2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Needledick the Bugfucker"--borrowed from another piece of WhorelyWood trash, to identify yet another piece of human excrement.

2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

OMG--this was great! Don't be shy!

If nothing else, I've found another person on Earth that uses the term, "Farticles"! I've called them that for years!

Know what it's called when you flush after dropping a deuce? A Spoornado--hence, have a can of disinfectant to keep the bacterial cloud from leaving the bathroom.

There's always a can within reach of the throne.

2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, he's her Nephew. Nepotism is a hot line in politics. Relationships all have connections, hence, the incestuous nature of sprawling bureaucracy.

2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bear in mind, too....it's as clear as day and everyone knows the recall on Gruesome was tampered with. They saw the real vote tallies before they had to tabulate how many votes it would take to get him reasonably over the finish line. It's entirely believable that Gavin's so incredibly unpopular, the writing was on the wall. Time to find some fresh meat to replace him.

After all, you're spot-on that to (((them))), anyone is expendable.

2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

For cyanosis *lack of oxygenated blood)? Or just in general...death?

2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

On the tweet where Gavin Grusome is getting the jab, the hashtag reads "#iunderstoodtheassignment" (I Understood The Assignment)

I thought that odd.

by klmd
2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

Much obliged, Fren. Thankya!

2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps Jovan Pulitzer, Jack Posobiec (Sp.?) or our Based Pillow Merchant..? I'm not exactly sure, but IMO, you have some good information that merits attention.

Perhaps even tapping the door of (I know I'm gonna get a ration for this, but he has connections to the Chans) Code Monkey (Ron)?

1
MagaPhone017 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was a lurker a long while back, and hung out on /pol and /b/....I hated seeing all the porn, so I could only manage small doses (and got wise pretty quick to opening images and links, t'be sure! LOL). I never really saw porn that involved children--again, learned fast to never click on anything randomly--but I did see a fair amount of images that had "young couples". I couldn't tell if the "participants" were over 18, but yeah, porn is an issue anywhere.

Remember that site, "Gaia Online"? people were posting nudes there and I know some of them were likely high-school kids most likely. At that time, our Daughter did the Gaia Art thing, so I told her how and what to avoid...especially that sort of thing.

AOL was the seed-bed for the bulk of this, too. Chatrooms, no verification, anonymous emails. Our teenaged Sons would get emails with seriously graphic images, get links in chatrooms and IMs. I remember they used to have AOL disks in Happy Meals and attached to cereal boxes back then, saturating the market (particularly though kids) to get them online and interested in handing out their images and getting them into clandestine activities.

Porn is an inherent problem with the Internet, not just the Chans.

2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

Worth considering, is the potential to save this information and forward it to a trustworthy someone with know-how that has some kind of connections.

by Quelle
2
MagaPhone017 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, shoot. You got here first. Well...I gave a link, in the event anyone's interested...

by Quelle
3
MagaPhone017 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hi all, new to the Board here (didn't even know this existed!).

But anyway, didn't Sacha accidentally expose paedos through a concierge at some ritzy hotel a few years ago?

From the Independent: https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/sacha-baron-cohen-paedophile-ring-who-is-america-deleted-scene-las-vegas-fbi-showtime-a8695866.html