According to The Advocate, local law enforcement agencies are investigating the threats, and an FBI spokesperson said, “We are aware of the recent bomb threats made in cities around the country, and we remain in touch with our law enforcement partners to provide assistance.”
does this make any sense to you? a crime that obviously crosses state lines, being left to local police?
this sounds like maybe they just needed a training drill so they cooked up this fake story about fake bombs.
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=planet+fitness&community=GreatAwakening
———-
So vaccines are creating the conditions where local populations outstrip their natural resources, and so their people are forced to leave
And then they come to Europe and US as immigrants.
https://news.google.com/search?q=planet%20fitness%20bomb%20threats
6 days ago,
WPTZ - Planet Fitness locations across VT and in Northern New York added to string of nationwide HOAX bomb threats.
See how they did that?
They slip the word HOAX into the storyline, to forum slide, or search slide, the fact that these bombs threats were an actual "hoax",
and based on the police-response in local communities, we should be able to determine who ultimately paid for these police responses.
was it done under a "training" budget"?
like so many "active shooter drills"
these threats were obviously fake,
because we all know good and well that if you or i would do something like that, we would be in jail already.
the FBI is frantically scouring their database for MK ultra sleepers
April 22, 2024 7:00am EDT
New Planet Fitness CEO Colleen Keating says DEI should be 'embedded in a company’s culture'
Planet Fitness, which plummeted $400 million in value in March after gym-goers boycotted the franchise over a transgender policy, announced it was hiring a new CEO Tuesday who has a history of pushing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).
Colleen Keating headed FirstKey Homes for the past four years, where she signed onto the "CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge," which promises to "continually strive to diversify our workforce, hiring through a DE&I lens to find talent in multiple locations and backgrounds," according to The New York Post.
In LinkedIn post from two years ago she said she signed the CEO DEI pledge "to crystallize my unwavering commitment to advancing #diversity, #equity and #inclusion in the workplace and the communities we serve."
"I was proud to be a part of this critical conversation with my peers who are equally committed to making our workplaces trusting places to have complex, and sometimes difficult, conversations about diversity and inclusion, implement and expand unconscious bias education, share best practices (and lessons learned!), and create and share strategic inclusion and diversity plans," the post added.
In a 2022 interview with Triple Pundit, Keating said ensuring the corporate DEI push isn't just a flash in the pan but "starts with DEI being embedded in a company’s culture and clearly demonstrated in words and actions across the organization. When we stop thinking about DEI as a ‘program’ and recognize it as an imperative that’s woven into the very fabric of our company then DEI can’t be a half-measure or a failure."
When reached for comment, Planet Fitness pointed to its press release announcing Keating's hiring.
"Colleen's deep operational knowledge, strategic mindset and understanding of large-scale franchise operations and consumer-facing brands made her stand out among the candidates considered," Planet Fitness board chairman Stephen Spinelli Jr. said in the release. "She also has a proven track record of building results-oriented teams and instilling cultures that put a premium on operational excellence and rigor, which we believe will be additive to Planet Fitness. We are confident that Colleen is an exceptional leader with the desired skills, experience and culture-first mindset necessary to accelerate Planet Fitness's next phase of growth."
The Western New England University graduate is set to replace Chris Rondeau as CEO of the "judgment free zone" gym on June 10. The Post reports Planet Fitness shares fell by an additional 1.7% earlier this week.
The decline started with the story of Patricia Silva, a Planet Fitness regular in Fairbanks, Alaska, who sparked outrage on social media by recounting her experience of seeing "a man with a penis" shaving in the women’s locker room in front of what appeared to be a 12-year-old girl.
"Planet Fitness is defending the man in the women’s locker room, the man with a penis, rather than the child sitting in the corner with a towel wrapped around her," the 67-year-old said in a video posted on X.
The gym revoked Silva's membership, saying photographing another gym-goer is against Planet Fitness policy.
However, Silva's experience wasn’t the first encounter of its kind that the international gym franchise has run into.
