From submission statement at /r/conspiracy
Kirsch does it again, proving the lies of the drug pushers with simple statistics
If you do a simple plot of the absolute number of deaths per day after a vaccine shot is given vs. the number of days that have elapsed since the shot, other than for a brief 21-day period after the shot, the number of deaths per day will always monotonically decline over time in a safe vaccine.
But for the COVID vaccine, it monotonically increases over time for up to 365 days straight.
This happens in every country, after every dose
Embalmers used to find clots in 15% of their cases, and now it’s in over 90% of their cases.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-plausible-connection-between-vaccines-and-sids/
The Plausible Connection between Vaccines and SIDS
Children's Health Defense Team
June 26, 2018
In January 2018, media outlets reported the embarrassing news that children born in the United States are 76% more likely to die before their first birthday than infants born in 19 other wealthy countries. This clear-cut finding emerged from a cross-national study published in Health Affairs by medical researchers at Johns Hopkins and two other leading U.S. teaching hospitals. Even though the U.S. spends more on children’s health care per capita than the other nations, the authors’ unadorned conclusion was that the U.S. is “the most dangerous of wealthy nations for a child to be born into.”
One of the top five causes of infant deaths in the U.S. is sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), which, by definition, is an unexpected and unexplainable death that occurs in a “seemingly normal, healthy infant under one year of age.” The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) views SIDS (along with “accidental suffocation in a sleeping environment” and “other deaths from unknown causes”) as manifestations of the broader phenomenon of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID). CDC attributes three-fourths (75%) of the 3,700 annual SUID deaths (a conservative estimate) to SIDS and “unknown causes.”
Many of those vaccines are administered in bundles at well-baby visits around two and four months—exactly when nine out of ten SIDS deaths occur. The pronounced bifurcation that characterizes infant mortality in the U.S. versus the other 19 countries began in the 1980s. It would make sense to ask whether something happened at that time that could explain why American children began having a tougher time making it past their first birthday than children in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Western Europe, Iceland or Japan, yet the Health Affairs authors propose only that differences in income, education and the social safety net are to blame.
There is no reason to believe that those factors dramatically worsened in the 1980s. However, there is another “elephant in the room” explanation that the Health Affairs authors studiously ignore: in the 1980s, there was a major uptick in vaccination, including a strong push to enact and enforce vaccine mandates in schools and, toward the close of the decade, a significant jump in the total number of vaccines required.
Without even counting the vaccines now routinely administered prenatally, American infants receive more vaccines in their first year than infants anywhere in the world and far more than in the 1980s. Many of those vaccines are administered in bundles at well-baby visits around two and four months—exactly when nine out of ten SIDS deaths occur.
Evidence of a SIDS-vaccine relationship
In 2017, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ruled that there was “preponderant evidence” supporting a claim that vaccines “caused or substantially contributed” to a 2011 SIDS death. The court, which has a notoriously high burden of proof, also ruled that the death could not be attributed to non-vaccine-related factors.
When the same authors also conducted a cross-national study to compare vaccine schedules and infant mortality rates across 34 countries, they reported “a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.”
A variety of epidemiologic and neuropathologic studies provide scientific context for the Court’s landmark SIDS determination. For example, a VAERS study by independent investigators scrutinized 1,881 reported infant deaths following receipt of one to eight vaccines and found that the deaths represented almost 5% of all adverse events reported for infants from 1990 through 2010. The authors then considered the childhood vaccine schedule over the 20-year period and determined that there was “a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of…deaths” as well as hospitalizations. When the same authors also conducted a cross-national study to compare vaccine schedules and infant mortality rates across 34 countries, they reported “a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.”
