-12
Qatriot -12 points ago +2 / -14

Ok, I cannot answer all this shill posts of people who are afraid digging into the real rabbit hole. So I summarize my points about this topic here once and for all:

  1. Saving the children from sex trafficking, exploitation, torture etc. etc. -> ALL the truth must be exposed, ignoring person, rank, and party.

  2. I think many here are not really aware how deep the rabbit hole is. When the day of the great awakening is coming, and people are prosecuted by military tribunals, many will be surprised by finding names on the list they didn't expect. Truth can be hard.

  3. I believe in doing my own research and looking in the raw evidence. In this case listening to his own words. And if something is fishy, I don't close my eyes. I look at the evidence and accept the truth. See my more detailed explanations about this Gaetz situations in other posts.

  4. If some shills here or some halfhearted Q-some-but-not-all followers are afraid of the truth and are attacking me here, attacking people who are fighting the Iran regime etc etc that's fine. That's not my problem, but there's.

  5. If the majority on this site is really looking only selectively on evidence regarding child sex trafficking and close their eyes selectively, that would it be for me. But I don't think that's the case. I have seen far too many great people here. I still believe that this is a great place to be and discuss!

  6. I understand why many people like Gaetz and don't want to hear anything possible bad about him. I really understand that. In the past I also had a quite good feeling about him. Because he really said a lot of very true and good things over time. I don't hold any grudge against you. I disagree with you and think you are wrong in this specific point (and maybe you convince me that I am wrong), but I think your heart is at the right place.

  7. Q research is hard. I definitely don't claim to know and understand everything. Yes, I may be even wrong on this one (I don't think so, but who knows). I don't mind disagreeing over some specifics. (At the end, Gaetz is not so important to divided a community because of him.) As long as we are on the same road overall.

  8. At the end we don't have to make the final decision about who is a white hat and who are the bad guys. Because we don't have to do the hard work. Trump, Q and the military is doing this. (As we also don't have to judge people, only Jesus is doing that.) Let's watch and enjoy the show! Together as friends.

This is my last comment on this post/topic.

WWG1WGA

-13
Qatriot -13 points ago +1 / -14

Tucker was never "friend" with Hunter. Tucker is not perfect, and he is on Fox. But I think his heart is in the right place. He says many things which are right. Including election fraud and yes, including sex trafficking

-21
Qatriot -21 points ago +1 / -22

Read my other posts.

Look at the raw evidence! Look at his own words!

I really don't understand why people here are claiming of trusting in the plan, and then jump the fence when they don't like what the evidence is showing up.

Q is not for lighthearted people who only want to see what the like seeing. It's about the truth!

-13
Qatriot -13 points ago +3 / -16

First, David McGee is not an accuser/blackmailer. In contrary, Gaetz is trying to blame McGee. And McGee is defending himself and calling for the tapes being released.

David McGee represented the family of Douglas Levinson, who was aducted and killed by Iranians.

Do you seriously want to claim that Gaetz and the Iranians are the good guys, and McGee and Levinson are bad???

-11
Qatriot -11 points ago +2 / -13

It's not about Tucker Carlson, but about what Gaetz said himself.

Don't get confused by Tucker, the MSM or whatever people are saying or believing about other people.

Look at the raw evidence and draw your own conclusion!

-13
Qatriot -13 points ago +3 / -16

I didn't look up what the MSM and DEMS are saying about Gaetz.

But do you want to suggest that Epstein is innocent because the MSM and DEMS reported negatively about him?

It doesn't matter what the MSM and DEMS say. The raw evidence matters.

-7
Qatriot -7 points ago +1 / -8

No, but I consider lying by omission and evading a valid question as proof that clear sign that he is not the good person he claims to be.

And I consider contradictions about the timeline another bad sign.

-14
Qatriot -14 points ago +2 / -16

If you are "no lookie" that's your problem.

I simply say: ALL child sex trafficking must be exposed. Regardless rank and name.

And it will be exposed with the great awakening.

I think many here are halfhearted Q followers, but not really aware of how deep the jungle is, and will be surprised at the day of the great awakening what names are on the list.

Read original(!) Q messages: It's not about democrats against republicans. It's about the cabal and deep state against the white hats.

-15
Qatriot -15 points ago +2 / -17

He didn't answer Tuckers question about when he knew about it.

Obviously because the investigation (already under Trump) predated that extorsion "defense".

I don't believe anything in the media.

I prefer looking at the original information. In this case Gaetz own words.

-22
Qatriot -22 points ago +2 / -24

Ok, so child sex trafficking by Hunter Biden is bad, by Gaetz is good???

I don't trust ANYTHING by the MSM.

But I watched what Gaetz said himself on Tucker Carlson!

What the interview yourself and tell me again that you think he is completely innocent.

-23
Qatriot -23 points ago +2 / -25

First, as written in another comment: In the Tucker interview he obviously lies by omission and evading a valid queston.

Second, the investigation started UNDER TRUMP!

Some have problems that "the truth is so horrific and outlandish" that it may even involve Gaetz.

-25
Qatriot -25 points ago +2 / -27

I don't care about any (corrupt) investigation! A care about the Q goal of exposing the deep state, the cabal and sex crimes on children. And Q NEVER protected famous persons only because of their names.

-10
Qatriot -10 points ago +2 / -12

McGee also says he wants the tapes to be released.

Watch the Tucker interview! And tell me that his story makes sense! Especially when he evades the question about when he know about it.

If he would be innocent, he would have no reason to evade that question. See my other comment.

And btw, did you see how skeptical Tucker was looking all the time? Yes, he does it often. But not always. He reserves it for special situations like this one. He didn't drop the spell over him yet, but he is prepared doing so at any moment.

view more: Next ›