I have made this post on Truth Social. I want you opinion if you all agree, or have some suggestions to add to this list:

While praying for the soul and family of @Charliekirk, I have been meditating on what can we do against the evil political forces that aim for our destruction. Let's just say the angry questions of "What can we do?" have spurred me to apply my God-given knowledge and experience.

Let me start things off with one thing:

NO VIOLENCE NOR KILLING. If you need a practical reason why, it is because the evil forces you don't care if you ice a thousand or even ten thousand of their expendable pawns; they can get more of such evil doers easily. Even their politicians are expendable pawns at the end of the day.

Instead, let us attack the one thing they cherish the most: POWER.

Especially political power.

Let us work to make sure that this year's elections on all levels of government is a complete wipeout for the DEMS-13. Let us make 2026's red tsunami be so big that it will crush the heart and soul of the DEMS-13. Let us make 2027 and 2028 be elections that will sound the death knell for DEMS-13 political ambitions for the foreseeable future. Let us make these demons cry and squeal in political feebleness.

I have a small list of things that we can do to get started:

1.) Ensure that no DEMS-13 punk runs unopposed anywhere from now on. Even if it is in the most blue of regions, have a candidate run against them, to offer resistance where none exist before. Be that opponent if you must. Many of these DEMS-13 punks stay in power because no one run against them, making them a winner by default.

2.) Clip and save every disgusting video, post, snippit, etc. of this event (and of the Iryna murder earlier this week) by every DEMS-13 punk right now; 2026 is not too long from now so we need every bit of ammo we can get their hands on to sink the political careers of these fat DEMS-13 demons. Heck, if we can, maybe we can use some of these videos as the October surprise for this upcoming election to ambush the DEMS-13 punks.

3.) Start volunteering for MAGA/GOP efforts and events if you haven't already. Get involved locally for start. There should be a Republican Precinct Committee within your local area that helps organize political efforts to get local politicians elected; go join up if you haven't already, for they can use the extra hands to get GOP/MAGA candidates elected.

The DEMS-13 demons want to use this assassination to kill the MAGA momentum and spirit; let us turn this moment of sadness into iron-clad resolve to see the downfall of the DEMS-13 everywhere. Like the dead albatross cursing the ancient mariner, let this day be a curse on the political futures of all DEMS-13 punks everywhere.

Make them rue the day they perform this evil act!

By now, everyone probably seen the two pieces of evidence, from that Epstein Scrapbook authored by Ghislaine, that the Democrats are parading around to claim Trump is indeed a pedophile: that "birthday card" with a sketch of a naked woman, and a photo of Epstein and others with a large novelty check "signed" by Trump above some handwritten text about Trump buying something from Epstein.

Unfortunately, I confirmed that they are in that Committee released documents, but I still feel in my bones that these pieces of evidence is faked.

Can people provide proof that these pieces of "evidence" is fake, or a comple nothingburger that implies nothing of Trump's wrongdoing?

No silly answers please.

Good evening. It truly has been a while since I have last posted here.

To give context to my question tonight:

We are all well enough aware of the shooting in Minnesota by the tranny. Instead of spouting mindless anger at this atrocity, I was thinking that I can help think of solutions.

Plenty of solutions on the medical and political front has been suggested (from reopening asylums and reclassifying trannies as mentally ill to posting armed guards at these schools), but the culture side of things has been badly neglected, so I am thinking to take care of that part.

From one of my recent truth posts:

4.) Develop and put into action counter-messaging campaigns to combat narratives spun by leftist and RINO officials regarding TG and violence. Truth Social and X are great at this for memes and messages and ideas. And Jesse Watters of Fox News have highlighted this correlation on his Prime Time show, so the message is planted; we need to drive it further.

5.) Develop counter-culture to go against the leftist-endorsed culture surrounding TG. Make TG the butt of jokes and use mockery and ridicule as your weapons. Make pictures, music, film, comedy, literature, you name it, for we need to attack the problem at all angles. And culture is upstream from politics; a change in cultural narratives could open the door for real change in politics.

The question is if mockery and ridicule will be effective weapons against the Transgenders? I was lead to understand that a lot of the reason why the problem festered as much as it has is due to social and cultural forces protecting the trannies, using counter-culture to break down some of the cultural and social power the trannies have might be a possible way to help bring about their end as a significant force.

During this past week, with this craziness with Pam Bondi and the Epstein Files, there has been strong renewed interest in placing Matt Gaetz in the AG seat on MAGA social media.

