Just in case the Reddit touts are not talking about it, people should know that GME is firing staff.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/07/gamestop-cfo-is-leaving-the-company-retailer-announces-layoffs.html
In another thread, u/Slyver replied to a discussion about political parties. In that reply was a mention of the Federal Reserve Act (FRA). I thought this subject deserved a thread of its own, rather than derailing that thread.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IYCrk69G/still-believe-in-the-right-vs-le/c/
I have long wondered the "how" part of the FRA. How did they structure it? And why did certain events happen in history that seemed to be centered around it? My research tells me this:
The FRA was the "Democrat" plan up against the "Republican" plan called the Aldrich Plan. The kicker is, they were the exact same plan.
Central banking had a long history in the USA before the FRA.
First one was in 1791, set up by Hamilton. Second one was in 1816. Third attempt was FRA in 1913, which became permanent.
It is helpful to understand the legal reasons that they had to keep re-starting it, and how they "fixed" that "problem" (from their perspective).
In the 1700's-1800's, businesses were either sole proprietorships, partnerships, or business trusts. There were very few corporations. Corporations were a creation of the king, with a special charter. Since the USA had no king, there was no mechanism for creating a corporation, or at least it was viewed as something undesirable.
The first Bank of the United States (1791), a central bank, was created as a trust. The history of trust law, going back to England, was that trusts could only last for 21 years (age of majority), or 21 years after the life of a named beneficiary.
So, they made business trusts for 20 years, a nice round number. That meant it would expire in 1811.
The fight over renewing the trust around 1810-1811 explains both the Original 13th Amendment (1810) and the War of 1812.
After the war, the second central bank was instituted in 1816. It would expire 20 years later in 1836. Just so happens that Andrew Jackson was around then, and he was anti-central banksters. This is why they tried to kill him, unsuccessfully, but his sounding the alarms and his fight against them kept the central bank away for generations following.
But around the turn of the 20th century, [they] were plotting to put in another central bank, as well as an income tax. The plan was a little more sophisticated this time.
They passed the FRA, which created the third central bank, which would again be in the form of a trust, while also passing the income tax. This trust was created in 1913, and would expire in 1933.
At the same time, they were pushing the "trust busting" narrative of anti-trust laws, using Rockefeller's Standard Oil Trust as the example. But in reality, they were shifting things behind the scenes.
The corporation is unlike the traditional business trust in that it has an unlimited life (perpetual duration, which does not expire in 20 years). While denouncing trusts as bad, they were also creating laws in states for this "new thing" called a corporation.
The Federal Reserve Trust was, indeed, owned by foreigners, which a lot of people have read about. But by the 1920's the corporation was on its way in and the business trust was on its way out.
In 1927, the Federal Reserve Trust was officially restructured as a corporation, which also had a different structure to hide who really controlled it. Key point: ownership was never important, but control always was. "Own nothing, control everything." -- John D. Rockefeller
By 1933, when the FR trust expired, it was no longer a problem because it wasn't a trust anymore, but Roosevelt unconstitutionally abused presidential powers to confiscate gold and clean up the books.
Since then, the FR has been a corporation with perpetual existence, and no longer needs Congress' approval every 20 years.
Today, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation, owned by its member banks (not individuals like the original trust). Those member banks are large banks around the country that Average Joe and Jane bank at.
But those banks don't really have any power to run the operations of the Federal Reserve. Remember: Ownership means nothing; control is everything.
The Federal Reserve -- IN THEORY -- is run by the Board of Governors, which are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. It is for this reason that normies think it is "controlled by" (or a "part of") the federal government.
But this is a deception. These people do not really run the FR. Even the chairman, currently Jerome Powell (a true idiot), does not run the FR.
The ONLY reason the FR exists, no matter what other fake claims are made, is to PRINT MONEY and make sure the INSIDERS connected to the FR can PROFIT from it.
Printing money MEANS inflating the currency, so that the newly created currency goes into the pockets of the people who created it.
If everybody THINKS there is $1,000,000 in the system, but I secretly create an extra $100,000 to put in my pocket, and everyone else just treats it like it is as real as the other money, then I have created $100,000 out of nothing but some pieces of paper. THAT is what money printing is all about.
