Everyone in the house is screaming at the TV! We the people know better!
They shut it off....
The fun begins...
The hate the GOPee'rs have for Trump and the Governor.
The money flowing to The Establishment choice candidates is incredible to knock out statewide and locally maga candidates. These are Jeb Bush establishment GOP. Marco Rubio knows what I'm talking about.
America will unfurl herself at the first motion of Justice.
However the clock IS running out.
And just like that we're a banana republic!
August 28-29, 2014 -- Pedophilia enabling follows around GOP candidate for the U.S. Senate publication date: Aug 27, 2014
Pedophilia enabling follows around GOP candidate for the U.S. Senate
Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate from Nebraska Ben Sasse, already struck by allegations that he helped cover up the sexual abuse of underage male pages while tutoring and proctoring the House Page Program in the late 1990s, is now faced with another brush with pederasty and pedophilia as a result of the conviction of the former chief of cyber-security for the Department of Health and Human Services.
The chief of cyber-security for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Timothy DeFoggi, was convicted by a jury for the U.S. District Court of Nebraska in Omaha for "engaging in a child exploitation enterprise, conspiracy to advertise and distribute child pornography, and accessing a computer with intent to view child pornography in connection with his membership in a child pornography website." DeFoggi used the sites, including two called PedoBook and Onion Pedo Video Archive, to traffic in child pornography. The sites were operated in Omaha by Aaron McGrath, who used the Tor anonymity service to cover the tracks of himself and clients like DeFoggi. DeFoggi is a former resident of Germantown, Maryland. Last December, Ryan Loskarn, the chief of staff for Tennessee Republican Senator Lamar Alexander, was arrested at his Capitol Hill home for possession and distribution of child pornography. The following month, he reputedly committed suicide at his parents' home in Sykesville, Maryland. Sykesville is a 45 minute drive from Germantown. Loskarn previously worked for GOP House members from Tennessee and California.
Sasse was the chief of staff for Nebraska GOP U.S. Representative Jeff Fortenberry when Loskarn also worked in the House. Sasse, who is a home schooler and an extreme right-wing Republican, served as the assistant secretary for planning and evaluation at the Department of Health and Human Services from January 2008 to January 2009. Sasse's oversight of HHS programs overlapped for one year with DeFoggi's work within the office of the assistant secretary for administration. The two offices, planning/evaluation and administration worked closely with one another, a fact that places Sasse, once again, in a job during a major case involving pedophilia.
Omaha, of course, is infamous for the so-called "Franklin cover-up," the use of the Franklin Credit Union in the 1980s by a top GOP official named Lawrence King to launder money used for the trafficking of children, including orphans from Boy's Town, for purposes of sexual molestation. The scandal involved the Reagan and Bush White Houses and was aggressively investigated in front-page stories by The Washington Times.
The FBI's Operation Torpedo targeted DeFoggi's and McGrath's cyber-pedophile operations based in Omaha. DeFoggi used the handles of "fuckchrist” and “PTasseater” to traffic in pornographic images and video of children, including infants.
Ben Sasse: Would you trust him around your children?
It is not known when the FBI first suspected DeFoggi but the Department of Justice stated in a press release that Operation Torpedo was part of a wider investigation called Project Safe Childhood, which began in 2006, two years before DeFoggi and Sasse were working at HHS on security policy issues. One can only wonder whether those issues dealt with securing the use of HHS computers used for storing child pornography from the Project Safe Childhood investigators. With Sasse in the U.S. Senate, one should not expect him to leading any crusades against child pornography and pedophiles. Sasse's brand of Christian Dominionism, as exemplified by the "Christian Fellowship" of Arlington, Virginia and Capitol Hill, suggests that anyone who molests children are automatically exonerated and forgiven of their sins if they "accept Jesus." Sasse's sordid record of affiliation with major pederast perpetrators may be exactly what the secret society of pedophiles in Omaha and Boy's Town wants to have representing them in the U.S. Senate.
