19
Insignificant 19 points ago +19 / -0

Going forward though, we've got to stop calling it a nobel peace prize. Nobody won a nobel peace prize for ivermectin. They won a nobel prize for medicine. Obama won a nobel peace prize for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples." And Obama did this by starting multiple wars.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Man this is exactly what I needed to see tonight. I just got home from another day of being persecuted at work because I stood up to the mask, vax, and testing mandates. I've shown a LOT of restraint with these people going out of their way to try and make me look bad at work, and I think it's going to backfire on them. Thank you for this post. I have a meeting with the big boss tomorrow about my concerns, so I'll be praying and thinking hard on the past two years and all the great people that have stood up for something.

5
Insignificant 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wait, I thought it was unvaxxed conservative terrorists.

9
Insignificant 9 points ago +9 / -0

Great points. It's amazing how many things kids are willing to do once they're out of the classroom. I finally understand what my parents meant by asking, "What do you mean there's nothing to do?" Homeschooling really seems like the best option at this point.

3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's crazy that a 5th grade curriculum is all we need to understand to be successful. Yet somehow, these basic ideas are actually debated, as if it's a hard decision to figure which system is more free and appealing to all humans.

50
Insignificant 50 points ago +50 / -0

They thought they would break us in 2 years or less. Many caved. What they don't realize is that people that believe in something have no problem standing up for however long it takes for them to back off.

4
Insignificant 4 points ago +4 / -0

I saw one on my way to work a few weeks ago in Alabama. I wanted to snap a picture buy my phone is ancient. It made my day.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Certain countries are beginning to declare their freedom, so you know they have to get something going quick. I can't wait to hear the headlines about why we have to immediately attack Russia. Here's to hoping it won't work.

3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're right but the big question is why/how does a company mandate something that's been declared unconstitutional in the highest court and runs contrary to so many state and local laws, or guidance from attorneys general, governors, and things like the ADA. It just seems like they're asking for a fight. But I suppose this is all part of the process to make people see that certain laws still need to be changed while we adopt some others that offer more specific protections for citizens.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

You may be right. I just don't think we should throw out the baby with the bathwater.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am familiar with those stories as well. Untermyer was something else. Here's some highlights:

• He took an active part in preparing the Federal Reserve Act, the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 and other legislation curbing trusts.

• He was a delegate to the Democratic National Convention in 1904, 1908 and 1912; and delegate-at-large for the state of New York in 1916. Accordingly, he was a strong supporter of Woodrow Wilson's administration.

• After America entered World War I, he was an advisor to the U.S. Treasury Department regarding the interpretation of the income tax and the excess profits tax laws.

• He was appointed by President Wilson to serve on the U.S. section of the 1916 International High Commission, which convened in Buenos Aires for the purpose of framing uniform laws in the Americas.

• Untermeyer later served as a delegate to the Democratic National Convention from New York in 1932 and 1936. He was also a delegate to the New York Constitutional Convention in 1938.

• Untermeyer also identified as a Zionist and served as president of the Keren Hayesod, the agency through which the movement was then and still is conducted in America.

• In 1933, he helped found the Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi League to promote an economic boycott of Nazi Germany.

Oops...I forgot to mention he was a lawyer too. Sounds like a trustworthy guy to me haha.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