On April 4, 38-year-old Christopher Miller was arrested and charged by North Carolina police for indecent exposure in the women's locker room at a Planet Fitness for allegedly stripping naked and asking a teen to shower together, all while declaring he identified as a woman.
The Post found that Miller gave no indication that he was transgender prior to barging into the changing room. He was held at Gaston County jail on a$25,000 bond.
In the fall, a 25-year-old man allegedly exposed himself in front of a 15-year-old girl at a Planet Fitness in Georgia, and 45-year-old Layton Kessler of North Dakota was arrested for installing devices to record women at another one of the gym’s locations.
Earlier this winter, Fox 2 reported that in Michigan, local police arrested 30-year-old Jeremiah Wiltfong for masturbating in his vehicle at a Planet Fitness parking lot as he reportedly recorded women walking by.
The health club lets members use the locker room of their "self-reported gender," and says the following on its website: "Planet Fitness locker room facilities and programs based on their self-reported gender identity; these facilities include bathrooms, showers, and all other facilities separated by sex."
Fox News Digital reached out to Keating but did not receive a response in time for publication.
If Hannity would lie about one thing, he would lie abour anything.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Craig
On June 11, 2007, Craig was arrested for indecent behavior in a men's restroom at Minneapolis–St. Paul International Airport; he pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct in August 2007 and paid $575 in court fines and fees. The arrest remained unknown to the public until the Washington, D.C.-based newspaper Roll Call disclosed it in an article, drawing widespread public attention as well as charges of hypocrisy against Craig, as he had been an opponent of LGBT rights in the United States.[2] Despite stating that he was not and never had been homosexual, Craig announced, on September 1, 2007, that he would resign from the Senate, effective September 30, 2007, but later reversed this decision and decided to finish the remainder of his term, although he chose not to run for re-election in 2008.[3]
On June 11, 2007, Craig was arrested at the Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport for lewd conduct in a men's restroom,[48] where he was accused of soliciting a male undercover police officer for sexual activity.[49] During the resulting interview with the arresting officer, Craig insisted upon his innocence, disputing the officer's version of the event by stating that he merely had a "wide stance" and that he had been picking up a piece of paper from the floor.[49]
Craig was charged with interference with privacy, a gross misdemeanor offense, and a disorderly conduct misdemeanor.[50] Despite his statements of innocence during the police interview, Craig pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct by signing and mailing a plea petition, dated August 1, 2007, to the Hennepin County District Court.[50][51][52] Including fines and fees, he paid $575. Craig signed the petition to enter his guilty plea, which contained the provisions, "I understand that the court will not accept a plea of guilty from anyone who claims to be innocent... I now make no claim that I am innocent of the charge to which I am entering a plea of guilty." Craig mailed his signed petition to the court, and his petition to plead guilty to the misdemeanor charge was accepted and filed by the court on August 8, 2007.[50][51] In an August 28, 2007 press conference, Craig regretted filing the guilty plea, stating "In hindsight, I should not have pled guilty. I was trying to handle this matter myself quickly and expeditiously".[53][54]
At a news conference on September 1, 2007, Craig announced his intent to resign, "with sadness and deep regret", effective September 30, 2007. On September 4, 2007, a spokesperson for Craig indicated that he was reconsidering his decision to resign,[55] if his conviction was rapidly overturned and his committee assignments were restored.[56] The following week, Craig's attorneys filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing that it "was not knowing and intelligent and therefore was in violation of his constitutional rights."[57] The motion was ultimately denied, upholding the initial guilty plea.[58] The controversy forced Craig to step down from his position as liaison to the Senate on the Romney campaign.[59] Craig was vehemently adamant that he was not homosexual, stating "I am not gay. I never have been gay."[60]
Following the ruling, Craig announced that despite his previous statements to the contrary, he would serve out his Senate term. He stated that he intended to "continue my effort to clear my name in the Senate Ethics Committee—something that is not possible if I am not serving in the Senate."[61] Craig did not seek reelection in 2008 and left office on January 3, 2009.[62]
Both the 2009 documentary Outrage and the magazine Newsweek (June 7, 2010 issue) listed Craig, among others, as a conservative politician with a record of anti-gay legislation who was caught in a gay sex scandal.[63]
In a lawsuit by the Federal Election Commission, it was determined that he improperly paid his attorneys in this matter from his campaign funds, and Craig was ordered in 2014 to pay the Treasury $242,535.[64] On March 4, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed that judgment.[65][66]
This smells like a set-up, to take him down.
