It's anybody's guess. My opinions are never popular, but I assert that it's the fear of potential damage, long-term consequences, toxic build-up, etc. that will do far more harm than any actual physical harm that may have been caused.

I think the body is able to eliminate toxic substances in time and I'm not on-board with these "bioaccumulation" ideas that are popular in the terrain theory community. But that being said, we still don't really know what was in these jabs and how it works. My guess is a very high percentage of them were placebo/saline of some sort whereas the highly toxic batches have already done their damage by now. Nothing else makes sense to me.

This is why I don't talk about what I know with folks that have taken the jab or when in mixed company. IMHO, they're better off not knowing about all the blood clot fatalities.

If the media starts blowing the whistle and acknowledging the excess deaths, the number of deaths will grow exponentially due to raw fear IMHO. If they stay silent on the subject by and large, we should see fewer deaths as time goes forward.

So the media is the lynchpin in my opinion, just as they were the lynchpin for drumming up all the fear and terror around the non-existent unicorn-virus. All those deaths attributed to it can in reality be attributed to their mass fear-generating psyop - which they've been utilizing against the masses for roughly 150 years now running...

My book collection includes over 3000 titles. You can't find 90% of these books in any library in the country. And for roughly 5%, there are perhaps one or two copies in random libraries around the country - typically at universities.

Virtually all books pointing to truth in one fashion or another on a wide variety of subjects are systemically barred or removed from the shelves of our "public" libraries. That should tell you something...

Agreed propertyofUniverse! I've been estimating between 100 - 200 million worldwide with a 7-10 million estimate in the USA.

So what happens if you don't know my intent and choice of definition when I use a multi-definition word? Does that not put you in a potentially vulnerable position? Especially if my goal is to take advantage of you in some way?

What if you presume one definition, but I was using a different one? Could that cause us problems?

And worse yet, what if I use a multi-definition word and presume you interpret it the way I intend, but in fact you interpret a different definition? That could be the cause for, not only confusion, but possibly harm or damage depending on the circumstances, right?

And still worse, what if you read a book written in 1900, 1800, 1700, 500, 100, 200 BC, etc. and don't know what a word meant then versus now? Has the concept/idea been properly conveyed to you? Will you draw incorrect conclusions? Will your understanding of the material be warped?

And I'm not even touching on incorrect translation and interpretation, sometimes unintended, but I contend more often purposefully performed to deceive the reader when and where it matters most.

On top of all this, as a linguist, you well know that there are not always perfect translations possible between languages, forcing the translator to make an approximation of what he/she believed was being said.

I could make you a long list of words from antiquity that meant one thing in days-gone-by, but now mean something almost unrecognizably different today. Biblical scripture is filled with numerous examples. The Buddhist word "Duhkha", still to this day is most commonly defined as "suffering" or "pain", which is an incredibly poor translation as compared to the far more accurate "dissatisfaction" - those definitions being world's apart really, rendering the word almost meaningless. And how about the words "meditation" or "yoga"? The meaning of each of these words has been so completely obliterated as to render both of these words virtually meaningless to 99% of the population. The popular definition of both today bears almost no resemblance to the actual meaning of each.

I could also make you a long list of words used within the legal system that pass for everyday ordinary words we all can agree on the definition of, but in fact those words mean something entirely different under the man-made legal system of "codes", "acts", and "statutes" (it's no accident this is what they're called). The trickery and deception is so pervasive, that not even most attorneys understand what is going on.

What if those responsible for changing, deliberately mistranslating, watering-down or obfuscating the true meaning of words had nefarious intent? Could they effectively deceive, gaslight and propagandize entire populations?

With the use of multi-definition words, I can deceive the masses in almost unimaginable ways. And this is precisely what has been done to enslave humanity.

The pen is INFINITELY mightier than the sword.

Still sound "pretty whack" to you?

I liked your correction, for the record... just smiling as I got shamed into not correcting grammar long ago...so I enjoy it when people do it. I hope it makes a big comeback!

That's some next-level grammar-bolsheviking right there. I'm with ya!

Neville Goddard is my favorite source, but I've heard it many places other than through him. His teacher was a 4 foot 9 inch Ethiopian Jew that taught him the true and original meaning of words were in the bible. Neville said this tiny black man strutted around NYC amidst actual racism of that time (1920-1950) without ever experiencing any of it due to his understanding of this reality. The stories Neville tells are quite fascinating and amusing.

Now, trying to recall which talks he gave where he mentioned these things about Jews I can't recall. He talked about this many, many times so you'd have to be willing to sit and listen through his not-so-professionally-recorded talks to.