Repeat: The ONLY purpose of ANY central bank is to PRINT MONEY, and ENRICH those who printed it. That has been going on even before the money changers figured out how to cheat via government power, rather than cheating on a small-time basis.
So, the REAL power of the Federal Reserve is the money printing. Jerome Powell does NOT do that. The Board of Governors do NOT do that. Their policies of raising and lowering the "target rate" of the Federal Funds rates and setting the Discount Rate are NOT what does it.
All of that is smoke and mirrors, no matter how many normies eat it up (even very smart normies eat it up, due to its sophistication and most normies' inability to think that it could all be a Big Con, which it is).
It is the New York Federal Reserve Bank that handles ALL "Open Market Operations," which is a euphamism for MONEY PRINTING.
The New York Fed runs ALL money printing of buying and selling pieces of paper (or today, computer digits).
This means that the New York Fed, even though it is only ONE bank in the entire system, has ALL the power of the system. Whoever runs the New York Fed is whoever prints the money at will.
Is that the President of the NY Fed? Maybe. There is a LONG list of former presidents of the NY Fed who have become Treasury Secretaries. And the president of the NY Fed is the ONLY person who has a permanent seat on the Federal Open Market Committee.
So, it could be that person. I suspect that even that person is a puppet of others behind the scenes, but if so, that would be done in a way that is never made public -- via contracts that will not see the light of day unless someone REALLY does a full audit. To do a full audit, one would likely have to dodge some bullets aimed at taking them out first. The people behind the NY Fed are the people behind the assassinations, terrorism, and so much more misery in the world.
The entire Federal Reserve System should be abolished once and for all, but this understanding of the legal structure can be helpful to understanding some of the "why did that happen" questions that people wonder about.
Come to think of it ... maybe the Federal Reserve is the Keystone.
Elon Musk may walk away from $44B Twitter deal over fake accounts: report
https://nypost.com/2022/07/07/elon-musks-44b-twitter-deal-in-jeopardy-over-fake-accounts/
Let's see the REAL numbers!
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/110/443/265/playable/ab89cca264d2e201.mp4
He says:
- Globe has been cooling since 2002, not warming.
- "We're all talking about something [Global Warming] here, which isn't happening."
- Calling CO2 a pollutant ... "Gives me the impression that some of our members here haven't had the benefit of a formal education."
- "Isn't this really just about the state being able to get its hand in ordinary people's trouser pocket to steal yet more tax from them?"
- "Isn't this all about political control?"
- "The whole thing's a sham."
I understand from other sources that the Earth goes through several cycles of temperature.
We are currently in an ice age, which is lasted over 2 million years. This ice age has been the 3rd coldest in the past 500 million years. We don't recognize it as such because we happen to be living within an interglacial period within the ice age, which started about 10,000 years ago (when the Woolly Mammoths went extinct and humans had to figure out something else, which was the invention of agriculture). There are glacial periods, when much of the Earth is covered with ice, and then interglacials when the ice recedes back to the poles (mostly the North Pole, as the greatest effect has been in the North).
More recently, there has been a series of 300-year cycles within the larger cycles, and a 30-year cycle within that. From 1940-1970, there was global cooling, which is why they were sounding the alarm in the 1970's about "Global Cooling and the coming Ice Age!"
But by around 1980, they realized all their predictions were wrong and the Earth was warming. That's because from 1970-2000 there was a new 30-year cycle. That's why in the 1980's and 1990's, they came up with the "alarming Global Warming" nonsense, complete with the Greenhouse Gases theory that proved false.
Again, by the early 2000's, they realized they were wrong (again) and the Earth was cooling again (due to yet another shift back to cooling, which will last 2000-2030, approximately). That's when then just switched it to "Climate Change," so that way they could pretend to be right no matter what.
But they are never right. ALL of their models are wrong, because they refuse to acknowledge that the Sun controls it, and the Earth has natural responses to anything thrown at it, including any human inputs.
The scam has been going on for at least 100 years:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hR7Vf1TW/global-warming-warning-/c/
https://rumble.com/v1al81j-the-end-of-germ-theory-featuring-dr.-tom-cowan..html
This video is packed with great info about the scam of Germ Theory.
Some of it is stuff I have never heard before, and I have been studying this subject quite a bit.