I certainly don't have all the answers, but I can tell you that many starved due to German supply lines being destroyed by the Allies later in the war. This is where the pictures of skinny Jews and piles of shoes come from. They never tell you about the shoe-making facilities where many of those pictures were taken either. I also know that 6 million is a very important number in Judaism for reasons that are beyond my full comprehension. I do know that the idea of a "plight of 6 million Jews" had been recycled many times prior to WWII, so it stands to reason that someone was trying to reach an outcome, whether real or not, that had already been decided.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Surely you've heard of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Yes, yes I know they were "debunked" long ago, but that debunking is missing a lot of context. They didn't debunk the text itself, only the paper it was written on. They literally declared it a forgery, which is simply an unauthorized copy of an original document. They never declared the information to be false. And when you analyze the committee that ruled on this, you find that nearly every person involved had something to gain from making the documents disappear, and they did disappear, that is, until it resurfaced thanks to our own FBI. But even if you put aside the Protocols, there is no denying what Theodore Hertzl and many of his disciples preached, much of which came from the Talmud. There is a reason anti-Semitism was so prevalent throughout the 19th century, and it's not as simple as saying everyone was just a racist back then. Please look deeper.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're right. I think we shouldn't demolish any of the thousands of sacred structures that still stand today that had the same purpose. After all, even pyramids and obelisks carry different meanings for different periods in history. This is no different. We can simply repurpose it for something with a positive goal in mind.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure I understand how discouraging abortion is a progressive women's health policy...? It's quite the opposite. The logic I used is simple.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why does everyone get triggered when they see the word NAZI, as if everything attached to it is inherently evil? The point of this thread is to show another example of how a narrative can be controlled for 75 years without many challenging it. Why would a Nazi law from 1933 remain on the books until today? The answer is because Germany has had a huge Christian/Catholic population that objects to abortion, plain and simple. You don't have to support the entire Nazi agenda because you happen to support something else they practiced. Who here supports a strong military? Well, you must be a communist since China and North Korea both fit that bill right? If you're one of the ones that likes to jump to conclusions about a user that posts anything related to Nazi Germany, please grow up and learn to look at things objectively.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes I'm very familiar with the history of eugenics. The problem is that most assume the Nazis only sterilized Jews, which is far from the truth. We can debate if what they did was moral by today's standards, but as you've also shown with your info, the Nazis only adopted and advanced a policy that was popular all over the civilized world at the time. It's hard for people to look at history without using a modern lens, and I think this is what makes it so easy for most to dismiss anything from Nazi Germany as evil. The truth is, many of the things they did would be considered acceptable by today's standards, yet those things rarely get taught in the classroom. Can we not separate the good from the bad and look at things objectively?

Many are also confused on the idea of a pure Aryan race. This had nothing to do with blonde-haired, blue-eyed Germans, but rather an ancient race of people that you learn about in any entry-level world history course. That's right, Hitler knew there was a mysterious people called the Aryans that showed up in India and taught them the foundations of what would later become Hinduism. They also taught them agriculture, mathematics, and many other skills that would serve to advance any race. Hitler tried his best to prove a link between Aryans and Germans in the 1930's but failed to do so. You didn't think he sent his SS to Tibet and other regions to study anthropology for fun did you? After all, he even hired the top Grail hunter of the day to seek out the famed Holy Grail. Yes, the Indiana Jones movies actually got it quite right.

Can you really blame him? He consulted the top science and experts of the day, which actually supported many of the things Hitler was trying to accomplish. In fact, the oldest human remains were found in Germany in the 19th century and weren't refuted until the 1950's, so it seems they had every reason to believe that they were part of some advanced, ancient race. After many years of studying history, I've come to the conclusion that many would agree with Hitler's motives for the most part, but likely disagree with the means used to achieve them.

Here's what a Rabbi had to say about Hitler:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/DQfnUHIjPN4K/

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let them stand and serve as a warning to future generations of what humans are capable of concocting. If we shouldn't demolish statues of Robert E. Lee, we shouldn't demolish stones that convey a different message...just my opinion.

5
Insignificant 5 points ago +5 / -0

That was very colorful. Thank you. There are tons of discrepancies when it comes to the Holocaust and Nazi Germany in general from what I've seen. I think it's great that people are actually allowed to discuss these things here. The Katyn massacre is a great example of how the narrative can change quickly. All it takes is a declassification of documents to shatter a lie that's been propagated for 75 years.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Loving Israel is one thing. Writing doctrine that states you plan to return every qualified Jew to their homeland in hopes of ruling the world is another. I'm talking about the Theodore Hertzl types. Then there are those who have realized that being Jewish comes with a long history of being persecuted, so they "convert" to the most orthodox forms of Christianity. The rock you seek is hidden in plain sight.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Recipe for D3- sunlight

Recipe for zinc- beef, chicken, fish

Just be careful. These are some of the most controversial products on the market today!

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

You beat me to it. But why? Because the first several Presidents had no idea what they were doing.

3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think you missed the point. I was pointing out how the truth doesn't always reveal itself in the beginning, and that a narrative can be safely passed on for generations until someone finally investigates. But yes, the Jewish spin can't be ignored in its relation to the Great Awakening, as many here already understand. Nobody is trying to generalize about Jewish people, as you seem to be implying. We all know the Zionists are the ones to worry about.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›