That's the standard line, but it's not really true. Or at least there's a LOT more to the story than that.
First, these "Treasury Bills" aren't from the Treasury, they are from the Fed, which is a distinct entity.
Second, they are Bonds, which means they are "money," which means they don't actually exist. I suppose I should go through that a bit.
Money, as we currently conceive of it, is actually a Federal Reserve Note (FRN). It isn't "US money," it is a FRN. FRNs are "debt instruments," which means, it doesn't actually exist. It is a "promise" that you can get a real asset from future human labor. Both sides of that equation doesn't actually exist. Where does this non-existent thing come from? It is fabricated out of thin air. A Bond (or any "money") is the creation of two things; a debit (Debt), and a credit (Money) They are both worth exactly 0. The debit and the credit together then, also add to 0. No matter how big they are, they are both together exactly zero:
Money = Debt --> Money - Debt = 0.
So it seems like someone is getting something, and someone is losing something. But in reality, nothing has changed hands. There are no assets there. It is just a belief that at some point you might be able to give your non-existent thing to someone else and they will be stupid enough to trade you for it.
To pay off a "debt" then, you would have to give a creditor your "money." But it's a zero sum game, and the Creditor is (in the case of Bonds) the same entity who created the Debt in the first place. To pay off ALL the debt that exists, you would have to pay off ALL the money that exists. The economy would cease to exist (as formed).
I don't think people realize what that means, but here's where it gets interesting. Let's add "interest" to the equation.
Current Debt = Money + Interest
As I said before, all the Money in the world = all the Starting Debt in the world. This means that the Current Debt = Starting Debt + Interest. In other words there isn't enough Money in the world to pay for all the Current Debt. The Interest is residual, in the form of Future Human Labor. The Interest is Future Human Labor that CAN'T be paid off. And that Interest is owned by someone. If "indebted to unpayable Future Human Labor" sounds like slavery, well, maybe that's because it was designed to be.
More formally, through the 14th Amendment, We The People of the United States are, legally speaking, responsible for all the debt, and are thus all Indentured Servants. The Bond on that Indenture is owned by the entities who own the "Treasury Bonds". That Indenture can never be paid.
So some entities own some of our US Bonds, but who owns ALL the Debt?
First, lets look who actually owns the Bonds. Most of those Bonds are owned by the Fed itself; the very entity that created them out of thin air. Most of the others are held (owned, as Trustee) by other Central Banks. But ALL Central Banks in the world are just part of the same, single entity called the Bank of International of Settlements (BIS). So who owns all the Bonds? The One and Only Single Bank In The World, the BIS. Who owns the BIS? That was created by Rockefeller and Rothschild (in 1931 iirc).
Interestingly (as an aside), they created the BIS to pay the Nazis so they could fix the German economy. You see, the German economy was broken, completely fubar. Why were they fubar? Because Rockefeller and his friends broke it through a "reparations" agreement from WWI that they couldn't possible pay for. Of course the BIS became much more powerful after that ("humble" beginnings).
This diatribe doesn't talk about the people who also own a good portion of the Interest (debt) that doesn't come from the Bonds themselves.
Look at the Fed. Who owns the Corporation we call The Fed? That is owned by the banks that hold the stock in the Fed. Who is that? It's banks like JP Morgan Chase, Mellon, Bank of America, and a few others I don't remember off the top of my head (around five of the biggest banks hold 80% of the assets iirc). Of course most of those Banks are all really just the same bank, all owned by the Rockefeller Dynasty Trust, but that's another discussion. The stock holdings from the member banks get 8% per anum (a little less 8% for the largest Banks mentioned, but we'll call it that for now). Since it's been going strong for 112 years, that amounts to a few Trillions (from the last official report that I could find from 1998). All of that money comes from Income Taxes (as does all of the other interest from the Bonds)..
All of those holdings then are a part of the National Debt.
So who are we indebted to?
The people who created the Central Banks, AKA the Rockefeller and Rothschild Dynasty Trusts (or rather, the Trustees of those Trusts).
I saw Demolition Man when it came out. I thought it was great, but none of it was surprising to me. On the contrary, I thought it meshed with social trends I was already experiencing in various media (other movies, songs, sci-fi books, MTV, etc.). Demolition Man used what was already there and took it to the inevitable conclusion.
I suggest that is what always happens in "cultural changes". First the seeds are planted, then those seeds grow, first in fiction, and then in fact.
That's how predictive programming works, by degrees. It is the primary tool of social engineering in practice.
I suggest this type of social engineering has been going on for a long time.