What else was he involved in that would be a good reason to set him up?
what is gender?
what is the difference between gender and sex?
"gender" was once a word that was used to describe certain "gendered" languages, or languages that attach a feminine or masculine connotation to many of their words.
example, LAS Vegas, LOS Angeles.
the word gender was then slowly appropriated by the LGBT community, and its meaning changed, to describe people instead of words,
and they have now successfully "socially constructed" the word "gender" to be,
not only a word that is used to describe PEOPLE, instead of WORDS,
but also as paradoxically as,
BOTH synonymous with "sex",
AND an independent idea that is completely unhinged from "sex".
what happens is, that you are not able to have a serious conversation about "gender" because the definition changes, depending on the context.
so, for example, a pregnant couple might have a "gender reveal party" where they get family and friends together and "reveal" the supposed "gender" of their un-born baby.
the problem is, that this unborn baby doesn't 'have" any "gender" at all,
because the baby has no clothes.
"gender" (by 2024 definitions) is now defined as how you present yourself to the world.
so, once the baby is born, it is "assigned" a "gender" at birth,
typically with no input from the baby,
other than some random 3rd party observation of his/her genitals.
today i argued about "breast augmentations" (boob jobs)
it turns out, that if you are an actual WOMAN, you get a boob job, its probably because you are vapid and vain, and looking to enhance your appearance, and boost your confidence, and its elective, and not medically necessary,...
BUT...
if you are a MAN, and you get a boob job, its because you suffer from debilitating gender dysphoria, and the only cure for this terrible affliction is a nice set of double-D titties with some pink pepperoni nipples...
and this is considered "medically-necessary, life-saving, gender-affirming health care.
isn't that crazy?
if you are a WOMAN, and you get a boob job, that is NOT considered "gender affirming care"
BUT if you are a MAN, and you get a boob job, that IS considered "gender affirming care"
your own personal health insurance policy will probably pay for a boob job if you are a man, but not if you are a woman.
so i have been using ChatGPT3.5 app for several months now, and i have been able to have many "gender ideology debates" with the bot, without getting blocked or banned or otherwise cancelled. this is unusual for me, because i tend to get blocked very quickly, and then reported, and even suspended. its a touchy subject, that you aren't allowed to debate right now...
and after a while, it becomes clear that you have exhausted their supply of talking points, because they just repeat something they already said.
here is a summary of their playbook:
- gender is a social construct.
if we are to use their language, to have these arguments...
trans gender: when a persons SEX observed at birth, doesn't match their GENDER assigned at birth.
cis gender: the antonym of trans gender.
they had to make up a concept of "cis gender" in order for "trans gender" to make sense.
"cis gender" is just plain-old super-straight people whose SEX observed at birth matches their GENDER assigned at birth.
they were BORN a male, and they still FEEL LIKE a male.
they are sexually attracted to cis gender females,
and many cis gender people don't like being called "cis gender", because it basically pathologizes normal people, and normalizes trans gender people.
this is a very important concept to understand, and internalize, and make-sense-of, because it will be the foundation of all other debates.
you can use "gender is a social construct" as part of your argument AGAINST gender ideology.
because these people live in a reality bubble where their woke ideas don't get challenged, and they aren't challenged because they socially isolate themselves into their own little echo chamber, by blocking, banning, censoring, filtering, etc
you can even begin the debate with ChatGPT with the following prompt:
you: "gender is a social construct"
chatGPT will give you 3 paragraphs of praise for how smart you are to understand this concept...
then you say...
"IF cis gender is a social construct,
THEN trans gender is also a social construct"
and the bot sill sometimes glitch.
but if you can get an answer, their argument boils down to two conflicting ideas...