Nebraska, once again, hit with another major pedophile case as seen in this below-the-fold article in the establishment Omaha World-Herald, which was implicated in the Franklin Cover-up. Nebraska's GOP candidate for U.S. Senate, Ben Sasse, is always one degree of separation from pedophile cases involving places where he has worked. Why would Nebraska want someone who, for almost 20 years, has had the stench of pedophilia around him representing them in the U.S. Senate?
Governor Ron DeSantis is very much needed for a full term in Florida.
When he first ran for office he said he wanted to clean up Florida's waterways.
While Florida has been under Republican rule for 30 yrs., You understand why it was never popular to mention it.
There has been so much damage done even the rich people can't enjoy their homes on the water, when the algae blooms begin to grow.
From the St Joe's paper company up in the panhandle, to the drilling deals in Collier County, people have been scarred or got cancer, in large numbers when there were toxic dumps. Florida is full of aquifers it is like swiss cheese underneath. The water flows through the cavernous territories and you cannot keep up with it as it moves around and you don't know where it is. You can Google all of the history on Florida's dirty waterways algae blooms and toxic dumps.
After being here for almost 40 years I can say no one has done as much damage in the way of not helping and making things worse, as the two termed Governor Rick Scott.
When Ron DeSantis ran for office and said he wanted to clean up Florida's waterways, the Republicans didn't know what to say. But the Democrats loved him. Ron won!
Let me tell you that dirty water and cancer does not know a party. Rick Scott stole from hospital organizations and got away with it. Billions! And was fined millions.
Working with Trump people seem to like him and have no idea who he is and how much damage he has done to Florida, when he was our governor for two terms.
Ron DeSantis still has a lot of work to do!
Everybody wants to know this is extremely unusual....
Pfizer Ordered By Uruguayan Judge to Report Composition of Covid-19 Vaccines, Including Any Presence of 'Graphene Oxide' or 'Nanotechnological Elements'
| 4 July 2022 |
According to a recent ruling by an Uruguayan judge, the government and the pharmaceutical company Pfizer must provide all the information they have on the COVID vaccine's biochemical composition, including any evidence of "graphene oxide" or "nanotechnological elements" as well as proof of the vaccine's efficacy and safety. Administrative Litigation Court (TCA) Judge Alejandro Recarey made the order in response to a request to suspend the immunization of children from five years of age in Uruguay. According to the court order released on Saturday, Judge Alejandro Recarey ordered the Presidency, the Ministry of Public Health, the State Health Services Administration (ASSE), and Pfizer to present all the information on Covid-19 vaccines within 48 hours, El Observador reported.
This was in a science paper three days ago, and Gateway has picked it up.
In November 2005, during morning rounds in the cardiac intensive care unit at the Sheba Medical Center in Tel Aviv, one of the authors, Jay Lavee, was stunned to have the following exchange with a patient suffering advanced heart failure:
“Doc, I’m fed up waiting here for nearly a year now while you guys find a heart donor. My insurance company told me to fly to China—they’ve already scheduled a heart transplant in two weeks.”
After processing what he’d heard, Jay responded: “Do you hear yourself? How can anyone promise you a donor heart on a specific date ahead of time? You understand that somebody must die on the very same day that you will undergo this surgery, don’t you?”
The patient: “I don’t know, Doc. That’s just what I was told.”
Sure enough, the patient flew to China and got his heart on the date promised. As far as we are aware, he was the first Israeli patient to undergo heart transplantation in China—though he was preceded by numerous Israelis who traveled there for kidney transplants.
For Jay, the incident was the unexpected beginning of nearly two decades of research and advocacy. Within three years he’d spearheaded the Organ Transplantation Law in Israel, the first of its kind in the world, which prevented insurance companies from reimbursing expenses associated with illicitly obtained organs. Along with a range of reforms encouraging domestic donation, this stopped the China-to-Israel organ trafficking pipeline in its tracks.
Since the 1990s it has been well known that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) traffics organs from executed prisoners. The pioneering human rights researcher Robin Munro was the first to find official approval for the practice while thumbing through an obscure volume of legal texts in a Hong Kong library. Those “temporary rules,” signed by a bevy of PRC ministries, authorized police and health departments to use the organs from executed prisoners and instructed them to keep quiet about it.
