Arizona’s constitution permits ballot measures by the people of Arizona which can alter the laws of Arizona. In the 2015 Supreme Court case Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission — The Supreme Court ruled that under the constitution of Arizona that the Elections Clause uses the word “Legislature” to describe “the power that makes laws,” a term that is broad enough to encompass the power provided by the Arizona constitution for the people to make laws through ballot initiatives. The Court found that the function of the “Legislature” was lawmaking and that this function could be performed by the people of Arizona with an initiative consistent with state law.
What does this mean? It means the people of Arizona have direct authority, as the states legislature, to, as the constitution outlined, choose “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives” as it “shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;”
Additionally
“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress”
While the AZ legislature is divided on forensic audits, the people of AZ have direct authority over the final choice and not their elected representative.
How does this change any thing?
Remove the total number of electors delegated by AZ from the 2020 election and there is no longer a majority electoral vote for either 2020 candidate and as such our nation has no de jure (by law) President.
EDIT: I made a mistake here; reference this comment for context: https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwR0K5sD/x/c/4JDEi6w7xNI
This is a constitutional crisis that demands remedy. A number of which are available.
The same ballot initiative that withdrawals the electors of the state there should be and can be a new time, place, and manner of choosing. A re-run of the election with a new manner (paper ballots)
Alternatively the constitution can simply be amended to remove the unelected president as “on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification”
Lindell facilitated Wendy Rogers in the organizing the first steps of just such a convention of the states legislatures by way of the 50 State Election Integrity Caucus.
If not by way of withdrawn electors and a re-choosing of the President by AZ, the convention of states legislatures may amend the constitution as they deem necessary and may remove the executive and seat an interim president, run a new election, or perform any manner of modification to the constitutional structure of our executive branch as they may see fit to resolve the constitutional crisis.
Now what if these actions are taken and Kamala/Biden refuse to leave and proclaim authority over the military in defense of their executive powers?
The 42nd Congress addressed this during reconstruction and on April 20, 1871 passed the Civil Rights Act of 1871 which states:
“or shall conspire together for the purpose in any manner impeding, hindering, obstructing or defeating the due course of justice in an State or Territory” ... “or by force, intimidation, or threat to prevent any citizen of the United States lawfully entitled to vote from giving his support or advocacy in a lawful manner towards or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector of President or Vice-President of the United States, or as a member of the Congress of the United States, or to injure any such citizen in his person or property on account of such support or advocacy, each and every person so offending shall be deemed guilty of a high crime”
https://scholarlylaw.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/civil-rights-act-of-1871.pdf
Such laws require enforcement and enforcement was addressed by the same congress in an act “To enforce the Right of Citizens of the United States to vote in the several States of this Union, and for other Purposes.” This act delegated by presidential signature and congressional vote, power over the militia, navy, and land forces to commissioners of the district courts to enforce voting rights.
https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Enforcement_Act_of_1870
“Sec. 9. And be it further enacted, That the district attorneys, marshals, and deputy marshals of the United States, the commissioners appointed by the circuit and territorial courts of the United States, with powers of arresting, imprisoning, or bailing offenders against the laws of the United States, and every other officer who may be specially empowered by the President of the United States, shall be, and they are hereby, specially authorized and required, at the expense of the United States, to institute proceedings against all and every person who shall violate the provisions of this act, and cause him or them to be arrested and imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be, for trial before such court of the United States or territorial court as has cognizance of the offense. And with a view to afford reasonable protection to all persons in their constitutional right to vote without distinction of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, and to the prompt discharge of the duties of this act, it shall be the duty of the circuit courts of the United States, and the superior courts of the Territories of the United States, from time to time, to increase the number of commissioners, so as to afford a speedy and convenient means for the arrest and examination of persons charged with a violation of this act; and such commissioners are hereby authorized and required to exercise and discharge all the powers and duties conferred on them by this act, and the same duties with regard to offences created by this act as they are authorized by law to exercise with regard to other offences against the laws of the United States.”