…12% of the SIDS deaths occurred within one to seven days of the infant receiving a hexavalent vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type B, poliovirus and hepatitis B…
Case reports offer an even more concrete form of evidence linking vaccines to at least some SIDS fatalities. A study in Italy published in 2014 described histological examination of the autonomic nervous system in over 100 SIDS victims for whom detailed clinical and environmental information was available. After finding that 12% of the SIDS deaths occurred within one to seven days of the infant receiving a hexavalent vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type B, poliovirus and hepatitis B, the authors concluded that “vaccine components could have a direct role in sparking off a lethal outcome in vulnerable babies.” A case report from 2008, also by Italian researchers, described a three-month-old infant who died within 24 hours of receiving a hexavalent vaccine. Drawing on clinical data, postmortem findings and immunohistochemical and laboratory analyses, the investigators concluded that “acute respiratory failure likely due to post hexavalent immunization-related shock was the cause of death.”
…researchers found that half (51%) of all the adverse events reported for hepatitis B-containing vaccines were for children under two years of age, and SIDS was the most commonly reported cause of death.
“No concerning patterns”?
Unfortunately, researchers at the CDC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—the two agencies charged with protecting children’s health and conducting vaccine surveillance through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)—seem unconcerned about infant deaths that are temporally associated with vaccination. Three recent examples illustrate the agencies’ relaxed perspective:
In a 2015 publication in Lancet Infectious Diseases, CDC and FDA researchers analyzed 783 deaths reported to VAERS from 2000 through 2012 following receipt of an individual or combination vaccine containing an inactivated poliovirus (IPV) component. The majority of reports involved children under age seven who received multiple simultaneous vaccines, and nearly all of the reported deaths (96%) were in children less than 12 months of age. For most (52%) of the deceased infants, SIDS was the reported cause of death. However, because the post-IPV SIDS reports “were consistent with reporting patterns for other vaccines,” the investigators found no cause for alarm. A CDC analysis in 2017 looked at over 20,000 VAERS reports (2005–2015) pertaining to hepatitis B-containing vaccines—administered to American babies from birth. The researchers found that half (51%) of all the adverse events reported for hepatitis B-containing vaccines were for children under two years of age, and SIDS was the most commonly reported cause of death. Nonetheless, the review “did not reveal new or unexpected safety concerns.” A third study by CDC researchers covering the time period from 1997 through 2013 characterized “main causes of death” among reports submitted to VAERS. Almost seven in ten deaths (68.4%) were in children, 57% of whom were male. Death certificates or autopsy reports, available for about 85% of child deaths, showed that SIDS was the top cause of death (44%), with asphyxia (6%) occupying second place. Although the CDC authors reported (for the child death reports) that “79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day,” they noted “no concerning pattern.” …hours after receiving the vaccine, they began wailing loudly, …had convulsions and serious trouble breathing and died shortly afterwards.
The two U.S. agencies and many of their international counterparts appear to be more interested in promoting across-the-board vaccination than in trying to find the cause of post-vaccination infant deaths. In numerous settings, officials take advantage of classification loopholes to mask the role of vaccines. In India, for example, a national committee charged with investigating 54 infant deaths that occurred following administration of an all-in-one pentavalent vaccine (similar to the hexavalent vaccine but without the polio component) sidestepped the possible role of the vaccine by rating 52 out of the 54 deaths as either coincidental or unclassifiable. In Vietnam, the World Health Organization (WHO) willingly reported a link between the pentavalent vaccine and non-fatal serious adverse events but termed all of the fatal cases in 12 previously healthy babies as not vaccine-related—despite reports that “hours after receiving the vaccine, they began wailing loudly, …had convulsions and serious trouble breathing and died shortly afterwards.”
The absence of a hard-and-fast definition of SIDS also contributes to the denialism about vaccines’ likely role. In the UK, researchers have described a growing reluctance among pathologists and coroners to even use the term SIDS, making assessment of SIDS data “potentially inaccurate and confusing.” In the U.S., non-standardized case definitions mean that “cases once reported as SIDS are now being reported as [accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed] and cause unknown/unspecified.” U.S. researchers also have shown that medical examiners and coroners are inconsistent in the cause of death that they apply to sudden unexpected infant deaths and often classify them as “suffocation/asphyxia.”