A) you, the plain-jane ordinary person who is "cis gender", your "gender identity" is merely a social construct. you wear those mens or women's clothes, because thats what your parents wore.
B) the "trans gender" person is NOT a "social construct", but a deeply rooted, hardwired phenomenon that is observable and measurable by brain scans, etc.
KEY POINT:
YOUR gender is fleeting, because YOU could choose to wear pants or a dress,
but THIER gender is far beyond their control, and therefore they MUST wear pants or a dress.
This is the part of the argument where you can argue that
"trans women are real women"
and then get into a debate about the semantics of gender and sex and social constructs.
- this word "assigned" is very interesting and important, as it is also a pillar of the gender ideology.
the trans community often refers to their "gender assigned at birth", which is technically true.
they were indeed "assigned" a gender, the moment they covered the baby with a blanket.
if the baby was a girl, they were "assigned" to have a pink blanket.
if the baby was a boy, they were "assigned" to have a blue blanket
now, what was NOT arbitrarily "assigned", but was in-fact officially observed during a medical exam, is the baby's SEX, which is either male or female.
the SEX of the baby is what goes on the birth certificate.
the GENDER of the baby is the color of the blankets and clothes that they are "assigned" by parents or some random hospital staff.
oh, and get this...
they don't even give babies pink or blue blankets anymore.
that creates gender expectations upon young and impressionable minds, instead of just leaving the babies alone, so they can find their own "gender identity"
instead, the blankets in the hospital nurseries are a mostly white field , with stripes of baby blue, and baby pink,
and if you look closely, you will totally "see" that these so-called "blankets" are actually the transgender flag.
think I'm kidding?
lets google image search...
http://google.com/search?q=hospital+nursury+blanket+for+babies
important to note: as i was reading old dictionary and encyclopedia about gender, it was mentioned that "gender" was learned from your parents.
that blew my mind...
because of womens lib, and broken homes, etc, young children don't have good "gender role models" like what the mom does, and what the dad does, as a matter daily habit.
if you are a young boy, and you see your dad dress up in the morning, you'll want to emulate your dad, and wear his clothes, and fill his shoes.
- "gender identity" is another pillar of the gender ideology, so its important to know and understand, so you can refute it, or even use it to your advantage.
the idea of gender identity, is that what you feel like on the inside, might not align with what you look like on the outside,
meaning, that maybe your SEX is male, but your internal sense of GENDER is female.
and for a long time, society has tolerated a great deal of "gender expression" such as allowing men to shave their beards, or grow their hair long.
but what has happened in recent years is that this "gender identity" has become the sole focus of someones life, and they become obsessed with "gender expression"...
EVERYONE HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE "TRANS GENDER" TOMORROW
simply by the way you choose to dress tomorrow.
if you are a man, you might choose to put on pants, or you may choose to put on a dress,
and honestly, nobody gives af about that...
if you are a woman, you might choose to put on pants, or you may choose to put on a dress,
and honestly, nobody gives af about that either...
you do you best.
BUT where this gender identity ideology has gone too far, is when males dress up as females and then go into female spaces,
like... I'm a man... and i have long hair... but i piss in the mens room with all the other dicks.
and i don't think its unreasonable for women to want to "exclude" men from their sex-based safe-spaces.
to summarize, they have hijacked the word "gender", and "socially constructed" this idea that SEX and GENDER are both TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, and also THE EXACT SAME THING.
State lawmakers passed a law, and commented something like, that SEX is biological and immutable, whereas GENDER is fleeting.
They have tried to build this new "social construct" whereby YOUR so-called "cis gender" is merely a superficial, fleeting, whimsical, CHOICE, and thus not necessarily worthy of any special respect or consideration,
but THIER so-called "trans gender" is NOT A CHOICE and therefore so much more valid than your "cis gender", and is NOT a social construct, and is a biological reality, and worthy of special rights, respect, inclusion, etc.
trans "women" have actually argued that they are even more womanly than cis women because trans women have to try so much harder to be women, whereas cis women are just so natural at it...
more later...
