In WWII, short wave radio was the main means of communication and coordination for armies. At this time, the RCA (Radio Corporation of America) knew that sunspots were connected to short-wave radio interference. The American government obviously did not want to risk a communications blackout during crucial operations so they tasked John Nelson of the RCA with figuring out the coorelation between the two.
John Nelson did indeed find that sunspots caused electromagnetic interference but something else also has that effect and to a much greater extent; planetary alignment. He found that when planeta were aligned at 90 and 180 degrees with each other with the sun as the focal point, it would cause measurable electromagnetic interference far greater than what sunspots could produce. The more planets involved, the greater the effect.
https://youtu.be/-jtqMGKaw6c This video goes into an explanation of the topic (about halfway through) and also includes some interesting bits on numerical patterns I think you guys would find related.
John Nelson's findings were, of course, shunned by the "scientific community" but not one of the clowns ever actually put out anything to disprove anything he said.
So, who cares and what does this have to do with an internet shutdown? Well, guess what's coming up right around the corner? That's right, a significant planetary alignment, 5 planets in fact.
Am I completely convinced of this? Hardly. BUT, there has been a weird uptick recently in chatter about internet and power grid blackouts. In fact, recently the FDA made a PSA about fake news, how to identify it, and how to not fall for it and the example they decided to use? A tweet from someone about how the internet is about to go down. Why did they pick that specific topic? Dunno, coincidence maybe? Why is the Food and Drug Administration doing PSAs about misinformation and, if they were going to do one, why would it be about an internet blackout and not about something tangentially related to food and/or drugs?
Coded message? A warning? Preemptively making it a joke so normies don't take it seriously?
Thoughts?
Backstory: About three years ago now, my sister was out somewhere with her friend's boyfriend and they hit and killed a guy on the street. He was high as fuck and crossing the street while oncoming traffic had a green in the middle of the night on a street where the speed limit was 55, so his death was ruled his own fault. The problem is, the guy she was with was driving but had 4 wrecks on his record (he was only 23 or something) and his license was suspended so he told her to tell the cops she had been driving and she did, presumably from a combination of shock and wanting to protect her friend.
My parents freaked out when the dead guys family tried to sue for wrongful death and hired a lawyer who told her to change her statement to the police, aka incriminate herself (I'm reporting him to the BAR), and got her arrested on a felony (lying to police) and obstruction. That lawyer took our 5k, got her arrested, and then never answered the phone again. Second lawyer said he would get them to drop the obstruction and bring the lying to police down to a misdemeanor, which makes sense since it's barely even procedural and made no difference in the actual investigation of the incident.
I had assumed that this was pretty much over and done with and had put it out of my mind when I just found out she got a letter to appear in court for her plea. She just got the letter and the court date is for for the 5th of January. Her lawyer didn't get anything and she had to inform him of it; apparently he hasn't been given discovery or half the information he's requested. Despite this, he told her there's "no point" in meeting with him and they'd see each other at court. So I guess instead of postponing it and demanding the necessary legal information, he's planning to just show up and wing it?
The reason I think she's being railroaded is because this happened while BLM was still at a high point and she's white while the guy she was with, the guy they hit, the DA and everyone involved in the case is black with BLM and black advocacy shit all over professional pages. I think they're just trying to extract their pound of flesh from the white girl, possibly even in collusion with the dead guys family since they have no case based on the police report (if she gets found guilty, they could use that in civil court).
Her lawyer is either in on it or unbelievably incompetent because:
- He's been handling this for two fucking years already and still hasn't any negotiations done
- He literally never knows what's going on and finds out feom my sister when she calls him after receiving papers from court
- Despite the fact that the court isn't giving him any info, discovery, or allowong him access, he doesn't think he should do anything about that
- Her plea hearing is on Jan. 5 and she just found out it last week. She had to inform the lawyer about this. Despite sitting on this for almost 3 years, they give her less than a month notice over the Christmas holiday while her lawyer still hasnt received the info he needs.
- Despite not even entering a plea yet, she already received a notification that her jury was selected.