…“the increase in inflammatory markers found in SIDS infants indicates that infection and inflammation might contribute to some of these deaths, either as a direct cause or the trigger of a lethal event”…
Inflammation and infection
Whether an infant death following vaccination eventually comes to be categorized as SIDS or something else, a common denominator in postmortem analyses is the ascertainment of “signs of inflammation and responses to infection” that are “out of proportion to preexisting symptoms.” The types of “mild problems” often listed as potential vaccine reactions are frequently observed in SIDS infants prior to death. Researchers have hypothesized that “the increase in inflammatory markers found in SIDS infants indicates that infection and inflammation might contribute to some of these deaths, either as a direct cause or the trigger of a lethal event” and “might also be indicative of vulnerability in the immune response to an infectious trigger in infants.” Vaccines—with their potent adjuvants designed expressly to stimulate an intense immune response—could well represent just such a trigger, with unfortunate consequences.
(2 minute video at bottom of page)
Eyewitness Video: SIDS & Vaccine Injury
in the comments below, please give examples of things you didn't know then. thanks
The WEF's Cyber Attack Simulation: Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETZscebFb58
The WEF's Cyber Attack Simulation: Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQF3Qhz-6fI
youtube search results
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=cyber+polygon
rumble search results are oddly bad...
https://rumble.com/?query=cyber+polygon
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=polygon&community=GreatAwakening
please take a moment to learn the back story on cyber polygon,
and then pass along what you learn, so that others may also learn...
thanks
A few years ago, i read a headline, made by a pro-vaccine person, laughing at how stupid anti-vaxxers were, for believing the story about
"FBI raids the CDC!"
and of course, since I'm immersed in vaccine/anti-vaccine stuff all day long, i found it strange that i had not heard of this story yet.
for a moment, i was happy at the thought of it, but that didn't last long.
when i went looking for more info on this supposed story, all i found was an army of pro-vaccine accounts, tweeting almost the same stuff, but slightly different.
basically, every pro-vaccine blogger in the world covered this story, with the headline of
"Look at what those stupid anti-vaxxers believe...this FALSE story about the FBI raiding the CDC"
except, there were no anti-vaxxers talking about it at all.
so i read several of these blogs, and it quickly became evident that they were all working together in a massive circle jerk, organized from a central point.
Blog A, cited blog B,
Blog B, cited blog C,
Blog C, cited blog D,
Blog D, cited blog E,
....
Blog Z, cited blog A
so where was the actual story about the FBI raiding the CDC?
it was made up by someone named Sorcha Faal, who somehow makes a living publishing endless stream of bullshit on the internet
http://google.com/search?q=Sorcha+Faal+FBI+raids+CDC
another time, right after the Boston Marathon Bombing psyop, the Boston FBI asked for the publics help in finding the suspects, and soon thereafter "reddit" was blamed for surfacing a suspect named Sunil Tripathi.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Sunil_Tripathi
except, "Sunil Tripathi" was probably a made-up character, or crisis actor, who was injected into the story to make it more Hollywood,
but more importantly, they used Sunil Tripathi as an excuse to clamp down on internet sleuthing, and to use as an excuse to dismiss anything any redditor says,
and the reason i say this is the reason, is because they over-played the "OMG YOU AWFUL PEOPLE ONLINE WHO FINGERED THE WRONG GUY IN A HEINOUS CRIME. YOU SHOULD JUST LOG OFF AND GO OUTSIDE AND GET SOME FRESH AIR.
https://www.reddit.com/search?q=Sunil+Tripathi&restrict_sr=&sort=relevance&t=all
Which brings us to Damar Hamlin, the NFL player who faked an injury,
During Monday Night Football, late in the season, when games matter more,
Emotions are high.