Income tax is thievery, and is thus an act of war. If a person doesn't comply with paying taxes, how is it enforced? By either more thievery, forced this time, incarceration, often for a very long time, and/or with death. These are all acts of war from the government against the people.
But engineers deal with facts, not feelings
I find that more often than not "facts" are opinions masquerading as "facts." A person usually considers and/or states only a small number of the required actual relevant facts. With insufficient information they thus come to false conclusions which they then use to state their opinion (false argument). "Facts" are not the end of a reasonable discussion, but the beginning. Unless of course a fact is so powerful (contains all the required information) that it stands on its own.
One such full formed conclusion is the fact that this type of taxation is thievery. (Here I am talking specifically about income tax, or any tax that takes from a person what they already own.) That fact requires either we live as subjects (slaves) or fight back, in which case we will probably die. That SINGLE FACT, all by itself says that any opinion that supports these types of taxes also opines waging war on the citizens just for being alive.
That means that whatever needs to be done, it can't be done by that method except through war. That by itself is enough against that opinion, but there's more. A LOT more. Consider a couple of the things our current income tax (an act of war) pays for.
What about military? Well, there's a huge problem there. We don't actually have any enemies. All the different countries on the planet are controlled by the same entity. We fight each other because of fraud. It's all fakery. A flim/flam con. So how much would the military really cost if we had no enemies (except the Cabal, a few people)? How much would it cost if we had no fraud in new equipment; if we had a real Free Market? I think the costs would be a tiny fraction of what we currently pay.
How about Welfare? First, our economy, institutions, and infrastructure have been designed by the Cabal specifically to disadvantage the people, making it impossible for people to take care of themselves. The need for welfare is by design. That needs to be addressed. But even with our current system, the programs themselves are full of fraud. If not for all the fraud, I suggest our current welfare programs would be a fraction of what we currently pay.
We could also do what people have always done in a community. We could give to people who need help. This is called charity. We do have charitable organizations designed to help people. Unfortunately, they too are full of fraud. Indeed, they are COMPLETELY fraudulent.
I've only gone over a couple of the problems on your list. I could continue, but I suggest it's not necessary. ALL OF OUR INCOME TAX PAYS FOR FRAUD.
So how can the government pay for things? By selling something. Tariffs are perfectly reasonable, but so are internal sales taxes. That is what we do with the gas tax. The gas tax pays for more than enough money to pay for transportation infrastructure. If we didn't have a money laundering government, the taxes would probably would be a fraction of what we currently pay.
In short, your opinion is that our government should wage war on its citizens and steal the resources from the citizens to give them to the Cabal.
In my opinion you should change your opinion.
A "Jew" is a confused concept. For most people in America, a "Jew" is by descent. It is a genotype.
Mothers' bloodline?
This is a belief from Judaism, it is not a function of their genetics. I mean, they are, but it's more specific, and is by law (Jewish Law, not any other law code).
From the perspective of the people of today, you can be a Jew just by being born to it, and it has nothing to do with the religion. It is, I think, a purposeful confusion; another layer of obfuscation from the Jews that sit at the top of the food chain.
A lot of my report is intended for a normie audience. Part 1 and the first half of Part 2 are good context, and Part 4 is a normie introduction to the origins of the media (an upcoming section will show a LOT more info on the media, it's just an intro). For someone who is up to speed on Q though, you can skim quite a bit of it up to Part 5. That's what really breaks down the creation of the Board of Directors stuff.
I suggest you read my report. It may change your mind on all of those statements.
That doesn't mean they are at the top of the food chain, but they have operational control of everything. Who directs them, is another story, but in the Box of "they can be only one," they have free act to "build" as you say it (if I understand what you mean).
They can't be "removed" at all. It is just shy of impossible. Please read my report. Your beliefs are an illusion.
Having said that, that may have changed in the past 6 years, but after Q, all bets are off (maybe).
A king never truly sleeps easy; there's always someone eyeing the throne.
That's true, but that person eyeing the throne is ALWAYS related to the king. Even when they are another country, the leader of THAT country is also always a relative. The only people allowed to rule are members of a single family, across all of recorded history (in Europe, Asia, and Northern Africa at least). The people are not generally of that phenotype, but the leaders are.
it’s all about the Jews
It's not all about the Jews, they just built the system that controls everyone, thus they sit on the top of the food chain. The problem is, "who are the Jews?"
I don't think that the Jews have always had that control of "everything." On the contrary, I think it was the Scythians. I think the Jews took over Rome the first time (economically, in the shadows, and not counting the possibility that they are actually the Hysos). You know those maps of Rome? You know about the rest of the Euro-Asian continent? Ya, most of that other land was Scythia. Another name for Scythia is Tartary, renamed so by Genghis Khan.
