We have one of those "local" cable tv news stations, that pretty much parrots regional or national MSM (I watch for the weather forecast and some locally relevant news) in southern NY (NYC is location for rest of MSM broadcast on tv here). This morning, they reported on one of the Big Pharma companies coming out with a "vaccine" specifically for omicron,but stated boosters would be required in six months. I don't think I need to explain the ridiculousness of this on several levels for people here, but what I was amazed at was the straight face the reporter had in reporting it.
Here in NY (NYC tv stations, maybe it's only there), they run commercials all the time where they put these medical organization clowns on talking about how important it is to get tested all the time; it's really ridiculous! But that got me to thinking; why? Well here is my theory: They want to keep as many people as possible from getting omicron, because they know it isn't that dangerous, will provide immunity to the next variant, and if it were to infect enough people to be considered to have reached true "herd immunity", covid, as the deep state and MSM has been portraying it, would come to an end.
I just checked twitter. There is some medical doctor still posting stuff about how irresponsible it is for people to not wear masks. The comments to it indicate that people still think covid is some deadly disease to be very afraid of! Even leftist media reports that omicron is not that dangerous, so I don't know how these people are still so afraid of covid.
I believe the covid shots were worth having for elderly and immune compromised people early in the pandemic, when the shots were developed for the viral variant that was initially out. But now, it is abundantly clear the covid shots are useless at best, and evidence suggests they increase the risk of infection, and of course, the side effects and unknown future side effects. The covid shots should have never been given to children, and I believe that the continued push to have children get the shots is the biggest crime of all the crimes associated with covid.
How many people here believe you spend too much time on this site, but do it anyway? :) If you are like me, you read the posts here for two reasons, to get news that MSM omits, and to see how far along "the plan" appears to be progressing. We can't do much about either, for the most part (some calls to elected officials can make some difference in some cases), but there just seems to be an attraction, almost like I don't want to miss something :)
Here is an exchange I found on twitter:
Some MD posted this:
Multiple emails/texts from colleagues/friends whose kids got infected with COVID in schools, figuring out next steps:
Some parents doing a full court press to avoid getting infected, isolating the kids having them mask
Others throw up their hands, assume everyone gets infected
One reply:
We sold our home, packed up our house and moved over Christmas break, to a new town an hour and a half away. Because we finally found a school taking COVID precautions seriously. Masks. In room HEPA filtration. Staff vaccination. My girls hadnt been in school in 2 yrs.
And people responded to the guy above that he is a good parent!
I have been wondering if getting covid, or getting covid shots, which both involve the spike proteins, has the same effects? This would be a brilliant plan of those who may be using this as population control. If 80% of a population gets the shots, and half of those who don't get the shots get covid, that would leave only 10% of the population totally free of the "spiked protein effects", and if the "shedding" phenomena is significant, then maybe EVERYONE is subject to the spike protein effects, to some degree.
I received a block notice today because I posted the following comment to someone who was lauding Fauci as a hero:
If you were the Dr., and there was any justice in the world, you would be swinging from a short rope on a high platform.
And it was just as I started getting quite a few "followers" :) (perhaps that's the real reason I was blocked :) )
I have scanned some sections of the R.F.K. Jr. book, and thought the information was pretty damning of Fauci, but the review below, that was posted in the review section on Amazon, makes a very good point: If you include what amounts to basically lying about something in a book that is trying to report the danger of something, how believable is everything else in the book. I welcome anyone's thoughts on this review:
I am distrustful of Big Government. I am unhappy with how the US has handled COVID-19. I am unhappy about the very real possibility that the virus itself came from gain-of-function experiments in the Wuhan lab, funded by US, Canadian and Chinese funds [AKA my tax dollars] and those experiments with Coronaviruses are described in a 2015 paper by Ralph Baric et al.
So when a friend suggested that I should take a serious look at a book that documents deep financial conflicts of interests between Big Pharma and NHS and CDC... and me knowing as published scientific author how political and bureaucratic science funding and publishing is... he didn't have to twist my arm
There is a LOT of heavily footnoted information here. If only 25% of the accusations are true, one should be pretty concerned. I suspect there's a decent chance that 25% of these accusations are in fact true.
But I quickly encountered an insurmountable problem with this book, and it was the graphs on page 84, 85 and 86 correlating vaccine injections with COVID deaths.
The book asserts that as soon as the vaccine programs were initiated, death rates from COVID-19 started going up. It alleges that the deaths were caused by the vaccines. It illustrates this with graphs of various countries, showing the point at which vaccines kicked in, consistently followed by a steep rise in deaths.
This is all clearly spelled out and illustrated in 24 graphs which appear to tell a very consistent and frightening story.
