https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/13/michigan-rep-schriver-conspiracy-theory/
State Rep. Josh Schriver says he won’t offer ‘a fake political apology for views I don’t hold’ after leaders accused of him sharing ‘hate speech’
So apparently its considered “hate speech” to talk about replacement migration.
Read the comments from these redditors who desperately want racism to explain why they suck at life.
https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1blm2e6/this_dude_is_still_getting_worshipped/
-
reduce the birth rate in Western countries.
-
“replace” the population with migrants
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replacement_migration
https://press.un.org/en/2000/20000317.dev2234.doc.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_birth_control
Birth control pills became publicly available in the 1960s
They concocted the Roe V Wade case, as a way to “legalize” abortion without any input from the legislative or executive branches, resulting in 63,000,000 “safe and effective” abortions…
They launch a bioweapon called COVID,
And then they launch another bioweapon called COVID vaccine.
And they target pregnant women, by encouraging them to take these so-called vaccines, resulting in there being a steep increase in misscarriages, and a steep decline in the birthrate.
You can tell that this is a planned culling, because the data are available to anyone, the safety signals are all alarming, and yet the so-called public health authorities remain silent about these issues.
The Surgeon General of Florida is just one of a handful of authority figures who is sounding the alarm,
And what does the rest of the establishment do?
They try to ridicule, dismiss, marginalize, etc.
Is this the behavior of innocent people?
Or is this the behavior of guilty people, who know what they are doing?
https://news.google.com/search?q=Florida%20Surgeon%20General&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
Great White Replacement “Conspiracy Theory”
https://news.google.com/search?q=great%20white%20replacement&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
Republicans are using Tyson’s decision to hire migrants to push their “Great Replacement” lie
If we were to ask the very reasonable question of,
“What is the differerence between a safe vaccine, and an un-safe vaccine?”
We would get some bullshit answer about how all vaccines are safe, because they would never produce or administer un-safe vaccine…
But if we start to drill down, and ask more pointed questions, we will continue to get more bullshit answers.
For example, we might ask, “for a brand new vaccine, that is being studied, how exactly would you determine if that vaccine is safe or un-safe?”
And they would say, “well we do lots of studies and blah blah blah…”
And then we ask, “ok, but when you are doing a study, wheres the actual threshold between safe and unsafe?… like, if the vaccine ‘only’ kills 5 people, is it still safe?”
And what we would discover is that there is no actual threshold between safe and unsafe,
And that no matter what their data actually shows, their study conclusion is ALWAYS that the vaccine is safe”
Their idea of “safe” is very binary, meaning its EITHER safe, or un-safe, with no grey area in between.
And of course, they always decide the vaccine is safe, regardless of what the data actually shows.
This is why the pro-vaccine people continue to insist the COVID vaccines are “safe”, even though the safety signals are clear to anyone else that the vaccine is NOT safe.
Furthermore, they always try to factor into their reasoning what would happen if you DIDN’T take the vaccine, as we have all seen, for example they might say,
“Well, yes this COVID vaccine is causing more cases of myocarditis than every vaccine in the history of the world combined, BUT… getting a COVID infection would be even more likely to cause myocarditis!
So when they do these bullshit studies, they always find that the vaccine is safe,
AND as an extra bonus, they also find that the vaccine magically prevents not only the infection, but also prevents any alleged vaccine injuries!
Vaccines PREVENT SIDS
Vaccines PREVENT Autism
Vaccines PREVENT myocarditis.
These pro-vaccine people are so completely full of shit, you literally can’t believe a single word they say.
I sincerely believe these people are EVIL. Its no longer reasonable to give them the benefit of the doubt and just assume they are grossly incompetent. They know what they are doing, and they simply do not care. The only thing that matters to them is that you comply with their vaccine mandates and/or recommendations, no matter what.
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fk919wpnrbmy61.png
By Fraiser Kansteiner Aug 10, 2023
After Pfizer allegedly fired a compliance manager for raising the flag on potential fraud activity in China, the former employee is hitting back.
Frank Han, the former director of global compliance analytics at Pfizer, has filed a civil complaint against the drugmaker. In the California lawsuit, Han claims he was terminated for identifying potential Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) issues within the company.
Han worked for Pfizer from May 2017 to November 2022, according to the court documents.
Back in 2021, Han says he discovered that Pfizer had spent “over ten times the amount of money” on potentially influential government officials (PIGOs) in China than the company had spent on those officials in other countries, the court documents state.
