1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

Speaking as one who also has hamhocks for hands, shaking hands can be pretty awkward. I've ended up in similar positions on many occasions. I honestly don't think there's anything to see here.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

Easy way to test this: Send him to San Francisco and look at the streets.

-1
anon82059 -1 points ago +1 / -2

What makes you think those tires were pressurized? The whole car was mounted, they could have easily just sent it up with the valve stems removed.

You've made my entire case for me. Thanks. Next time, THINK.

2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

So many still don't realize that the year doesn't refer to when it was printed, it refers to the year in which that design was introduced.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's a good answer, but it can go both ways: People don't like feeling small and insignificant, so they ignore reality and embrace that which validates them as special.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ooh, a FE honeypot. Wheels within wheels, I like it.

Thanks for your work, it's a serious contribution to the overall vision. Most of us see it.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +2 / -1

Here you go. Not NASA, though I expect you'll label this as CGI as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBr2kKAHN6M

2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I didn't realize GA wasn't created until after we lost the original TD.win domain."

I'm not positive it was, human memory being as feeble as it is. I do remember that Q people were trying to use TD and they got pissy thinking that by "trust the plan" we meant "do nothing." Exactly when that escalated to kicking Q topics off into GA.win, I'm not certain.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

Awesome, I didn't know that. Thanks for your work!

2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL I never noticed that, hilarious!

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're confusing badass with faggotniggerkikers. By the end, that's pretty much all Voat was. It really undermined the concept of free speech absolutism.

4
anon82059 4 points ago +4 / -0

When the Reddit Great Awakening group was banned, they migrated over to Voat. Gab was just a fledgling site at the time. When the r/The_Donald was banned, TheDonald.Win was set up. Gab gained steam, and most of the Q-type conversation shifted over there, since Voat was a steaming pile. After Trump, TDW rebranded to Patriots.Win. Voat had recently shut down, so a bunch of people piled into TDW/Patriots.Win. they decided we Q people were too much and GAW was set up to corral us, just as we've done with Conspiracies.Win. Both GAW and Gab were popular for a time, until the Gab group got overrun with slides and boomers and was set to private. That left us with just GAW today. That's why so many of us are so protective of it - we've watched what happens to these places if they're left too unruly. They self-destruct (or sabotage?). I can't give you dates, my memory isn't that good.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +4 / -3

The sticky wasn't about FE, the sticky was about bots.

8
anon82059 8 points ago +11 / -3

It fell apart. It became a waste of time to even go there, it was filled with forum sliding, useful idiots, and glowies aplenty - all unfettered by any sense that boundaries must be maintained for any social movement to succeed. By the time the owner closed up shop, Gab's GreatAwakening group was a much better option.

4
anon82059 4 points ago +10 / -6

I was there from the GAW Reddit exodus to the bitter, messy end. It was a shithole.

2
anon82059 2 points ago +10 / -8

I implied no such thing, I'm saying idiots have the right to be idiots, but not on our time.

88
anon82059 88 points ago +112 / -24

If they didn't draw some boundaries, this place would be overrun with glowies and their useful idiots. It would fall apart just like Voat did.

The discussion is not policed away - it's segmented out to Conspiracies.win where you can explore it in depth. Doing so keeps GAW.win free to accomplish its mission with fewer distractions.

-1
anon82059 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Do you have any comprehension of the Earth's sheer scale compared to our puny megaprojects? The biggest would be smaller than a mote of dust on a billiard ball. The mote of dust doesn't need to worry about the ball's curvature.

-3
anon82059 -3 points ago +1 / -4

It won't just wink out of sight like there's fog. (Unless there's fog.) It will, from your point of view, slowly descend until you can only see the top, then it will disappear.

Explain how refraction can do that.

Here's an example of the problem we face in this argument: FEers simply dismiss any attempt to reason, usually using science that is bullshit - but it sounds good, and it gives them a chance to look like they know THE SECRETS. So it becomes useless to even try talking to them. That's why the ban hammer gets dropped.

You don't see it because you're inside it.

Here's another experiment, then. Fly from Brazil to Australia. The shortest route should be over the Arctic. See if that's where you go.

2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem with this theory is that the Moon is only about 60% the density it should be to make this work. It's roughly 2% the volume of Earth, but 1.2% of its mass. If the Earth/Moon impact theory were true, they would have identical densities, since they'd be made of the same stuff.

11
anon82059 11 points ago +17 / -6

Get a telescope and a helicopter. Go to the shore of Lake Superior and point your telescope at the helicopter, and have the helicopter fly away in a straight line at a constant elevation.

If the Earth is flat, the helicopter will be visible forever no matter how far it goes. But that's not what happens. What happens is it disappears over the horizon. BECAUSE IT CURVES DOWN.

There, now you have a way of proving a hypothesis. Go get 'em tiger!

7
anon82059 7 points ago +10 / -3

What you say is true, in general, especially in science, religion, and history, but we're talking about something you can walk out your front door and test for yourself.

Flat Earthers are too invested in how their "special knowledge" places them a step above other people; therefore, they never pay any heed when their theories are crushed and melted.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›