How about this:
At about 16:00, he gets into the Spanish Flu. Turns out, it was caused by toxic vaccines.
The US Army carried out a large scale vaccination program in 1917-18, funded by Rockefeller, and supervised by Frederick Gates.
That program began in November 1917, and the "Spanish Flu" became a "pandemic" immediately thereafter. (The EXACT timeframe of Covid 19.)
The outbreaks began not in Spain or anywhere else in Europe, but in the USA. An overlay map of breakouts and US Army bases is an exact match.
This was the first time in history that multiple vaccines (up to 25) were injected into people at the same time.
It was clearly an exeriment, not a treatment. The results were massive illness with multiple "diseases," not just the sympoms of "Spanish Flu." (Same thing we are seeing today with the fake Covid vaxx.)
Some people in polio experiments lost their sense of taste and smell due to the poisons on the test swabs. (interdasting ...)
So much info in this video that I cannot summarize it all. Massive resource.
Slavery existed for thousands of years before Columbus went on his famous cruise.
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zNB0mLV2/
It was originally a punishment for a crime. Later, it became a method of bringing in conquered peoples into the society that conquered them.
When White Europeans came to North America, they discovered that the American Indians had slaves. Later, the American Indians would also buy black slaves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_slave_ownership
Slavery existed in Europe. Portugal was the #1 slave trading country, with the largest shipment of black slaves from Africa to the Portugese colony of Brazil.
Black people were also involved in slavery. Black African tribal kings would capture their enemies and sell them to slave traders. Today, there are more slaves in Africa than ever existed at the height of the slave trade.
So, who began the process of ending slavery?
The American founding fathers, that's who.
When the American colonists declared independence from Great Britain, they also began to end the system of slavery.
Jefferson's original draft of the Declaration of Independence included this passage:
He [the king] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the Christian King of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where Men should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or restrain this execrable commerce. And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he has obtruded them: thus paying off former crimes committed against the Liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another.
This clause was removed by the committee for the final draft.
Following 1776, many American States began to outlaw slavery, with Vermont in 1777. This was the turning point, as the Atlantic slave trade reached its peak during the 1780's.
1792 - Denmark outlaws slave trade to its West Indies colonies, effective in 1803.
1807 - Britain outlaws Atlantic slave trade.
1808 - United States passes law banning slave trade.
1811 - Spain abolishes slavery.
1813 - Sweden bans slave trade.
1814 - Netherlands bans slave trade.
1817 - France bans slave trade.
Once the slave trades were banned by multiple countries, they would eventually abolish slavery altogether in the next few decades.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-slavery-idUSL1561464920070322
So, it was the American founding fathers who set the light afire to end slavery.
The problem they had at the time was, they wanted to end it (Jefferson tried several times), but they didn't know what it would look like. How would the slaves avoid being captured and sent somewhere else? How would they live with no real skills?
Still, they knew it was wrong, was an institution that existed for thousands of years before they were born, and wanted to end it, eventually.
Remember, it was illegal to free slaves, where slavery existed. So, what do you do? Free your slaves and go to prison yourself?
Washington freed his slaves upon his death, as part of his will. Virginia allowed that at the time, but then changed the law. Jefferson wanted to do the same, but it was illegal by the time he died.
Bottom line: Slavery existed for thousands of years, and was generally accepted as normal for most of that time. This was likely because it originated as a method of punishing criminals (which is why the 13 Amendment still allows slavery for punishment of a crime). Later, it became less about that and more about conquering other people, and bringing these new people into the winning society.
Eventually, it became nothing more than a brutal exploitation of other people (just how the globlist psychopaths today think). This rationale for slavery was hotly contested, and ending it became a real idea in society.
Ultimately, the American founding fathers started the political process that eventually ended slavery as an accepted practice.
Now class, it is time for recess!
A couple of locals have been doing videos on the alarming drop in water levels at Lake Mead. It's nothing new. It's been going on for 20 years. But now, it is at crucial levels.
Here, they show how the water level has dropped, and how the reservoir is running dry:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCBG_aVkv4s
In this one (more recent), they show how the turbines at Hoover Dam, that generate electricity, are just about far enough out of the water that they won't be able to produce electricity anymore. That will shut down 1/3 of the electricity in Las Vegas:
Reminder: these bastards had no problem at all putting you through hell to force you to buy health insurance that you did not want or could not afford, and putting you in prison if you "violated the law."