“Sec. 10. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of all marshals and deputy marshals to obey and execute all warrants and precepts issued under the provisions of this act, when to them directed; and should any marshal or deputy marshal refuse to receive such warrant or other process when tendered, or to use all proper means diligently to execute the same, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in the sum of one thousand dollars, to the use of the person deprived of the rights conferred by this act. And the better to enable the said commissioners to execute their duties faithfully and efficiently, in conformity with the Constitution of the United States and the requirements of this act, they are hereby authorized and empowered, within their districts respectively, to appoint, in writing, under their hands, any one or more suitable persons, from time to time, to execute all such warrants and other process as may be issued by them in the lawful performance of their respective duties, and the persons so appointed to execute any warrant or process as aforesaid shall have authority to summon and call to their aid the bystanders or posse comitatus of the proper county, or such portion of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as may be necessary to the performance of the duty with which they are charged”
This means that the commissioners as appointed by circuit courts may at their discretion, without executive consent, deputize the national guard (militia), the army, and navy to enforce this act.
This is to say in shorter terms that the courts of the United States, through appointed commissioners, may deploy the US Military on US soil to enforce any outcome of a re-run Arizona election, and that by way of a ballot measure by the citizens of Arizona, such a condition can be constructed.
Further, this act provides the means of removal of any elected official in violation of the act.
“it shall be the duty of the district attorney of the United States for the district in which such person shall hold office, as aforesaid, to proceed against such person, by writ of quo warranto, returnable to the circuit or district court of the United States in such district, and to prosecute the same to the removal of such person from office”
Don’t get distracted folks. This is our last constitutional remedy. We must create the constitutional crisis and open the constitution to modification, a point a district attorney by constitutional mandate to the District of Colombia who will employ the land and naval forces as deputies to remove Kamala and Biden from office under writ of quo warranto and prosecution thereof. Further such a convention must define a new time, place, and manner of choosing that runs the election anew with paper ballots under the supervision of the national guard.
TL;DR; Read your constitution and the Civil Rights Act passed by the 42nd Congress while demanding your state legislators perform FULL FORENSIC AUDITS OF ALL 50 STATES
When someone is paid to speak on behalf of another it is not the speech of the individual rather the speech of another.
We need a law that requires any one hiring others to speak on their behalf to register the count, purpose, and pay for those who speaks on behalf of them and to register those hired as an agents of the company that hired them.
Additionally any foreign individual who is paid to speak on behalf of a entity should be held to strict content standards and enforced by treaty law to prevent negative, harassing, destructive, divisive, or political speech by those foreign agents speaking on behalf of an entity.
The net effect would be an audit trail of those paid to disparage, distract, and discredit online gatherings. It would make a political and financial cost to foreign nations who wage information war against the US public.
WallStrertBets is in an uproar about the moderator coup and flagrant manipulation.
If we all go over there and find any one commenting about the coup and mock them saying “this is literally DEBUNKED you sound like a conspiracy theorist” It will build the association in their minds between the key word DEBUNKED and real coups being covered up.
They are all wise to the shills and bots, a mass influx of this key word in trolling comments would yield self reflection in people who otherwise won’t pay attention.
Please enumerate these facts which most compel us to alter our political system to an America First system of government lead by we the people
Alright boys and girls, I know we are all in “wtf is even real?” states of minds.
Let’s remember the most important lessons we learned from Q; how to research and build public record.
I was part of the volunteer data science group helping formulate the court admissible materials used by Sidney, Byrne, and Rudy to combat the fraud along with an army of volunteers. I learned many lessons about how discovery works, how to get through the front door of the court house and walk away with warrants.
Let us focus our energy where it matters, building an open source rico case that doubles as a journal of public record.
I am looking for volunteer researchers who are ready to take this to the courts at every level and in every jurisdiction.
We all hope for a flash of sudden change and clarity, and those moments do come, but those moments cannot be all that we depend on for the long term security of the American way of life. We must each become involved in the public debate and the responsibilities of self governance.
While our courts are corrupt in many jurisdictions, there enough that aren’t that we can drag the facts into the public light kicking and screaming.
I can educate volunteers on what I learned and together we can fill in the gaps and learn together how to organize an army of journalists engaging on the lawfare front. For what is a legal case but journalism with consequences for the belligerent?
If you are interested in diving in and getting your hands dirty, reply here and declare your self. I’ll reach out and connect you to discord or similar chat where we can begin to build a body of court ready case material.
Through my work with the data science teams and election efforts, I have come to know several lawyers who can help us introduce our work into the courts as we begin to compel the truth one layer at a time.
This is far from over!
Let us be the fine point quill that defies empires with ink.