Football is a lot of peoples "safe space" where they can just tune out their personal problems for a while, and get away from it all...
Previously, a lot of athletes had collapsed, and the mainstream media had successfully been able to ignore them.
But with Damar Hamlin, everyone on TV had his jersey by the next day?
So, in order to gain control of the "died suddenly, doctors baffled" narrative,
They fake an injury, during a high-profile game, and immediately start giving out conflicting information.
for example,
Damar was laying in the "fencing posture" which is indication of a concussion.
https://i.redd.it/q9fb15dwo4aa1.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fencing_response
Damar didn't get CPR for 9 minutes? that seems suspiciously long to start CPR, and also too long to have a good prognosis for recovery.
Damar's uncle claimed he was resuscitated TWICE,
Later, it was clarified that he was only resuscitated ONCE.
So heres how it all might have gone down...
-
They have Damar fake a collapse on field.
-
They immediately flood the internet with posts, criticizing anti-vaxxers for blaming vaccines, even though at that point, anti-vaxxers were not doing that.
-
Anti-vaxxers eventually see the chatter, take the bait, and start blaming vaccines.
-
Prediction: Damar is later diagnosed with some "rare heart disorder" that is only found is the most oppressed people in the world.
-
They come out, and call anti-vaxxers insensitive, stupid, gullible, mean, for picking on poor little Damar and his rare heart condition.
-
going forward, any on-field collapse, in any sport, will be talked-over with BUT DAMAR DAMAR DAMAR
Their reactions are just crazy! Literally NOBODY on twitter is blaming Damar Hamlin's collapse on a vaccine related blood-clot, BUT there are endless tweets from normies who are spitting mad about anyone who might consider the possibility...
Damar Hamlin’s tragic on-field collapse: To antivaxxers, it’s always the vaccines. Always.
As a physician I believe Damar Hamlin was likely suffering from commotio cordis where a blow to the chest at a precise moment in the electrical cycle stops the heart. Those trying to tie this to vaccine status to project their unscientific beliefs are terrible, horrible people.
https://twitter.com/drdawg1996/status/1610112190555557888
What's going on with Damar Hamlin? ... What's really going on with Damar Hamlin?
HOAX https://twitter.com/search?q=Hamlin%20hoax
FAKE https://twitter.com/search?q=Hamlin%20fake
FENCING https://twitter.com/search?q=Hamlin%20fencing
"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
~Karl Rove
There seems to be a pattern, where every damn thing a so-called “expert” says, is a damn lie!
“Science” has become a religion, and a very evil religion at that.
In the comments below, please list some more of these damn lies these science cult leaders tell us
YouTube Strengthens Medical Misinformation Policies to Combat False Cancer Treatment Claims and Vaccine Misinformation
YouTube Strengthens Medical Misinformation Policies to Combat False Cancer Treatment Claims and Vaccine Misinformation
Published 09 Dec 2023
YouTube, the popular video streaming platform, has announced significant updates to its medical misinformation policies. The new guidelines aim to curb the spread of misleading health-related content, particularly concerning cancer treatment and vaccine misinformation. This move is part of YouTube’s broader effort to ensure the provision of trustworthy health content to its users.
YouTube’s Ban on Anti-Vaccine Misinformation
As reported by san.com, YouTube has implemented a total ban on anti-vaccine misinformation. The expanded medical misinformation policy targets videos that propagate inaccurate information about vaccines. These include claims that vaccines do not reduce disease transmission or contraction, misinformation about the composition of vaccines, and allegations linking vaccines to chronic health issues such as autism, cancer, or infertility. Misleading statements about vaccines in general, including those against measles or Hepatitis B, are also in the ban’s scope.
The platform has taken decisive action against high-profile anti-vaccine influencers and removed over 130,000 videos for violating its COVID-19 vaccine policies. The announcement has sparked a heated debate on social media, with some supporting the ban as a public health necessity, while others express concerns about potential censorship.
