Thank you! Extremely grateful. Needed to hear that.
Thanks for trying. Appreciate it.
Interesting because I just mentioned this to a friend. But my thinking is more along the line of whether we have been naive in our American way of thinking that within our borders we are safe from attack. If the left is either compromised by China in such a way that they fear for their lives or welfare or if they are sold out to China because they buy into communism, is it so unthinkable for Trump and our military to believe that China might have submarines on their way or troops within reach of our borders? But to bring reason to this: we have been told that we are safe. I believe that some of us Americans (my hand is raised) are just myopic in our views about our enemies. They exist outside of our gates. They work outside of our borders. I think I'm seeing a little further than I used to see. And I have to admit that stepping outside the comfort of myopia is daunting.
I tried to find a link to this. If you have it, would you mind sharing. Don't doubt you saw it. I just want to read what he had to say.
This is a laugh-out-loud read. While I'm not completely onboard the Kennedy Express, John F. Kennedy served heroically. He had an intellect. And in many things he had some integrity. None of that even applies to Joe Biden. I was a toddler when JFK was assassinated and not much older when Robert was killed. My mother was a staunch Republican, but I remember her tears when Robert died. Knowing her political views, she wouldn't have voted for a Kennedy to save her life. I suspect there was some good in the family, but I can't believe that some did not and do not dabble where they should not. History tells us otherwise. You cannot forget the Kennedy legacy. We cannot expel the family from the deep state no matter what we may believe caused Kennedy's assassination. Old man Kennedy left a legacy of infidelity in the clan and remember Ted Kennedy got away with rape and murder and others in that family live the deep state lifestyle. I believe the best thing the Kennedy family ever had going for them was Jackie, and her actions after his demise tell us all we have to know. She definitely put a hedge around John-John and Carolyn. But I do agree with the false-flag scenario. Joe is expendable. And Jill may be as well. Her desire for the White House may get her killed.
I'm not seeing it posted anywhere either. Maybe a delay or a derail? I like Lindell. I understand he's a strong businessman and a Christian. I suspect, though, that he could cross the lines sometimes, and I'm not sure that I'd trust him to completely hold the line. Just a sense that I get from the man.
Honestly, I think the front of the ornament conveys a message, but what's on the back is the real message. I didn't purchase a 2020 ornament this year until just now.
I dared 2020 to take Betty. It didn't take me up on the challenge.
For those who keep talking about a virtual inauguration, look to the MSM for their details of what they believe will be the itinerary. As slated, Old Joe can't ride the Am Trak as he desired to do because of security fears. Despite the damage done by the "Trump Mob," Biden insists on being at least brave enough (with 21,422 troops standing at the ready) to be sworn in on the west side of the Capitol. The inauguration stage is being checked for damage. Biden and Harris will then take a trek to the White House. Because of COVID concerns there will be no inaugural balls, etc. ... blah ... blah ... blah. Already, you can see the bleakness. It reminds me of watching Animal Farm in the classroom every year. The dank, gray, gloom of it all. I hated that movie, but I sure never forgot it. This is what we would live in if Biden were to be allowed to step into office. President Trump was sworn in while violent riots were being held in D.C. Trump has never shied from a virus that killed so few. He did it with grandeur and pride in our country. The old man's version is just like their crippled version of the DNC convention when help up against the optics of the RNC convention. Look at the optics. While we don't believe it will go off like this, already, don't you believe that even some on the left are wondering how a man who was so adored that he could run a campaign from his basement, while barely able to mumble into a microphone, garnered 80 million votes, but yet, he's so afraid of a virus and of his own countrymen that he has to have so much security around him? (Of course, we know who and why brought in the security). If they aren't awake with the visual of a cowering president-elect, nothing will wake them. They'll stay "woke" forever.