Alright boys and girls, I know we are all in “wtf is even real?” states of minds.
Let’s remember the most important lessons we learned from Q; how to research and build public record.
I was part of helping formulate the court admissible materials used by Sidney, Byrne, and Rudy to combat the fraud along with an army of volunteers. I learned many lessons about how discovery works, how to get through the front door of the court house and walk away with warrants.
Let us focus our energy where it matters, building an open source rico case that doubles as a journal of public record.
I am looking for volunteer researchers who are ready to take this to the courts at every level and in every jurisdiction.
We all hope for a flash of sudden change and clarity, and those moments do come, but those moments cannot be all that we depend on for the long term security of the American way of life. We must each become involved in the public debate and the responsibilities of self governance.
While our courts are corrupt in many jurisdictions, there enough that aren’t that we can drag the facts into the public light kicking and screaming.
I can educate volunteers on what I learned and together we can fill in the gaps and learn together how to organize an army of journalists engaging on the lawfare front. For what is a legal case but journalism with consequences for the belligerent?
If you are interested in diving in and getting your hands dirty, reply here and declare your self. I’ll reach out and connect you to discord or similar chat where we can begin to build a body of court ready case material.
Through my work with the data science teams and election efforts, I have come to know several lawyers who can help us introduce our work into the courts as we begin to compel the truth one layer at a time.
This is far from over!
Let us be the fine point quill that defies empires with ink.
How do you use military assets domestically without the insurrection act under present conditions? Let me explain what I’ve learned.
During reconstruction after the civil war, the congress mandated that the right to vote shall be enforced by a series of actions by various responsible parties which conclude with the right to enforcement by such portion of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as may be necessary to the performance of that duty.
Forty-first Congress An ACT To enforce the Right of Citizens of the United States to vote in the several States of this Union, and for other Purposes.
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/EnforcementAct_1870.pdf
Let’s walk through the system outlined in the act:
Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That whenever, by or under the authority of the constitution or laws of any State, or the laws of any Territory, any act is or shall be required to [be] done by any citizen as a prerequisite to qualify or entitle him to vote, the offer of any such citizen to perform the act required to be done as aforesaid shall, if it fail to be carried into execution by reason of the wrongful act or omission aforesaid of the person or officer charged with the duty of receiving or permitting such performance or offer to perform, or acting thereon, be deemed and held as a performance in law of such act; and the person so offering and failing as aforesaid, and being otherwise qualified, shall be entitled to vote in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had in fact performed such act;
Any one who attempted to vote and who was qualified shall be entitled to vote in the same manner as before; a re-run election by another phrasing.
and any judge, inspector, or other officer of election whose duty it is or shall be to receive, count, certify, register, report, or give effect to the vote of any such citizen who shall wrongfully refuse or omit to receive, count, certify, register, report, or give effect to the vote of such citizen upon the presentation by him of his affidavit stating such offer and the time and place thereof, and the name of the officer or person whose duty it was to act thereon, and that he was wrongfully prevented by such person or officer from performing such act, shall for every such offence forfeit and pay........ and shall also for every such offence be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall, on conviction thereof, be fined not less than five hundred dollars, or be imprisoned not less than one month and not more than one year, or both, at the discretion of the court.
In other words when Pence and the Senate refused to admit the electors from the various states contested, those who refused to permit the electors to perform their constitutionally mandated duties have violated section 3 of this act.
Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That if any person, by force, bribery, threats, intimidation, or other unlawful means, shall hinder, delay, prevent, or obstruct, or shall combine and confederate with others to hinder, delay, prevent, or obstruct, any citizen from doing any act required to be done to qualify him to vote or from voting at any election as aforesaid....... shall also for every such offence be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall.....
We all read the reports of the violence, threats, blackmail, etc going on in the swing stages concerning the certifications and selection of electors....
Sec. 6. And be it further enacted, That if two or more persons shall band or conspire together ......... with intent to violate any provision of this act, or to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise and enjoyment of any right or privilege granted or secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having exercised the same, such persons shall be held guilty of felony, and .........
Motions by the congress to hunt down and persecute every Trump voter as terrorists for asserting their rights under this act by utilizing a staged insurrection of their own design is a conspiracy with the intent to oppress and intimidate the citizenry. The planning and coordination around such motions and of legislative actions which intend to deprive us of our rights under the guise of the staged events of Jan 6 thusly disqualify from office those who participated in planning of the legislation and or the staged insurrection.