Here's a YouTube video about Abdullah but I haven't taken the time to listen as to whether this particular talk are where he discussed these things:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L6B1eGrFvw

You can parse through all Neville's talks here, best audio quality you can find. As I mentioned, Neville talked about this subject many times but I can't recall which specific talks so you'd have to put in some time to find them. Here's the link:

https://nevillegoddardbooks.com/audio-files-metaphysical/neville-goddard-audio-recordings-remastered

The Unity Church metaphysical dictionary also explains the word "jew" as well, not as anything we have been taught, but rather that it involves a "state of mind", focused on the inner/spiritual, rather than the outer/worldly. Here's the link:

https://www.truthunity.net/mbd/jews

I've seen and heard it many other places, but hopefully this will help you along with your understanding.

And to think almost nobody knows/understands what the original meaning and definition of the word "Jew" (Judean) meant in the bible. It had nothing to do with a place, a country, a geographical region, a belief system, a bloodline or anything else along these lines.

The "opposite" of a Judean was either called an Egyptian or Sodomite, where an Egyptian had nothing to do with a place, a geographical region or country, and a sodomite had nothing to do with a crude sexual act, as both of these words are defined today.

There's a tiny sect known as the "Ethiopian Jews" who do understand, and represent this original meaning of the word "Judean".

Nothing has proven to deceive humanity more than the slippery, often changed, often misunderstood, often mistranslated, often assigned multiple definitions and meanings of words.

We have an entire system of control based solely on this deception. We call it the "legal system", where "legalese" is consistently used to deceive the masses. Further illustrated by their heavy use of Latin, a language where words truly do only have one meaning. English, on the other hand, is a disaster, quite purposefully I might add.

If words don't mean one thing, and only one thing, then they really don't mean anything.

I'd look more at the worry/argument aspect of this explanation. The miscarriage which could spark a "loss conflict" would have resulted in ovarian cancer, as the cell proliferation in your ovaries has the biological purpose of making you more attractive and fertile in order to conceive another child.

A 10-year period is hard to account for and recall. Did you get multiple opinions from different histologists at different times? I only ask because sometimes they declare "malignant" when in fact the tissue had stopped proliferating. If you had two opinions and both came back as malignant, then the worry/argument conflict you had running was still active at that time. In other words, it is something you had not yet resolved. And in fact, it may still be unresolved now as we speak, if you're still receiving conventional treatment.

Sometimes you have to really step back, relax and allow the answer for some of these things to arise in your awareness. Often times we bury certain situations from our day-to-day awareness. And these can also be tricky as women, especially mothers, are biologically-wired to worry, especially for their children. But the key here is an ongoing worry that you've had for a long period of time that was at least active up until the time of your diagnosis, and perhaps still ongoing.

If the worry/argument situation doesn't jump straight to mind now, drop it into your inner-self and simply ask for clarity (from God/Jesus/Holy-Spirit if you're a Christian - from the universe if not - or from whatever higher power you believe in) when the time is right for you. It may take days/weeks even months for something to bubble up. It's a very individual situation. Just look for a long-running, nagging worry you've had surrounding someone you love that is either still unresolved or was only recently resolved (after your diagnosis).

Consider the circumstances in the months leading up to your diagnosis and let me know if the following diagnosis resonates with events in your life:

Conflict/Cause: In biological terms, the female breast is synonymous for caring and nurturing. The biological conflict linked to the breast glands is, therefore, a nest-worry conflict concerning the well-being of a loved one (including a pet) or worries about the “nest” itself (distress regarding a woman’s home or workplace). The breast glands also correspond to an argument conflict. Typically, the argument (with a partner, one of the children, a parent, a friend) has a “worry”-aspect.

Biological Purpose: of the cell increase is to enhance the function of the breast glands in order to have more milk available when a nest-member is in need (female mammals also nurse the adult males in the event of an emergency). Even if a woman is not breastfeeding at the time or is no longer of childbearing age, her breasts still respond to a worry conflict in this biologically meaningful manner.

Oh I have serious doubts about most "healthcare" I'm in Healthcare, as a pediatric PT

You're a firsthand witness then. All of allopathic western medicine is wrong, save for emergency/trauma care which is indeed world class.

I find the vast majority of what they teach to be outright lies other than structural. Physical anatomy.