Specifically, Pfizer spent $168 million on PIGOs in China between the second quarter of 2019 and the third quarter of 2021, Han's work found. That compared to $12 million in the U.S., $11 million in Canada, $7.5 million in Russia and $7.1 million in the U.K.
Even after Han brought the data to his supervisors, he claims he saw no evidence that Pfizer struck up a company investigation.
Instead, Han said he was rated lower on a subsequent employee performance review, with his supervisor “baselessly critiquing his work, berating him, and impeding his ability to perform his job," the lawsuit claims.
After Han’s supervisor allegedly screamed at him, it became clear to Han that Pfizer's “statements and actions were in retaliation to his complaints about the fraudulent activity he had uncovered,” the lawsuit says.
By May 2022, Han says he had received several negative performance reviews. Come Aug. 3 of last year, Han received a “Final Notice of Underperformance” from the company, he says.
He was ultimately fired Nov. 4, 2022.
Pfizer did not immediately provide a comment on the lawsuit, which was filed earlier this summer in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco. More recently, the case was moved to California federal court.
This isn’t Pfizer’s first run-in with potential fraud activity abroad. In 2012, the company inked a $60 million FCPA settlement centered around its alleged conduct in Bulgaria, Croatia, Russia and several other countries.
Pfizer additionally disclosed more FCPA scrutiny in 2019 and 2020.
And, in its most recent annual securities filing (PDF), Pfizer said it was under investigation for potential FCPA violations in Russia and China.
Inadequate medical procedure claims did not meet bar for suit
Federal government submitted statement supporting dismissal
Whistleblower claims that Pfizer defrauded the government while developing its Covid-19 vaccine have been dismissed with prejudice in Texas.
Brook Jackson, who worked as a regional director at testing sites by Pfizer contractor Ventavia, alleged several protocol violations that could have led the Food and Drug Administration to discontinue the trial. Ventavia fired Jackson shortly after she called the FDA.
The US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas rejected claims that Pfizer and contractors filed false or implied false certifications based on Jackson’s testimony
Government knew about allegations for years and authorized Pfizer’s vaccines regardless, Ventavia said
https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-jordan-comer-reject-motion-moskowitz-impeach-joe-biden-1881572
Check out these reddit comments.
This is supposed to be r/politics, but as you can see its more like r/LeftyCircleJerk
The mods/admins there ban anyone who is even slightly right-leaning, leaving a bunch a lefties in their own echo chamber.
One commenter even explicitly said he went to conservative sub reddits to see their take, implying, of course, that he instintively knew he would have to leave r/politics if he wanted to hear anything other than the leftist take.
https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1bjoiak/republicans_reject_motion_to_impeach_joe_biden/
“The former president’s comments were utterly disgusting and a textbook example of the kind of antisemitism facing Jews, pushing the dangerous antisemitism trope of dual loyalty,” Schumer said Tuesday.
http://news.google.com/search?q=schumer+dual+citizen
The context of Schumers comment, was that he was replying to what Trump had said, which was
Trump was asked on a podcast hosted by his former White House aide Sebastian Gorka about criticism from the Biden administration and Schumer’s comments criticizing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
“I actually think they hate Israel,” Trump said in the interview, which aired Monday. “I don’t think they hate him, I think they hate Israel. And the Democrat Party hates Israel.”
Now obviously the upper ranks of Democrats (like Schumer) are 100% pro-Israel,
But the rank and file Democrats, absolutely do hate Israel.
And justifiably so, i might add.
Israel is nothing but a terrorist organization masquarading as an illegitimate nation, and everyone knows it!
We don’t need dual citizens in our government.
We don’t want dual citizens in our government.
There is no reason for dual citizens to even be in our government.
We need to name them, and shame them, and kick them tf out of our government!
And the louder they squeal, the more they expose themselves as impostors who are infiltrating our government for nefarious reasons.
Israel did 9/11
OP's commentary in the comments below
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/01/09/why-maga-is-obsessed-with-jeffrey-epstein-00134394
By CATHERINE KIM
01/09/2024 09:00 AM EST
Catherine Kim is an assistant editor at POLITICO Magazine.
A day before the so-called Epstein list was supposed to drop, far-right conspiracy theorists buzzed with excitement over the expectation that it would crucify prominent figures on the left for their involvement in sex trafficking. It’s a wildly popular notion in that world, where Pizzagate and QAnon fantasies run rampant.
The truth, of course, was far different: The material made public in federal court last week, with more now being released, wasn’t some kind of Jeffrey Epstein client list, as had been speculated online. It was actually documents from a court case filed by one of Epstein’s victims that did include people’s names, but provided little new information on whether they knew of or participated in Epstein’s heinous crimes.