Beginning in the year 2000, however, China’s organ transplantation system began a period of rapid expansion: Thousands of new doctors were trained, hundreds of hospitals opened new transplant wings or constructed dedicated buildings, new patents for transplantation technologies were registered, and domestic immunosuppressant manufacturing began. A leading surgeon told Chinese media that “the year 2000 was a watershed for the organ transplant industry in China.” Another said the number of hospitals doing liver transplants after 2000 “rose abruptly like spring bamboo after rain.” The upward trajectory continued even after 2007, when major reforms to the death penalty system dramatically reduced the number of judicial executions.
Theories as to whose bodies made up the shortfall between the number of transplants and the number of officially recorded death penalty prisoners have confounded analysts since 2006. The leading hypothesis to date has been that political prisoners—mostly practitioners of Falun Gong, and more recently probably Uyghur Muslims, too—were killed extralegally, and their organs monetized.
But alongside the question of from whom, there is an almost equally compelling question of how? According to official claims, the act of judicial execution by public security authorities was hived off from the procurement of organs by medical professionals. This arrangement would still be highly unethical and is banned globally, because capital prisoners and their families cannot give informed consent to donate organs due to the inherently coercive nature of their circumstances.
The official narrative is comforting to the PRC medical establishment for two reasons. First, it exculpates medical workers from a campaign of secret surgical killings for profit. Second, it saves them from being identified as the executioners.
Our understanding of organ transplantation in China led us to doubt the official claims of hands-off surgeons. Recently, we conducted a detailed empirical study of the topic. We wanted to know whether the anecdotal accounts and claims of surgeons removing vital organs from living prisoners were accurate, or if the matter could be settled one way or another at all.
The obvious way to get an answer would be through detailed interviews with surgeons themselves—something the scholar of medicine and ideology Robert Jay Lifton managed with Nazi doctors after World War II. For obvious reasons, no such study is possible at present with PRC surgeons. But what if the evidence of surgeon involvement in executions by organ removal is hiding in plain sight?
Human rights researchers have highlighted cases of PRC doctors appearing to engage in execution by organ procurement for decades. Human Rights Watch uncovered procuratorial documents from the late 1980s stating that a small number of regions, “in order to be able to use particular organs from the criminals’ bodies, even go so far as to deliberately avoid killing them completely when carrying out the death sentence, so as to preserve live tissue.” The medical researcher Li Huige has co-authored a number of similar studies citing such documents. The most thorough Chinese-language study of the issue was conducted by the grassroots research collective The World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong in September 2014. Former surgeons have given testimony to similar effect, including Wang Guoqi before the U.S. Congress in 2001 and Enver Tohti before the China Tribunal in 2018. The Chinese military doctor who blew the whistle on SARS, Jiang Yanyong, told Hong Kong media in 2015 that doctors “would shoot prisoners so they’re not fully dead ... then quickly pull them into the truck and get the liver out.”
Our core question was simple: Are prisoners who have their hearts removed for transplantation actually dead?
Personal accounts and a sampling of clinical reports may have already convinced those who are predisposed to a skeptical view of the Chinese medical system. But until the system of mainstream medical research has put its imprimatur on the topic, the findings will not be legible to medical societies, policymakers, NGOs, or the prestige press. This is what led us to conduct a methodologically rigorous scientific study on the topic, run the gantlet of peer review, and place it in a respected medical journal, the American Journal of Transplantation, in April 2022.
Our core question in that article was simple: Are prisoners who have their hearts removed for transplantation actually dead? This question is based upon the dead donor rule, the most fundamental ethical rule in organ transplantation. The rule states that organ procurement must not commence until the donor is formally pronounced dead and that the procurement of organs must not cause the donor’s death.
For an organ donor to be medically and legally dead, brain or circulatory death must first be declared. Brain death is the permanent and irreversible cessation of all brain function, including breathing. As long as ventilation is artificially maintained in such patients, the heart continues to beat for a short while, thus keeping vital organs viable and suitable for transplantation.
