Gaetz child sex trafficking: YES, I am FOR investigating and exposing. Because I'm AGAINST the cabal, AGAINST child sex trafficking, and IN FAVOR OF PROTECTING CHILDREN! I don't give "famous" people a pass only because they claim to be a conservative, sorry. EXPOSE ALL OF IT! No favors!
(breaking911.com)
?️ DISCUSSION ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (165)
sorted by:
I don't care about any (corrupt) investigation! A care about the Q goal of exposing the deep state, the cabal and sex crimes on children. And Q NEVER protected famous persons only because of their names.
cares about "Q goal of exposing the deepstate"
still believes the MSM, despite ll that Q has said
Again, I don't care about the MSM at all. I look at the raw evidence itself. In this case Gaetz own words.
Hearsay is not evidence
Nice try shill
MSM always uses hearsay as “evidence” where none exists.
No, but I consider lying by omission and evading a valid question as proof that clear sign that he is not the good person he claims to be.
And I consider contradictions about the timeline another bad sign.
dude u contradict yourself. You say RAW facts but bash investigations as corrupt amd claim you dont care what the MSM says but do the opposite. Retard shill
You define that as evidence huh.
How about when MSM smeared Trump for sex scandals?
HTF can you be a Q follower and trust claims about Gaetz? He's been one of the most loyal supporters of Trump and never pushed against him. If the guy was a pedo he'd have been taking a stand on the opposing Trump long ago because he KNOWS Trump is moving BIGLY against human traffickers.
You really need to improve your math.
If I were Gaetz lawyers I would not be happy with what he's said so far. Rules 1 and 2 is that you don't add unnecessary detail to the public record because it helps add to the narrative and may make you sound guilty. It's a indirect form of self-incrimination, aka shooting yourself in the foot. As a lawyer he should know better.
That being said I have no clue if he's guilty or not. It could be deep state dezinformatsiya as he claimed. Would not surprise me since Gaetz was so high profile (especially against the intel community). If that is the case we'll see drip..., drip..., drip of fabricated leaks via the FBINYTimes.
On the other hand, it looks like the government has a lot of evidence against his buddy, and it looks like the investigation has been going on for a while (from Aug 2020): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8655859/Married-ex-Florida-county-tax-collector-accused-child-sex-trafficking-11-charges.html
So innocent unless proven guilty. I've seen no proof outside of innuendo coming from Gaetz' own mouth about what we are about to hear (I assume) about some former lady friend of Gaetz (who may or may not have been underage).
If he's actually a pedo then feels bad man.
It's really difficult to know anything these days. I just tend to go with my gut instinct on this stuff and that tells me Gaetz is being smeared.
I also believe this is dangerous for the deep state as they're now directing the spotlights on the subject of human trafficking and politicians... That could spread really fast.
So this as a move is brilliant. Either he is guilty and they get rid of an outspoken conservative which would be a huge blow to us. Or the DOJ or whoever is guilty of slander and the left can claim DOJ corruption when the tables are turned I think we have to wait and see.
sometimes people take a stance against the crime they are committing, in order to throw people off the track.
we shouldn't trust the claims outright, nor should we insist he's innocent without doing any research