To get a sense of why conspiracy theories centered on sex trafficking and pedophilia — and now the “Epstein list” — are so buzzy in MAGA circles, POLITICO Magazine called up Mike Rothschild, author of The Storm Is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything and Jewish Space Lasers: The Rothschilds and 200 Years of Conspiracy Theories. Rothschild pointed to a toxic stew of age-old antisemitism; the worst incentives of today’s social media; and the right’s unending obsession with Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Donald Trump pops up in the documents, including some released on Monday, but that’s typically not a problem for his hard-core supporters. As with most conspiracy theories, adherents create their own reality.
“There’s nothing Trump can do that will lose these people’s loyalty,” Rothschild said. “Anything that is inconvenient, that alters their worldview, they’ll just ignore it, or they’ll make up some bizarre justification for it.”
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
What are the conspiracy theories surrounding the so-called Epstein list?
The conspiracy theories are that this new release of documents is going to finally be the thing that brings down the elite trafficking cabal that’s been running the world for 6,000 years. There’s this perception that there’s been information that’s been held back by the courts or by politicians or the media, this is finally going to put everything out in the open.
And because I’ve studied these movements for so long, I know that these movements really revolve around this idea that there will be a document or a memo or a list or a recording. And that will finally be the thing that finally ends the evil grip of the New World Order, and it never does. They always move on to the next one.
A common misconception is that the list documented Epstein’s clients who partook in sexual acts with minors, but that’s not the case, right? It’s not the case at all. It’s a dump of documents related to the case. It’s not the smoking gun that’s going to finally bring down all of these powerful ones. A lot of the information and many of the names that are being revealed in these documents have already been known. Some of them were redacted.
But so far, I don’t really think there’s much of anything that we’ve learned that really changes our perception of what Epstein did and kind of who in his orbit knew what, because we know a lot of that already. We know it because of tenacious reporting, and the courage of the accusers who have faced him.
Then why was there so much excitement for the list within MAGA circles online — especially when the list itself wasn’t even documentation of Epstein’s clients?
I think it really ties back to this industry of conspiracy theories about the Clintons. I think they really feel like this will be the thing that brings down Bill and Hillary Clinton. They’re still obsessed with the Clintons. And so anything that can serve as the final nail in their coffin, they’re going to rally around, even if, of course, Trump and a lot of the people around Trump are also implicated in all of these documents. They don’t care about that at all. It’s about the Clintons and the rest of the liberal establishment.
What is it about the Clintons that captivates far-right conspiracy theorists like this?
Part of it is that it’s already been three decades of this: The Clinton conspiracy industry started in the early 90s. It started with stuff like Whitewater, Travelgate, stuff that is ancient history now. But there was a really well-funded, very organized and popular effort to bring the Clintons down. And then of course, it resulted in the impeachment, it resulted in the dump truck full of conspiracies about Hillary Clinton when she ran for president. And even though they’re not really in the public eye much anymore, it’s so prolific that conspiracy theorists have stuck with them because they know what works. They’re just like a classic rock band playing the hits.
You wrote a book on QAnon. Based on your research, why are conservatives so obsessed with the theory that prominent left-wing figures like the Clintons are running pedophile rings? Where does that conspiracy theory originate from?
There’s always been a certain amount of salaciousness in these conspiracy theories, and there are theories going back about the awful sexual depravity of the Catholics or later on of the Jews. So you’re always going to find a certain amount of attention paid to any kind of conspiracy theory involving sexual proclivity of trafficking. And if it involves children, people immediately just lose their mind — even if these children don’t exist. There are no children who have been trafficked because of Pizzagate because Pizzgate isn’t real.
But if you just put out the suggestion there, it grabs ahold in a way that is difficult to dislodge. I think a lot of it has to do with antisemitism. I think a lot of it has to do with fear of the occult and Satanic panic. So you get all of these things that are mixed together: the anti-Jewish sentiment, the fear of Satanism. And, of course, now it extends to social media. So you have these powerful figures, in media, in politics, in culture, academia. It’s very easy to kind of put these people together as part of this vast conspiracy. And if there’s a conspiracy of them, well, they’re probably doing horrible things to children, too, because that’s what evil people do.
You’ve mentioned that all these conspiracy theories are connected. How does the Epstein saga fit into the broader ecosystem of far-right conspiracy theories, including QAnon and Pizzagate? Particularly when Epstein was never even a figure on the left?
The QAnon and Pizzagate people — they really have embraced Epstein as the most obvious example of these sort of high-level traffickings. Of course, with Epstein, a lot of it was true. He was doing these things, he was connected to this absolutely abhorrent behavior.