Agreed. Gross anatomy/physiology are obviously true as how could they lie about what is plainly obvious to the average person? But microscopic anatomy is to a great extent completely made up. Take the contents of a cell for example, only the nucleus, cytoplasm and mitochondria actually exist. All the other junk you had to learn about like the golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum, ribosomes, etc. are all completely unreal. They were literally made up as "things" due to the staining, heavy metals and air bubbles that are part of the electron microscope preparation process. Blowing a hole in just one little area calls into question everything we've told about MRNA and all the nonsense that goes along with it. It's literally all made-up lies.

I'm also a cancer survivor, but hubby insists I do mainstream treatments which I've done, while supplementing with plenty of natural protocols.

If you tell me what type you had/have, I can tell you WHY you got it. Something conventional doctors cannot do. Sure, they can say things like "family history", "gene mutation", bad diet/exercise/lifestyle habits, carcinogen exposures, etc all of which is entirely unprovable, therefore entirely impossible to disprove. The causes for all dis-ease, bar none, begin in the mind. Fear and judgment are at the root.

I have Vax damaged kids (before I knew), and I assume hubby is and I am as well.

I'm sorry to hear that, but assume nothing. Look upon yourself, husband and children anew. See them as perfectly healthy, as yourself. Continue with determination, regardless of what the outer circumstances may present. Do not accept the story of "permanent vax damage". This too is a deception. But the power of belief trumps all "facts" in this realm.

I do honestly struggle with the idea that there are no viruses, as anecdotally, as mom of 6, and In my practice, I've seen what seems like contagious things that run through a family, church, school, etc.

Understandably so, you're in good company. Almost everybody believes this to b the case. For colds/flus, consider the element of "sensing danger" when such "germs" are said to be going around. Not to mention, young children take on the attitude/thoughts of their parents, especially their mother, making them all the more susceptible. Your subconscious/psyche attempts to help you "sniff out the danger" by enhancing and widening your nasal/bronchial passages. When you no longer "sense danger" (aka, a boogeyman-virus floating around), your psyche returns your nasal/bronchial mucosa back to normal - and this is when you "get sick" with a cold or flu. This is just one simple example. It's all based on "fear" as you can hopefully see. Chicken pox, measles, rubella have to do first with a "separation conflict", almost always from the mother, which is why typically kindergartners and first-graders come down with it. However, the chicken-pox party kids suffer an "attack/defilement/feeling-soiled" conflict as they're purposefully "exposed" to the "danger". Both "feeling separated and attacked" are also forms of fear of course.

But I've also read enough to be plenty skeptical of just swallowing all the bull they spew in journals, studies, etc

Good for you for questioning things and doing your own research, which is apparently too difficult for some here on this board. They prefer to call me an idiot as they sit in their ivory castle of unsubstantiated beliefs.

I've studied this virus nonsense and germ theory to the ends of earth and back to ensure I understood it through and through. The unfortunate part of this movement right now is that the major voices in this arena have chosen to reject a particular health-based modality, leaving them unable to explain what does cause these so-called viral dis-eases. However, the guy who brought them all along, Dr. Stephan Lanka completely understands.

I'd read enough on fauci prior to Covid to know he was a bad apple as well as Gates etc.

Good for you again. Yes, I shared at least 5 videos about Fauci and the AIDS sham with everybody I knew in the fall of 2020 when we knew they were coming with a jab. One out of several dozen watched all the videos and therefore understood was afoot. The others told me "we're gonna stick with the establishment" by and large. As they say, you can lead a horse to water....

I hope in the end the truth is finally revealed for all to see, no matter how hard the truth may be to swallow.

The red pill grows more enormous by the day. Many aren't gonna be able to swallow it. But the truth will be exposed, as it is entirely self-evident requiring nothing but one's willingness to look. We're immersed in a sea of lies and deceptions today. We're at the height of the film "Idiocracy", which should have been a documentary.

The best advice I can give you is BELIEVE nothing that you find suspicious and do not accept an "expert opinion" on anything, as most of our experts have been profoundly miseducated - case in point - the doctors you work with. Most, if not all are well-meaning, kind-hearted people who entered pediatrics to honestly help children. What they didn't realize, and largely still don't realize, is that they paid a fortune to be lied to in innumerable ways. Sad but true. In many ways I feel for these people the most, especially pediatricians, who have been deceived into delivering these toxic nostrums to their patients without a modicum of evidence to support their efforts. They are going to have to go through some tremendous suffering and depression when they finally realize what has happened.

Keep your skeptical hat on tight, we've only just begun to scratch the surface at this time. Things are about to get even bumpier in the times ahead. I could tell you much more that I know but there's a limit to what can be said to the vast majority at this time. Much like you don't chug water after being severely dehydrated for a long period of time, but rather must thirst start with tiny gulps, this is the same situation when it comes to sharing hard-to-believe truths.

