I am far from a lawyer, but I would think that this is where mens rea comes in. If that person to publish the EOs did it knowing Biden criminally stole the election, then they should be held liable for aiding an illegitimate/illegal act, otherwise they are just doing their job.

I think you are right, but this sounds like a perfectly reasonable explanation for why they are not there: https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJtD3YKy/x/c/4DvmPwXWK7Z

As much as I want to believe Biden is just “playing” president, I have not seen evidence to buy into this interpretation of the Q drops. To the contrary, the Whitehouse has stated these ARE executive orders: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-revocation-of-certain-executive-orders-concerning-federal-regulation/

God, I hope you are right though.

I think this makes the most sense

?

Great point!

Says the handshake account. I think and make decisions for myself, try it sometime.

I like and agree with the sentiment here. I used to say I follow Q because I would check for new posts routinely, just as I would say I follow @POTUS on Twitter. However saying it that way can give the impression that you would blindly do whatever is commanded, and at least for me, that couldn’t be further from the truth.

One word: discovery.