But part of what happens is we lose the ability to discern noise from signal. So you’re tarring as a pedophile anybody who had any kind of association with Epstein. And of course, most of the people who were associated with Epstein had nothing to do with what he was doing. Some of them may have known about it, some of them may have looked the other way. And they certainly have a lot of hard questions to answer about their associations with Epstein and what they knew. But just because a person had a meeting with Jeffrey Epstein doesn’t make them part of sex trafficking rings. But it’s very easy to point at all of these people and say, “They’re all working together. They’re all hiding the same things. They’re all doing the same horrible things. And we’re the only people who will talk about it.”
Do you think if the Clintons weren’t involved, the “Epstein list” wouldn’t have blown up like this?
I really don’t think it would’ve. I don’t think it would have gotten quite the attention. I think there would have been some attention; you do have people in that world who are really obsessed with the idea of trafficking and Pizzagate and all that other stuff, but I think the Clinton connection is really what vaulted it into the stratosphere.
How did these people use the “Epstein list” as ammunition for their conspiracy theories, and how does the role of the internet factor into all this?
Internet is a huge part of it, and social media in particular. It spreads incredibly quickly, because it sounds believable and if you share it with some documents, it doesn’t matter if they’re real or not. The people who are passing this stuff around don’t care.
It’s very easy to spread these things around and very easy to ignore the parts of it that you don’t find to be palatable to your worldview, such as Donald Trump’s connections to it, and you play up the connections of people like Bill Clinton.
Do you see that misinformation about Epstein has been spreading more than other conspiracy theories?
I think it’s definitely spreading more. I think part of it is the fact that Twitter (now called X) has been so completely eviscerated as a source of truth. As soon as the documents came out, I started seeing fakes. And they were getting passed around by verified accounts with a million followers, who are making tons of ad money, because Elon Musk has completely eviscerated verification on Twitter. They have every incentive to pass fake documents along and if somebody says, “Oh, that’s not real,” who cares?
Disinformation and conspiracy theories spread so quickly and so readily on social media, while the rest of us are doing our research and writing our articles and doing our interviews, trying to figure out what this actually means. The people who believe this stuff have already decided what it means. And they don’t want to be told differently.
Twitter and people like Alex Jones and people like Steve Bannon, they have an alternative media ecosystem. These are not fringe people anymore. This is not the guy standing outside the football stadium waving a sign about the end is coming. This is a massive industry. You’ve got billions of dollars being pumped into misinformation, into these products, into these podcasts, into these books. It’s a job for a lot of these people, and they’re very good at it. They spread this stuff very quickly. They know it doesn’t matter whether it’s real or not, their audience doesn’t care.
Trump’s appearance in the documents unsettled some conservatives, like Alex Jones. Others like Jack Posobiec rushed to Trump’s defense by posting screenshots from the released court documents, claiming that Trump was exonerated. How does Trump’s presence here complicate the worldview of MAGA conspiracy theorists, especially those who thought Trump would save the nation from pedophiles?
It doesn’t complicate it at all. They just sweep it away. There’s nothing Trump can do that will lose these people’s loyalty. Whatever his involvement is, they just pretend it’s not there. Or they say, “Well, he was only there because he was getting information on Epstein to give to the FBI.” I saw tons of that early on in QAnon. The idea that there’s some sort of undercover sting operation. I’m like, really? I don’t think Donald Trump could stay quiet about that for five seconds. But you believe it, you talk yourself into it. So it’s a lot like a lot of Trump’s other associations, and I write about this in my book on the Rothschilds. The Trump Taj Mahal was actually saved from bankruptcy by Rothschild Inc. Their bankruptcy guy was Wilbur Ross, who helped structure the deal that got the Taj Mahal out of bankruptcy. And, of course, Wilbur Ross later became Trump’s commerce secretary. You’ve never heard a peep about it from Trump believers, they just sweep it away. Anything that is inconvenient, that alters their worldview, they’ll just ignore it, or they’ll make up some bizarre justification for it.
With Epstein, we know how bad he was. And there may be some people who have a difficult time because they wind up in one of these documents. But ultimately, it’s not going to change that Epstein was a horrible person, and that it was people who were connected to Trump who helped him get out of prison the first time, that it was the incompetence of the jail that allowed him to take his own life. That is not going to change. There’s not going to be a document that completely alters our understanding of what happened.
What does it take to change the minds of conspiracy theorists, especially when it seems they’ll jump through all sorts of hoops in order to distort their reality for the sake of their own beliefs?