- Neither she nor her lawyer were present for the jury selection or even aware it was happening.
I guess the question is who would I even call about this? Civil rights lawyer for the massive violations of due process? Yet another defense attorney and hope he's not also a fucking retard? My sister was barely 22 when this happened and now she's looking at 10 years in prison and a felony comviction (making all the school she did to be a teacher pointless) because a bunch of fake-woke black bureaucrats want to crucify her over a dead druggie killed by another black delinquent. My parents are prepared to sell their house to keep her out of jail because she'll almost guaranteed kill herself so I really need some advice/reputable lawyer I can call.
The only tiny ray of hope I have in all of this is that Trump surely would not nuke his own base's morale the way he just did unless he was wrapping up. He's made no missteps for years and it would be weird to, seemingly intentionally, trip up this hard for no fucking reason. I'm still fucking pissed at the hype for that speech though.
There has to be more to it because, at face value, it was fucking pathetic and there's no way he thought that would be anything but a giant middle finger to his base at large and especially those who follow along background stuff.
4chan prophesy - my thoughts in green
The belly of the dragon will drip water
China seems like the obvious dragon allegory and they've been having massive flooding problems in the last couple years
It will happen when the weather cools.
I keep hearing about stuff coming in the winter/fall so maybe somehow related, i.e. "winter of death, etc.)
That's when they'll make their move.
The plans made long ago, before the founding of America, and older still, will come to fruition. we know the cabal has been around for ages
They're trying to force God's hand.
I've seen some thoughts that they're intentionally trying to trigger the apocalypse for some reason. They think it's their only shot maybe?
Watch for these signs: Three branches will become one.
three branches of government folding under the executive branch seems like an obvious interpretation. Either a last ditch DS attempt at control or the good guys wiping the slate with military. Maybe also refers to branches of a family tree? Political dynasties have been culled left and right and now the UK monarchy is up in the air as for who the crown will go to.
An island will drift away.
The UK could be a contender for this at the moment. Possibly Taiwan? Might even be more literal as theres supposedly volcanic activity around some Spanish island that could see the entire thing collapse beneath the ocean (going off of memory as there hasnt been any news on this in a while).
A killing bolt will shine in the night but will not kill.
Project bluebeam? Or maybe that massive lightning bolt that went across multiple states a few weeks back?
The star will gorge itself on clay.
China again, taking land maybe?
Idols will speak and move about.
Don't have much for this one. Holgrams, maybe?
The black flag will fly above the dome.
Black Flag represents piracy. The capitol has a dome. Stolen election, black flag over the capitol?
Two voices will call out in a silence that all will hear.
Not a clue for this one, I'd love to hear ideas.
A rock will stand on seven hills.
The only 7 hills I can think of relates to Rome. I dont really have any idea what "rock" refers to, but since it says "a" and not "the" I'm inclined to think it may be literal, like a meteor. It's a stretch.
The ravens will starve.
No guesses.
The bear will leave its cave forever.
California and Russia are the two obvious. Russia leaving its isolationism or California fucking off from the US.
The rod and the ring will strike.
This is the part that makes me think it's related to Q. "Q" is called the "qoth" (and pronouncedlike "coof" lmao) in Aramaic. It is written like ϕ. Looks a lot like a rod and ring to me.
So I live in GA and recently moved from Atlanta to Tifton for reasons. I got a job that requires me to drive through a shitty little speed trap town called Omega, a reputation I didn't know about until after I got my speeding ticket there.
So, long story short, I reengaged my cruise control to 60 when I saw the sign for 55 at the outskirt of the town and there was a cop (black truck, no reflective lettering, parked facing traffic for even less visibility) almost literally right next to the sign and she pulled me over for 60 in a 45 because "technically I didn't pass the sign yet."