OP is in response to this post
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1MiMV6q/who-says-wikipedia-articles-aren/c/
Page 1 of lawsuit against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein that alleges Trump and Epstein raped a virgin, and made her a sex slave. The lawsuit was dropped just before the election, but NPR didn't bother to report that fact until the Friday after the election.
https://i.redd.it/yjt9xyx9nk701.jpg
Page 2 of lawsuit against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that both defendants raped the plaintiff, and argued over which one would take her virginity.
https://i.redd.it/vn4fbijvnk701.jpg
so, during the 2016 election, it was supposed to be Hillary Clinton winning, but of course we elected Donald Trump instead, and upset their plans.
or did we? ...
Hillary Clinton had apparently been convinced that the Presidency was already hers, and that the election was just a mere formality, a technicality,
like, she met with the shadowy men in the smoke-filled back-room, who make these decisions...
later, Hillary would make a comment to the effect of "i knew those jew bastards were never going to let me be president..."
but anyway, Hillary had to go thru the motions of campaigning, and of course, she would have to have a sock-puppet as a Republican opponent.
it was called the "Pied Piper Strategy" and they boasted about it like it was so clever....
http://google.com/search?q=hillary+clinton+pied+piper+strategy
basically, THEY RECRUITED TRUMP, to play the role of the bad guy...
and the media did everything they could, to make him a villain that everyone loved to hate.
Trump was loud, and obnoxious, and rich, and white, and straight,
not to mention transphobic, xenophobic, homophobic, racist, fascist, nazi...
oh, and Trump likes to rape virgins, and is friends with Jeffrey Epstein...
oh, and Trump also likes to rape little old ladies in the department store changing rooms in broad daylight ...
Trump was the walking, talking embodiment and personification of everything that is wrong with America today...
and the media induced TDS Trump Derangement Syndrome on the American people. just look at how they hate Trump now. have you ever seen anyone who is hated as much as Trump?
(well theres Jesus... but i digress...)
And then we had Hillary Clinton... who was supposed to "break the glass ceiling"
Literally, on election night. there was a "glass ceiling" made, that Hillary was going to ride up on this platform and "break thru" this glass ceiling, which would have been a metaphor that was left over from the women's "rights" movement. this gesture would signify that women had finally achieved "equality" with regard to the sex/gender of the person serving as POTUS...
but anyway, the main point is that the 2016 election was a HOAX!
it was completely theatrical.
almost like we are watching a movie...
but another key point here is about the timeline on "pizzagate" and Q ...
That rape lawsuit was the first i had ever heard of JEFFREY EPSTEIN...
and at the time, there was not much news or info on Epstein, although by that point Epstein had already been convicted in Florida on state charges, so there was a bit of place to start...
we were able to read about these charges, and in particular there was an article that talked to the prosecutor, Alexander Acosta, and how Acosta seemed to be very upset at how he had been treated during the Epstein case...
in particular, it seems to be that Acosta received some "credible" threats to him and his family...
which would piss off any man...
and also Acosta was told to back off on Epstein because Epstein "belonged to intelligence" and "above his pay grade"...
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/alexander-acosta-trump-jeffrey-epstein-plea-235096
Billionaire sex offender's 'sweetheart deal' violated our rights, victims tell feds
Jeffrey Epstein may be the red pill we have been waiting for ...
years ago, there was the LIBOR scandal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libor_scandal
basically the bankers were fixing the interest rate, and negatively affecting borrowers around the world.
one banker asserted that the UK government already knew all about it, and was thus complicit too.
so... who went to jail for this?
ahahaha just kidding. we all know that nobody went to jail.
but the guilty parties openly speculated about the future of LIBOR, whether they should scrap it and start something new, or what...
and as I'm watching this scandal unfold, i'm like
why tf are these guys even involved in the conversation about the reforms that need to happen?
why aren't these guys sitting in jail, preparing for their own defense in their upcoming criminal trial?
years later, we had the Boston Marathon Bombing, which went horribly bad for the deep state propaganda teams.