Most people will not change their mind. Most people will double down, they will show absolutely no interest in being wrong. For a lot of these people, that’s the worst thing that can happen. They have to go back to their friends and family and say, “You were right, I was wrong, and I’m an idiot.”
Sometimes it does happen. You will find people who have gotten out of movements like QAnon or have broken away from the hardcore Trump worship because they’ll read something or they’ll hear something that they just can’t reconcile with how they see the world. And once you find one thing that doesn’t work for you and these movements, you start to find more of them. I liken it to a tapestry where if you pull on one thread, the whole thing immediately unravels. But you have to want to pull on that thread, you have to prepare yourself for the possibility of it all, and you being left with a view that is completely collapsed. For a lot of people, that’s just too difficult. They just can’t handle it. So they just burrow into it more, and the more things go wrong, and the more predictions fail, and the more things don’t come true, the more they believe because they just have nowhere else to go.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/03/13/politics/aaron-rodgers-sandy-hook-conspiracy-theories/index.html
So in other words, Aaron Rodgers has a brain, and isn’t afraid to speak the truth, which is causing the propagandists at CNN to shit their pants.
https://thehill.com/homenews/lgbtq/4529687-utah-transgender-discrimination-doj/amp/
In May, after nearly two years in custody without access to adequate gender-affirming health care, the woman performed a dangerous self-surgery to remove her own testicles.
2h:20m
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8xHgSx7EN9w
This is one of those “MUST SEE” videos.
Its over 2 hours long, so some people might be able to watch right away, so SAVE this video for watching later when you have time.
Whats it about?
Basically, there is a tapestry that is shown in the movie, that illustrates a key concept quite well.
That key concept is how all of the Royal Familes of Europe are represented by a Coat of Arms,
But what the tapestry shows is that theres one superceding family, illustrated as a puppet-master, and at the end of each puppet-string is a coat of arms representing a royal family,
Implying that there was ONE family that was the puppet-master, and all of the other families were mere puppets.
And that ONE family, is the Vanderbilts.
As in, Cornielus Vanderbilt, the railroad tycoon,
Gloria Vanderbilt,
And Anderson Cooper, the fake news guy,
who “used to” work for the CIA…
Yes Anderson Cooper isn’t just “wealthy”. The dude is the heir apparent to the Vanderbuilt puppet-strings!
Yes it appears that the Vanderbilt family, migrated to American, and set-up Biltmore estate, which is just opulent beyond imagination.
Take a look at these photos of Biltmore.
It was a stupid pledge anyway. They never used to ask candidates to do that. They just rolled it out just for Trump!
thats basically what they did to Trump in NY.
Money Masters The Rise Of The Bankers
3h:30m
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mDlnM481Gcg
One point i think Bill Still could have done a better job on was talking about USURY.
We, as young students, are taught about “compound interest” in school, and you are given these math exercises to do to see how your money could grow in a 5% savings account.
But what they dont tell you is that it doesnt matter how good that savings account is paying, if you don’t have money any in savings!
What they DON’T tell you, is that you won’t actually be collecting compound interest, but instead you will be paying it!
And the trajectorys are predictable.
If you are in debt, you will likely get further in debt.
Nicely stated as:
The poor get poorer, the rich get richer.
And this isnt due to much more than chance.
Any one of us could have been born a Rothschild, and grown up to be rich. Hi Mike!
But most of us were born poor, and we will stay poor,
That is, unless we liberate ourselves from this usury based debt slavery system that has been recognized as the root of all evil since ancient times.
These boom and bust cycles.
The inflation, deflation, greedflation,
Its all as predictable as tomorrows sunrise time.
But the bastards who do this shit to us, have all the money (obviously) but whats more they have all the power that comes with that money.
And they have abused that power
Let us count the ways…
So heres the plan.
We abolish usury.
And i don’t mean the banker definition of usury, which is legalese and subject to change.
I mean the interest itself cannot exceed 0.00…
Why?
Because no matter how small that interest rate is, it will eventually “go asymptote” and eventually crash.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptote
Boom and bust.
This is how they shear the sheep.
Lend money to a farmer, for 5 generations, while that family develops a farm, and then they kill the farm economy and take the farm.
This isn’t on accident.
Thats the long game these people play.
When Willy Nelson heard that the American farmers were having trouble, he replied,
“How Can I Help?”
Willie Nelson Speaks Out On 35th Anniversary Of Farm Aid | TODAY
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=st2JWHI9CBg
“How can i help?” Is the exact attitude that every one of us should have,
And not in a defeatist “little ole me” kind of way,
But in the sincere, eager Willy Nelson kind of way!