This question is central, because if the prisoner donors in China were indeed brain dead at the time, then heart extraction would not have been the cause of death. But if the declaration of brain death was false—or indeed, medically impossible—then heart procurement would necessarily have been the cause of death. In other words, the prisoners would have been alive at the time of heart extraction and the surgeons would have been executioners.
It is worth pausing here to reflect on the logistical and clinical quandary faced by PRC judicial authorities and transplant surgeons. With few exceptions, the procurement of the heart for transplantation must take place when the heart is still beating. The heart is only stopped when the surgeon perfuses it with a cardioplegic solution, which stops it from beating while preserving its potential to reanimate after transplantation in a new host. It is extremely rare for successful heart transplantation to occur from a donor who has undergone circulatory death; this practice has only recently been established as viable. In particular, if a heart suffers uncontrolled cardiac arrest, the chances of graft failure increase dramatically.
So how did PRC security authorities inflict brain death—and only brain death—on humans in a repeatable and reliable way, while preserving the rest of the body for successful organ procurement? There are obviously no known published studies detailing experiments on this problem anywhere in the world. If the PRC medical establishment were to stay at arm’s length from the actual executions, then this challenge would have to be overcome by the security apparatus.
The only other country we know of that even tried something like this and wrote about it was Taiwan. In 2011 Taiwanese researchers discussed a very similar process to the quotes above from China about partial execution: “The bullet penetrating the temporal bone of skull will not reach the brainstem, so a direct brainstem death could not occur.” A bullet to the head will cause intracranial hemorrhage, they write, and this could possibly cause brainstem death. But “such a means is indirect, imprecise and unreliable.” The danger, from a strict transplant outcome perspective, would be accidentally causing the donor to suffer cardiac death—and the heart would then be wasted.
The question then is how PRC security and medical authorities resolved this dilemma. We don’t think they did. Our research presents a large amount of evidence for the alternative: Rather than execution-by-brain-death being mastered and refined by security authorities, the act of execution was joined with the act of heart removal, and was carried out by surgeons on the operating table.
There is a sense in which this choice might have been easily rationalized and even justified: The executed prisoner would now suffer only a prick to the arm before being anaesthetized rather than the trauma of a bullet to the head. (Of course, some prisoners may have suffered both.) Moreover, another life would have been saved in exchange. In this way, the image of killer doctors from some sort of horror film can be transmogrified into scenes of medical heroism. But this ethical gerrymandering sidesteps the fact that many of the victims in China were likely not capital prisoners who “would have been executed regardless,” but instead prisoners of conscience who were extrajudicially euthanized, and then had their hearts removed. Our study design therefore meant we needed to search for evidence of false or impossible declarations of brain death.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/china-killer-doctors
MOLLIE HEMINGWAY VISIT ON TWITTER@MZHEMINGWAY
President Biden really does not want the public to know about his federal takeover of election administration. Dozens of members of Congress have repeatedly asked for details, to no avail. Good government groups, members of the media, and private citizens have filed requests under the Freedom of Information Act. Not a single one has been responded to. All signs indicate a concerted effort to keep the public in the dark until at least after the November midterm elections. The lack of transparency and responsiveness is so bad that the
Department of Justice and some of its agencies have been repeatedly sued for the information.
When President Biden ordered all 600 federal agencies to “expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process” on March 7, 2021, Republican politicians, Constitutional scholars, and election integrity specialists began to worry exactly what was up his sleeve.
They had good reason. The 2020 election had suffered from widespread and coordinated efforts by Democrat activists and donors to run “Get Out The Vote” operations from inside state and local government election offices, predominantly in the Democrat-leaning areas of swing states. Independent researchers have shown the effect of this takeover of government election offices was extremely partisan and favored Democrats overwhelmingly.
At the time the order was issued, Democrats were also hoping to pass H.R. 1, a continuation of the effort to destabilize elections throughout the country via a federalized takeover of state election administrations. Biden gave each agency 200 days to file their plans for approval by none other than Susan Rice, his hyperpartisan domestic policy advisor. Yet fully nine months after those plans were due, they are all being hidden from the public, even as evidence is emerging that the election operation is in full swing.