Problem is that I recall that it is Matt Gaetz who pulled his name from consideration and also resigned from his Congress seat, which pretty much removed him from active politics. And this is amongst the time that ethics report is about to come out. If Gaetz is as innocent as he maintain, he would've fought on to be AG, and Trump can vouch for him and push him through.

Something tells me that, through his actions, Gaetz might have implied that there is more serious skeletons in his closet that he does not want to get out and he is not the innocent golden boy he is.

So, the question is, why is Matt Gaetz considered to be the golden boy within MAGA circles? Even he is criticized less than Donald Trump.

I am having a bit of a thinking moment today, amongst the chaos online regarding the Axios article and what the hell is going on with Epstein.

Going straight to the point: Why do we care so much about the Epstein Files? Are we getting gaslit to think that the files are more important than what they are really worth?

I am genuinely curious and alarmed on the massive amount of zeal and craziness that MAGA/GAW/Q has over Epstein's crimes when there are many crimes done to children everywhere in the world, especially pedophilia in Muslim countries (where the crime is BAKED into their religion), that we never give as much attention as Epstein (who is dead) and Maxwell (who is imprisoned).

And with the recent exposure of many "MAGA" influencers, who expose themselves as dishonest grifters who will do anything for clicks, money, and attention, I have the sinking feeling that these poisonous influencers have pretty much gaslit us all about the supreme upmost importance of Epstein so they can forever milk the issue for clicks, money, and attention from MAGA/GAW/Q, especially the most emotional and gullible amongst our ranks that have filtered in the recent years.

I have arrived at the hypothesis that they do not want the files because they care about justice; they want the files so they all have something to wave around and talk about on their podcasts or video channels. In fact, I have seen one such influencer callously dismissed DOJ's largest fentanyl drug bust in history just because it is not Epstein. How psychotic; there is enough drugs that will kill millions of children, far more harm than Epstein could ever do by sheer number, and you have the gall to say such a thing.

In fact, I have checked Trump's Agenda 47 (his core mission objectives he aim to get done during his second term, see here, not once did it mention about anything about Epstein, so I think that, at the end of the day, Epstein takes a lower priority than combatting the very real crimes and problems we have right now, which is burning down the nation.

I pose all of this information and questions in good faith.

It has been at least 12 hours after the unjust courts struck down Trump's tariffs and jeopardize this nation's economy. Usually when Trump and we the people does not get our way, Trump would be lighting up his Truth Social account by now and yelling how bad this decision is for the nation.

However, he's uncharacteristically silent about this issue, and I am monitoring his social media all day at this point. Not even a word about the issue. And none of his cabinet is sounding the alarm over this, other than a brief quip about Judicial Overreach from Steve Miller.

And I do not think it is because he is shocked or cowed into surrendering. This is Trump 2.0 we are talking about; retribution against the enemies of America is the theme here, and I think Trump has entered stealth bomber mode,

Think of this silence as the deafening calm that signals that something big is coming. Like a lion stalking their pray: silent before the pounce!

Last week, this post was made to the General Chat:

Does anyone else ever find themselves becoming increasingly frustrated that some anons just don't seem to be able to think? We are supposed to be learning to think critically, but there is clearly a subset of people who are just following the herd with no idea of what this movement is really about.

Case in point. Earlier today I found myself in a discussion with a friend. He is a gold absolutist, but he also believes that the deep state has hidden unlimited free energy technologies from us. Neither one of those on its own is an issue for me, but combining them is seriously conflicting, and I tried to explain it to him.

The world's oceans contain 20 million TONS of gold. Not ounces. Tons. The problem is that its so dilute you can't profitably extract it. But, I explained to him, if there really is free energy, then all of that can be extracted. There are processes like this: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/jacs.8b09555 that do a pretty efficient job of it. Only problem is the amount of energy required to pump the water around, because you need to pump several million cubes of water just to get 1 ounce of gold.

But if that energy is actually free, then there is no limit on the extraction of gold from the oceans. And it wouldn't be like mining. You wouldn't have to dig up and restore anything. There would be no environmental degradation to speak of. (Nuclear and desalination plants already solve the problem of water intake, and there's no excessive heat or brine on the outflow) The entire ocean surface of the planet becomes a literal gold mine.

The amount of gold that would flood the economy if free energy is real is staggering. The inflation would be so extreme that trying to use gold as a monetary instrument would become impossible.

So, if you truly believe in free energy, how can you think gold as money is a workable idea? I thought I made a pretty obvious case, but it's like his brain turned off or I suddenly started speaking Swahili. These 2 ideas are absolutely cemented in his consciousness. The cognitive dissonance required to ignore reality and hold them simultaneously is astounding to me.