they didn't even have a back-up distraction planned, so the BMB false flag expose dominated social media for far longer than they had anticipated, and it was exposed far more in depth than they had ever expected...
until they used the fake tornado in Moore Oklahoma to "SQUIRREL!!!" the audience.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Moore_tornado
at the time, Glenn Beck had gone to Washington DC, to supposedly meet in secret with a group of "concerned congressmen", one of which had said something to Beck to the effect of, "ya know... maybe we ought to just scrap everything, and return to the US Constitution"
at the time, i took that to mean that they would scrap every law that had ever been written, and start over, with nothing but the constitution.
at the time, the context of this congressman's comment was that their false flag BMB had gone horribly wrong, and had accidentally woke up and red-pilled millions of Americans, and these Americans were taking a closer look at fake Sandy Hook School Shooting too.
so, heres this congressman, basically admitting that they all know that they are all fucked. they all got caught. they all know theres going to be hell to play.
and instead of fleeing the country like any common criminal might do, he's opining on the reforms that might have to be made, as if he is going to be part of that process.
no dude, you are going to jail. prison. thats the only role you will be playing in these reforms. the example!
They take our taxes, and "redistribute" the wealth from the people who actually create wealth, which is the laborers.
Let's be perfectly clear on this one very important concept.
ALL wealth is derived from LABOR.
Most everyone reading this post LABORS for a living, or did LABOR at one time. You are ALL LABORERS. And without your LABOR, there would be NO WEALTH.
The concept of wealth is usually framed in such a way that it appears that wealth is created by wealthy people, and that wealth "trickles down" to everyone else,
They frame "redistribution of wealth" as if wealth starts with the rich, and is unjustly "redistributed" to the poor.
this is the exact opposite of reality.
wealth STARTS with LABOR, and is "redistributed" TO the rich. thats how they got rich. by redistributing the wealth FROM the poor laborers
What good is GOLD, until it is found by the LABOR of LABORERS?
What good is WATER, until it is found and brought to you by the LABOR of LABORERS?
If you haven't read Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, you should asap... He explains all this in very eloquent fashion, and his book is the Father of all economics textbooks, but without all the unnecessary woke-ness
The government has NOTHING, that it didn't TAKE from others.
And then they spend it like a drunken airman ...
When you get your tax return, they get that number calculated down to THE PENNY,
But when they want to SPEND your tax money, for example on Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan, and Pakistan....
The US government asks these countries how many zero's they would like to have on the check.
There's some very sketchy shit going on, and it appears as though this whole Ukraine thing is just a huge money laundering operation.
Why tf would the average American give af if Russia annexed Ukraine? Does the average American even know that Kiev was once the CAPITAL of RUSSIA?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kyiv
Then theres the Israel-Palestine thing.
We all know that October 7th was a false flag, self-inflicted, fake attack, by a israeli proxy hamas.
we all know that the Israelis are currently in the process of "ethnic cleansing" of Palestine. they are destroying everything they can, to make it absolutely uninhabitable for Palestinians.
So the Palestinians have a tough choice to make... they either leave, and become a refugee, or they stay, and probably die soon...
And of course, the American wealth-creating, tax-paying, laborer will be expected to foot the entire bill, and his congressman will be happy to add as many zero's as he feels is appropriate.
Why tf are Americans GIVING money to Israel, instead of LOANING it to israel?
Why are American Christians expected to fund both sides of a religious war in Palestine?
Why are American Aryans supposed to support war against Iranian Aryans?
To truly appreciate whats going on in the middle east, you have to understand it thru the lens of religious history,
and to truly understand the religious context, you have to go looking for what religious people are currently saying about current events, and have a working background knowledge on key characters and concepts.
pray discernment
Then theres the whole US border debacle. like, what tf is actually going on here?
media gaslight: oh yes, America is being flooded by millions of illegal aliens, and heres why thats a good thing!
Mayorkas got impeached by the house, and still he refuses to do his job? what is he actually doing while he is on the job as a public servant?