FULL SPEECH: Nayib Bukele, President of El Salvador, Addresses CPAC in DC 2024 - 2/22/24
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Omt50rGZ4n8
Near the end he addresses financial situation ———-
Keep pushing the word “usury” every chance you get, and make it a word that everyone knows.
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=Usury&community=GreatAwakening
We’ve done it before… ive got a good story ill tell in comments if anyone asks…
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M18-2101
Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccination and Autism -
A Nationwide Cohort Study
Abstract
Background:
The hypothesized link between the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism continues to cause concern and challenge vaccine uptake.
Ok, so right here in the first few paragraphs, the authors readily admit their "motivated reasoning".
they are "concerned" about vaccine uptake,
so therefore they want to reassure the public, by doing a "study", that they already know what the conclusion will be.
notice also that they deliberately limit their study to just ONE vaccine, instead of studying ALL vaccines.
then they extrapolate their findings on ONE vaccine, and assert that it implies to all vaccines.
this perfectly illustrates the vaccine quack playbook.
-
vaccinate a bunch of people
-
wait to hear back on all the side-effects and adverse reactions that were caused by the vaccine
-
do a study, where they "can't find the evidence" that the vaccine actually caused the problems.
-
announce to the world that vaccines didn't cause the vaccine problems.
NPR: A Large Study Provides More Evidence That MMR Vaccines Don't Cause Autism
So this "new" study is actually a follow-up to the notorious "Danish Study", where a man named Poul Thorsen was "allegedly" committing fraud, and is presumably still a fugitive running from the FBI, unless he has been caught, which i doubt, because they don't want the publicity.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa021134
http://google.com/search?q=Poul+Thorsen+wanted+by+FBI+danish study
"The idea that vaccines cause autism is still around despite our original and other well-conducted studies," Hviid wrote in an email. "Parents still encounter these claims on social media, by politicians, by celebrities, etc."
"We felt that it was time to revisit the link in a larger cohort with more follow-up which also allowed for more comprehensive analyses of different claims such as the idea that MMR causes autism in susceptible children," he added.
Other researchers agree the study provides powerful new evidence supporting the safety of the vaccine.
In an editorial accompanying the study, Dr. Saad Omer and Dr. Inci Yildirim of Emory University write that studies like this can help doctors refute unfounded claims and fears.
see what they are trying to do here?
they do these studies for the sole purpose of NOT finding the evidence.
then they shove these "studies" down the throats of concerned parents who are in the doctors office trying to decline a vaccine, yet are unprepared for the focus-group tested vaccine propaganda that is about to used against them.
also, see how they show that they are upset that rumors of vaccine problems persist, in spite of their efforts to produce "studies" that can never seem to be able to find the evidence?
they just can't believe that you would believe your own friends personal experience, over the vaccine quacks vaccine studies.
Hviid hopes the findings will reassure parents.
do you suppose that Hviid would publish and publicize his study, if he had somehow been able to "find the evidence"?
has Hviid ever demonstrated competence in "finding the evidence"?
"The study strongly supports that MMR vaccination does not increase the risk for autism," the authors write in the Annals of Internal Medicine. "We believe our results offer reassurance and provide reliable data."
Here Paul Offit says, quote,
"You can never really say, MMR doesn't cause autism, but frankly, when you get in front of the media, you better get used to saying it, because otherwise people hear a door being left open, when the door shouldn't be left open"
10 second video (save this video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2cHZa8t98w
What i take this statement to mean is "you can't prove a negative"
Which is a very important point, and important argument.
This particular argument is the atheists primary defense when challenge to "prove God does not exist"
The atheists one and only rebuttal to this argument is,
"we can't prove a negative..."
PolitiFact: No evidence atrazine in the water supply is causing more kids to identify as transgender
Me: Hey ChatGPT, please give me a list of all known side effects to Atrazine
ChatGPT: Atrazine is an herbicide commonly used in agriculture to control weeds. While it is effective for weed control, there have been concerns about its potential side effects on human health and the environment. Some known side effects and concerns associated with atrazine include:
-
Endocrine Disruption: Atrazine has been linked to endocrine disruption, which can interfere with hormonal systems in animals and humans. This can lead to reproductive and developmental abnormalities, including effects on fertility, sexual development, and hormone-dependent cancers.
-
Developmental Effects: Exposure to atrazine, particularly during critical periods of development such as gestation and early childhood, has been associated with adverse effects on fetal development and reproductive development in animals. Human studies have also suggested potential risks to fetal development and birth outcomes.