They also had no problem at all with putting you in prison if you didn't wear a worthless facemask or get injected with a harmful mystery drug. They didn't even think they should have to be bothered with providing a shred of evidence that their ideas were in any way effective at solving a problem.
So, basically what I'm saying is ...
They can just shut the fuck up.
People start to understand when I put it this way:
The SCOTUS decision was NOT about abortion. It was about a much more important issue. It was about a MUCH higher principle.
It was about RULE OF LAW.
If you live in a society without Rule of Law, then you have NO rights at all. You have no right to abortion, no right to self-defense, no right to free speech, no right to religion, no right to even think your own thoughts.
If they could create a microchip that could be implanted into your brain, and everytime you had a thought that the dictator or oligarchs did not like, they could punish you in some way, then you would not even have the right to think your own thoughts.
And you would have no right to refuse the implanting of that chip. You would be pushished or even killed if you tried to refuse, because there is no Rule of Law in a dictatorship.
So, Rule of Law is the MOST IMPORTANT issue for ANY society.
I will NOT discuss abortion or any other topic until AFTER they agree with me that Rule of Law is #1.
Once we agree on that, then I talk about how the Constitution is the Rule of Law in America. "This Constitution shall be the supreme law of the land." That's what it says.
They MUST agree with this, as well, because if they refuse then I call them out as being dishonest (or ignorant of American Rule of Law, depending on the person).
Once they get THAT ... THEN they can see that this SCOTUS ruling was about getting back to Rule of Law, whereas Roe v. Wade was a violation of Rule of Law.
Most people can rap their mind around that concept. They might not want to agree with it if it is a new concept to them, but you can see the wheels turning in their head.
Those who are already like-minded embrace it with excitement, because maybe for the first time in their life (especially if they are younger), they have some sort of understanding of why America is 50 states, united, and not 1 single big government like most other countries.
Rule of Law.
Constitution.
THEN, specific topics, such as abortion, right of self-defense, right of gun ownership, right of free speech, right of religion, right of due process, etc.
This is WHY the founders set it up this way.
OMG!
It's so much FUN to watch now!
Hahahahahahahahahaha
POOF! Roe v. Wade ... gonzo!
AND ...
Q returns!
AND BOTH ...
On 666 day???
What a way to tell the deep state criminal cabal satanic garbage to FUCK RIGHT OFF.
Glorious day!
If you have never heard Jesse Kelly, he is the BEST talk radio host in the business today.
He is WITHOUT MERCY on the communists/leftards.
Two days ago, he announced on his show that there was a tranny who secretly got apppointed as grand master in the upcoming Independence Day Parade on July 4th.
This tranny is a degenerate, and has no place in an American history parade.
He gave out the mayor's email and phone number, and the NEXT DAY, the tranny resigned from the postion.
GETTING THINGS DONE.
He is funny and has a great take on things. Very entertaining to listen to.
Check out his recent podcasts:
Let's take a step back and rejoice in ... WINNING!
3 recent Supreme Court cases ALL went in favor of liberty.
- States are prohibited from giving money to secular schools and not give it also to religious schools.
- States are prohibited from violating the right of self-defense via gun possession.
- States are prohibited from using Roe v. Wade as a basis for abortion law.
None of these would have happened if Trump did not put 3 justices on the Supreme Court.
We still have A LOT of work to do. Our generation exists at a time in history when the communists/globalists have decided to make their final move to force their evil agenda on good people.
We MUST fight back.
Today, we should take a moment to enjoy these recent victories.
Tomorrow, we get back to work at winning at the LOCAL level -- taking control of the school boards, taking control of the city councils, taking control of the judges by booting out the corrupt judges who refuse to uphold the rule of law, taking control of the corrupt district attorneys by booting those who refuse to uphold the rule of law, and taking control of the Republican Party via Precinct Strategy.
VERY interesting 2-minute video.
Attorney involved in lawsuit against Pfizer claims that Pfizer lied and committed fraud in its vaccine trials, and also its filings with the FDA about those trials.