So I ask you. Has Q actually failed in its mission to get people to wake up and think for themselves? Are we just another group of mindless automatons like the Left?

You can find the post in this thread:

https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0k6RYBw/general-chat--inauguration-meltd/

I was so intrigued about the questions imposed by the post, that I HAD to spin it off to a separate post (with all permissions granted of course), so that the wider GAW community can weigh in.

In this post, two main catagories of questions are imposed:

1.) What is your take on this whole "If we have unlimited free energy by whatever technologies that was concealed from us, then gold (and many forms of cryptocurrencies, per later discussions elsewhere) will become useless as holders of wealth" thought train? Are these concerns valid, or overblown?

2.) (I think this is the main question imposed by this post) Does anyone else notice or believe that there is a growing lack of critical thinking skills amongst the anon population? Has Q actually failed in its mission to get people to wake up and critically think for themselves? Are anons just another group of mindless automatons like the Left, brainlessly regurgitating what we hear without thought?

u/bubble_bursts can comment and explain more; he is the one who suggested that the post be spun off in the first place.

Candace Owens: The Deadly Poison Threatening MAGA and GAW

Okay, so I held my tongue with regards to Candace Owens for a long time (at least ever since last year when I did my essay on Andrew Tate), partially because this essay took a while to write, and partially because many within GreatAwakening.win still holds her with high regard, and will verbally lynch people who speaks ill of her. However, I do feel that she is a poisonous and deadly viper that needs to be expelled from MAGA before she kills the movement (and Great Awakening to a large extent).

Why do I feel that Candace Owens is a deadly poison to the MAGA movement and GreatAwakening.win?

I feel that Candace Owens is poisonous because of her close associations to the human sex trafficker and pedophile Andrew Tate, to the point where she's, hypocritically, defending him and covering for his crimes on her media platforms.

BACKGROUND:

Before she was acquainted with Andrew Tate, Candace Owens met George Farmer on December of 2018. The two of them got married 17 days later. George Farmer is the son of Lord Michael Farmer, who is a former Conservative Party treasurer & member of the House of Lords in the UK.

Early in 2019, Candace Owens was introduced to Andrew Tate through her new husband. In past interviews, George Farmer said Andrew Tate is a good friend of his and that he known him for a long time, long before Andrew Tate gained his current infamy. During that meeting, Candace Owens’s Romanian assistant warned Candace that Andrew Tate might be a pimp in Romania.

(Source: https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1825770708506653092)

Despite this warning, Candace Owens seems to be receptive to Andrew Tate. How receptive/ Receptive enough to have a framed picture of him and her husband on her home office’s wall, and in a very visible location that could be seen during at least one of her recent videos.

(Source: https://images2.imgbox.com/e4/44/KwlMvdhg_o.png )

A few years later, on December of 2022, Tate and his immediate associates are arrested by Romanian authorities on charges of rape, human sex trafficking, and other organized crime activities. Some time later, Andrew Tate was charged with pedophilia. And unlike the kangaroo court cases against Trump and his allies, the cases and evidence against Tate is far more rock-solid and damning, to the point where it is clear to me that Andrew Tate and his brother are toast.

Soon after the first arrests, Andrew Tate sat down with an interview with Tucker Carlson in 2023. Tucker Carlson was freshly-fired from Fox News, and was riding a high wave of popularity. In that interview, Andrew Tate told so many lies, and the lies were not even that well-concealed. What is worse is that Tucker Carlson did not push back on any of these lies, making this interview a huge black mark on his journalistic career in that it shows him either unacceptably-unprepared for the interview or a shill for Andrew Tate.

Very quickly after the Tucker Carlson interview, independent journalists on Twitter did their research and made viral videos tearing apart the lies uttered on that interview, damaging Tate and Carlson’s reputation in the process.

(Source: https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1825770725372027054)

Soon afterward, Candace Owens was flown into Romania (along with her husband, George Farmer) to conduct an interview to help repair the massive amounts of PR damage. Many months later in 2024, afterward, Candace Owens, who was fired from the Daily Wire and on an Anti-Israel streak by now, did another interview with the Tates, probably as another attempt to repair the PR damage and provide cover for Andrew Tate and his criminal activities.

Unfortunately for her, by that point, people already have been researching into her and her relations with Andrew Tate deeply. And what they discover is damning to Candace Owens.

I will be summarizing the most damning of the findings, the ones that convinced me that Candace Owens is deadly poison to the MAGA movement.