History has been erased about Scythia/Tartary. I've written up a few hundred pages on this, with all the receipts. Hopefully I will publish it at at some point.
The Jewish Elite married into the Royal Scythians in Khazaria in the 6th century (an area now called Ukraine). These Jewish Elite first controlled the Khazarian economy, then they married into the family. Khazaria (the Khazarian Khanate aka Kingdom) are a country of the Scythian Empire. All Royal Scythians (a distinct ruling family) are united in the same bloodline, the Arian blood line, with blond/red hair, and blue/green eyes. All of Europe and Asia have this same lineage. Indeed, the Merovingian claimed the right to rule because they were of the Royal Scythian bloodline. The Church agreed, giving him the right to rule because he was a Royal Scythian. From the Merovingian (Clovis I iirc) we have all of the kings of Europe and northern Asia. We are all, ultimately, living under Royal Scythian rule, using the same system of government ("There Can Be Only One"), and it has been that way for a VERY long time (at least 3000 years, probably 5000+).
CEO is an admin role.
A CEO is a Frontman, nothing more. It is the Board of Directors that has the power (see my report) (legally). Who controls them is another story.
My whole point is that power seekers have always killed each other and don’t trust each other.
That is because of their religion.
Now that one is a long discussion...
To be brief, it's kinda like Highlander: "There can be only one."
In this case it doesn't really give any insight into the tenets of the religion, except one. They also have deep connections, they work together on certain agendas that are never violated (similar to talking about their immorality in Highlander e.g.), but they are also in competition to each other. It's deadly competition in a box, a very Aristocratic box. Even the Jews are part of the same Aristocracy. Ever looked any any Jewish Elite person? Do the Elite look "Semitic," or do they look White as fuck? Do they often have blue or green eyes? There's a reason for that...
They don't trust each other because they are in competition. But that is a fundamental of their religion, which unites them intimately. Plus, they are all part of a single family, and they know it. That takes a bit to figure that out, but it's all there once you start looking.
I believe the Jews are a scapegoat.
Agreed. I said the Jewish Elite, the Aristocracy, and not even all of the Aristocrats. Only those who have certain qualities that will put themselves into compromise under the System.
The Jewish Elite who lead the Cabal scapegoat the REST of the Jews. The evidence is everywhere. One of the best ways to hide something is to make a reason for people to not look.
Because the real players would be stupid to make it so obvious!
It is all of history that "makes it obvious." Though I suggest it is not obvious at all. Indeed, the vast majority of the planet believes that it is NOT the Jews. How is it obvious then? Answer: It's not. The Jewish Elite are a hidden layer.
Everyone already sees the Jews. Which tells me they aren’t the top.
I agree with you there. I think there is another layer; an even MORE hidden layer. Indeed, I have a pretty good guess of who (what) it is. I'm not going there, because it's too much of a discussion, but I agree completely, that there is an even more hidden layer.
That doesn't mean it is impossible to see who it is. The best way to hide is in plain sight, where NO ONE would consider the possibility, even if they see.
However, just because the Jews (or rather, the Jewish Elite) aren't the VERY top of the food chain doesn't mean they aren't very close and/or very closely related to them.
Show me your sources.
That is a perfectly reasonable request. However, I am not by my computer atm. Most of the things I said are easy to find so take a gander on your own. To start, I quickly looked at the first google source. It makes it clear that the Jews always came on top. The article in the link doesn't really show how they came on top in the end, but there is plenty of evidence that suggests that they did, by the methods I stated. Looking deeper on any of the topics in that article will be very enlightening I think.
Each article on the Jews in history does exactly that. It says "the Jews had it great, but then they lost everything" or, "The Jews were persecuted." etc. Over and over it says that. Every time you look at a time period of when the Jews were disadvantaged, there is another article looking at the same time period (or very shortly after) that shows that the Jews actually got more social and economic advantage. Those articles ALSO say, "but in the end the Jews were disadvantaged." Over and over again, through history...
For example, look at how many times you find "a Ghetto," as if it were "anti-semetic" or some sort of disadvantage. The "Ghetto" was by Jewish design. It was the nicest part of town, and only Jews were allowed to live there by laws created by the Jews. It wasn't until the 1890s when the "Ghetto" became associated with a "poor place." The reasons for that are another deep dive in fuckery, setting up WWI and ultimately the state of Israel.
How far are going back?
