rates of vaccine hesitancy may also lead to false-positive reports in VAERS. Given the high and growing prevalence of allergic disease in the general US population, public concern about possible vaccine-induced anaphylaxis risk among individuals with allergies, and the key role of vaccination in achieving herd immunity to COVID 19, it is essential that additional, comprehensive, and up-to-date clinical data be evaluated to further understand this important topic.

4
HellofAWoman99 4 points ago +4 / -0

They need to be making photo copies of the vaccine card they get when vaccinated. They are letting the American People down.

1
HellofAWoman99 1 point ago +2 / -1

But the numbers are down. Compared to 2020 so i don’t foresee anything like this.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›