And for the record, I'm well aware I've uncovered only so many deceptions, by no means most. I'm sure there are some shocks in store for me moving ahead as well.

kek!

Great share, appreciate it. I'm a salty dog when it comes to figuring stuff out for myself.

As to the test, I don't have any willing "guinea pigs" to test this out with, so I'd have to do it on the down-low...

I look forward to your results. I have yet to see any real proof that this alleged phenomenon is in fact true. Thanks for stepping up to test it out, and more importantly, thank you for NOT BELIEVING what anybody else tells you, so-called "expert" or not, and instead going the extra mile to determine fact from fiction for yourself.

We need millions more people like you in this world if we're ever going to break out of this belief-saturated matrix.

Indeed, "Virus Mania". It's definitely worth the read if you want to get all the dirty details of the virus deception.

Here's a great 2hr20min video that summarizes things in a nice tidy fashion to give you a head start -> https://www.bitchute.com/video/jajyAdPMdzfJ/

Ah, good for you. Seems my thread here brought out the insta-doubters in droves. There's nothing that will convince them which I find incredibly odd as this board is all about exposing the lies.

AIDS is an umbrella term that covers 30 different dis-eases today. In the early 90s it was perhaps 7-10. They added new dis-eases for about two decades to get to the current 30.

Did you know all 30 dis-eases alleged to be a "sign of AIDS" are and have been well described and catalogued in the medical literature for many decades before so-called AIDS came along? How can this be reconciled?

Did you know the one and only time the establishment tested established AIDS patients for the presence of the HIV virus in the mid-1980s, that only 37% tested "positive" out of over 1000? That was the last time they ran any large scale tests.

Did you know that nobody has ever been able to find and photograph the alleged "HIV retrovirus" since that initial "Miraculous" discovery by Dr. Gallo in 1984? Even Luc Montagnier, the French scientist who was given dual-credit for the supposed discovery of HIV, admitted in a fairly recent interview around 2010, that nobody else has ever found and photographed this so-called virus.

Did you know the Perth Group of Australia has submitted hundreds of scientifically sound papers to the WHO and other world infectious dis-ease authorities demonstrating the flaws, errors and mistakes with all the "official" papers making the false claim that they've proven HIV exists?

Did you know Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, tried to write a paper for a grant in the 1990s and was unable to complete it because he couldn't find a scientific paper to uphold the first sentence of his paper which was; "HIV is the probable cause of AIDS". Here's a snippet of his story: https://www.bitchute.com/video/kEUHWpXzYZED/

Did you know there's no "gold standard" AIDS test in existence, exactly like there's no "gold standard" test in existence for Covid19? Without such a gold standard test, all results are, by definition, fraudulent, unreliable and completely unscientific.

Do you know what the AIDS tests actually test for? You would think if they tested for the presence of an HIV virus, that it would be trivial for somebody to isolate and photograph such an entity, wouldn't you? Why can't anybody achieve such a feat? Can you reconcile these facts?

Did you know that AIDS/HIV was the first alleged boogeyman-virus dis-ease where the so-called "presence of antibodies" was the definitive sign that you had the dis-ease? Whereas every so-called viral dis-ease before and since, the presence of antibodies meant you were IMMUNE to the dis-ease? How can you reconcile this strange anomaly?

Did you know there are no known cases of a lab worker accidentally sticking themselves with a needle containing alleged AIDS-tainted blood actually contracting AIDS, despite thousands of examples of this happening?

Did you ever wonder why the alleged HIV boogeyman-virus can only be passed through bodily fluids but cannot become airborne like virtually every other alleged boogeyman-virus known?

Did you know the Bay area doctors that treated the first 100 patients that were said to have AIDS (GRID) had everything figured out within the first 3 months as all 100 patients were living the "fast track gay lifestyle", sharing the same needles taking elicit drugs and all were frequent users of "poppers" (Amyl nitrates). All had "Kaposi's Sarcoma" from huffing the poppers, which are well established poisons.

Did you know AZT was shelved by the FDA as the most toxic drug ever tested for cancer treatment in the history of medicine in the late 1960s?

Did you know Dr. Gallo had burned through hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money throughout his career in the 60s, 70s and early 80s trying to prove that viruses caused cancer but failed miserably in all his attempts?

Have you ever wondered why Magic Johnson appears to have never had a single problem in his life with his so-called AIDS diagnosis? Could it be because he was instructed to NOT take AZT or any of its precursors?