Aligning With World Health Organisation’s Recommendations
According to fee.org, YouTube will also ban content contradicting the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) coronavirus recommendations. Despite WHO’s controversial handling of information during the early stages of the pandemic, YouTube justifies this policy as a protective measure against dangerous misinformation. The platform acknowledges the potential for censorship to bolster the perceived credibility of false information but maintains its policy’s intent is public safety.
Cracking Down on COVID-19 Misinformation
In a direct response to the ongoing pandemic, YouTube has updated its policy to remove videos promoting false or misleading information about COVID-19 vaccines and treatments. As summarized on the Healthcare Triage YouTube page, the policy also prohibits content contradicting local health authorities’ COVID-19 guidance. Channels that repeatedly violate these guidelines risk removal.
Combatting Misleading Content Ahead of India’s 2024 General Elections
As reported by factcheckhub.com, YouTube is taking action to prevent the spread of misleading content ahead of India’s 2024 general elections. The platform plans to collaborate with reputable news publishers and independent journalists to provide high-quality news. YouTube’s global head of responsibility expressed their commitment to serving and supporting the entire news ecosystem and reiterated the platform’s intent to remove videos causing ‘real world harm’.
Additional Policy Updates
According to ABC News, YouTube’s policy updates extend beyond health misinformation. The platform is now allowing health professionals to apply for verified labels and has incorporated fact-checking notices to combat misinformation more effectively. YouTube has also updated its hate speech policy in response to criticism for not doing enough to halt LGBTQ harassment.
YouTube’s recent policy changes signify the platform’s commitment to combating the spread of harmful misinformation. While these measures are not without controversy, they represent a significant step towards a safer, more trustworthy digital environment for all users.
More at:
They should actually purge the voter rolls every year, and make every voter re-register to vote for every election.
This will ensure that all of the various scenarions that occur wont create opportunity for cheating.
For example, if someone lives somewhere, and registers to vote, and then moves somewhere else, and also registers to vote, they are still “registered” to vote in the first place,
and just because they move away, doesnt cancel their voter registration at the first place, so someone could in theory cast a vote using their name, without their knowledge
By purging the entire voter registration roll after every election, you ensure all of these obsolete voter registrations are purged from the rolls in a timely fashion.
https://chathamvoice.com/2023/11/08/vaccine-hesitancy-a-growing-concern/
By Pam Wright
Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
Restoring public confidence in vaccines in a post-pandemic world is a top priority for Chatham-Kent Public Health.
“Vaccines can save lives,” said Dr. Shanker Nesathurai, C-K’s acting medical officer of health
However, the physician explained that good information and dialogue to raise awareness about the benefits of vaccines are as critical as the medicine itself.
“I think moving forward we have to present a balanced message with vaccines,” he said.
Nesathurai’s comments came at a recent board of health meeting following a report by Marnie Van Vlymen, leader of the health unit’s infectious diseases team. Van Vlymen pointed out that vaccine hesitancy is on the rise, noting there’s less uptake in the COVID-19 vaccine today compared to two years ago.
“We’re seeing an increase in the number of (vaccine) exemptions,” Van Vlymen told the board, adding the team is seeing “decreased confidence” in vaccines across the board.
Nesathurai said Ontario is progressive in its vaccine approach, with the first vaccines administered by public health officials at two months of age. Ongoing immunizations prevent a wide range of illnesses, from whooping cough to meningitis, he said.
Using polio as an example, Nesathurai explained the devastating illness affected 9,000 Canadians in 1953, killing 500 people. But thanks to a vaccine developed by Jonas Salk in 1955, the last recorded case of polio in the country was in 1977.
“Despite all these advances, we are facing this challenge called vaccine hesitancy,” the doctor stressed, noting it’s a “complex problem” influenced by complacency, inconvenience and lack of confidence.
Vaccine hesitancy ranges from delaying getting an immunization to outright refusal.