-
Cancer: While there is limited evidence linking atrazine directly to cancer in humans, some animal studies have suggested a possible association between atrazine exposure and certain types of cancer, such as mammary tumors and prostate cancer.
-
Neurotoxicity: Some research has suggested that atrazine may have neurotoxic effects, affecting the nervous system and cognitive function. This includes potential impacts on behavior, learning, and memory.
-
Immune System Effects: Atrazine exposure has been associated with alterations in immune function in animal studies, although the significance of these findings for human health is still being investigated.
-
Environmental Concerns: Atrazine is known to persist in the environment and can contaminate water sources, soil, and air. It has been detected in surface water and groundwater at levels that may pose risks to aquatic organisms and ecosystems. Additionally, atrazine runoff from agricultural fields can contribute to water pollution and harm non-target plants and animals.
-
Reproductive Effects: Atrazine exposure has been associated with reproductive effects in animals, including changes in hormone levels, reduced fertility, and developmental abnormalities in offspring.
It's important to note that the extent of atrazine's health effects may depend on factors such as the level and duration of exposure, individual susceptibility, and other environmental and genetic factors. Regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regularly review scientific evidence on atrazine and other pesticides to assess potential risks and establish safety guidelines for their use. If you have concerns about atrazine exposure, it's advisable to consult with healthcare professionals and follow guidelines for safe handling and use of pesticides.
so, what does endocrine mean?
The endocrine system is a network of glands and organs that produce, store, and release hormones to regulate various bodily functions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endocrine_system
The endocrine system is a messenger system in an organism comprising feedback loops of hormones that are released by internal glands directly into the circulatory system and that target and regulate distant organs. In vertebrates, the hypothalamus is the neural control center for all endocrine systems.
In humans, the major endocrine glands are the thyroid, parathyroid, pituitary, pineal, and adrenal glands, and the (male) testicles and (female) ovaries. The hypothalamus, pancreas, and thymus also function as endocrine glands, among other functions. (The hypothalamus and pituitary glands are organs of the neuroendocrine system. One of the most important functions of the hypothalamus—it is located in the brain adjacent to the pituitary gland—is to link the endocrine system to the nervous system via the pituitary gland.) Other organs, such as the kidneys, also have roles within the endocrine system by secreting certain hormones. The study of the endocrine system and its disorders is known as endocrinology.
So we know that Atrazine causes problems with the endocrine system, and yet PolitiFact calls this claim false?
MUST READ their rationale:
https://www.businessinsider.com/qanon-conspiracy-theory-covid-19-vaccines-turn-kids-trans-gay-2021-2
False allegations that COVID-19 vaccines turn children gay or trans are spreading rapidly on Telegram, the messaging-based social-media app.
Ayatollah Abbas Tabrizian, an Iranian cleric who is known for spreading false medical claims, appeared to be the first to popularize the bogus claim in a post on Tuesday for his more than 210,000 Telegram followers, the Jerusalem Post reported.
Following Tabrizian's Telegram post, popular figures within the world of QAnon, the baseless far-right conspiracy theory alleging Donald Trump is fighting to destroy a cabal of pedophiles, began to discuss the baseless claim. Influential QAnon channels, including one with more than 182,000 subscribers, began circulating the idea, using convoluted and inaccurate logic to question whether vaccinations could impact the gender and sexuality of children. These posts have tens of thousands of views.
MelQ, a QAnon influencer with 57,000 Telegram subscribers, shared a news article that referenced Tabrizian's comments. The post, in which the influencer shared a conspiracy theory claiming that vaccines in general cause "Gender confusion," has 71,000 views as of Friday morning. A Telegram representative did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.
There is no link between vaccinations and queerness, medical experts told Insider. Still, these claims continue to spread on Telegram among QAnon conspiracy theorists who cited comments from Tabrizian, whose field of medical advice is considered a threat by Iranian health officials.
"There is certainly evidence that shows unvaccinated children are more likely to catch things like measles, but there is no relationship between vaccines or not being vaccinated and being queer or transgender," Dr. David Verhoeven, an expert in virology and professor of Vet Microbiology & Preventive Medicine at Iowa State University, told Insider.
Medical experts say there is no link between vaccinations and queerness
Some of the claims say that the COVID-19 vaccines turn children queer or trans by somehow activating a recessive "queer" or "trans" gene passed down by the parents.
According to Verhoeven, this theory is false for multiple reasons, the first being the vaccines don't integrate into human DNA at all and only activate the body's immune system against the coronavirus.
