5
PopTartGun 5 points ago +5 / -0

Liberals advocate gun control to prevent gun violence. They scapegoat firearms—inanimate objects—for the violence of criminals. The action of the newspaper proves the failure of gun control. The newspaper protects the suspect committing gun violence under the false pretense of "perpetuating stereotypes." The liberal newspaper commits tacit admission of the failure of the social sciences, social justice, et cetera to solve criminality in society.

1
PopTartGun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tenth Amendment of The United States Constitution:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The States of the southern border have the lawful power and right to construct the wall with or without support of the federal government.

1
PopTartGun 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I don't accept the 'this is a war' disclaimer. You can't intentionally target non-combatants in war" (AFChiefRet).

  • The history of war refutes such a statement. The phrase "collateral damage" serves as the pretense and euphemism for targeting non-combatants intentionally and inexorably. Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Dresden manifest three examples only.

"You expect me to believe that anyone who wore a mask or took the jab isn't a Patriot?" (AFChiefRet).

  • The rhetorical question reveals the unstated assumption that patriots can compromise their conviction. The mask can serve as a subterfuge or a means to an end expediently. In contrast, patriots target themselves as non-combatants by taking the vaccine intentionally. The actions political of Donald Trump bears no fault or responsibility for the choice of patriots to become casualties of the vaccine.
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
view more: ‹ Prev