Mobilizing Voters Is Always A Political Act
There are several major problems with Biden’s secret plan, critics say. It’s unethical to tie federal benefits to election activity. It’s unconstitutional to have the federal government take authority that belongs to the states and which Congress has not granted. And, given that all 50 states have different laws and processes governing election administration, it’s a recipe for chaos, confusion, and fraud at a time when election security concerns are particularly fraught.
Mobilizing voters is always a political act. Choosing which groups to target for Get Out The Vote efforts is one of the most important activities done by political campaigns. Federal agencies that interact with the public by doling out benefits can easily pressure recipients to vote for particular candidates and positions. Congress passed the Hatch Act in 1939, which bans bureaucrats and bureaucracies from being involved in election activities after Democrats used Works Progress Administration programs and personnel for partisan political advantage.
Executive Order 14019 ignores that the Constitution does not give the executive branch authority over elections. That power is reserved for the states, with a smaller role for Congress. With H.R. 1 and other Democrat Party efforts to grab more control over elections have thus far failed, Congress hasn’t authorized such an expansion. As with previous efforts to destabilize elections, the chaos and confusion that would occur are part of the plan.
The Executive Order copied much of a white paper put out by left-wing dark money group Demos, which advocates for left-wing changes to the country and which brags on its website that it moves “bold progressive ideas from cutting-edge concept to practical reality.” Not coincidentally, Biden put former Demos President K. Sabeel Rahman and former Demos Legal Strategies Director Chiraag Bains in key White House posts to oversee election-related initiatives.
Rahman serves as senior counsel at the White House office that oversees regulatory changes, meaning he approves every federal agency’s regulations and provides legal review of executive orders before they’re released. If you were looking to rush out constitutionally and ethically questionable orders, this post would be key to fill. Bains had been Demos’ director of legal strategies, helping write the paper that was turned into an executive order. He reports directly to Susan Rice, the hyperpartisan head of the Domestic Policy Council.
Rice has served in political positions in Democrat White Houses and the scandal-ridden Brookings Institution. She played a role in the spying-on-Trump scandal, blatantly lying about same, lying about the Benghazi terrorist attack, and lying about Bowe Bergdahl’s military record.
Rice is described as President Obama’s “right-hand woman,” and it’s been said she was “like a sister” to the former president. She was his National Security Advisor at the same time Hunter Biden was hitching rides on official White House aircraft to other countries for meetings with oligarchs and corrupt government officials. She spread conspiracy theories about the law enforcement officers in Portland during the violent BLM riots that besieged the city. Most worrisome, she was briefed on the Clinton campaign’s Russia collusion hoax, which was used to destabilize the 2020 election and question its illegitimacy. (she lives in his DC home!) Leftist Groups Know Exactly What’s Going On Conservatives may be in the dark, but left-wing activist groups are fully involved in the plot. The left-wing dark money group Demos put out press releases immediately after the executive order was issued, saying it would be happy to work with federal agencies on the project.
And then the group admitted publicly that it “organized agency-based working groups and met with the staff in these agencies to provide technical expertise as they developed their initial voter registration plans, to ensure those plans reflect the knowledge and priorities of various agency stakeholders.” It also admits it “developed research and resources to assist and advance agency efforts to implement robust voter registration opportunities, including a slide deck explainer of the agencies’ potential for impact, best practices for conducting voter registration at federal agencies, and recommendations for modernizing and improving the accessibility of Vote.gov.”
All of that information should be available to oversight authorities in Congress and the American taxpayers paying for its implementation, not just the left-wing groups that produced it. Yet as of this publication date, none of it has been shared.
Biden’s plan “raises serious ethical, legal, and constitutional concerns,” wrote Rep. Ted Budd, R-N.C., along with three dozen Republican members of Congress on January 19, in a letter to the head of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), demanding more information by February 28 about the secret plot. It went unanswered. The top Republican members of nine House committees and subcommittees likewise demanded information from Rice and the head of OMB in a letter they sent on March 29. They noted that election activity goes well beyond “the scope of each agency’s authorizing statute and mission.”