"The only thing within the body that the vaccine 'turns on' is the immune system," Verhoeven said. "Since there is no 'gay gene' anyways, there is no connection between getting vaccinated for COVID or any other pathogen and 'turning' queer or transgender."
While researchers have tried for decades to find a specific gene that makes a person queer or transgender, no such gene has ever been found.
The other portion of the theory asserts the combination of the vaccine coupled with soy products in our food supply would lead to more children being queer or trans.
Again, Verhoeven said there is no evidence to back these claims, as certain East Asian communities have historically eaten many soy products with no disproportionate rates of queer or trans people.
"If we can stop looking at being queer or gay as some defect or disease that needs to be cured or prevented and just be accepting of diversity, society would certainly benefit," Verhoeven told Insider.
The QAnon community has played a major role in spreading COVID-19 misinformation
germany anti-lockdown protest qanon
Mostly right-wing protesters, including a young woman wearing a QAnon shirt, observe riot police clearing Unter den Linden avenue during protests against coronavirus-related restrictions and government policy on August 29, 2020 in Berlin, Germany.
QAnon influencers, like other far-right activists, have used their platforms to promote baseless conspiracy theories about COVID-19 throughout the pandemic.
Marc-André Argentino, a PhD candidate at Concordia University researching extremism, wrote in an August report in The Conversation that the online QAnon ecosystem applied its "conspiracy mentality to the coronavirus crisis," beginning with the movement's belief that the virus was a hoax created to damage Trump's reelection chances. Even "Q," the anonymous figure whose cryptic messages originated the conspiracy-theory movement, has made false claims about the virus in posts on 8kun, a message board known for misinformation that's popular on the far-right.
Throughout the spring of 2020, the QAnon community merged with other COVID-19 deniers, most of whom come from wellness and pseudoscience spheres, a September 2020 BBC News investigation found. Together, these groups have protested government-mandated lockdown orders in the US and Europe throughout the pandemic.
MelQ, one of the QAnon influencers who spread Tabrizian's claims on Telegram, was one of the major proponents of coronavirus disinformation.
Since the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were announced in December, conspiracy theories alleging these shots cause various health problems continue to go viral on social media.
Facebook has since cracked down on vaccine misinformation, after false claims that the COVID-19 shots caused infertility circulated widely on the company's flagship app and on Instagram.
let's apply what we have learned in the last few years, in the comments below...
A report provides information on how gender-affirming care such as the use of puberty blockers can positively impact the mental health of transgender and nonbinary teenagers and young adults.
On February 23, 2022, Texas governor Greg Abbott told the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services to conduct thorough investigations into any reports of minors undergoing elective gender confirmation procedures and called for Texans to report incidences of children receiving gender-affirming care. A day earlier the state’s Attorney General issued an opinion that equated care such as puberty blockers to child abuse. Much of the public furor against the actions of Texas state officials centered on how the actions would impact the mental health of gender diverse children. A new report examines how receiving gender-affirming care impacts the mental health of transgender and nonbinary adolescents and young adults, who are often at risk of suboptimal mental health outcomes due to discrimination and stigma.1
The investigators performed a prospective observational cohort study at an urban multidisciplinary gender clinic. The participants were transgender or nonbinary individuals who were seeking gender-affirming care. They used the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scales to assess mental health outcomes.
A total of 104 adolescents and young adults aged 13 to 20 years participated in the study: 63 transmasculine, 27 transfeminine, 10 nonbinary or gender fluid, and 4 who either did not respond to the gender identity question or responded, “I don’t know.” At the study’s baseline, 59 were found to have moderate or severe depression; 52 had moderate to severe anxiety; and 45 indicated engaging in self harm of having thoughts of suicide.
By the time the study ended, 69 had been given puberty blockers, gender-affirming hormones, or both, whereas 35 hadn’t received either intervention. After adjusting for both potential confounders and temporal trends, the investigators found that the participants who had started either intervention had 60% lower odds of depression and 73% lower odds of suicidality than among those who had not been given gender-affirming care. No link between receiving puberty blockers or gender-affirming hormones and anxiety were discovered.
The investigators concluded that receiving gender-affirming medical interventions were linked to lowered risks for negative mental health outcomes over the course of 12 months. The results contribute to a growing collection of evidence that indicates that gender-affirming care is linked to overall improved well-being to transgender and nonbinary teenagers and young adults.
Reference
- Tordoff D, Wanta J, Collin A, Stepney C, Inwards-Breland D, Ahrens K. Mental health outcomes in transgender and nonbinary youths receiving gender-affirming care. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e220978. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0978
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2789423