Pfizer filed a Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that:
It does not matter if Pfizer lied about safety or effectiveness in government filings, because the government knew the filings were false, and therefore it was not fraud.
The 9th Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America is the one that is NEVER talked about in legal or political circles. It's the one [they] don't want you to think about.
It preserves ALL rights that ALREADY existed before the Constitution was created, with the only exception being those rights that were delegated to government by the Constitution.
The 2nd Amendment is about We the People fighting off enemies, foreign or domestic.
But the right to self-defense, gun ownership in general, and all the rest are in the 9th Amendment.
Remember: All of the Bill of Rights (first 10 amendments) are to LIMIT THE POWERS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, and NOT to "create" any new rights of the people.
Most people do not know there even is a preamble to the Bill of Rights, much less have ever read it. Here is the Preamble:
The conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added.
Catch that? RESTRICTIVE.
The Bill of Rights are ALL restrictive, as to what the federal government is NOT permitted to do.
The 1st: Congress shall make NO law ...
The 2nd: ... shall NOT be infringed.
The 3rd: NO quartering of soldiers ...
The 4th: ... shall NOT be violated ... (btw: "unreasonable" search or seizure means without a judge's signed warrant)
The 5th: NO person shall be held/compelled/etc. ...
The 6th: The government SHALL provide several protections to anyone accused of a crime.
The 7th: Anyone involved in a civil case SHALL have certain rights preserved.
The 8th: Excessive bail shall NOT ...
The 9th Amendment says that ALL rights of the People, that ALREADY existed BEFORE the government was created, were STILL IN EFFECT AFTER that government was created. Here is the 9th Amendment:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Get it? RETAINED.
Originally, Madison wrote 17 amendements, mostly modeled after George Mason's work on the Virginia Declaration of Rights. He scaled that down to 12. He did not omit anything, but merely rearranged them so that some of them were consolidated from two or three into one. The 5th, for example, has several restrictions of the federal government included within one amendment, rather than having them each in their own separate amendments.
The 12 amendments were presented to the States, and 10 were approved. The other 2 had to do with the number of representatives in the House, based on population, and congressional salary increases not taking effect until after the next legislative session. Those 2 did not pass. However, the one on salaries was given new life more than 200 years later, and was ultimately ratified in 1992, to become the 27th Amendment.
The 9th Amendment is KEY. It preserved ALL rights that humans had before the government was created.
https://constitution.org/1-Constitution/billofr_.htm
As the Declaration of Independence stated (which was written just 13 years earlier), certain truths are SELF-EVIDENT. Namely, that we have rights that existed BEFORE the government existed, and for which the government shall never be permitted to violate (inalienable/unalienable). And ...
... to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Government does not grant fundamental rights. Those rights existed before the government existed, and those rights were used to CREATE the government in the first place.
Once created, government CAN create "civil rights," which are rights that are really privileges, and can be regulated by their creator (the government). But the government cannot create civil rights that supercede natural/God-given rights, because those rights are inalienable/unalienable (untouchable).
His interview from more than a decade ago is worth watching.
It would appear that this was the beginning of the scam, so that "mRNA technology" could be used for new "vaccines" instead of the old methodology.
Why did he issue this EO?
It is full of lies.
(a) Section 1. Findings. Influenza viruses are constantly changing as they circulate globally in humans and animals.
False. Who presented this "finding" to him?
(b) Vaccination is the most effective defense against influenza.
False. Did he believe this?
(d) The current domestic enterprise for manufacturing influenza vaccines has critical shortcomings.
Wait for it ... wait for it ...
(e) The seasonal influenza vaccine market rewards manufacturers that deliver vaccines in time for the influenza season, without consideration of the speed or scale of these manufacturers’ production processes. This approach is insufficient to meet the response needs in the event of a pan-demic ... Because the market does not sufficiently reward speed ... he Government must take action to promote faster and more scalable manufacturing platforms.
So ... "Operation Warp Speed" started BEFORE Covid was a thing.
Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to modernize the domestic influenza vaccine enterprise to be highly responsive, flexible, scalable, and more effective at preventing the spread of influenza viruses. This is a public health and national security priority ... This order directs actions to reduce the United States’ reliance on egg-based influenza vaccine production; to expand domestic capacity of alternative methods that allow more agile and rapid responses to emerging influenza viruses; to advance the development of new, broadly protective vaccine candidates that provide more effective and longer lasting immunities ...