Nesathurai admitted the world has changed and people don’t defer to authority, including public health messaging, as they once did.
The doctor stressed that “rigorously tested” vaccines are safe and benefit society by keeping people from getting sick and preventing the spread of communicable disease, which in turn lessens the burden on hospitals and the health-care system.
Chatham-Kent’s annual influenza and COVID-19 immunization rollout is in full swing. Van Vlymen said public health has been working hard to immunize high-priority populations such as vulnerable citizens housed in long-term care and retirement homes. To promote convenience, clinics are also being held at schools, workplaces and other community spaces.
Did you know… that the diagnoses for “mental retardation” DECREASED at a rate that is inversely proportional to the INCREASE in diagnoses for “autism”?
Thats right!
One of the real reasons the rate of autism is growing exponentially, is because doctors have been getting exponentially better at diagnosing autism, year after year, for the last 50 years…
At least, thats the official story…
So we ask the obvious questions, like, how exactly are doctors being trainer better, year over year?
What exact improvemments did they make to diagnoses, training, education, etc…
And what you will find is, “they” cant really explain how doctors are getting better at diagnosing autism…every year, for 50 years…
But one way doctors are being “trained” better, is to diagnose patients with “autism” instead of “mental retardation”
They want the phrase “mental retardation” striken from the collective memorys of the masses.
But why?
Because the phrase “mental retardation” has meaning. It conveys the true nature of the problem.
“Autism” is a bullshit word that doesnt actually “mean” anything at all.
The word “Autism” comes from “aut” as in “automobile, automatic, etc
So “Aut” means “self”,
Therefore “aut-ism” is “self-ism”
Well what does that even mean?
Supposedly, according to the people who come up with these ideas,
they coined the term autism to describe someone who was basically more into themselves, than they were into the world around them.
So basically autistic people were just extremely “self-centered”
and therefore probably not very nice people…
But the phrase “mental retardation” has the root word “retard” in it, and that is the key,
To retard, is the opposite of advance.
In order to “retard”, there must be “regression” back away from a previously achieved milestone
For example, in many cases of “regressive autism” a child will have been able to feed themselves, have toilet control, walk, talk, etc…
And then “regress” or “retard” away from those milestones.
Thats the very definition of “retard”
And that “regression” away from previously achieved milestones, is very problematic for the “autism is gentic” official narrative
If you were ever told it was “rude” to call your friends retards, because it might hurt a real retards feelings…
you were the victim of another psyop!
Get the phrase “mental retardation” out in the popular lexicon,
Get the experts to explain to us, where all the actual retards went, since they have been decreasing in numbers every year for the last 50 years…
Did the medical establishment find a cure for mental retardation?
You’d think they’d be singing the praises of modern medicine and science,
But they are oddly quiet about mental retardation,
because they want you to be calling it autism instead
So breach the topic,
Make the fact checkers debunk it.
And when they try to “debunk it” they only get the Streisand Effect
1 hour video, can play 2x speed
Oddly enough, the corrupt FBI never thought it was necessary to use FISA to spy on Joe or Hunter Biden
https://news.google.com/search?q=FISA&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
https://public.substack.com/p/why-renee-diresta-leads-the-censorship
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/17zlx0s/the_woman_behind_censorship_renee_diresta/
This is the woman who got up in front of a public meeting and screamed “I VACCINATE MY GOD-DAMNED BABY”
For context, she was upset because other parents were smart enough to get vaccine exemptions, and now their kid was somehow a threat to her vaccinated kid
Don’t you think its strange, how (almost) the entire medical establishment went along with COVID vaccines,
Even after there were unmistakeable safety signals telling them to stop?
How did that even happen?
Why was the Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine pulled for far less?
For the illusion of pharmacovigilance?
It happened because this new COVID vaccine rollout was more-or-less the same playbook they had been using for years and years, with every other vaccine!