CANDACE OWENS CONSISTENTLY LIED, AND DID NOT FACT-CHECK LIES, ABOUT ANDREW TATE’S CRIMES

Just from the 2023 interview between her and Andrew Tate alone, there no less than three separate lies that were either propagated by Candace Owens herself, or propagated by Andrew Tate and Candace Owens never pushed back of fact checked. Three of such lies are:

1.)“Andrew Tate and his company stopped doing anything with pornography ten years ago (which would be in 2013)”: Financial records obtained by authorities show that Andrew Tate is still generating an income from webcamming as late as summer of 2022, a few brief months before the authorities arrested him and his company. This is in addition to Candace’s Romanian Assistant’s warning about Andrew Tate’s pimping activities in 2019 as well as Andrew Tate’s infamous “Pimping Hos Degree” Course offered between 2018 to 2022 (the course was shut down probably due to the authorities arresting Andrew Tate and not because he gained a working moral compass).

2.)“The criminal case, brought by the Romanians, charges Andrew Tate and company with crimes dating back to 2021 at earliest”: The official documentation of the indictment show that they are charging Andrew Tate and company with crimes that happened as early as 2016. Also, this lie actually contradicts the earlier lie that Tate stopped doing anything with pornography back in 2013.

3.)“None of Tate’s videos that show him confessing to grooming women into pornography, and teaching would-be pimps and criminals to do the same, holds any significance to Tate’s current criminal case”: the official documentation of the indictment points to said videos as evidence of Tate’s crimes, and the directly quotes (or accurately summarized portions of) the videos within its paragraphs. It is certain that the prosecution will be using Andrew Tate’s own videos and words against him during the trial.

Video Sources for the above information are here within the next two Twitter posts:

(https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1825770733748052324)

(https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1825770742438572254)

There are more lies within the 2023 interview alone that could be taken apart, more than I have time within this essay to address. However, if she can lie three times within this interview, why not lie four times, or five times, or more?

We are more than willing to call out other journalists and media networks for lying; why should we spare Candace Owens our analysis and criticism?

CANDACE OWENS ATTEMPTS TO DISCREDIT ONE OF TATE’S UNDER-AGED VICTIMS BY FRAMING HER AS A SEX PEST, WHILE COVERING UP OTHER ACTUAL RAPISTS’ CRIMES.

After her 2023 interview with Andrew Tate received severe backlash from the internet at large and did not fix the PR damage against Andrew Tate, Candace Owens quickly published a video episode where she directly attacked one of Tate’s victims (going to be referred to as “Jane” in this essay) in a shameless and brazen attempt to discredit her testimony. How does she intend to discredit Jane?

By painting Jane as a serial seductress who, even as a minor, preys on unsuspecting men and has already destroyed the good name and freedom of at least seven innocent men. Candace Owens even goes as so far as to speak Jane’s actual name out throughout the video, while censoring all mentions of the names belonging to these supposed seven innocent men.

Candace Owens’s attempted framing of this case is a complete lie.

1.)It is an outrageous tall-tale for a minor (in Jane’s case: 15-17 years old) to be a serial seductress who preys on innocent men, naturally. The far more likely case is that the first pedophile got to Jane first, mentally and physically broke her down with his heinous crimes, and allowed other pedophiles to do their vile deeds on Jane and pass her around like a living sex-doll.

2.)Under Florida law, it is the sole responsibility of the adults of the relationship to verify all ages. Claiming ignorance or claiming that the minor in the relationship lied to them about their age IS NO EXCUSE AND NOT A VALID DEFENSE IN FLORIDA’S COURTS. So, even if Jane lied to the men, it is the legal responsibility of the men to take the incitive and verify the age.

3.)The predators within Jane’s case KNEW, or HAVE STRONG BELIEF THAT, that Jane was underaged, with electronic communications transcripts to prove it.

4.)None of the predators within the past case are under the age of 35 when they did the crimes, putting them well past the point where Romeo and Juliet laws may apply. One of them, Mr. Fox, was 57 years old when he did the crime to the then-15-year-old Jane, and caught a 24-year-prison sentence for that. And there was no doubt that Mr. Fox did the crime, as a private investigator did manage to catch Mr. Fox red-handed, raping Jane, and covertly took pictures as damning evidence.

I could go on, but I recommend anyone, who’s interested in hearing all of the details destroying Candace’s lies, this 20-minute video by Twitter-users and researchers @TheMilkBarTV and @CrayonMurders, both whom I use as sources for this essay.

