Nick Freitas, VA delegate. He says some awesome things, including general parenting advice, life advice, and even homesteading advice. He has proposed really good bills as far as I know of, etc. (Veteran, not that it means anything in terms of ideology)

Why isn't this guy getting promotion from good people? He seems like an actual good dude.

Also, Merry Christmas, much love to all.

We have idiots on either side calling for the destruction of (Jews/Palestinians) and here's why they're both wrong. I'll be brief.

If you stand for destroying innocent lives, you are not mentally well. God has opened up salvation to all mankind (this was even true pre-dating the NT). Many here say that any support to Israel and Ukraine is flat out wrong and should be treated as treacherous, and I can't say I quite agree, short bit on that.

It would be, not only acceptable, but preferred for us to provide aid to those in need. The problem with our "foreign" "aid" is that it is for the benefit of the MIC and we are only willing to aid in the fighting aspect. We ought to be aiding in the ... aiding department. There are broken families who we could be helping, think of people who bring medical supplies and food and water and living supplies to churches that are in affected zones, that's surely a noble thing to do, and what God calls us to do.

My problem with the American version of foreign aid is that we use that term to fight proxy wars as well as "special military operations" that only kill our young men. Think Iraq and WMD, that was NOT a war. That was a military operation, we haven't been at war since WW2! Our soldiers died to kill Suddam and feed wealth to the ultra-rich and ultra-powerful, and what we left in our wake was hatred for USA. If we came in, and provided food for the hungry, clothes for the poor, and visited the sick and lowly, our enemies would be fewer, the problems in the world, would be fewer. Following God's commandments are not just holy or righteous, they're literally good ideas for us to follow for our own good, to secure our own blessings.

I just want the world to stop killing itself.

Mods (& community), I don’t think you know the train you have started. This community has become a beautiful place, where people are free to espouse ideas, and even when emotions flare over different topics, the discussion keeps going on.

You may ask why I even mention this.

This website has become more than a Q research site, it has become a beacon of hope for those wallowing in the sorrows around us, reaching out for a breath of hope. People need hope, it is why God is being sought out in these days, when things are difficult. This research board has shifted to a supporting community for that hope. Trying to understand the world around us, our place in it, and what we can do to effect change. The Bible calls us sheep, and sheep we are. We need a place where we can have a renewed trust in what people are telling us. We have been deceived so much by so many. I’m not advocating for new news programs that align with right wing beliefs, but no one person can spend infinite amounts of time on every subject, so we need a place we can trust. This place has become that place. It’s like home, for many of us here, on the internet.

Matthew 7:22-23

[22] On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ [23] And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

I know many conservatives who fall into the trap of a bad guy (according to”conspiracy theorists” like Rockefeller's) who donated to good churches, providing “necessary” worship equipment (albeit pews, pipe organs, buildings, or anything else). That means NOTHING compared to the damage they done. Don’t think because they gave charitably to an actually good organization or a good cause, that it eliminates the damage that they did. The bad far outweighs the good (speaking in earthly terms). The good they did had its own selfish desires, though those things may have been used for God’s glory (in the end).

No deals for these A-holes.

1st off, apologies to the mods (great job) for "off topic" post, but I feel I needed to get this off my chest.

I'm getting a new job, which I dont dilly dally all day in front of a computer and will be far less active, plus I now have 2 kids at home, a friend moving in (for a short while), and many other interruptions in life.

I'm so glad that this community is so strong, I hope that when the habbenings habben, you will still all be as sharp as you are today, because I will be leaning on you all like a newbie to the movement when I can get back on. The new job doesn't officially have a start date yet, so I will be on for another month actively. I just wanted to say I love you, you patriot sons of b*tches. Thank you for helping me, I hope I helped you.

Whether you believe Crenshaw is a RINO/WEF or a sleeper, I have concerns about his endorsement. This however seemed to be more of a verbal support so he can cozy up to MAGA congressman in hopes they don't turn on him with laser eyes. The Mowers campaign responded to my Truth Social post quickly, which provided some relief of concern.

I have the opportunity to meet Ric Grenell in the flesh, potentially as a VIP to the event.

Good morning!

You are cordially invited to join Matt Mowers and Ambassador Ric Grenell for the first-ever 'Granite Grill Out' on Sunday, August 28th at 12:30 PM in Manchester.

The link to RSVP can be found here.

We are also offering special VIP passes for anyone who knocks over 100 doors or makes 500+ phone calls before the event. Please let me know if you are interested or if you have any questions.

We look forward to seeing you soon!

Best,

Parker Carey

Thoughts, questions you all would ask, I'm trying to limit to something like 3 questions if I even get the opportunity, no promises. Also, let's be realistic with good questions, obviously he's not going to delve into all of his knowledge of the plan, but would likely be a nod and wink. Thanks brothers and sisters!

I go off on some one who thinks porn is good, I vehemently disagree:

I ask for someone to post sources, their response is, I have so many sources, but I'm not going to dig them up and post them, just for you to ignore them

I post my source (just one for simplicity, it also has it's own set of sources)

So tell me, am I wrong for wanting those sources, regardless of me looking at it or not, wouldn't it be prudent to post them and others might use them?

I thought Brave was better than safari/chrome, but WOW is Yandex good. Only issue is asks to convert things to RU, or mostly shows RU websites, but it’s fast and doesn’t direct you to what the DS wants you to find.

The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine (also known as the Derivative Evidence Doctrine) is a rule in criminal law that makes evidence that was derived from an illegal search, arrest or interrogation inadmissible. In other words, the evidence (the “fruit”) was tainted due to it coming from the illegal search and seizure (the “poisonous tree”). Under this doctrine, not only must illegally obtained evidence be excluded, but also all evidence obtained or derived from exploitation of that evidence. The courts deem such evidence tainted fruit of the poisonous tree. The origin of this doctrine is found in the landmark Supreme Court case, Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963).

If this proves to be the case, even if they "found" "incriminating" evidence, they truly have nothing.

The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine (also known as the Derivative Evidence Doctrine) is a rule in criminal law that makes evidence that was derived from an illegal search, arrest or interrogation inadmissible. In other words, the evidence (the “fruit”) was tainted due to it coming from the illegal search and seizure (the “poisonous tree”). Under this doctrine, not only must illegally obtained evidence be excluded, but also all evidence obtained or derived from exploitation of that evidence. The courts deem such evidence tainted fruit of the poisonous tree. The origin of this doctrine is found in the landmark Supreme Court case, Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963).

If this proves to be the case, even if they "found" "incriminating" evidence, they truly have nothing.