My God, man.
You want to go read YOUR sentence. I simply switched prove to disprove. In logic it does not matter if you are proving a negative or proving a positive, it's the same. While you're waiting for the "No", I'm telling you a truth in that people lie. Do you want me to disprove that as well?
Here. In my initial supposition, you're saying I would have to sample everyone, and assume their answers are truthful. Ok, then for every person encountered, the question asked and....if true...I'm correct, and you are wrong. But, you say even if one person says no, then it falls apart. Doesn't matter the "methodology", one could conceivably do exactly what I propose, if you have time, resources, and will. Monkeys typing the works of Shakespeare and all.
For you and your statement, you HAVE TO rely on people being truthful, and if you think that everyone is, or would be in every condition, or doesn't want to get over on those they feel are below them...I have a big bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, real cheap. Let's go look at some Twitter posts from these people if you really need proof.
And some how, I "fail" by accurately describing human behavior? What smarmy pontification is this? You're trying to be extreeeeemley intelligent, and I'm just some old country lawyer, I don't know nuthin'.
No, dude. YOU are lacking in basic logic and human understanding. Your supposition fails the sniff test of what people would actually do. The fact you went and flaired "Mod" so quickly tells me where your head is in all of this. Please spend some time in self reflection and pray for God's grace in humility before you decide to rail on about stuff you really, really don't have as good a grasp on as you think you do.
Sincerely, some old dude with a boat load of math, logic, and comprehension skills, with human understanding sprinkled in.
I have no doubt you'll be butt-hurt over the whole thing, and I've never used profanity, insulted you (merely pointing out the obvious is not an insult), and ignored your holier-than-thou attitude rather than attacking you as someone really could.
So, you had to throw on the Mod flair?
My God you know nothing about logic. What you're arguing is common sense, not logic. Common sense would say "not all" when faced with "every single time". I literally used your exact methodology and you're saying it's not valid? Do you want to rethink that?
There is absolutely no way you or anyone can disprove this assertion.
If you find someone who says differently, they could be lying.
Schmuck.
I saw the interview. While he would make these statements, Tucker kept saying, repeatedly, that he wasn't "against the jewish people, his best friends were jewish" and on and on.
The fundamental issue is the understanding that jews and zionism are inexcorably linked. They, to every single one, believe in jewish supremacy and their role in ruling over the earth from the unwashed/unclean/servant goyim. And those standing in their way are those from Europe, especially the German people. I forget the historical name they use, but it's tied to the Germans (well before WW1&2).
You see this in previous posts of jews who will say they're not, but then a review of their public posts tell a different story.
Any Christian who thinks israel and therefore all of jews, is not the terrorist org that it is, is a brainwashed fool.
Let me also say this: Do you know ANYTHING about judaism? Have you read the Talmud? I have. It's ponderous. Horrible. Ridiculously long and contradictory.
The Talmud teaches EXACTLY this, about rape of goyim children being ok, about having the goyim work like cows so we can feed the jews as the masters of the world that they are
--Protip, who rules over the world, who rules over the kingdom of God?
Their religion, if they are jews, IS THAT of supremacy. All of it. Educate yourself on this, there's a buuuunch of help out there to wake you up.