(https://x.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1825770759308132536)

CANDACE OWENS PROMOTES TATE’S SHADY “HUSTLER UNIVERSITY” SCAM.

Separate from Tate’s sex-trafficking crimes, but still related to Tate and his criminal enterprises, whenever Candace Owens is interviewing the Tates or talking about the Tates, she sometimes goes off on a random tangent on how great Tate’s Hustler University (currently rebranded as “The Real World”, but will be referred to by its old name, “Hustler University”, in this essay) is, how her best employees are graduates of that program, and that she recommends the program as a true way forward rather than an expensive college education (not a very high bar to meet, to be honest, and not exactly the glowing praise she think she is).

Aside from the dubious wisdom of taking advice for money-making from a liar and a very-probable human trafficker who bragged about using pornography to squeeze money from rich suckers, it is awfully strange that Candace Owens would promote this Hustler University without warning and gush about it.

Especially since it is a scam where, for $50 a month, instead of Andrew Tate teaching you directly, in a special website, how to make real money free from “the Matrix” (as he advertised), you get a bunch of soy-boy nobodies lecturing you on Discord how to run an Amazon side-hustle to earn the crumbs that falls off the e-commerce mega-corporation plate. Lessons and lectures that people on Youtube are already offering for free and without the guilt of paying into a scam.

However, the reason why becomes clear when you remember that, one of the methods that Hustler University teaches to its “students” how get rich quick is to sell Hustler University to more people through astroturfing on social media like Twitter and TikTok. Apparently, it seems the reason why Andrew Tate gets a lot of social media attention (especially on TikTok) so frequently in the past is because the numerous suckers into Andrew Tate’s get-rich quick scheme spammed both:

A.Video clips of him promoting the program, and

B.Practically-unverified and biased praises of said program.

And the spamming on all social media services was, at the apex of Andrew Tate’s infamy, virtually non-stop. And all of this is in hopes that ever increasingly more people pay into the pyramid scheme that Andrew Tate have constructed to criminally enrich himself and his accomplices.

Video source for the above information about Andrew Tate’s scams is this video by Coffeezilla.

(https://youtu.be/BijOF8I2t_4?si=zUQG6EMRFJOFZGtV)

It is disgraceful that Candace Owens ever stooped so low as to promote a scam that financial harms her supporters and listeners who placed their trust and faith in her.

ESSAY CONTINUED IN COMMENTS SECTION DUE TO RUNNING COMPLETELY OUT OF SPACE HERE

While GAW is high as a kite over Gaetz's nomination, there is a consideration we need to think about:

While Gaetz is Trump's first pick, he's NOT Trump's final, or real, AG pick.

Gaetz's Trump's first low-ball offer to the seller when negotiating deals, something Trump has plenty of experience with. When making deals, you first throw out an extreme number that is the absolute minimum or maximum end that you are willing to go with, and the opposite side will do the same to you.

Then, the you and the opposite side will negotiate down to a medium that hopefully satisfies you and your main objectives.

Gaetz, while our ideal man for the job, might be considered to be too extreme to do the job effectively (and I don't think GAW nor Truth Social had him in the list of seriously-discussed AG candidates, so it clues us in the fact that his nomination is a complete surprise, and potentially not that serious.) I bet that Gaetz is there to make the final AG choice Trump has seem more tame in comparison.

Of course, Gaetz could be sworn in normally, which is still good for us..

And with regards to the talk about Article II Section 3, my problem with that possibility is that I don't think that route has been tested and proven to actually work without significant and real damage backlash that WILL harm the MAGA movement. Plus, it might give the enemy the green-light to use this tool against us if they succeeded in seizing power from us again. Also, the only source of this notion is "though a writer", which holds as much water as "anonymous sources" or "sources close to the Trump Administration", which is absolutely no water.

Sounds like a rumor to smear Trump again.

People both on Truth Social and on GAW are melting down in hysterics right now over Thune getting the Senate Majority Leader position, just like the leftists melting down over Trump winning 2024 election. If I didn't know any better, I would've thought that Trump and Vance both got assassinated, and the Democrats strangled a puppy in front of us.

But, objectively, how bad is Thune to the MAGA agenda, because I suspect that this is not unexpected and Trump probably has a plan to get through this obstacle. I do not think this is the death of MAGA people are making it out to be. As ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter says:

As long as Thune plays ball with Trump and gets his cabinet filled quickly, he'll still be better than the turtle. If he doesn't help, they remove him.

Who knows, maybe Thune might turn a leaf and start playing ball in Trump's favor. Look at Vance and see proof of transformation from Never-Trumper to MAGA-Man.