4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fren I don't know what to tell you other than to read the drops and widen the range of possibilities you're considering.

u/#q1450

u/#q813

u/#q1449

11
merf 11 points ago +11 / -0

Agree but the AF1/AF2 designation is separate from the registration number, aye?

4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's a fair point, but what exactly is your argument? That Biden as Commander in Chief instructed Kamala to fly a plane without registration, in contrast to what has been done by all the VPs before her?

What do you figure the purpose is of that?

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's one of them. Seems to be several though. 80002, 90003, 90004. Possibly others.

26
merf 26 points ago +26 / -0

I've seen 90003 & 80002 also. So there appear to either be multiple planes or they've cycled a few out over the years.

I cannot find any photos or videos of a Harris plane with a registration number on it yet...

Take a look at the FAA regulation doc though. That is truly the icing on the cake for this dig.

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-45

There is an exemption for displaying the registration number if you are making a movie.

4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're experiencing a reading comprehension error. I'll attempt to clarify.

  1. I stated that the picture is from a real event and accurately depicts the crowd, with the camera being positioned inside or near the airplane hanger where the event was held.

  2. I provided source video for this which you likely failed to examine.

  3. You then imagined that I was stating that the entire crowd was inside an airplane hangar, and that I was making a comparison between Trump's crowd sizes. Perhaps even that I was implying his crowd's were smaller.

You're likely in a defensive and emotive state. Understandable. But simply empty your head of emotion and re-read my original post.

11
merf 11 points ago +11 / -0

For extra credit here are some Biden landings w/registration number (90003).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfJh5ofcqiY (Cyprus, May 21st 2014)

https://youtu.be/I-B6iP_JcMw?t=7 (Sharm el-Sheik, Jul 24th 2015)

https://youtu.be/wR6cc_IOdbA?t=55 (Berlin, Jul 31st 2015)

Vance (N917XA):

https://youtu.be/ayL44nqN9jk?t=153

Cheney (80002/illegible/90003):

https://youtu.be/WPRl2vQy58I?t=19

https://youtu.be/WLhLg8T_yeU?t=16

https://youtu.be/5YDBosPBRko?t=44

Kamala is the only one I see that never has a registration number.

21
merf 21 points ago +21 / -0

No serial number (Harris):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaF7lHFDLxU (orlando, aug 1st 2023)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9DdAsQkghk (detroit, aug 7th 2024)

https://twitter.com/sfpelosi/status/1821292944995053822 (detroit, aug 7th 2024, jd vance)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjm3APyM64k (phoenix, aug 8th 2024)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN9y9U0dmtw (indianapolis, july 24 2024)

Has serial number (Pence): https://youtu.be/Eyc5OARJoN4?t=222 (nov 4 2017)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eyc5OARJoN4 (jul 29 2020)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIr0uz1Vyv4 (may 6 2019)

FAA regulations on registration markings--note the exception in 45.22:

14 CFR Part 45 - Identification and Registration Marking https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-45

When display of aircraft nationality and registration marks in accordance with §§ 45.21 and 45.23 through 45.33 would be inconsistent with exhibition of that aircraft, a U.S.-registered aircraft may be operated without displaying those marks anywhere on the aircraft if:

(1) It is operated for the purpose of exhibition, including a motion picture or television production, or an airshow;

This is especially insulting as white hats are implying it would be "inconsistent" if they put the Air Force Two registration number on the aircraft.

i.e. It would be unbelievable that she were VP.

u/#q4158

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a full video of the event. The picture seems edited but it's an accurate representation of the event.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9DdAsQkghk

Way too many folks failed to stay frosty on this one. I think we're being tested and got an F.

4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

The event is at an airport hangar and the camera is likely positioned in or near the hanger.

It is a real event. See the video I linked from local press.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Ware interview is worth watching as I think the body language leads me to believe he's not some sort of undercover white hat (or if he is, he's very good at being undercover).

Unlike Krebs, Ware seems to have some technical background

3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

u/#q4857

u/#q4951

Krebs definitely has some stink on him. How did he get a critical cyber security job with an environmental sciences and law background? Interesting that he went to consult on SolarWinds right after..

After leaving office, Krebs joined former Facebook CISO Alex Stamos at the beginning of 2021 to form Krebs Stamos Group, a cybersecurity consultancy, which quickly landed its first customer, the recently-beleaguered SolarWinds.[21][22][23]

What's the significance of Ware? Stepped down Nov 12. Founded Next5, which doesn't seem to exist any more. Ware seems to imply his being let go wasn't expected.

https://washingtonexec.com/2021/02/watch-cisas-former-assistant-director-for-cyber-bryan-ware-launches-next5-tech-company/

8
merf 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not sure what is going on with the photo (if anything) but video indicates no manipulation would be needed.

This is the best full video I can find. Includes the "red giants" at the front, who apparently are real dudes (perhaps part of some local union).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9DdAsQkghk

It's an airport hanger (which is easy to fill up), with the overflow spilling out towards the plane. Cameras are positioned from within the hanger to create maximum visual impact.

https://twitter.com/ProTruth4Life/status/1822409048450625676

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCnD9-p-TWI

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/HzNClpFfdCU

Stay frosty folks. Work from primary sources.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not great but there should be close to 100% overlap on Trump's vetting research and Democrats oppo research...

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great take on it and TBH the fact that @PapiTrumpo was never mentioned by the cabal and the press seemed to have zero curiosity about the account despite how in-tune it was with Trump, was always a great reassurance to me that white hats were in control.

I don't think it'd be possible for a layperson to sync up so perfectly with Trump for so long.

11
merf 11 points ago +11 / -0

If you're not having fun, you're doing it wrong.

A good tactic is one your people enjoy.

A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.

Take whatever break you need fren. Finding God is like planting a tree: the best time is always now.

5
merf 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interesting. This user indicates she had cancer:

https://twitter.com/internetanarch/status/1822137498765570343

https://twitter.com/SusanWojcicki

https://twitter.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1822139282535891362

She wasn't a prolific poster. Recently joined the board of @planet:

https://twitter.com/planet

There are tons of plausible hits here. Just grabbing one given Trump targeting Google in the news recently:

u/#q2063

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting. So this was the brother that worked for the Democratic candidate for governor.

Wonder what the status of the family foundation is.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›