Aaaaaand ... THERE you have it. Changes in the MEHOD for producing vaccines, which would be that "mRNA" bullshit.
and to support the promotion of increased influenza vaccine immunization across recommended populations.
Pushing the false narratives in the media, the hospitals, etc. for the purpose of propaganda to coerce people into taking a shot of something, the ingredients of which are not disclosed, and the safety and effectiveness of which is not studied.
Executive Order 13887, September 19, 2019.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-09-24/pdf/2019-20804.pdf
Trump needs to be held accountable for this.
Why did he issue this EO?
Most people here will think he was tricked. That is one possibility (but only one). If he was, then (a) who was responsible for getting him to write it, (b) why did he not do more research into it at the time, and (c) over the past 2 years, why has he stuck to supporting this, when so many of us have realized the fraud? After all, he would have more intel than we do.
Questions need to be answered.
... I always viewed that trial as a test for Durham.
Now, he has more information available to him to go after higher ups.
Also interesting that immediately after the bad verdict, it becomes known that Sussmann was the person running a secret FBI computer from within the Perkins Coie offices.
Hmm ...
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/107/865/421/original/3851fc3a0568bab5.mp4
EDIT TO ADD:
Hillary/HRC Campaign/DNC paid Perkins Coie for "legal work." This, in itself, was fraud, because there was nothing legal about what they did -- nor was it related to legal advice.
The attorney assigned to work on it was election attorney, Michael Sussmann.
Sussmann was/is operating a "workspace" (i.e. computer) from within his office that was/is an FBI computer.
Sussmann hired Rodney Joffe, who hired a "team" (how many? two? eight?) from Georgia Tech, who "accessed NON-public information," and came up with the fake story linking Russian Alfa Bank with Trump.
Meanwhile, NSA Director Adm. Rogers discovered that some "FBI contractor(s)" was (were) accessing the NSA database, illegally. He shut down that access.
Also meanwhile, Perkins Coie paid Fusion GPS, who paid Christopher Steele, who created a set of false documents purportedly linking Trump to Russians. Danchenko, who was the source of this fake story, will be prosecuted by Durham in a few months.
The FBI computer that Sussmann was running has been there since 2012. Rogers found out about the illegal access (i.e. spying) of the NSA database in late 2015, and shut it down in early 2016.
The DNC/Perkins Coie/Joffe/Steele stuff all happened after that, I think.
So ...
Establishment DNC (RNC, too?) were using contractors to illegally access the NSA database to spy on political opponents. They paid "legal fees" to Perkins Coie, who had direct access to the FBI computer, as well as using Fusion GPS, who possibly had a computer to hack into the NSA database. Could that be the CIA computer ("Hammer")? Did Snowden have something to do with setting up that link? All this illegal spy intel would be sent into the FBI computer by Sussmann, and FBI could then put pressure on people or get spy warrants from the corrupt FISA court, run by corrupt John Roberts.
When the NSA database access was shut down, Hillary/DNC had to pivot by manufacturing false dirt (since they couldn't find any real dirt via illegal NSA computer access), and they used Perkins Coie/Sussmann/Joffe/Georgia Tech/Fusion GPS/Christopher Steele/Igor Danchenko/Nellie Ohr/Bruce Ohr/DOJ/FBI to do it.
Did Sussmann provide Joffe/Georgia Tech with external access to the FBI computer?
Did the Sussmann jury conclude (since they were already pro-Clinton anyway) that Durham did not prove a DIRECT payment-for-false-story by Clinton to Sussmann, so that they could pretend that the Clinton payments to Perkins Coie were not necessarily SPECIFICALLY for creating this false dirt on Trump?
Were they both blinded sheep AND too stupid to function in the real world, at the same time? Possibly. If they thought Durham did not prove the payment was SPECIFICALLY for creating his false dirt, because there was no invoice for "False Dirt on Trump" that was billable to Hillary, then maybe that is why they acquitted.
But there is a MUCH bigger picture than what Sussmann wrote in a text message about whether or not he was giving (false) info to the FBI on behalf of a client or not.
