Do you really think the likes of AOC deserve a quarter of a million dollars a year? They do nothing but have meetings with lobbyists and sit in a chamber to vote on things. It takes zero training, and minimal knowledge, to do what they do. They shouldn't be paid more than $100,000 per year.
That is pretty amazing, because it seems like one of the leftist judges could fairly easily judge that "it violates basic human rights to force someone to leave a place where they live", since they make even more ridiculous arguments for other cases.
I tried it out for one of my invention ideas. It gave a great technical discussion of the idea, but couldn't draw it properly despite numerous tries. Same thing happened when trying to get it to add Trump to Mt. Rushmore :)
I tried to get grok to draw Trump's head on Mt. Rushmore. Despite multiple tries, with variations in the questions, and even having it first make a statue in granite of Trump's head, grok would not draw what I requested (the closest it came was Mt. Rushmore with a photo of Trump in front :) )
I saw that lousy Kirby guy on the morning "news" (ABC) and he sounded like such an idiot claiming that there are thousands of drones being legally flown all over the U.S., and that lousy Stephanopolis didn't even say "but the drones being observed are much larger than the legal drones you are referring to".
I recently watched "Children of Men" (2006) and other than the obvious "if you are against illegal immigrants, you are bad" message the movie tried to promote, it seemed like it was a pretty good depiction of the soon-to-be state of Great Britain. Hollywood is pretty good sometimes at depicting future things.
I did a reverse image Google search. It is the album "Gentle Giant" by the British group of the same name. I've never heard of them, but the wikipedia entry for them seems pretty interesting, based on the instruments they used.
Decent women are. It's the bimbos and other women who only care about their appearance and what they can buy who seek wealthy husbands.