This goes back to the first diaspora as far as I can find reliably. In that case the evidence is a mess of "history," but the same patterns emerge from that mess. One interesting thing about the Babylon diaspora for example, is that the Jews weren't "taken by the Babylonians," but rather, a very few Jewish children from the Elite families were taken, many from the Levites (priests). They returned from Babylon and learned all sorts of things from the Babylonians: advantage Jews (Jewish Elite). Interestingly, it was from these Babylonian "refuges" (or rather, their direct Levine descendants) that the Torah was written.
This may go back even further, as I'm pretty sure the "Jews" were the Hyksos, and the story of Joseph --> Moses was actually about the end of the Hyksos Empire. written from the perspective of the group that was kicked out of Egypt by the original Egyptians...
Why are you assuming that only the Jews seek power and that everyone else is weak?
Where did I say that "everone else is weak?" I suggest that nothing could be further from the truth. I DO however, suggest that there are Jewish Elites that are at the top of the food chain. They are at the top not because others are weak,but because they created the System that puts them at the top. You can't be a part of the System unless you are compromised, economically or otherwise. They have used economic advantage to control the System that they created, learned in Babylon (maybe).
The world is controlled primarily by economics, and it always has been. If you deep dive into any part of history, you get all the surface stuff; who defeated who, etc., but underneath that surface is the economics; who paid who.
But there are other control systems than economics; gateways that grant power by the PTB to both other Jews, and others that are not Jewish. For example, look at the pedophile blackmail system (e.g. Epstein, a Jew controlled by Jewish Elite (Mossad)). You can't be in power unless you are willing to be a part of that control (Jew and Gentile alike). Within that control however, you can be powerful. It's just "power in a box." Guess who created that Box?
There is evidence that the Elite Jews controlled the Roman Empire by the same method that they do today.
For example, why were the Jews the only ones allowed to be bankers and charge interest? Why did other subject nations of the Roman Empire have all sorts of concessions for the Jews that other subjects did not?
These advantages aren't just in the western Roman Empire, this goes through time. Sure, they were still subjects. They are always subjects, but the Jews ALWAYS have advantages that no one else has. Just because someone says "they are Cesar" doesn't mean they are in control. If you control the money, you control everything. The key to success is to be distanced for the evils. Let the Front Man take all the blame.
In the case of the Romans, the Jews also always had huge investments in politics (like Superpacs today), owned massive amounts of property, controlled trade, etc. If they controlled the Roman economy, who really controls the army?
So they get the blame as intended.
Maybe the reason they got the blame was because they were to blame.
It was a good post (a very good post), however, it IS the Jews. It's just not all of the Jews. The author themself said it was a subgroup of the Jews, though he called them the "Khazarian Mafia."
I think that is wrong, or rather, the concept of the Khazarian Mafia is missing important information which misdirects, but that's a longer discussion. As long as you concede that the Khazarians and the Jews are intimately tied, the article clearly states that "The Jews are what's behind 'It's the Jews' narrative," albeit with some more details of how they accomplish that fact that are important.
It's not the tool, It's about who's using it and for what purpose.
Sometimes the tool is the purpose; i.e. there can't be any other purpose than the tool.
The purpose is to decrease liberty, full stop. That it is also intended to provide "security" is a secondary effect. There are other things we can do to keep illegals from voting in our elections. That this loss of liberty is being explained away to "keep illegals from voting" is, according to my research, exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like.
In other words, that we are losing personal liberties for increased securities, but are being told it's "for a good reason," is pure Cabal.
From my perspective, this is some fucked up shit.
Bullshit. I used to live in NYC. I have a lot of friends that are Jewish. 80% of them don't have a clue of the tenants of Judaism. The most of those that do (that I personally know), don't have any religious superiority complex and they certainly aren't trying to enslave anyone, nor do they have any desire to do so.
Having said that, sure, there are plenty that do have those beliefs (even 5% of people is a lot of people when we're talking about many millions). But even there, most are clueless of the bigger picture. They may have that "supremacy" belief, but most of they aren't complicit, rather they are just following their programming. They have been just as brainwashed as everyone else. You can find the same fanatics in any religion.
The only people who are the problem are the actual people who commit crimes. That's it. Everyone will be coming to the Awakening, no matter what belief system, race, or culture they adopted in their previous NPC life.
That's some serious date fagging. If my tits were any more jacked, I'd be a porn star. And not one of those pretty porn stars. I'd be one of those plastic ones, with the tits SUPER jacked to obscenity.
I guess in this case, I'd be a super jacked tits fag. A super tramp? A super tranny?
#SuperTrampy