One of the concerns shared by the members was that Biden was directing agencies to work with third-party organizations. Nobody knows which third-party organizations have been approved by Rice for her political efforts, nor which are being used. They also asked how much money is being spent on the effort, which statutory authorities justify the election activities, and what steps are being taken to avoid Hatch Act violations. They received no response.
The Foundation for Government Accountability filed a lawsuit on April 20th to compel the Department of Justice to respond to the FOIA request for information. And the American Accountability Foundation (AAF) filed suit on June 16 to compel Justice to comply. Those suits are ongoing.
What We Know
While the White House and agencies are steadfastly refusing to share details about how they’re complying with the executive order, who they met with to develop their plans, or how they’re justifying their involvement in something Congress has not authorized them to participate in, some details are trickling out. Here are a few examples of the widespread and coordinated effort by Biden’s political appointees to meddle in the state administration of elections.
In the midst of a labor crisis, the Department of Labor boasted that it was turning 2,300 American Job Centers previously focused on helping displaced workers find jobs into hubs of political activism. These new federally funded voter registration agencies were given guidance about how to bring in organizations to conduct “voter outreach.”
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services likewise announced plans to turn community health centers into voter registration agencies, using thousands of health care facilities to focus on voter registration and turnout. The Housing and Urban Development Department sent notice to public housing authorities that they should begin voter registration drives and participation activities. Previously, officials had been barred from electoral activities because they receive federal funding.
“It is presumed residents of public housing might disproportionately vote Democrat. … The executive order targets people receiving government benefits who might think their benefits depend on one party in power,” Stewart Whitson, legal director for the Foundation for Government Accountability, told the Daily Signal.
The Department of Education sent “dear colleague” letters to universities, telling them that Federal Work Study funds could now be used to support voter registration activities, contrary to previous guidance. The change was made without having gone through any rulemaking process to allow the change.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture said it’s using its child nutrition programs to push voter registration and enlisting state, local, and federally funded employees to implement voter registration drives in local schools. The Commerce Department produced a massive, 113-page report which likely took four agency officials many hours to generate. It directs local voting board members about polling stations and poll worker training.
The tactics being used by these agencies were almost certainly contained in the plans submitted to Rice that have been withheld from investigators and overseers who had hoped to have some transparency about what the plans were. Frequently, the agencies claim the tactics are in response to the executive order, yet information about how they were developed has been withheld from the public for much of the year.
It is unclear why Biden and his political appointees are being so secretive about the work that went into their plan to engage in a federal takeover of election administration.
Whatever the case, Americans have a right to know whether these bureaucracies that are meddling in elections have experts in for each state’s election laws, what type of training is going on to ensure that state laws are being followed, whether they are allowing inspections and oversight to ensure no illegal activity, how they are determining whether a third-party group is genuinely non-partisan, whether they are allowing state investigators to approve money, and how much is being spent on this federal takeover of elections.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/06/23/yes-biden-is-hiding-his-plan-to-rig-the-2022-midterm-elections/
Only Yahwah could have kept them from shutting down his microphone.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iLOyzTUBVbcZ/
Here is his transcript:
Sam Dodson: Hello, my name is Sam Dodson. I run a podcast called To The Lifeboats and I have no relationship with the pharmaceutical cartels. I’m schooled in electrical engineering and two years ago I’d never heard of mRNA, but let me tell you what I’ve learned since.
It starts with the shot you told us stays at the injection site. We know it doesn’t. You knew it didn’t. Biodistribution studies show that it goes to every major organ, primarily the heart, liver, and spleen where, thanks to the highly inflammatory lipid nano-complex, it transfects the cells. That complex contains a PEGylated lipid being mass injected into humans for the first time ever, while the animal studies showed heart attacks in pigs after the second injection.
You knew the lipid nanocomplexes collect in the ovaries, where they have the potential to cause devastating effects on reproductive health, yet you did nothing. When women started complaining of menstrual problems you did nothing.
Transfected cells in every organ pump out the spike protein that ends up in the nucleus where it interrupts p53 LINE1 Embrica.
