I think I’ll add my my most recent observations here as well. :)
Debunk: to discredit
Discredit: to cause to be doubted.
Vs.
Disprove: to PROVE to be false, invalid or in error. To refute (v).
Refute (v): overthrow by argument or PROOF.
Prove: to establish the truth or validity (of something) by the presentation of argument or EVIDENCE.
Is it any surprise that the left prefers the easiest path (debunk) because no evidence or work is required? Lol
That tweet said calvary but as SoL21 pointed out, even if they had said cavalry, there were no horses! Lol
I proudly call myself a conspiracy theorist. In my experience, people who have a vested interest and/or benefit from the outcome routinely conspire to further their own interests. This is human nature. It is also human nature to survive so it is in my own best interests to make sure these conspiracies do not negatively affect my own survival (or the survival of others).
It is idiocy that the negative label is applied to the person trying to protect themselves instead of the persons/group possibly trying to take advantage.
Anyone catch the difference between calvary (where Jesus was crucified) and cavalry (mounted soldiers)? The Dems just used the tweet “Calvary” is coming” to indicate soldiers are on the way...ironically using to “crucify” Trump!
What are the round silver pins the Dems are wearing? Anyone know?
This concerted effort to oppress us is actually a positive sign. Can you imagine all the effort to infiltrate? Lol Liberty is in the marrow of my bones and no mod, law or external force can ever take that away. (Ew, I just thought if cannibalism. Nope! Not even then!)
I could not agree more. On a slightly different approach, aren’t autists the ones who were able to decipher Q because of their unique thought process? I have aspergers (ass burgers ha!) and while I do not even begin to compare my brain effectiveness to a true autist, even as borderline spectrum as I am, it is sometimes very difficult for me to understand or gauge other people’s emotional state and coupled with my tendency to be blunt, I cannot imagine trying to “social justice” an individual with autism. That’s incredibly thoughtless to put them in those parameters. (In my not so humble opinion.)
As for optimism, consider this...how many coincidences have to occur before they are no longer coincidental? Would Trump ever just walk away after four years of planning? I hold on to this. Combined with how many times Q has been uncannily, impossibly right. Hold the wine! (Or at least save some for March!) :)
Lol! I know you’re being condescending but damn if that wasn’t witty! Well played!
Sure are a lot of deleted comments on here (I counted at least 25, some with 15+ upvotes.) Hmm... very odd for a free speech forum.
Btw, have you ever researched what percentage of the genome is allocated for melanin (skin color)? .00003%!! Not even taking into account recessive genes, etc. Do you know how many generations it takes to completely change skin color? Three!!
I do not get it. Why does skin color even matter? It’s part of the individual uniqueness but that’s it!
I have taken the word “offend” out of my vocabulary because I choose who has power over my state of mind. I highly recommend it. I personally attempt to be respectful but it’s voluntary. You can’t legislate respect.
Would you like me to post a list of “possibly offensive” words for you? And let’s add in the subjective trigger words. Oh and let’s not forget the hand gestures or colors or paraphernalia that could be offensive. I almost forgot the lgbtq trigger issues... But let’s be reasonable here! To make it easier on everyone, why don’t you just tell me what I AM allowed to do or say. That list would be much shorter. (I never ever use the N word. This is about PRINCIPLE.)
Have you ever watched Equilibrium? I highly recommend it. I also learned quite a bit from Thomas Paine.
Lol! Bless your poor pea pickin’ heart. Maybe you’ll figure this out ... eventually.
That was very well articulated. What I have never understood is why is the platform held responsible for the speech of the users utilizing the platform? Can’t it just be a mutually beneficial arrangement where the platform requires a waiver and the user has the ability to control their exposure? You could even have separate requirements that confirm adult age. Beyond that, if the platform is not held responsible (and isn’t responsible for the actions of others) the users are only held responsible for threats of violence. This all started with “hate” crime. Please tell me, what crime isn’t hateful?
You’re no fren. More like frenemy.
My last comment on this post: I was the person who ten years ago was saying that putting a color in front of someone’s name was completely unnecessary. I also think stereotypes, especially based on something people have no control over (skin color) and is such a small part of their makeup, are completely unreliable and unfair. Besides, what difference does it make what you look like? The thing is, I want to know what people think. Please! Let them talk! Let them be racist, sexist, etc., because then I can determine more accurately what kind of person they are! Do I want to be their friend? Business partner? Let my kids have playdates at their house? Have them as my child’s teacher? Why the hell would I want them to present some politically correct facade and not be able to see the negative or rotten lurking underneath that carefully cultivated mask that “social in-justice” demands? No fracking way!
The only reason they even have a platform is because people are leaving other sites doing just that, I find some good info here but not exclusively. Besides, there’s a weird infiltration of info that seems to be muddying the waters...and now they’re trying to pull the same tactics as big tech? Please, tell me how this isn’t a concerted effort to divide us? What blows my mind is how can anyone spend any amount of time seeing evidence of children being horrifically abused and still choose to undermine and oppose? Do they not have or care about kids? Do they not have a heart?
Be careful! I think you said a no no word!
^^that! I have a hard time saying the f word and it undermines my emphasis! Lol
Do you not understand what Trump supporters are going through? We are white supremacists if we support Trump. We are censored on fb, Twitter, whatever. If we put Trump flags on our house, people throw eggs or scratch our cars. Now they’re calling us domestic terrorists! I’m not saying I agree with everyone who is a Trump supporter but I differentiate between what I am responsible and have authority over and what I don’t...and vice versa. Your focus on a word is opening the door for the last bastion of free speech to disappear. Please consider this.
How are you a moderator? Are you going to ban me too? Just because I think your judgment is unconstitutional? My bad if I was under the impression the constitution mattered in this group of Trump supporters.
Good job, moderator. You banned my husband for three days just because he disagreed with your social justice rules. Wow.
Kek