Note the key phrase “conspire together” which does not require the implementation of their intended punitive reaction only the intent. The Congress have widely publicized their intentions to hunt down the Trump voting American public for reprisal.
shall, moreover, be thereafter ineligible to, and disabled from holding, any office or place of honor, profit, or trust created by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
With the forfeiture of their offices they are ineligible to participate in the choosing of President.
What remedies exist In such a crisis? With the grace of wise men long before our times, we have a set of congressional authorizations which directly address situation. It begins in the courts.
Sec. 8. And be it further enacted, That the district courts of the United States, within their respective districts, shall have, exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of all crimes and offences committed against the provisions of this act, and also, concurrently with the circuit courts of the United States, of all causes, civil and criminal, arising under this act, except as herein otherwise provided, and the jurisdiction hereby conferred shall be exercised in conformity with the laws and practice governing United States courts; and all crimes and offences committed against the provisions of this act may be prosecuted by the indictment of a grand jury, or, in cases of crimes and offences not infamous, the prosecution may be either by indictment or information filed by the district attorney in a court having jurisdiction.
Of note is that Supreme Court justices declared them selves the circuit judges at the end of November. They can in their authority convene a grand jury.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitAssignments.aspx
Within our present crisis the question is, who has the authority to act and by what vehicles must they act?
Sec. 9. And be it further enacted, That the district attorneys, marshals, and deputy marshals of the United States, the commissioners appointed by the circuit and territorial courts of the United States, with powers of arresting, imprisoning, or bailing offenders against the laws of the United States, and every other officer who may be specially empowered by the President of the United States, shall be, and they are hereby, specially authorized and required, at the expense of the United States, to institute proceedings against all and every person who shall violate the provisions of this act, and cause him or them to be arrested and imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be, for trial before such court of the United States or territorial court as has cognizance of the offense.
We see that the US Marshals along with others and of note within them, commissioners appointed by circuit judges are empowered to enforce this act. Those commissioners in the present topology of our courts would be appointed by the Justices of the Supreme Court who are at present occupying the circuit courts.
And with a view to afford reasonable protection to all persons in their constitutional right to vote without distinction of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, and to the prompt discharge of the duties of this act, it shall be the duty of the circuit courts of the United States, and the superior courts of the Territories of the United States, from time to time, to increase the number of commissioners, so as to afford a speedy and convenient means for the arrest and examination of persons charged with a violation of this act; and such commissioners are hereby authorized and required to exercise and discharge all the powers and duties conferred on them by this act, and the same duties with regard to offences created by this act as they are authorized by law to exercise with regard to other offences against the laws of the United States.
The number of commissioners is variable to the situation at hand and congress stipulated those commissioners are required to discharge their duties under this act.
If the US Marshals fail to act, the commissioners have at their disposal a set of remedies.
Sec. 10. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of all marshals and deputy marshals to obey and execute all warrants and precepts issued under the provisions of this act, when to them directed; and should any marshal or deputy marshal refuse to receive such warrant or other process when tendered, or to use all proper means diligently to execute the same, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in the sum of one thousand dollars, to the use of the person deprived of the rights conferred by this act. And the better to enable the said commissioners to execute their duties faithfully and efficiently, in conformity with the Constitution of the United States and the requirements of this act, they are hereby authorized and empowered, within their districts respectively, to appoint, in writing, under their hands, any one or more suitable persons, from time to time, to execute all such warrants and other process as may be issued by them in the lawful performance of their respective duties,
Let us recount that the commissioners are produced as an act of the circuit judges who are at present Supreme Court judges. Through this act, congress granted the authority for those commissioners to appoint in writing what amount to deputies to enforce the provisions of this act.
This is where it gets interesting. Through this act, congress has granted certain domestic authorities to command the armed forces which may be employed to enforce this act.
and the persons so appointed to execute any warrant or process as aforesaid shall have authority to summon and call to their aid the bystanders or posse comitatus of the proper county, or such portion of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as may be necessary to the performance of the duty with which they are charged, and to insure a faithful observance of the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and such warrants shall run and be executed by said officers anywhere in the State or Territory within which they are issued.
These commissioners may call to their aid: bystanders, posses, land or naval forces, or the militia (national guard). Under their authority as granted by congress and delegates by the circuit courts, the military and militia can be deployed domestically out side of the Presidential chain of command.