Only this time, we had the internets to help everyone connect the dots in real time!
And we also had the entire worlds attention, for once, fixated on a single topic,
for hours, and days, and weeks, and months, and years…
Prior to the internet, the establishment could get away with things like “SIDS” and “SADS” (kek) because most of us simply didnt have the background knowledge necessary to understand what was happening,
And the few people who did understand, were either directly or indirectly involved with it, and exercising their right to remain silent…
or if they were whistleblowers, they were either drowned out by the pro-vaccine noise,
or otherwise silenced thru the various methods at the establishments disposal.
Like having you de-platformed for “spreading dangerous public health misinformation…”
Vaccines have always killed and maimed people.
The anti-vaccine movement was born with the first vaccine injury, which was very soon after the very first vaccine…
and the anti-vaccine movement has only gotten bigger and louder over the years, because more people now have vaccine injuries!
Vaccine scientists have always cooked their books to get the results they want.
They are so utterly sure of their “vaccines are safe and effective” narrative, that they literally look at safety and efficacy studies as a mere formality, to “prove” what is already known to to be true, to the true believers…
The big pharma sponsored big media has always dismissed vaccine criticisms as “misinformation” and “conspiracy theories”
And the medical establishment has always tried to marginalize or expell anyone who goes against the system,
especially when it comes to vaccines, which are the gateway drugs to a lifetime of pills for every vaccine induced problem like autoimmune, diabetes, dementia, ADHD, …
Thats why it was so easy for 90%? of doctors and nurses to go along with the COVID program.
And Remdesiver, Ivermectin, etc
However, i do believe these COVID vaccines were designed specifically to cause death and destruction,
While with other vaccines they may have actually been trying to do the right thing,
even if they were accidentally causing an autism epidemic afflicting 1 in 36 children…
Its like Rev Jim Jones and Jonestown Massacre
(CIA op, btw, watch ‘evidence of revision’)
https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=jonestown%20evidence%20of%20revision&kind=video&sort=new
The Jonestown playbook was to train and condition all of the followers to drink harmless flavorade on command,
and then one day they poisoned the flavorade and everyone died.
That is, if you still believe the official story after watching Evidence of Revision…
And like the Jonestown flavorade, the masses were trained and conditioned to take (less harmful) vaccines on command, in preparation for the day when they would roll out a (more harmful) vaccine.
Even the Disneyland Measles Outbreak was FAKE NEWS,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disneyland_measles_outbreak
Concocted to give pretext to new vaccine laws in California.
We watched that unfold in real time, calling BS the entire time, yet helpless to stop Senator Richard Pan MD from ram-rodding his vaccine bills thru to law.
Taking away religious and personal belief “exemption”,
And also severely limiting the medical exemption, by putting all exemptions in front of a country health board, whose members are 100% pro-vaccine,
And they have a blacklist of all the reasons that are NOT acceptable for an exemption,
And family history or even personal history of adverse reactions was NOT considered a valid reason for medical exemption.
The very idea that anyone even “needs” an exemption from an unecessary medical treatment that they don’t want,
should be a BIG RED FLAG about the kind of totaliatarian, authoritarian regime we are living under.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Pan
And what if the SCOTUS overturner RvW, not because of abortion,
but because anti-vaccine activists had successfully hijacked the “my body, my choice” meme?
Now states are free to say you have no bodily automomy when it comes to vaccine mandates…
Even the mRNA tech that the establishment is now crowing about, was discussed in anti-vaccine circles, long prior to COVID,
And at the time, it seemed like they were trying to get the mRNA tech perfected, but they kept killing all the lab animals.
We assumed this meant their experiements were a failure, and we were laughing about how crazy these people were for persuing a tech that was such a long way away from “safe and effective”…
Little did we know, at the time, that these mRNA experiments were not actually a failure, but a wild success!
