Cannot say that I care where it goes and, at this point, what you think. As Jesus was wont to do, He washed his hands of those who fail to forgive.
I corrected it. There is nothing more that I can do and I deem the correction THOROUGHLY SUFFICIENT. 🙂🙂🙂 ✅✅✅
This is my final post to you.
Sadly, you are grievously misled. Take the time to research before forming a misguided opinion. I will pray for you!
Funny...Very funny actually. I did not claim expert status. I was telling people: If they simply took the time to READ my prior posts, they would know I'm not a shill.
I say this in all charity: It's Time to wake up and discern who's who or you will remain hopelessly confused.
In order to achieve worldwide awakening, it requires those who are cognizant of the GODLY work that must be done. Charity is essential and one can correct others properly and improperly. Sadly, you chose the latter. If you're as wise as you believe, you will learn from this missive.
This is my final post to you.
LOLOLOLOL
Peddling poison pills to someone like me is comedy gold.
It wasn't SCOTUS but, it is a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court:
vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
Of course, I am sorry and I have stated in this thread that I will look for better substantiated primary and secondary sources prior to posting again. Feel free to remove this erroneous post.
Amg-news mistook Superior Court for Supreme Court. It wasn't SCOTUS but, it is a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court:
vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
There IS a sitting Senator Kennedy.
Within the article, there is a period between Senator Kennedy and Robert F Kennedy, Jr. Did you miss that?
Yes, amg-news got the wrong court. The suit was filed in Ontario's highest court which they call Superior Court:
vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
Try being less critical because none of us are unerringly perfect. That includes you, too.
Have a great evening.
Amg-news posted this article and they mistook Superior Court for Supreme Court. That's grounds for execution?? No.
😅😅😅
Tell me: You've been unerringly correct your entire life. Right?
🤣😂🤣
It wasn't SCOTUS but, it IS a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court: vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
It wasn't SCOTUS but, it IS a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court: vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
In the future, I will ensure that my primary and secondary sources are well substantiated.
It wasn't SCOTUS but, it is a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court: vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
Yes, there is but amg-news mistook Superior Court for Supreme Court. Here's the data: vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
It wasn't SCOTUS but, it is a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court: vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
Would greatly appreciate correcting the headline OR deleting it altogether given the fact that AMG-news got it wrong. In the future, I will always look for a good, unimpeachable primary and secondary source.
It wasn't SCOTUS but, it IS a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court: vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
Wrong. Do your research before accusing others. It wasn't SCOTUS but, it IS a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court: vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
Think what you want but, you'd be absolutely wrong. Do your research before accusing people. I'm on many blogs and my position speaks for itself.
Yes, it is! With a good attorney, I have felled a few powerful companies, including Experian and Comcast, spending a pittance and, at the end, getting nice judgments which my spouse and I enjoy donating to the needy. If the law is on your side and you've taken good notes, David slays Goliath every time. 😊😊😊
There aren't any laws requiring healthy people to wear masks. Ergo, it's an unlawful request and one that is deleterious to one's health given that it causes metabolic acidosis which compromises immune function. It also increases bacterial and, in some cases, fungal pneumonia because with every inspiration the victim is transporting all oral fungal and bacterial organisms that are present down to the pulmonary alveoli.Research has proven that this does not occur with unrestricted breathing.
Once an attorney notifies the company that they have no legal standing to mandate mask wearing and a suit will be imminently attached, they will drop their demand like a live grenade. Bet on it.
Happy to help! Yes, some areas have better, more expensive lawyers but for $25/mo it's still worth the price.
Please keep us in the loop. Would greatly enjoy celebrating your victory with you. 🎉🎉🎉
I'll wait for reliable sources with cybersecurity creds to give their approbation. Seconds after it's deemed safe, hundreds of sites will download it anyway.
Exactly. Trojans, viruses are pushed, not elicited by the user.
Consider purchasing legal insurance. Legalshield.com is an excellent choice and it's $20 per month. My spouse and I own it.
A legalshield lawyer in your locale will work on all civil cases for you free of charge up to the policy limits. Tell your business that you have an attorney on retainer and if they don't immediately cease and desist in their unconstitutional demand, you will file suit. Medical personnel in Texas won their case, filed by a class action lawfirm, once their hospital was served with the suit.
If your employer balks, have the lawyer draw up the paperwork. There is legal precedence affirming your right to remain unmasked. Also, do not allow your business to demand rapid PCR tests as they are inoculating people with the bioweap0n by this method, too.
GOOD LUCK.
We no longer have a two party system. It's comprised of whitehats and s@tanists. Wrongfully elected [[non]] representatives are in the majority. They know the stakes. If they lose this battle, their lives are on the line.
I completely agree, lockdowns will occur.
Laughably wrong, buddy. For most individuals, O N C E I S E N O U G H. 🤣🤣🤣 Most grasp this at the age of reason. May this be a valuable learning lesson for you.
This is my final post to you.