Let us reduce these threads and state that the US Supreme Court acting as circuit judges can assign commissioners with the authority to utilize the US military domestically to enforce the rights of the citizenry to vote and may arrest those who deny that right or conspire to oppress the population; those who have committed those acts have surrendered their offices of trust and profit under the United States.
What happens when the courts are no longer functional?
The Supreme Court answered this question after Pearl Harbor in Duncan v. Kahanamoku, 327 U.S. 304 (1946). When the courts are not able to function, the military holds jurisdiction.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/327/304/
Additionally the President is authorized by this act to employ the military to aid in the execution of these judicial proceedings.
Sec. 13. And be it further enacted, That it shall be lawful for the President of the United States to employ such part of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as shall be necessary to aid in the execution of judicial process issued under this act.
One of Obama’s final acts as puppet dictator was to reorganize the continuity of government plan. This likely lead to the authorization of the insurgency that has fought against Trump every step of America’s presidency. This consternation under the guise that Trump hacked the elections was in the retrospective an act of sedition promulgated by Obama and his team.
https://www.gpo.gov/docs/default-source/accessibility-privacy-coop-files/January2017FCD1-2.pdf
What authorities might exist under the continuity of government plans that existed pre-trump?
During reconstruction after the civil war, the congress mandated that the right to vote shall be enforced by a series of actions by various responsible parties which conclude with the right to enforcement by such portion of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as may be necessary to the performance of that duty.
Forty-first Congress An ACT To enforce the Right of Citizens of the United States to vote in the several States of this Union, and for other Purposes.
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/EnforcementAct_1870.pdf
Let’s walk through the system outlined in the act:
Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That whenever, by or under the authority of the constitution or laws of any State, or the laws of any Territory, any act is or shall be required to [be] done by any citizen as a prerequisite to qualify or entitle him to vote, the offer of any such citizen to perform the act required to be done as aforesaid shall, if it fail to be carried into execution by reason of the wrongful act or omission aforesaid of the person or officer charged with the duty of receiving or permitting such performance or offer to perform, or acting thereon, be deemed and held as a performance in law of such act; and the person so offering and failing as aforesaid, and being otherwise qualified, shall be entitled to vote in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had in fact performed such act;
This would mean if my interpretation is correct that any one who attempted to vote and who was qualified shall be entitled to vote in the same manner as before; re-run election by another phrasing.
and any judge, inspector, or other officer of election whose duty it is or shall be to receive, count, certify, register, report, or give effect to the vote of any such citizen who shall wrongfully refuse or omit to receive, count, certify, register, report, or give effect to the vote of such citizen upon the presentation by him of his affidavit stating such offer and the time and place thereof, and the name of the officer or person whose duty it was to act thereon, and that he was wrongfully prevented by such person or officer from performing such act, shall for every such offence forfeit and pay........ and shall also for every such offence be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall, on conviction thereof, be fined not less than five hundred dollars, or be imprisoned not less than one month and not more than one year, or both, at the discretion of the court.
In other words when Pence and the Senate refused to admit the electors from the various states contested, those who refused to permit the electors to perform their constitutionally mandated duties have violated section 3 of this act.
Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That if any person, by force, bribery, threats, intimidation, or other unlawful means, shall hinder, delay, prevent, or obstruct, or shall combine and confederate with others to hinder, delay, prevent, or obstruct, any citizen from doing any act required to be done to qualify him to vote or from voting at any election as aforesaid....... shall also for every such offence be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall.....
We all read the reports of the violence, threats, blackmail, etc going on in the swing stages concerning the certifications and selection of electors....
Sec. 6. And be it further enacted, That if two or more persons shall band or conspire together ......... with intent to violate any provision of this act, or to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise and enjoyment of any right or privilege granted or secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having exercised the same, such persons shall be held guilty of felony, and .........
Motions by the congress to hunt down and persecute every Trump voter as a terrorist for asserting their rights under this act by utilizing a staged insurrection of their own design is a conspiracy with the intent to oppress and intimidate the citizenry. The planning and coordination around such motions and legislative actions which intend to deprive us of our rights under the guise of the staged events of Jan 6 thusly disqualify from office those who participated in planning of the legislation and or the staged insurrection.