We had naively assumed that if a lab animal dies a few weeks or months after a shot, that would be considered a failure,
However, looking back on how this all played out, it seems that the delayed-death was exectly the tech they were persuing!
If they want to kill everyone with a vaccine, they can’t kill everyone on the same day as they are vaccinated, or else they would get caught!
So they tried to develop the tech where they could “vaccinate” 90% of the world population, before the first deaths spooked the rest of the flock out of compliance.
SV-40 gave millions of people cancer.
(Wikipedia lies)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40
When the vaccine scientists (Stanley Plotkin) found out what they had done, they literally laughed and shrugged their shoulders like, oops my bad! haha shit happens oh well…
https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=stanley%20plotkin&kind=video&sort=views
So how did SV-40 wind up in COVID “vaccines”?
Makes me think Stanley Plotkin et al knew good-and-well what they were doing,
and putting SV-40 in COVID shots was the same playbook.
Remember when they demolished the Georgia Guidestones?
Then they memory-holed it?
Did they demolish the GG because they had served their purpose and the job was done?
Did they demolish the GG because too many people were becoming aware, and visiting, and posting on social media etc and exposing their agenda?
Anyway, i want to draw your attention to my username which is u/VaccinesCauseSIDS
The reason i picked this username, was because i wanted to continually broadcast this message, no matter what else i was posting or commenting on.
Why this particular message?
Because the implication is so big, so all encompassing, that it tells the entire vaccine story,
if anyone has an ear to hear it…
The establishment literally INVENTED the entire concept of SIDS, to coverup the fact that vaccines kill infants,
AND also to covertly communicate to other initiates, that a vaccine killed an infant, without actually mentioning the vaccine.
“Died Suddenly, Doctors Baffled”
We couldn’t have been TOLD, the vaccine playbook,
We had to be SHOWN!
And what we have been shown,
took like 4 long years to explain, in little bits, until you see the much bigger picture.
Its like we are watching a movie!
We have more than we know!
What is the definition of ‘anti-christ’?
King James Bible
2 John 1:7
For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist
https://biblehub.com/2_john/1-7.htm
1 John 4:3
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world
https://biblehub.com/1_john/4-3.htm
1 John 2:18
Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.
https://biblehub.com/1_john/2-18.htm
Do you see?
Its not “THE” antichrist, (singular),
But rather “AN” antichrist (plural)
Basically anyone who isn’t a Christian,
is “an” antiChrist
Also, i would like to mention that although i had been a regular on conspiracy type forums for many years, i had never even heard of WEF World Economic Forum,
And before COVID, i dont think too many of you had heard of WEF either.
So the fact that we were able to pluck the WEF out of the noise, and focus on the WEF long enough to expose them to the whole world,
Such that today Klaus Schwab can’t walk down the street without risking inciting a protest.
And Bill Gates has been given the negative publicity he deserves too.
Save these memes!
https://i.redd.it/qdqn1t8t5hx21.jpg
https://www.vox.com/policy/2023/11/17/23964294/covid-19-vaccine-2023-us-vaccination-rates
Poor Dylan Scott, he is just as baffled as those doctors who died suddenly
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/09/230904104633.htm
so apparently its OK to torture this poor chat bot to get the pro-vaccine propaganda you want.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/11/15/paul-pelosi-jan-6-riot-00127267
This dude has to be a crisis actor. Delivering all the scripted lines they need to fabricate a narrative.
This author relies heavily on pro-vaccine sources, and “fact-checkers” who are probably fully vaccinated
https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/nov/07/united-facts-of-america-discusses-the-profit-motiv/
Its amazing to me how clueless these people are.
They come up will all kinds of wild theories about what actually motivates anti-vaccine activism, but then they can never seem to be able to bring themselves to question their own positions.
Example:
maybe anti-vaccine people are misinformed by misinformation!?
What about me? No, It would be impossible for me to be misinformed by misinformation
5m:51s video
top all time posts at r/DebateVaccines