Here you go. Not NASA, though I expect you'll label this as CGI as well.
"I didn't realize GA wasn't created until after we lost the original TD.win domain."
I'm not positive it was, human memory being as feeble as it is. I do remember that Q people were trying to use TD and they got pissy thinking that by "trust the plan" we meant "do nothing." Exactly when that escalated to kicking Q topics off into GA.win, I'm not certain.
When the Reddit Great Awakening group was banned, they migrated over to Voat. Gab was just a fledgling site at the time. When the r/The_Donald was banned, TheDonald.Win was set up. Gab gained steam, and most of the Q-type conversation shifted over there, since Voat was a steaming pile. After Trump, TDW rebranded to Patriots.Win. Voat had recently shut down, so a bunch of people piled into TDW/Patriots.Win. they decided we Q people were too much and GAW was set up to corral us, just as we've done with Conspiracies.Win. Both GAW and Gab were popular for a time, until the Gab group got overrun with slides and boomers and was set to private. That left us with just GAW today. That's why so many of us are so protective of it - we've watched what happens to these places if they're left too unruly. They self-destruct (or sabotage?). I can't give you dates, my memory isn't that good.
It fell apart. It became a waste of time to even go there, it was filled with forum sliding, useful idiots, and glowies aplenty - all unfettered by any sense that boundaries must be maintained for any social movement to succeed. By the time the owner closed up shop, Gab's GreatAwakening group was a much better option.
If they didn't draw some boundaries, this place would be overrun with glowies and their useful idiots. It would fall apart just like Voat did.
The discussion is not policed away - it's segmented out to Conspiracies.win where you can explore it in depth. Doing so keeps GAW.win free to accomplish its mission with fewer distractions.
Do you have any comprehension of the Earth's sheer scale compared to our puny megaprojects? The biggest would be smaller than a mote of dust on a billiard ball. The mote of dust doesn't need to worry about the ball's curvature.
It won't just wink out of sight like there's fog. (Unless there's fog.) It will, from your point of view, slowly descend until you can only see the top, then it will disappear.
Explain how refraction can do that.
Here's an example of the problem we face in this argument: FEers simply dismiss any attempt to reason, usually using science that is bullshit - but it sounds good, and it gives them a chance to look like they know THE SECRETS. So it becomes useless to even try talking to them. That's why the ban hammer gets dropped.
You don't see it because you're inside it.
Here's another experiment, then. Fly from Brazil to Australia. The shortest route should be over the Arctic. See if that's where you go.
The problem with this theory is that the Moon is only about 60% the density it should be to make this work. It's roughly 2% the volume of Earth, but 1.2% of its mass. If the Earth/Moon impact theory were true, they would have identical densities, since they'd be made of the same stuff.
Get a telescope and a helicopter. Go to the shore of Lake Superior and point your telescope at the helicopter, and have the helicopter fly away in a straight line at a constant elevation.
If the Earth is flat, the helicopter will be visible forever no matter how far it goes. But that's not what happens. What happens is it disappears over the horizon. BECAUSE IT CURVES DOWN.
There, now you have a way of proving a hypothesis. Go get 'em tiger!
What you say is true, in general, especially in science, religion, and history, but we're talking about something you can walk out your front door and test for yourself.
Flat Earthers are too invested in how their "special knowledge" places them a step above other people; therefore, they never pay any heed when their theories are crushed and melted.
Speaking as one who also has hamhocks for hands, shaking hands can be pretty awkward. I've ended up in similar positions on many occasions. I honestly don't think there's anything to see here.