How are all these aliens supposed to support themselves?
only 2% are "refugees"
the other 98% have some other reason to be here...
and i can tell you that as a tax-paying American laborer, i would expect to find it very difficult to find honest work if i didn't have the proper paperwork... and i was born here...
so how are these people able to find work?
and if they are able to find work, are they takin' ur' jerbs' ? (south park ref)
according to what is being said in the Black communities, it is BLACK LABORERS who get hit first, and get hit worst, by illegal immigration and illegal working.
do you personally know any BLACK LABORERS? of course you do! you probably work next to one!
those are the LABORERS who are hit first, and hit worst, by all this.
and thats just the economic part...
because i don't think these people are here to LABOR in the sense of agricultural or manufacturing...
it just feels like a VERY BIG TROJAN HORSE, and all these young, fighting age males are coming in, and presumably staging themselves until further notice.
The US started out small, and then slowly, over time, it grew to what it is today.
The UN started out small too, and then slowly, over time, it grew into what it is today.
The US is only "legitimate" in the sense that "We The People" give it legitimacy, "by consent of the governed"
Look at the UN today. do they operate under the presumption of the consent of the governed?
Today, we all understand that the UN is just another Rothschild-founded world government, that was created by the bankers, for the bankers.
But in 3 generations time, the UN will have been around so long, that it just assumes authority and assumes control.
Look at the WEF. these psychopaths started something small, and it just grew over time, to have a facade of authority and legitimacy,
and what did they do with this power?
they decided that YOU are TOO FREE.
too free to eat meat.
too free to own a car.
too free to fly on an airplane.
too free to travel across town.
these psychopaths assumed control of the entire world, and decided that you were going to eat z bugz
who are these psychopaths ?
they are jewish supremacists!
and if you recall the Bolshevik revolution, Russia was taken over by JEWS who happened to be experimenting with COMMUNISM on White Christian people.
and then we had Senator McCarthy, who tried to warn us all, that COMMUNISTS had taken over America and the US government,
and today we can see that McCarthy was absolutely correct.
The Bolsheviks murdered all of the Czars family and next of kin,
and now the Bolsheviks are going after Trump.
isn't it interesting how they put a Black face on a Jewish operation?
but thats blowing up in their faces too, as the prosecutors have their own dirty laundry hung out to dry, while also shining more light on how prosecutors are elected, funded, backed, etc.
And now Trump goes on trial, instead of Cohen and Daniels?
Background:
A few weeks ago, an actual woman had her gym membership terminated because she took a picture of a mentally ill man invading the womens locker room so he could shave the stubble off of his face.
At the time, Planet Fitness went along with the wild assumption that this man was in fact somehow actually a woman, based on nothing more than the words coming out of his mouth.
More recently, a different man (who also claims to be a woman) was minding his own business by invading the womens locker room at Planet Fitness, but instead of appeasing the mans delusions and expecting all the actual woman just deal with it, Planet Fitness unilaterally and arbitrarily decided that this man wasn’t actually a woman, and had him arrested on felony charges!
We need to pressure Planet Fitness to clarify their policy. Either they allow users to use the locker room that corresponds to their self-diagnosed gender, or they don’t.
How can trans people have any confidence they wont be arrested if they are simply using the locker room of their choice?
http://news.google.com/search?q=planet+fitness+trans+arrested
You: Please give me the name of a good documentary style video that explains the history of immigration law in usa
ChatGPT3.5: One documentary that covers the history of immigration law in the USA is "Immigration Battle" produced by PBS. It provides an in-depth look at the historical context and evolution of immigration laws in the United States.
You: Ok give me a video with a so-called “alternative” perspective
ChatGPT3.5: For an alternative perspective on immigration law in the USA, you might want to check out "Immigration Nation" on Netflix. While not a traditional documentary, it offers a nuanced exploration of various viewpoints surrounding immigration policies and their impact on individuals and communities.
You: ok give me a video with a right-wing slant
ChatGPT3.5: A video with a right-wing perspective on immigration law in the USA could be "The Border States of America" produced by conservative filmmaker Nick Searcy. It provides a viewpoint that emphasizes border security and stricter immigration enforcement.