You didn’t know this because you didn’t care to ask the question, and when shown to you in a study you did nothing.
Every transfected cell expressing spike protein risks autoimmune disease, the most acute of which is myocarditis.
When people started dying of myocarditis you did nothing. The spike protein flows freely in the vasculature, finding its way into the brain, breastmilk, and the environment as the body sheds its protein in exosomes, making those around the vaccinated sick.
The spike protein directly affects toll-like receptors in CD4+ T cells, which are essential to the immune defense against these very viruses. When the vaccinated repeatedly caught COVID and suffered reactivation of herpes, shingles, papillomavirus in unprecedented numbers you knew this was a massive problem, yet you did nothing.
You knew that the mRNA stays around for months in the lymph node germinal centers causing T cell exhaustion, because the Stanford group performed the study that you couldn’t be bothered to do. And then you ignored that massive safety signal. You were warned about oncomirs and the effect on p53, yet you did nothing.
When you were warned about prion disease and amyloid as a result of the huge amount of spike protein produced by these therapies you did worse than nothing; you silenced those people who raise the alarms. You were informed of fraud in the vaccine studies, yet instead of investigating you colluded with the manufacturers to suppress trial data for 75 years.
Knowing all of these concerns you now want to inject the very young who have zero clinical risk from COVID and for which not one single study has shown any clinical benefit. You have abjectly failed in your sole duty to ensure the safety of any drug given to Americans. The late Frances Oldham Kelsey would have been ashamed at how you’ve turned a once respected agency into a corrupted vessel for the very corporations you swore to protect the American public from.
If you have one shred of humanity left you will recommend an immediate halt to all the shots and pray that God has mercy on your souls. Might also want to figure out how we’re going to diagnose myocarditis in very young babies who are unable to speak.
Thank you.
Steve Bannon only talks as far back as 2010, Obama vs. Romney. Romney may have won. But they don't look any further back. I say because when the republicans were winning with Bush and Rove, they don't look why they are losing, because they won. Now that it was stolen from Trump, they are looking. But you must know the history. Steve just won't go there....so here, for you.
Testimony from work after the theft of 2004. Yes, that was stolen too. This is the whistleblower whom was tasked at the Yang, Corp in Oviedo, FL, under JEB and Rep Tom Feeney, to create 'vote flipping software' after the 2000 psyop of 'pimples and dimples and chads, oh my!' Punch cards were the safest, but they made us run away from it with the 2000 psyop. Touchscreens ushered in for FLA and GA for 2002. They used these to remove Max Cleland from the US Senate, after removing him from the 911 commission, for asking all the right questions.
Here is our work from back then:
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Clinton_%E2%80%9CClint%E2%80%9D_Curtis
testimony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzBI33kOiKc
Here is a later interview in 2008 with Clint. Clint Curtis was a republican, who became a democrat when he blew the whistle. But we NOW learn they use the machines for controlled dems too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wsumj7aG4vg
We finally caught up to Karl Roves 'numbers guru'...who created the numbers for the pre-programmed memory cards across the nation using electronics. He was to receive a subpoena. He died in a plane crash when we finally caught up to him.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/republican-it-guru-dies-in-plane-crash/
On and on and on. While republicans created this electronic system, they use it for the controlled dems, to give the illusion of a two party system.
We followed and demonstrated hacks on Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia, Hart. They continue to change the name of the companies but we chased them.
The rest that you know, is now history, once again.
There is a record of our work in DC. I dare someone there to dig it up in the house reform committee.
We lobbied 21 members of congress and orgs in 2007. That is why you hear all of these dems on clips now, talking about election fraud.
Now...just crickets from dems.
This is a magazine I renewed for my 96 year old mother. We grew up with it all of our life as she was a lifetime subscriber.
She always returns the magazines to me to share, the material always being about cooking, gardens and home decorating.
All of my life I saw meringue pies on the cover and beautiful baskets of flowers, etc.
This 100-year cover was so absurd when I looked at it I understood what it was to be and was thoroughly disgusted. So I called their 800 number to talk to them about it.
