I did not say Q was. I said: it depends on the actions later on as the determinant for lawfulness or unlawfulness. Hence the term: unlawful conspiracy.
Conspire is an act in and of itself has neutral meaning, like in hatching a plan between two or more people.
Consider the word plot. It may refer to planning on a course (by one person or more), the general direction of the story, an actual plan.
Let's look at it backwards. The impeachment is now ongoing. Let's suppose the Senate votes turn out to be in favor of guilty. Of course, it is a political determination. However, a legal determination would then follow.
The question of law then is: are all those following Trump and Q, and not pro dems, by definition part of an unlawful conspiracy, or are the dems and rinos, perpetrating this plit themselves part of an unlawful conspiracy, as it is geared towards the plan to destroy the US and the Constitution.
So, not the conspiracy factor in and of itself is the determinant, but the acts following it.
A prima facie reading of the insurrection act suffices to recognize the gravity of it
Hence, the title: "It's not a conspiracy when there's proof" is conveying the wrong impression.
Agreed. "Conspiracy theory", and now "conspiracy" have been corrupted in the popular understanding to mean "not true", "silly", etc.
Conspiracies are everywhere. Conspiracy theories speculate about that fact. A conspiracy theory with sufficient evidence to put it beyond reasonable doubt, is simply a theory evidencing a conspiracy.
People roll their eyes but it's the exact same thing going on when being white becomes white identarianism, becomes white nationalism, becomes white supremacism becomes white extremism.
The people saying "Muh pedantry" should shut the fuck up and pay attention, this is how and why you ended up being called domestic white terrorists, funnily enough even if you're not white via "whiteness". We think fundamentally with our language, let them define words under you at your grave peril.
Military Intel, retired or active, set up puzzles for us to decode. Goal being so that we awake from centuries of slumber to boatloads of corruption thereby eliminating the chains that bound us from Truth. I’d say we’re innocent of any “conspiracies”. The threat to the illuminati is loss of mental control...which like a virus will spread. Tossing about labels like conspiracy theorists or domestic terrorists is their attempt to put us back into chains. We’ve been freed and there’s no turning back. The Truth WILL set men free.
I proudly call myself a conspiracy theorist. In my experience, people who have a vested interest and/or benefit from the outcome routinely conspire to further their own interests. This is human nature. It is also human nature to survive so it is in my own best interests to make sure these conspiracies do not negatively affect my own survival (or the survival of others).
It is idiocy that the negative label is applied to the person trying to protect themselves instead of the persons/group possibly trying to take advantage.
Look at the food industry where farmers are giving grain that does not reproduce because it's genetically modified. So farmers will be dependent on the government to do as they say the heavenly father the Creator gave in Genesis the seed to perpetuate itself when mankind starts manipulating that, what other kind of evil is he capable of.
The first two are bad, but that third one is what will be the clincher here. That... Yeah still struggling to stay peaceful when i see it. This gif is the closest to my expectation of what i want to be able to see...
Just point out the Gulf of Tonkin, JFK, MLK, RFK, Reagan being shot by the Bush associate; Hinckley, Saddam throwing babies out of incubators, 9/11, weapons of mass destruction, Epstein didn’t kill himself . . . Usually you can get a feel for where to start pulling the thread with someone. When I talk to Black people, often they will bring up Tuskegee and I agree and amplify. Sometimes I will bring up syphilis experiments in Guatemala and ask if they think things have really changed.
You left out a word there, Skipper. Your topic should read "It's not a conspiracy THEORY when there's proof." The conspiracy still exists, but with hard evidence, it becomes ACTUAL conspiracy. But yeah, I get what you mean :)
Man, on an intellectual level I understand there's a strong case for cannibalism with some of these wealthy people but.... I have this little hope in me that maybe it isn't as bad as it looks. Armie Hammer freaked me out a lot more than I expected. I was somehow caught off guard.
If you hang on to such ideas, you still have no clue what a conspiracy actually is, and you show how brainwashed you still are.
Conspiracy is a legal term to denote premeditation = mens rea = intention.
Any agreement to hatch a plan IS by definition premeditation and therefor conspiracy.
If people say Q is a conspiracy, that is correct. IF less than 10 are in on the Plan, it is by definition a conspiracy.
Whether it is criminal or not depends on the actions following......
If people say: the WHO conspired with the governments to hoax us into this covid scare, it is correct.
The actions determine criminality: e.g. deprivation of rights under color of law.
Well, someone's feeling particularly pedantic today.
Bro, pull that wedgie from your asscrack....it's making you irritable.
He has a point though. The word “conspiracy” was hijacked and “conspiracy theorist” was twisted into a slur. An attack on mental competency.
When in reality, I’d wager that most consp theorists are smarter than the average bear.
If the word has been muddied lets fight the muddied word instead of trying to wipe it off with our shirt-sleeves
Never said or implied he didnt have a point. Look up the word "Pedantic".
I’ve known the word ever since my mom used it on me in eighth grade. I just misunderstood your criticism.
Roger that. Good to know others have a decent range of vocabulary.