But there are some problems.
The print is very blurry so you can't see the dates - either in the printed book or the Kindle version.
I looked up the same data via search terms like "Ireland COVID stats" on Google. If you choose "deaths" instead of "cases" you get identical data to what is in the book, for each country you choose.
That's when I looked closely and compared.
The first graph is Ireland. Ireland shows a steep upward spike in deaths right at the beginning of January 2021. The arrow on the chart in this book indicates the vaccine program started just a few weeks before that.
But... that's not what happened.
The arrow is only indicating when vaccines first were announced (December). They did not get distributed until many months later (spring and summer).
Plus... I was IN Ireland December 27 2020 to January 4 2021! I managed to get into the country and spend a week hiking. It was right in the middle of my week there that Ireland's COVID cases started spiking. They moved the country from Level 3 to Level 5 lockdown while I was there. The hospitals started filling up and that was all they were talking about on the radio as I drove back to Dublin to fly home.
THIS HAD NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH VACCINES. Vaccines did not cause this spike in COVID cases because nobody could get vaccines in Ireland in January 2021. They were not available.
The spike occurred in Ireland (and most of those other countries) because it was wintertime in cold countries, people were forced inside and it was easier for the virus to spread. And Christmas had just occurred, people were visiting relatives and people got sick.
3-4 months later, you see deaths going down because 1) vaccines getting distributed and 2) winter was coming to an end, people were opening windows, going outside and not having social gatherings indoors.
I cannot fathom how any person could include pages 84-86 in this book and say what these graphs allegedly mean. Not unless they were either A) so ideologically possessed that they couldn't possibly see the data any other way, or B) convinced that the 'other side' is so evil that telling lies about them were somehow justified.
At best this shows extremely poor judgment on the part of the authors, editors and publisher.
At worst it is wanton disregard of facts.
This is unfortunate because it casts everything else in the book into question.
Is it true that $4.9 billion of the $12 billion CDC budget comes from vaccines? I don't know. This book says that's the case. It wouldn't surprise me.
But if it is true, Kennedy shot his entire case in the foot and poisoned the well with bad and very unnecessary information.
It's not very often that a book exposing government corruption makes it to the tippy top of the bestseller lists. So - when that rare opportunity comes, why are people sabotaging their chance to be heard with misleading and wrong conclusions from misinterpreted data?
What else did they get wrong???
And why weren't there enough fact checkers in place to stop these illustrations from making it into the book before it went to press?
Does anyone care?
I don't have time to research the rest. I supposedly paid the publisher and authors to do good research when I gave them my money for the book in the first place. We will have to leave it to others to sift truth from fiction.
I'm taking a break from GA until I see a major player in all the U.S. corruption making headlines for being arrested for their crimes. Have a Happy New Year everyone and let's hope those arrests start showing up soon!
I have seen the annual deaths in the U.S posted by CDC, with a jump of about 500,000 in 2020 and estimated for 2021. Since we know CDC is yet another Federal agency that can't be trusted, I started to dig into this a little. I am waiting for Texas to send me their data (hopefully they will), so used what I could from CA. I didn't think FL was a good state to use since they have such a large seasonal population. Here is what I found from CA compared to the CDC stats for the entire country:
Population of CA, ~39,550,000
pre-covid death rate of ~0.00683 (total deaths divided by population)
2020 death rate of 0.00811
US population of ~331,000,000
pre-covid deaths in U.S. per year: 2,854,838 (in 2019) 2020 U.S. deaths: 3,358,814
U.S. death rate of: 2019 - 0.00862 2020 - 0.01015
So what is interesting is that the U.S. death rate from CDC in 2019 is about the rate in CA in 2020 (with both pre- and post-covid U.S. death rates higher from the CDC estimate as compared to CA). CA, being the largest state in population, would seem to track fairly well with the U.S., so this quick little analysis brings up an interesting difference that may suggest CDC fudged the total deaths in the U.S. up to support the covid deaths narrative. I will hopefully get the Texas data, since TX is the 2nd most populous state, and would hopefully have truthful numbers. I wouldn't put it past CDC to have altered data from previous years, but that would mean any reports from past years that are not on their site would show those differences, so they wouldn't be that stupid, would they :)
36 The Lord said to me: “Son of man, will you judge Oholah and Oholibah? Then confront them with their detestable practices, 37 for they have committed adultery and blood is on their hands. They committed adultery with their idols; they even sacrificed their children, whom they bore to me, as food for them. 38 They have also done this to me: At that same time they defiled my sanctuary and desecrated my Sabbaths. 39 On the very day they sacrificed their children to their idols, they entered my sanctuary and desecrated it. That is what they did in my house.