I could go on and on but hopefully I've made my point. Unless you've researched this topic, then I'm willing to bet you did NOT KNOW any of these facts. Now ask yourself why.

As to your friend, his wife and child, in the early 1990s getting a positive AIDS test was a near-fatal death sentence as the fear was rampant in those days and only one single treatment was on offer - AZT - which is one of the most toxic, deadly poisons known to mankind. It destroys the body from the inside out, not unlike the many poisons used in chemo-non-therapy. The people who survived the fear and terror of this era were the ones who refused to take the AZT treatment. Many of their testimonials can be found on alternative platforms. Many speak of how they watched all their friends die, one by one, but couldn't convince them to stop taking the poisons.

Do you know what people diagnosed with AIDS today are medicated with? They take various pharma drugs that are 1/1000th to 1/5000th the strength of AZT compared to what people diagnosed with AIDS were taking in the late 1980s through the late 1990s. This fact alone succinctly explains why almost nobody dies of "AIDS" in recent times (past 20 years).

I'm very sorry for your friend, his wife and child, but it's a well known fact in alternative health circles, and even in the gay community, that AZT was what killed the vast majority of people fraudulently diagnosed with a non-existent, undefined, umbrella-term dis-ease known as AIDS.

You're a real special fella you are. Enjoy your nastiness.

I honestly don't even know what you mean????

Most animals acting erratically have been poisoned. A smaller percentage have either been severely abused/mistreated and/or are starving to death.

There isn't a shred of proof these animals are "rabid", as in they've been invaded and attacked by a non-existent boogeyman fairytale unicorn-virus. And further, nobody from "centuries ago" suggested such a complete absurdity. They weren't subjected to a lifetime of propaganda and deception like we were.

Even beyond. But you've clearly demonstrated you're not interested in any of it, having asked zero questions in favor of leveling CogDis attacks with every statement you make.

Enjoy the lies masquerading as truths and the resulting fear and disempowerment they bring!

Not even close. I've profoundly researched the subject and arrived at the one and only sane, rational, sensible conclusion possible - boogyeman-viruses are a man-made fairytale construct designed to control the sheeple.

"The flat earth society" is a CIA/Intelligence-agency, government-funded limited hangout specifically designed to turn people away from the truth. You won't ever catch me there.

Blind trust in authority is our greatest enemy!

The only thing I'm interested in "delegitimizing" is things that aren't legitimate in the first place.

I don't BELIEVE boogeyman-viruses don't exist. I KNOW they don't exist.

And I'm a proud "flat-earther" too, the magical rotating globe is yet another illegitimate BELIEF.

Humanity suffers due to all their illegitimate beliefs. This is how the cabal controls us. But we should let them if the majority still wants to believe in their nonsense. Great strategy!

The thread title is to encourage people to start doing their own research. Sam's video is just summarizing the frustration around the continuing, nonsensical burying of the one's head in the sand in order to "go along to get along". It's as if everyone is tip-toe'ing around the subject waiting for some tipping of the scales before they'll come to the simple and obvious conclusion that's been clearly shown and proven for coming up on 3 years now.

The only people who still believe in viruses are choosing to outsource their intellectual sovereignty to pseudo-experts who have all been equally deceived as have we. It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled.

We all fell for the lie with a single story from a parent/friend/teacher when we were children - with a complete lack of any tangible evidence. We were fooled.

Now it takes mountains of data, proof, evidence and research to unwind literally what was never even proven in the first place. Go figure.

"It ain't what you know that gets you into trouble, it's what you know that just ain't so" - Mark Twain

You started the ridicule, I just returned the favor. Like for like.

Step one is proving that ANY BOOGEYMAN-VIRUS exists. This has never been accomplished because they're made-up nothing-burgers.

Because of this failure, the establishment deceivers need to make up all sorts of ludicrous tales like "dormancy", "asymptomatic carriers", can only spread through saliva, etc. It's nothing but one lie stacked on top of another lie, ad infinitum.

The fact that nobody has ever been able to find a boogeyman-virus in the fluids or tissues of a living organism is the beginning and ending of any debate on the subject. They readily admit they've never been able to achieve this, for yet another laundry list of ludicrous reasons - "there's not enough there" or "they're too hard to find because they're hiding". It's all absurdity.

Open your mind and consider the possibility that you've been deceived to cause you fear. This is the whole game. The lies of germ theory are just one aspect of the larger agenda. Fear and judgment are the great destroyers of mankind.