You: What are criticisms of this video
ChatGPT3.5: Critics of "The Border States of America" might argue that it presents a one-sided view of immigration that lacks nuance and ignores the complexities of the issue. They may also point out that it may rely on fear-mongering tactics or stereotypes to push a particular agenda. Additionally, critics might argue that it overlooks the humanitarian aspect of immigration and fails to address the root causes driving migration.
1 hour video about the US-Mexico border, immigration, drugs, sex slavery, other slavery, crimes, labor issues, policy,
Can do playback speed 1.5X
https://www.them.us/story/planet-fitness-trans-customer-libs-of-tiktok-bomb-threats
Media Matters maintains an ongoing list of instances in which Libs of TikTok’s social media posts are followed by real-world consequences, including bomb threats, harassment at medical clinics, threats of violence, and threats against public drag events. The list currently includes at least 42 instances of threats or harassment at 33 institutions as of March 27.
Just to be clear, every one of these supposed incidents was carried out by the loony left or their enablers, in order to change the subject away from what they are actually doing, and toward what you are allegedly doing.
This is similar to saying “Squirrel!”
They can’t defend their actions with a logical argument, so instead they turn it around and pretend they are the victims, and you are the oppressor.
We shall see who gets arrested for these crimes.
You know good and well if YOU did anything like this, youd be arrested within hours… but when THEY do it to themselves… FBI is baffled.
https://news.google.com/search?q=Planet%20Fitness+bomb
This reminds me of the fake shooter at Comet Pizza after James Alefantis was outed as a pedo-sadist
They need a pretext to crack down on the people exposing them
Ask yourself why some people will instinctively run interference to protect pedos and other weirdos, instead of instinctively exposing them
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudine_Gay
We all remember how the President of Harvard University got busted for plagiarizing her work. She still rakes in big money from Harvard, even though any Harvard student caught plagiarizing would presumably be expelled.
But the President was a DEI token. she "Didn't Earn It".
Its a safe bet to say that most DEI tokens "didn't earn it", and in fact plagiarized their work.
So lets do this...
Lets use Harvard, to make an example for everyone to see.
Harvard has already been busted, and Harvard has has plenty of time to do whatever it is they are going to do.
TERF - Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist (ordinary lesbian who won't suck girl dick)
TIM - Trans-Identifying Male
Super-Straight - a straight person who refuses to date trans people.
everyone needs to pay closer attention to this issue, which is basically that TIMs are normalizing hateful and violent rhetoric against any woman who would dare to socially reject them, for any reason.
for example, Riley Gaines has become the target of TIMs because she thinks MEN ought not to compete in WOMENS sports.
does that make Riley Gaines a "radical feminist"?
by the ever-changing definitions of the LGBT clown culture, YES!
Riley Gaines was already the victim of TIM violence, when she went to speak, and was met by a mob of leftist wackos who tell themselves they are fighting nazis.
and because these TIMs are actually (sorry excuses for) MEN, they have the potential to do a lot of physical harm to a woman.
for example, theres a TIM fighting in MMA, and he gets off on hurting women in these fights.
the women who are labeled as "TERFs" by these deranged men, are then socially ostracized, or even worse
(personally i think getting kicked out of the LGBT club might be a good thing)
its kinda like the guy who coined the term SUPER-STRAIGHT.
he was just minding his own business, and someone asked him if he would date a TIM,
and he wasn't disrespectful when he said, "NO... because he is straight, and only dates women" ...
and then there was an argument about whether trans "women" are actually women,
and this everyday, ordinary plain-old straight guy was not having it, so in a moment of Devine inspiration, he asserted that he was "super-straight" (meaning, an ordinary everyday straight guy who won't date trans "women")
and this concept of "super straight" instantly went viral,
and of course, it was instantly condemned as HATE SPEECH
because HOW DARE HE refuse to date a TIM!
and this phrase was actually censored on social media, because its "hate speech"
you got that? annunciating your sexual orientation is "hate speech"
These trans weirdos are attacking everyone... gays, lesbians, straights...