I've been driving for 12 years in ATL without ever getting a speeding ticket at all and I've never heard of someone getting a speeding ticket like this so I googled it and found out that, yes, technically that is how it works. I still thought it was bullshit that they park there knowing people will see the sign and speed up so I did more digging and found this:
2020 Georgia CodeTitle 40 - Motor Vehicles and TrafficChapter 14 - Use of Speed Detection Devices and Red Light CamerasArticle 2 - Speed Detection Devices§ 40-14-6. Warning Signs Required; Signage Requirements Each county, municipality, college, and university using speed detection devices shall erect signs on every highway which comprises a part of the state highway system at that point on the highway which intersects the corporate limits of the municipality, the county boundary, or the boundary of the college or university campus. Such signs shall be at least 24 by 30 inches in area and shall warn approaching motorists that speed detection devices are being employed. No such devices shall be used within 500 feet of any such warning sign erected pursuant to this subsection.
In addition to the signs required under subsection (a) of this Code section, each county, municipality, college, and university using speed detection devices shall erect speed limit warning signs on every highway which comprises a part of the state highway system at that point on the highway which intersects the corporate limits of the municipality, the county boundary, or the boundary of the college or university campus. Such signs shall be at least 24 by 30 inches in area, shall warn approaching motorists of changes in the speed limit, shall be visible plainly from every lane of traffic, shall be viewable in any traffic conditions, and shall not be placed in such a manner that the view of such sign is subject to being obstructed by any other vehicle on such highway. No such devices shall be used within 500 feet of any such warning sign erected pursuant to this subsection.
In addition to the signs required under subsections (a) and (b) of this Code section, each law enforcement agency using an automated traffic enforcement safety device as provided for in Code Section 40-14-18 shall erect signs warning of the use of a stationary speed detection device within the approaching school zone. Such signs shall be at least 24 by 30 inches in area, shall be visible plainly from every lane of traffic, shall be viewable in all traffic conditions, and shall not be placed in such a manner that the view of such sign is subject to being obstructed by any other vehicle on such highway. Such signs shall be placed within 500 feet prior to the warning sign announcing the reduction of the speed limit for the school speed zone. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that such signs are properly installed pursuant to this subsection at the time of any alleged violation under this article.
(note: formatting changed "a, b, c" to "1, 2, 3" for some reason)
So, subsection b (2) says that "No such devices [speed detection] shall be used within 500 feet of any such warning sign erected pursuant to this subsection." I'm interpreting that to mean that they cannot be parked and using laser/radar within 500 feet of the sign and need to know if I'm correct in that interpretation because where she put on the ticket that I was when I got clocked is slightly past the 500 ft. mark.
https://gyazo.com/9004a3d2198ec2ce4f95bf5773de027d
That is a google maps of the area. The red circle is where the speed limit sign was and the green is about where she said I was. The first driveway next to the red is where she was parked. The scale got cut out in the screenshot but it's about 700ft from one circle to the other.
I found out that GA actually has a license system through the Department of Public Safety, GA specifically has anti-speedtrap town laws like the one I posted, and the municipality can lose their license by violating them.
It's physically impossible for them to hand out tickets in the screenshotted section of road without violating either this law, or GA Code 40-14-7, because there's a hill to the south and you can't see any of that area until you are at about the green circle I marked. That said, they're parked out there at 4:30 AM multiple times a week. I saw them there just last night, parked on the driveway closest to the green circle where they don't come into view behind the hill crest until about 60-80 ft.
Assuming I'm correct in the interpretation of these laws, whoever is parking there is either massively incompetent and doesn't know the basic laws around handing out speeding tickets that govern their ability to even have the license for it or, more likely, is banking on people not knowing this or having the resources to fight it and is maliciously flaunting the law and effectively extorting drivers.
Assuming I am correct about this interpretation, what is the best way to go about dealing with this? There's a number on the ticket that says we can call the police chief and discuss it with him, should I call him? Do you think that would give me a quick resolution to this? The advice I found on legal sites details how to fight it in court but 1. I've had speeding tickets in small towns and that shit is a racket that the prosecutor and judge are in on and 2. I'd like the fastest resolution to this because I work 12 hours a day 6 days a week and I don't have the patience for this. I'm willing to pay a lawyer to deal with it for me, and I'm willing to pay him/her more than I'd pay for the ticket just on principle but I'd obviously prefer to save a few hundred dollars if I can.