All good?
How to irritate people.
These comments are getting too edgie for me, I'm out.
???
Cuz we’re not faggot Brits...American’s do things our own way.
Throw it in the boot. Use a torch.
HUGE LOL!!!
It’s just a debate, bro, relax.
Btw he’s right.
Conspiracy to awaken the children of God.
I did not say Q was. I said: it depends on the actions later on as the determinant for lawfulness or unlawfulness. Hence the term: unlawful conspiracy.
https://thelawdictionary.org/unlawful-conspiracy/
Conspire is an act in and of itself has neutral meaning, like in hatching a plan between two or more people.
Consider the word plot. It may refer to planning on a course (by one person or more), the general direction of the story, an actual plan.
Let's look at it backwards. The impeachment is now ongoing. Let's suppose the Senate votes turn out to be in favor of guilty. Of course, it is a political determination. However, a legal determination would then follow.
The question of law then is: are all those following Trump and Q, and not pro dems, by definition part of an unlawful conspiracy, or are the dems and rinos, perpetrating this plit themselves part of an unlawful conspiracy, as it is geared towards the plan to destroy the US and the Constitution.
So, not the conspiracy factor in and of itself is the determinant, but the acts following it.
A prima facie reading of the insurrection act suffices to recognize the gravity of it
Hence, the title: "It's not a conspiracy when there's proof" is conveying the wrong impression.
Agreed. "Conspiracy theory", and now "conspiracy" have been corrupted in the popular understanding to mean "not true", "silly", etc.
Conspiracies are everywhere. Conspiracy theories speculate about that fact. A conspiracy theory with sufficient evidence to put it beyond reasonable doubt, is simply a theory evidencing a conspiracy.
People roll their eyes but it's the exact same thing going on when being white becomes white identarianism, becomes white nationalism, becomes white supremacism becomes white extremism.
The people saying "Muh pedantry" should shut the fuck up and pay attention, this is how and why you ended up being called domestic white terrorists, funnily enough even if you're not white via "whiteness". We think fundamentally with our language, let them define words under you at your grave peril.
Reading comprehension on here is truly awful at times, my sympathies mate.
You mean it’s not a THEORY when there’s proof.
Don’t conflate conspiracies with conspiracy theories.
I consider myself a conspiracy factist.
Not to quibble, but I would say it's not a conspiracyTHEORY when there's proof. It's a proven conspiracy.
Cqnt wqit for thqt time to hqppen
Military Intel, retired or active, set up puzzles for us to decode. Goal being so that we awake from centuries of slumber to boatloads of corruption thereby eliminating the chains that bound us from Truth. I’d say we’re innocent of any “conspiracies”. The threat to the illuminati is loss of mental control...which like a virus will spread. Tossing about labels like conspiracy theorists or domestic terrorists is their attempt to put us back into chains. We’ve been freed and there’s no turning back. The Truth WILL set men free.
Adding this to the list of quality meme collection I have, ready to break out when the hammer drops. I hope it happens this year.
I proudly call myself a conspiracy theorist. In my experience, people who have a vested interest and/or benefit from the outcome routinely conspire to further their own interests. This is human nature. It is also human nature to survive so it is in my own best interests to make sure these conspiracies do not negatively affect my own survival (or the survival of others).
It is idiocy that the negative label is applied to the person trying to protect themselves instead of the persons/group possibly trying to take advantage.
Maybe you mean it's not a theory if there is proof?
It’s a conspiracy because people conspired. It’s not a theory, because it’s true.
Any sauce for the food poisoning? I j Der stand Monsanto and crop poisoning, but what else? Thank you.
Look at the food industry where farmers are giving grain that does not reproduce because it's genetically modified. So farmers will be dependent on the government to do as they say the heavenly father the Creator gave in Genesis the seed to perpetuate itself when mankind starts manipulating that, what other kind of evil is he capable of.
u/#Trumpbeatdown
The first two are bad, but that third one is what will be the clincher here. That... Yeah still struggling to stay peaceful when i see it. This gif is the closest to my expectation of what i want to be able to see...
If there's proof then it is a conspiracy and no longer a conspiracy theory.
Just point out the Gulf of Tonkin, JFK, MLK, RFK, Reagan being shot by the Bush associate; Hinckley, Saddam throwing babies out of incubators, 9/11, weapons of mass destruction, Epstein didn’t kill himself . . . Usually you can get a feel for where to start pulling the thread with someone. When I talk to Black people, often they will bring up Tuskegee and I agree and amplify. Sometimes I will bring up syphilis experiments in Guatemala and ask if they think things have really changed.
And I use mainstream sources.
You left out a word there, Skipper. Your topic should read "It's not a conspiracy THEORY when there's proof." The conspiracy still exists, but with hard evidence, it becomes ACTUAL conspiracy. But yeah, I get what you mean :)
Man, on an intellectual level I understand there's a strong case for cannibalism with some of these wealthy people but.... I have this little hope in me that maybe it isn't as bad as it looks. Armie Hammer freaked me out a lot more than I expected. I was somehow caught off guard.