The bigger picture is how the entire thing was set up to rig an election and engage in sedition against the United States. The set up was clearly done in a manner that was designed to hide the true source of payment and the true purpose of the "legal work." It was designed to give plausible deniability to all involved, which is evidence of conspiracy. And because foreign people were involved, it is not "merely" sedition. It is treason.
In the wake of yet another "school shooting" (unlikely to be as advertised), I was reminded of a Darren Brown episode on a similar topic.
I don't know enough about Darren Brown to determine if this entire thing is fake or real. But it does seem genuine. Some of Brown's work clearly has an effect on people, so this could be legit.
Either way, it is an interesting demonstration of how a person could (at least, theoretically) become an MKUltra mind control assassin -- from identifying a target person who could be manipulated, to the process of slowly training him to commit murder, to then blocking it from his mind, ensuring that he could never testify as to what happened, because he really does not know (of course, killing him before he can talk is even more effective, and is the typical modus operandi).
Brown did not use drugs, but consider if drugs were added to the mix by a "therapist," and it sure seems possible to do something like this.
The video is 45 minutes for the full episode, but you can't really "get it" by just watching a couple of clips. You have to watch the entire process to understand it. Very interesting.
In a store last night, I saw a man wearing a face mask. Not many of those around anymore, but still too many. This man was probably a little north of 70 years old, judging by his silver hair and older look.
The mask he was wearing was not a regular one, but a very thick, cloth. Seemed like he would suffocate in it.
I don't know why, but I just said to him in a friendly way, "You know, that mask doesn't really do anything for you."
He said, "Well ... I have had pneumonia twice in the past two years."
I said, "Maybe wearing that mask has caused you respiratory problems."
He said, "Yeah, I wonder about that."
I told him about why doctors wear masks in operating rooms, and how they have studied this subject for over 50 years, long before Covid.
He said, "I'm listening."
I told him that no study has ever proven that masks are effective at preventing the transmission of any illness, and some studies have shown they are harmful to wear. In fact, some surgeons now recommend not wearing them, or wearing them as little as possible.
He said, "My friend sounds just like you. Maybe you guys are right."
I told him he should check out Dr. Shawn Baker on Youtube, who talks about the studies. He said he would.
During the conversation, he also mentioned how hard it is to know who to believe, because there is so much conflicting information.
I was surprised at how open and willing he was to consider what I had to say.
Some of these people have just been traumatized so much, that they don't know what to do.
Gives me a little empathy for some of them ... SOME of them.
Aaron Russo revealed his conversations with Nick Rockefeller. He told us what those conversations were about. He was told almost a year before 9/11, that there would be an "event," and the result would be the "War on Terror." But there were never any real terrorists. It was all a hoax to instill fear in the People. These people are the real terrorists.
Here is a brief snippet of his interview on this subject:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qrKj63fBm51C/
(The interview was done by AJ. If you don't like AJ, so what? He served a useful purpose here.)
Here is another excellent clip of a BBC documentary that seems to have been scrubbed from the net:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbzedd
Just like there were never any real terrorists, there was also no real virus for Ebola, Zika, Covid, or Monkey Pox.
There are no (or very few) real mass shooters who are magnified in the media. Those who do kill multiple people for real are primarily drug and gang related shootings, and the fake news propaganda media ignores them -- because those people are not part of the fear agenda.
It is all very simple, when you look at it from that perspective.
The real terrorists are the people pulling these strings. Those are the people to shine the light on, and to prosecute for their crimes. We can start with Fauci and his handler(s) and their puppet masters (Hello, Mr. Gates and Mr. Schwab and their co-conpsirators!).
FYI --
If you own stocks, take defensive action ... NOW.
We are now in a bear market, partly due to the Federal Reserve, partly due to the criminals in Congress, partly due to the resident in the White House and their/its policies.
Whatever the reasons, market is forecasing a DRASTIC recession or depression.
Look at Walmart, Target, and other retail stocks today. SMOKED! This is VERY BAD NEWS for the economy ahead.
Also, Twatter is down over $12 billion in stock market valuation. Elon's offer at $54, but the market has dropped the stock by over 30% since then. This is probably due to the realization that the people running that company have been engaging in fraud, but also the market in general is getting crushed.
FYI.