Note the key phrase “conspire together” which does not require the implementation of their intended punitive reaction only the intent. They have widely publicized their intentions to hunt down the Trump voting American public.
shall, moreover, be thereafter ineligible to, and disabled from holding, any office or place of honor, profit, or trust created by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
With the forfeiture of their offices they are ineligible to participate in the choosing of President.
What remedies exist In such a crisis? With the grace of wise men long before our times, we have a set of congressional authorization which directly address this. It begins in the courts.
Sec. 8. And be it further enacted, That the district courts of the United States, within their respective districts, shall have, exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of all crimes and offences committed against the provisions of this act, and also, concurrently with the circuit courts of the United States, of all causes, civil and criminal, arising under this act, except as herein otherwise provided, and the jurisdiction hereby conferred shall be exercised in conformity with the laws and practice governing United States courts; and all crimes and offences committed against the provisions of this act may be prosecuted by the indictment of a grand jury, or, in cases of crimes and offences not infamous, the prosecution may be either by indictment or information filed by the district attorney in a court having jurisdiction.
Of note is that 4 Supreme Court justices declared them selves the circuit judges at the end of November. They can in their authority convene a grand jury.
Within our present crisis the question is, who has the authority to act and by what vehicle will they act.
Sec. 9. And be it further enacted, That the district attorneys, marshals, and deputy marshals of the United States, the commissioners appointed by the circuit and territorial courts of the United States, with powers of arresting, imprisoning, or bailing offenders against the laws of the United States, and every other officer who may be specially empowered by the President of the United States, shall be, and they are hereby, specially authorized and required, at the expense of the United States, to institute proceedings against all and every person who shall violate the provisions of this act, and cause him or them to be arrested and imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be, for trial before such court of the United States or territorial court as has cognizance of the offense.
We see that the US Marshals along with others and of note in them, commissioners appointed by circuit judges are empowered to enforce this act. Those commissioners in the present topology of our courts would be appointed by the Justices if the Supreme Court who are at present occupying the circuit courts.
And with a view to afford reasonable protection to all persons in their constitutional right to vote without distinction of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, and to the prompt discharge of the duties of this act, it shall be the duty of the circuit courts of the United States, and the superior courts of the Territories of the United States, from time to time, to increase the number of commissioners, so as to afford a speedy and convenient means for the arrest and examination of persons charged with a violation of this act; and such commissioners are hereby authorized and required to exercise and discharge all the powers and duties conferred on them by this act, and the same duties with regard to offences created by this act as they are authorized by law to exercise with regard to other offences against the laws of the United States.
The number of commissioners is variable to the situation at hand and congress stipulated those commissioners are required to discharge their duties under this act.
If the US Marshals fail to act, the commissioners have at their disposal a set of remedies.
Sec. 10. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of all marshals and deputy marshals to obey and execute all warrants and precepts issued under the provisions of this act, when to them directed; and should any marshal or deputy marshal refuse to receive such warrant or other process when tendered, or to use all proper means diligently to execute the same, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in the sum of one thousand dollars, to the use of the person deprived of the rights conferred by this act. And the better to enable the said commissioners to execute their duties faithfully and efficiently, in conformity with the Constitution of the United States and the requirements of this act, they are hereby authorized and empowered, within their districts respectively, to appoint, in writing, under their hands, any one or more suitable persons, from time to time, to execute all such warrants and other process as may be issued by them in the lawful performance of their respective duties,
Let us recount that the commissioners are produced as an act of the circuit judges who are at present Supreme Court judges. Through this act, congress granted the authority for those commissioners to appoint in writing what amount to deputies to enforce the provisions of this act.
This is where it gets interesting. Through this act, congress has granted certain domestic authorities to command the armed forces which may be employed to enforce this act.
and the persons so appointed to execute any warrant or process as aforesaid shall have authority to summon and call to their aid the bystanders or posse comitatus of the proper county, or such portion of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as may be necessary to the performance of the duty with which they are charged, and to insure a faithful observance of the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and such warrants shall run and be executed by said officers anywhere in the State or Territory within which they are issued.
These commissioners may call to their aid: bystanders, posses, land or naval forces, or the militia (national guard). Under their authority as granted by congress and delegates by the circuit courts, the military and militia can be deployed domestically out side of the Presidential chain of command.