I went digging, and I found nothing profound about this person. He was a philanthropist (and I know that means nothing). He was some kind of horse carriage enthusiasts. I pondered whether he killed himself for any reason or whether he was killed by the deep state as someone who may have peeked behind the curtain and could testify without duress once everything goes down. In other words, was he lured to something and quietly turned it down? Was he silenced before he could speak of what he saw? I can't see an eighty-nine-year old man with Parkinson's climbing up to jump out of anything. But I'm holding my opinion on his allegiances until or if anything does come up about him. If anyone has other information, please share. On another word, I agree with the post that indicates that we are not acting in good faith in our understanding of Q if we are rejoicing at the death of others. I believe commenting and understanding why a person might commit suicide or be killed is one thing. Rejoicing in it is another. We are only turning people away when we do that. And actually, we come off just like the left who are calling for our demise. We are asked not to gloat when things go down. If we can't handle it during the show, how will be handle things when the show is over and we need to share things with others? Just a thought.
I listen to Simon because I truly believe that when we think of someone as crazy, there is always truth in them somewhere. I dealt with a high-level genius of a father, and his elevator did not always go to the top floor, but anyone who knew him loved him because he was fun to be around, but they all said the same thing: "Most intelligent man I've ever known, but I don't know if I believe he's done half of what he's done." I was one of those people who doubted him. His exploits were wild, often criminal, and somewhat amusing, but they all turned out to be true. So, do I believe everything Simon says (no pun intended) is true? No. I'm not an alien-enthusiast. I believe more in Bigfoot than aliens. I'm not a "JFK, Jr." is a live theorist either. I thought what he said about the fake inauguration was interesting because of a few things:
- This would mean that the MSM would be further colluding with the deep state to pull off a coup (because in this same interview, Simon said something I believe is absolutely true: Trump won 75% of the legal votes, and he flipped CA red).
- If the MSM is colluding with anyone (a person, another country, any other entities, people in government), they will all be brought down, and it will be done with a clear visual of why.
- There is a contingency plan in place.
- If this happens, the contingency tickles the fancy of those in charge of what we are seeing. Part of me wants them to have a little fun.
- While I would not want to put all those who believe we are nearing the end of this into one second more of hopelessness (because I believe if we're honest, our emotions are going up and down), this could bring down other players who might have been in the shadows. For my own purposes, my greatest fear is that if they use a CGI event to do a fake inauguration, what if they continued that illusion with a fake assassination? I'm sure there is a contingency for that as well, but it would be a little frightening for a while. For that reason, I pray that Simon is telling us the truth when he says they believe it will end before the inauguration.
At this stage, those engaged and very hopeful of what is about to happen are like the disciples who believed Christ immediately. The doubting Thomas's are going to have to be shown the truth, and when they are shown the truth, they will have to be led to understand that what has happened has happened for their good. There's going to be a lot of sorrow, grief, and anger. I heard this recently, "It is easy to con people. It is almost impossible to convince them that they have been conned." We don't want to admit to our own failings. Questions will come out: "Why didn't I see that the children were being harmed? What kind of animal does this to people? Why did the Deep State do this to us?" I believe that people will have to work through the process of grief, and we all deal with it our own way. Some never get past the first stage. Others act out in only some ways, and others come out healthier as the process slowly and realize, "Okay. I lived through that loss. I have to pick myself up and move on." And many will discover that what they've moved on to is much better. **Disclaimer: While I believe Q is a Godsend, this movement does not replace my religious believes in any way, shape, or form. Either God will deliver or He will not. I choose to have faith that He opened the eyes of a few good men who then opened the eyes of the world. And in that respect, as Solomon said, "There is nothing new under the sun." This could be a very Biblical moment, a time when we see God at work mightily. I pray it is so.
I guess this is one of those "made you look" posts or someone saw a fake post?? His account is still down.
Some folks can't log in to Twitter. B&MO have been silent on Twitter (last time I looked this afternoon) since 01/08 and 01/07, respectively. Podesta off since 01/07 as well. Curiously, their last posts concerned the Capitol attack. Hillary is tweeting. However, one of her tweets has give me something to ponder. It involves the movie The Dissident which she gleefully says gives a great account of the Saudi Arabia killing of the journalist (too lazy to try to spell his name). My first thought is, lady, you have brass if you're going to bite the hand that fed you so well. Then I realized that those that fed her have been jailed. Yet, I'd think a country that enriched her so well and to whom Hussein sent cash to pay off her debts when she lost the election she couldn't lose, would not take kindly to that remark. Might it not be Hillary? Might it be an attempt to make her a target the way that those who went against her were targeted and killed? Just thinking.