Go to your court house and request to meet with a judge and present him your case and ask if he will help you get it prosecuted.
If a definitive or comprehensive list can be made I can train AI to detect and scan for those faces.
It was an honor to meet with Flynn and to help him prepare a breefing for you. I’m not done! And I know you aren’t either. I hope some day to meet you in person and thank you for being such a positive influence.
Sadly that article fails to provide a link to the Supreme Court decision so its bad faith without sourcing.
^^ This guy knows how to get shit done
Thanks for the editing. I’ll scoop your post into my source document as I revise my essay to address my drunken math madness.
As noted in my math error comment I’m leaving this post as is because it’s never fair to alter the soil under people feet when they’ve stood up on it.
It’s not a theory. It’s simply an illustration. This community seems stuck on a coined term “devolution”. You guys need to be careful about ideologies. To many times I’ve seen this community suckered into crap like “r anon” and “jfk”. This devolution thing smells to high hell to someone long disassociated from the community.
Be critical. Don’t let your selves fall for another deep state coined term or distraction.
So get off your ass and offer corrections. Do something useful. Or don’t.
It’s your choice if you wallow in sorrow and whine without action. Choose to be valuable. Or choose to be a snot nosed waste of bandwidth. I did something. What can you hold up as your value beyond complaints?
Neither does it prohibit the reconvening of the same and the constitution specifically states powers not delegated to the Congress belong to the states or to the people. It doesn’t prohibit it and neither does it give a framework for it. If the time, place, and manner is modified by a state legislature, the federal apparatus has no say.
I was drunk and doing common core math. No excuse. You’re right. It would take additional states. We have 6 in the line of fire. So it would require a cascade beginning with AZ. None the less a constitutional crisis would arise from withdrawn electors. Still, major oversight on my part. Thanks for the call out.
I’ll leave my post as is because the basis of it doesn’t so much require that factor to flush out as it depends on the election integrity caucus having consensus momentum behind it which AZ will still create. But I’ll update my essay this week to address this before I spread my work again.
Thanks for the proof reading! I miss Q folks for this reason. The real thinkers are amongst this community ❤️
Edit: note added inline in my post to reference the comment above.
After knowledge comes action. A redress to our grievances must occur. At some point we must take the risk. If the last courses of legal and judicial action are dismantled, then the contract of our society is void. We are far from that moment but we must gamble at some point; take the risk, and trust that the people will rise if the course of judicial resolve fails.
No offense but that guy has been shilling silver so long that his words fall on my deaf ears. I used to be a listener but it’s a little too much of a dead end hopium hit for me.
I’m not a regular poster or reader over here. I’m an old school Q follower so I knew I’d find a receptive audience to my research here. But I’m going to stick to my own path of study and judicial action and let you guys do your work as you do it. I’m too disconnected from the Q world to find my footing again.
The pinnacle of Q was 14 days after the election and the consensus struck like lightning in the form of public data science. That for me was my last hoorah before I took my own course.
Blessed are the peace markers and the researchers who meme in the name of light, shine brightly Anons o7
You can donate doge coin to my candidacy ?
Extradition in motion means some foreign power files charges and is using treaties to attempt to compel the delivery of the criminal to their jurisdiction. It does not mean arrested.
They are as similar as interchanging convicted (found guilty) and indicted (accused). One is the end the other the beginning.
If you want to claim the 'Hillary Clinton will be arrested ...' part is not Q, fine, but
It’s not a claim. It’s a fact. It’s still up on the 4chan archives. Go use your own eyes and see.
For the rest... What of it? It doesn’t change the above fact that it wasn’t Q who said she would be arrested. Don’t move the ball.
Q didn’t post that. He replied to it. Go look again.
What happened in Saudi Arabia the same time? Is 11.3 a date or is it a chapter and section reference? Is it attributed a year? Who knows. No one made a claim it was a date, people assumed it was and have spent 3 years trying to discredit Q for an assumption made by Anons.
What Anons have done is insanely profound. Q gave us a rally point and little more. The rest was all we the people. Those who sat and watched every thing like a TV can bitch and moan about us all they want, we know they were placated by the TV and memes and are projecting their own disappointment with them selves on us.
I spent 3 years of my life working with incredible citizen journalists studying the dynamics and topology of fact patterns in our modern age and applying that to the information domain.
No one knows who I am or what all I’ve done and I like that fact. Don’t need credit. Don’t need fame. Only need freedom. They can hate all they want, I know what I did and I stand by my actions and the actions of the broader anon community.
Truth in the night will always shine bright!
If they are they have a motive. Thus it’s done out of malice and therefore with the intent to cause harm. Just as bad.
They are going to take exposed Anons and try and destroy their lives. Then relentlessly mock people who stood up and went to work exposing corruption.
It’s disparagement. Ignore the insults. They will use every psychology trick they have. We know the war is just beginning. Hold the line soldiers! The truth won’t expose its self! Keep digging you glorious bastards!
Do we get ban hammers and arm bands?!
Then no thanks. But keep up the good work!
Too bad that site is 100% ads and you can’t read unless you touch the data collectors.
I can see the boogers up your nostrils while you smug at me ?
I’m 99% sure you’re a raging liberal climate activist mad that she does t have a penis right now.
How do you know this isn’t Q related? What inside knowledge do you have that you’re filtering public debate with?
Man those “other” people. The “they” of them is just so “other”. Division is the only solution. And silence those who dare be “other”.
Thing thread graph theory and key symbolism in the catholic heritage.