Let us reduce these threads and state that the US Supreme Court acting as circuit judges can assign commissioners with the authority to utilize the US military domestically to enforce the rights of the citizenry to vote and may arrest those who deny that right or conspire to oppress the population; those who have committed those acts have surrendered their offices of trust and profit under the United States.
Additionally the President is authorized by this act to employ the military to aid in the execution of these judicial proceedings.
Sec. 13. And be it further enacted, That it shall be lawful for the President of the United States to employ such part of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as shall be necessary to aid in the execution of judicial process issued under this act.
What happens when the courts are no longer functional?
The Supreme Court answered this question after Pearl Harbor in Duncan v. Kahanamoku, 327 U.S. 304 (1946). When the courts are not able to function, the military holds jurisdiction.
During reconstruction after the civil war, the congress mandated that the right to vote shall be enforced by a series of actions by various responsible parties which conclude with the right to enforcement by such portion of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as may be necessary to the performance of that duty.
Forty-first Congress An ACT To enforce the Right of Citizens of the United States to vote in the several States of this Union, and for other Purposes.
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/EnforcementAct_1870.pdf
Let’s walk through the system outlined in the act:
Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That whenever, by or under the authority of the constitution or laws of any State, or the laws of any Territory, any act is or shall be required to [be] done by any citizen as a prerequisite to qualify or entitle him to vote, the offer of any such citizen to perform the act required to be done as aforesaid shall, if it fail to be carried into execution by reason of the wrongful act or omission aforesaid of the person or officer charged with the duty of receiving or permitting such performance or offer to perform, or acting thereon, be deemed and held as a performance in law of such act; and the person so offering and failing as aforesaid, and being otherwise qualified, shall be entitled to vote in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had in fact performed such act;
This would mean if my interpretation is correct that any one who attempted to vote and who was qualified shall be entitled to vote in the same manner as before; re-run election by another phrasing.
and any judge, inspector, or other officer of election whose duty it is or shall be to receive, count, certify, register, report, or give effect to the vote of any such citizen who shall wrongfully refuse or omit to receive, count, certify, register, report, or give effect to the vote of such citizen upon the presentation by him of his affidavit stating such offer and the time and place thereof, and the name of the officer or person whose duty it was to act thereon, and that he was wrongfully prevented by such person or officer from performing such act, shall for every such offence forfeit and pay........ and shall also for every such offence be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall, on conviction thereof, be fined not less than five hundred dollars, or be imprisoned not less than one month and not more than one year, or both, at the discretion of the court.
In other words when Pence and the Senate refused to admit the electors from the various states contested, those who refused to permit the electors to perform their constitutionally mandated duties have violated section 3 of this act.
Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That if any person, by force, bribery, threats, intimidation, or other unlawful means, shall hinder, delay, prevent, or obstruct, or shall combine and confederate with others to hinder, delay, prevent, or obstruct, any citizen from doing any act required to be done to qualify him to vote or from voting at any election as aforesaid....... shall also for every such offence be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall.....
We all read the reports of the violence, threats, blackmail, etc going on in the swing stages concerning the certifications and selection of electors....
Sec. 6. And be it further enacted, That if two or more persons shall band or conspire together ......... with intent to violate any provision of this act, or to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise and enjoyment of any right or privilege granted or secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having exercised the same, such persons shall be held guilty of felony, and .........
Motions by the congress to hunt down and persecute every Trump voter as a terrorist for asserting their rights under this act by utilizing a staged insurrection of their own design is a conspiracy with the intent to oppress and intimidate the citizenry. The planning and coordination around such motions and legislative actions which intend to deprive us of our rights under the guise of the staged events of Jan 6 thusly disqualify from office those who participated in planning of the legislation and or the staged insurrection.
Note the key phrase “conspire together” which does not require the implementation of their intended punitive reaction only the intent. They have widely publicized their intentions to hunt down the Trump voting American public.
shall, moreover, be thereafter ineligible to, and disabled from holding, any office or place of honor, profit, or trust created by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
With the forfeiture of their offices they are ineligible to participate in the choosing of President.
What remedies exist In such a crisis? With the grace of wise men long before our times, we have a set of congressional authorization which directly address this. It begins in the courts.
