it was a propaganda campaign to paint a picture of what these lowlifes look and act like. creepy dudes with no friends that have overactive sweat glands. and from my perspective, and most peoples I imagine, you're left thinking what do you do to prevent the oddball lone pedo ? gonna perform citizens arrest on a guy because he looks like a pedo? the people felt helpless and probably didn't know what they should demand to rid the planet of "these types" of pedos not realizing how rampant and profitable it was with other "types".
in reality these dudes may have been actors (most likely IMHO) or setup, while the true predators were the oligarchs and elites and doing so via much more "social" routines that involve much worse actions such as cannibalism and murder
I thought it was to keep squeezing us useless eaters out of more and more. they openly "tax" us as much as they can get away with (usually that's around 40% plus or minus before the masses revolt) and once that's maxed you secretly tax em all via inflation by printing and printing money. before us fools know any better they've left us destitute and we are begging the government to help us with "health"care, food, housing, etc, and then boom check mate for them!
yeh, i mean just imagine a normie hearing the "normal" newscasters gloating about how the boogeyman didn't actually get them like the mental patients in the hospital said they would!
I mean, if "QAnons are so crazy and the ideas are whacky conspiracy theories, what are they doing by revealing continually how afraid they are of the boogeyman?
meme idea:
nornies be like, why you trippin over whether crazy peoples crazy ideas become true...I startin to think you be crazy
buy a billboard that reads "Q is love, love for all Patriots, no matter how asleep, and all people of this world! as long as they aren't involved in pedophilia, cannibalism, satanic rituals, murder and crimes against humanity - With Love, Q"
looks so...seen this post tonight ?
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkYRBgta/that-lin-wood-whistleblower-inte/c/
awesome if true and can be substantiated...I choose to believe it can and will be!
this relates exactly to what I posted last night with respect to FISAs...check out the bottom of the 2nd page line # 20, and see my post last night:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkYMcjAc/i-think-q-white-hats-used-fisa-a/
I've heard of these emergency powers and the Stafford Act and they all seem reasonable to me, but I don't have access to written docs that detail them, so I am not going to have much of anything to add beyond your linked stories.
bottom line is I think Q has/had many paths to success and these may well be a couple of them
We Win (already won?), that's the gist !
i agree we're rooting for the same outcome and debate is not only good, it's necessary in an advanced society that is interested to continually improve and hopefully get things right.
correct me if i wrote something to the contrary but i don't ever recall linking this EO with some requirement that the Supreme Court take the case. i believe the court has no jurisdiction over this unless someone later challenged Radcliffe's or others use and interpretation of the data but presumably that wouldn't occur until after it was revealed to have been activated to opposing parties that legally have standing.
without going bit by bit I'd just suggest you consider what I'm saying and EXACTLY how the EO reads. in theses types of legal docs exact words and their plain meaning are very important.
the EO reads that he first 45 day clock starts upon CONCLUSION OF AN ELECTION. there's no chance the election concluded Nov 3. certain rigged states allowed votes to be counted for days after. it's not written that it's to be within 45 days of VOTING. either way it's likely only a matter of a few days depending on how a court may view it if the EO were to ever be challenged in a court
also, PDJT doesn't activate EO or really have any involvement by the true reading, or at least he's not written in as an active participant in its enaction and design. perhaps it's legally appropriate for him to be involved in the last 30 day portion of the EO. there's an intrinsic conflict of interest if the then-president who is seeking reelection gets to call the shots on such an EO. it's left to DNI Ratcliffe and others and PDJT needs/needed to have as much distance from those decisions as possible
beyond that given the way the EO is written, if it was even activated (i don't dont it could have been), the assessment and plan could have happened in very short order or like you're speculating it could be being dragged out to the last moment.
no matter the actual case, let's hope something soon fren !
p.s., not dooming, just trying to prevent more date fagging and false hopium, although you'll see based on my analysis, if accurate, that the plan could take effect at a later date potentially if the EO was activated by Ratcliffe
i think there's plenty of hopium to go around either way !
not even close to proper analysis of that EO. that's not to say that the 30 day period couldn't be coming to a close but highly doubtful based on thorough analysis from legal and logical perspective
my analysis from almost a month ago in response to this post:
https://greatawakening.win/p/11SKPzS29i/election-interference-executive-/
response was this:
sorry, but that's a junk analysis of EO 13848 and it's timelines
important legal dates and timelines in the actual EO if you read it with legal eyes are that the first 45 day clock starts upon CONCLUSION OF AN ELECTION. We sure as heck know the election didn't conclude on 11/3/20. according to a biased Google search Biden was declared winner on 11/7/20, but even then it's still very unclear when a court might determine the conclusion was, if there's been one at all!
anyway. then the EO states that an assessment needs to be done WITHIN 45 DAYS...meaning it can't take longer than 45 days but can be done and submitted within 1 day, 1 week or 1 month if they wanted to.
same with the second 45 day timeline....WITHIN 45 DAYS to present the report to proper parties.
then from there the President and DOD, etc have up to 30 days to coordinate a plan. note that once the EO was written in 2018, the President need not have had any role in its activation. the President is first mentioned only when it comes time for the report to be submitted to the specific parties. this could have happened on 1/19/21 or any date before 1/20/21 at 12 pm. otherwise the EO would have required that the report be delivered to the then disputed President Biden.
it seems illogical to me that the time for notifying the President (only required after the first two timelines are met) would occur after the faux inauguration.
I'll leave further speculation to you based on these facts and I don't doubt that Freedom Day we will likely find out was significant for some reason, but doubt it's when EO 13848 went into effect. it would have went into effect in November of 2020. DNI Radcliffe's actions to just initiate an assessment would make it in effect.
your post headline and finale question don't align. why wearing a mask is different than wearing clothes is obvious to anyone that researches efficacy and harms of a mask not to mention legitimacy of the "virus"
as for clothes, i don't think they should necessarily be mandatory in public and by mandatory you mean having to cover just ones man or lady parts. I've seen plenty of thong bikinis that hardly qualify as "clothes"....not that im complaining :)
nothing to see here
yes there is some very convincing arguments about how we become a slave to the Corporation of the United States (created circa 1871) once our birth certificate creates a corporation named identical to the birth name our parents wished to call us, only the birth certificate by it being in all capitals and/or on bond paper is proof of the creation of the new corporation (i.e., person, entity) that is beholden to the corporate US
check out Anna Von Reitz and https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/ among others
it's all a show I say. any normie watching them must think, for the love of god why are these folks so paranoid that they can't stop talking about "QAnons" and planning everything they do around them