Inside the cover they explain their special cover for the 100th year anniversary.
They say they have never used their cover for celebrities other than just a couple of times as they did for Michelle Obama, (that I mentioned in my phone call) and never showing our first lady Melania Trump.
I told them that while Melania does not care, I do. But now I see something much worse on their cover.
They have a picture of Harry Styles on the cover. He looks to be wearing a female tank top and large coral bead necklace around his neck for a woman. He is showing his hands on purpose so you can see his nail polish and his upside down cross tattoo on his hand.
This is not about a 'Better Home', it is now about the destruction of the family unit that makes up a home.
Here is the picture - do not ever buy this magazine again!
I think it's a good question from someone who no longer looks like himself...who did the inside work for Trump. (CIA and State!)
McCormick is a non Trump - non election reform candidate. He IS the establishment candidate. Endorsing Barnett was a scam, as we now know her polling was a scam. She never had what they said...she only got a bump outside of her district from it, but came in a very distant third.
It is the same tactics the dems used to split the Bernie Warren vote, to get Joe. Now Trumps most trusted are using the same tactics.
I am no longer interested in Pompeo, and if he runs for Prez, whether Trump runs or not, I will not be interested in him. Nor Pence.
Just think, these traitors could actually allow Joe to win again....
When will Trump be calling these traitors out??
This was on purpose.
How unprofessional and what a poor choice of professional dress.
I know I know...just saying....
The recipe calls for 13 ounces of evaporated milk, 20 ounces of water, and 2 level teaspoons of Karo syrup to be heated together and divided into 6 bottles. The “special instructions” also say to give the baby water twice a day, to give 2 ounces of tea per day, to give vitamins starting at 10 days old, and to give orange juice diluted with water after only 3 weeks!
Similar recipes were given out in 1952 and another in 1945 (seen below).
Link for recipe from years ago. https://dustyoldthing.com/1950s-homemade-formula-recipes/
FUCK the democrat party!
Law enforcement better do their job.
(I use the organic!)
Even techs, who drive trucks for years...with a stellar record are now subjected to CAMERAS IN THEIR TRUCKS, and pointing them on the lawn area when they arrive.
My tech is superb and has been there a long time. I can understand new techs, or those with complaints of all sorts. But that's not what they are doing.
My tech was training a new tech, (she needs to be watched?) bitching in her truck while driving, about the Ukraine war. She was listening to her radio. When she got back to the office, she received a warning that they listened to her in her cab bitching to herself, and she better not do that anymore, because she is at work and should not be talking about any of that stuff. (To herself?)
After I went out to greet the tech, as we have a long good relationship, and retrieve my cat to bring inside during the spray, I saw the camera. When I asked if it was on me, I was told yes. I asked if they could hear me? I was told yes.
I DON'T WORK FOR THEM!
I got angry and spoke to the camera, that I hope the guys get a good look at me in my nightshirt and bad hair, first thing in the morning as they came early and I had to get the cat. I am appalled and I do not want the camera on when they are here. I now know, because I asked, that they can see and hear me. All the guys is some office having a good time.
This tech has received extra pay from incentives due to reports from their actual customers. They are not one to need monitoring. This is not our country.
I am awaiting the manager's call to now cancel after 17 years. Interesting....
I will tell him this is conditioning for natzism and communism, and no AMERICAN COMPANY that works in the neighborhoods of America should be doing this!
It has ruined our relationship, I don't want them here filming from the street, me coming out in the morning to say hello, get my cat and ask about my lawn I'm paying them to treat. Now that I have been made aware the managers do not only speak to them about work issues they see, they are telling them they cannot talk to themselves or those they are training about certain topics. Gee, who does that sound like? And they are filming customers too, unless I stay inside to avoid the camera. Can't do that with my cat...so oh well so long True Green.
Can we do a woke go broke to help all of these workers? And ourselves? It is not just about canceling their service. It will continue, and it just cannot.
Maybe RAV could talk about this....they are a natl' company. Communism is here and we must stop it. Thank pedes...
Any social media you can post to everywhere, would be much appreciated by the hard workers.
Thank Q