Sec. 8. And be it further enacted, That the district courts of the United States, within their respective districts, shall have, exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of all crimes and offences committed against the provisions of this act, and also, concurrently with the circuit courts of the United States, of all causes, civil and criminal, arising under this act, except as herein otherwise provided, and the jurisdiction hereby conferred shall be exercised in conformity with the laws and practice governing United States courts; and all crimes and offences committed against the provisions of this act may be prosecuted by the indictment of a grand jury, or, in cases of crimes and offences not infamous, the prosecution may be either by indictment or information filed by the district attorney in a court having jurisdiction.
Of note is that 4 Supreme Court justices declared them selves the circuit judges at the end of November. They can in their authority convene a grand jury.
Within our present crisis the question is, who has the authority to act and by what vehicle will they act.
Sec. 9. And be it further enacted, That the district attorneys, marshals, and deputy marshals of the United States, the commissioners appointed by the circuit and territorial courts of the United States, with powers of arresting, imprisoning, or bailing offenders against the laws of the United States, and every other officer who may be specially empowered by the President of the United States, shall be, and they are hereby, specially authorized and required, at the expense of the United States, to institute proceedings against all and every person who shall violate the provisions of this act, and cause him or them to be arrested and imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be, for trial before such court of the United States or territorial court as has cognizance of the offense.
We see that the US Marshals along with others and of note in them, commissioners appointed by circuit judges are empowered to enforce this act. Those commissioners in the present topology of our courts would be appointed by the Justices if the Supreme Court who are at present occupying the circuit courts.
And with a view to afford reasonable protection to all persons in their constitutional right to vote without distinction of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, and to the prompt discharge of the duties of this act, it shall be the duty of the circuit courts of the United States, and the superior courts of the Territories of the United States, from time to time, to increase the number of commissioners, so as to afford a speedy and convenient means for the arrest and examination of persons charged with a violation of this act; and such commissioners are hereby authorized and required to exercise and discharge all the powers and duties conferred on them by this act, and the same duties with regard to offences created by this act as they are authorized by law to exercise with regard to other offences against the laws of the United States.
The number of commissioners is variable to the situation at hand and congress stipulated those commissioners are required to discharge their duties under this act.
If the US Marshals fail to act, the commissioners have at their disposal a set of remedies.
Sec. 10. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of all marshals and deputy marshals to obey and execute all warrants and precepts issued under the provisions of this act, when to them directed; and should any marshal or deputy marshal refuse to receive such warrant or other process when tendered, or to use all proper means diligently to execute the same, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in the sum of one thousand dollars, to the use of the person deprived of the rights conferred by this act. And the better to enable the said commissioners to execute their duties faithfully and efficiently, in conformity with the Constitution of the United States and the requirements of this act, they are hereby authorized and empowered, within their districts respectively, to appoint, in writing, under their hands, any one or more suitable persons, from time to time, to execute all such warrants and other process as may be issued by them in the lawful performance of their respective duties,
Let us recount that the commissioners are produced as an act of the circuit judges who are at present Supreme Court judges. Through this act, congress granted the authority for those commissioners to appoint in writing what amount to deputies to enforce the provisions of this act.
This is where it gets interesting. Through this act, congress has granted certain domestic authorities to command the armed forces which may be employed to enforce this act.
and the persons so appointed to execute any warrant or process as aforesaid shall have authority to summon and call to their aid the bystanders or posse comitatus of the proper county, or such portion of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as may be necessary to the performance of the duty with which they are charged, and to insure a faithful observance of the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and such warrants shall run and be executed by said officers anywhere in the State or Territory within which they are issued.
These commissioners may call to their aid: bystanders, posses, land or naval forces, or the militia (national guard). Under their authority as granted by congress and delegates by the circuit courts, the military and militia can be deployed domestically out side of the Presidential chain of command.
Let us reduce these threads and state that the US Supreme Court acting as circuit judges can assign commissioners with the authority to utilize the US military domestically to enforce the rights of the citizenry to vote and may arrest those who deny that right or conspire to oppress the population; those who have committed those acts have surrendered their offices of trust and profit under the United States.
Additionally the President is authorized by this act to employ the military to aid in the execution of these judicial proceedings.
Sec. 13. And be it further enacted, That it shall be lawful for the President of the United States to employ such part of the land or naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as shall be necessary to aid in the execution of judicial process issued under this act.
What happens when the courts are no longer functional?
The Supreme Court answered this question after Pearl Harbor in Duncan v. Kahanamoku, 327 U.S. 304 (1946). When the courts are not able to function, the military holds jurisdiction.
