4
astutsa 4 points ago +4 / -0

The latest in the Oppression Olympics

'gender-affirming care' for children is homophobic

Conservatives about to get the gay vote?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13040507/transgender-children-gay-teenagers-surgery-hormones-detransition.html

2
astutsa 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's huge. So many. They can't all claim to be brainwashed.
Hoping for justice eventually but that's a long road away.
Thx for the links

2
astutsa 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is sad. So many are brainwashed. Can't force people to wake up. I keep trying.

7
astutsa 7 points ago +7 / -0

Whenever the pedo cabal communicates you have to replace parts of what they say for it to make sense.

"rules based international world order"
means
"pedovore satanist cabal"

He is warning that they will all be hung if they fail.
They are loosing and are panicking.

1
astutsa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, ok. Will keep my eyes open for something like that. Thx for the info.

I started posting from pretty early on, close to the beginning of the site, back when /r/thedonald got banned on preddit and a bunch of angry users migrated over here. Back then it was just thedonald.win domain and was a pretty basic site. Got tons of posts over there. TheDonald is fun, like a pep rally, but been lurking here (GAW) more lately. Little more chill and people actually do digs.

1
astutsa 1 point ago +1 / -0

TY
Will post updates. DailyClout (Naomi Wolf) contacted me looking to get ahold of the Dr. to do an interview. I forwarded info to Dr. but suspect they will delay until published.

Unrelated:
How did you get a pepe in your username!?!
Nice! Me wants
I can't figure out where to add that.

2
astutsa 2 points ago +2 / -0

I reached out to Dr. McLinden and received a response from a colleague with the following:

It’s important the data gets published, at least as preprint or will be discredited before it sees the light of day. The miscarriage rate was 50% for all comers, the 74% concerned close vaccination around time of conception

amongst high risk pregnancy after vaccines started 19 of 38 had a miscarriage (50%) vs around 14% pre vaccine (40 people from memory). There appears to be a relationship with the proximity of vaccination to conception that may elevate the risk further to around 74% but this data is preliminary and is in process of being published.

They are trying to publish to navigate the rough path to legitimacy in the scientific community,

I updated the article with the numbers (50% - 74%) and screen grabs of the above interaction.

Agree fully with your warning of being cautious. Until publish date this is all technically hearsay. For all anyone knows this could be a LARP and I could be gullible and/or involved. I'm not of course, (maybe a tad gullible, ha) but there is no proof yet anyone can hold in their hand. Thanks for your input. Appreciate it.

1
astutsa 1 point ago +2 / -1

UPDATE:
I just checked the site.

https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FDA-2022-N-0904

20,951 comments!!!!!!

For reference, check the very next docket:

https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FDA-2022-N-0905

only 108 comments

Boom, Almost 21k!!!! >> Silent No More

Not sure it will, but I'm hoping it makes a difference.
Since these were received before the deadline they ALL have to be provided to the committee.
I hope they have to actually print them out and hand deliver.

21
astutsa 21 points ago +21 / -0

California drivers would be speeding. Routinely going 90 in a 55, in the middle lane with someone crawling up my ass. Can't get mad at them, the second you get upset at one driver another one comes along and pisses you off even more.

12
astutsa 12 points ago +12 / -0

likewise
I had that alert on but recently disabled it cause it was going off to much.
I figured the app had a bug, kek
Didn't even think about vaxxidents.

Unrelated, but notable:
a few months ago the app stopped showing police helicopters.
I always used to pull it up when I heard a bird around to see where it was circling.
Now, lots of times nothing shows up on the app, even if I am looking right at a helicopter.

1
astutsa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love reading his articles. I don't think it's all really happening though.

I imagine some of the things he covers are dis-info intentionally distributed as sort of warnings and/or maybe subtle messages to others.

Or he just makes up a bunch of stuff, but, I don't think so imho.

I think he has real intelligence agencies that feed him stories, the question is what are their motivations. Looking at what he covers and how he talks about it some of that can be discerned.

Good weekly reads.

Check out www.whatdoesitmean.com also for an interesting alternative perspective.

4
astutsa 4 points ago +4 / -0

Life insurer refuses to cover vaccine death | Free West Media

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/01/14/life-insurer-refuses-to-cover-vaccine-death/

https://archive.md/psuCo

An explosive case is currently being hotly debated on social media: In France, a rich, older entrepreneur from Paris is said to have died as a result of a Corona injection. Previously, he had taken out multi-million dollar life insurance policies for the benefit of his children and grandchildren, according to a media report.

Although vaccination is recognized as the cause of death by doctors and the insurance company, it has refused to pay out. The reason is because the side effects of the Corona jabs are known and published. They argue that the deceased took part in an experiment at his own risk. Covid-19 in itself is not classed as a “critical illness”.

According to the company, an experimental vaccination resulting in death is like suicide

The insurance company justified the refusal of payment to the family by stating that the use of experimental medication or treatments, including Corona injections, is expressly excluded from the insurance contract. The family’s subsequent lawsuit against the insurance company has been unsuccessful.

The court allegedly justified its ruling as follows: “The side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not claim to have known nothing about it when he voluntarily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France that compelled him to be vaccinated. Hence his death is essentially suicide.” Since suicide is not covered by the policy from the outset, the insurance refuses to budge.

1
astutsa 1 point ago +1 / -0

In 1996 the WSJ actually did reporting, and won a pulitzer for it in 1997

One of the winning articles exposed the corruption of federal agencies in Exaggerating the Risks of AIDS to promote a fear campaign

Health Hazard: AIDS Fight Is Skewed By Federal Campaign Exaggerating Risks - WSJ

https://archive.fo/tvDaX

1997 Pulitzer Prizes-NATIONAL REPORTING, Works [archive]

https://web.archive.org/web/20070705215448/http://www.pulitzer.org/year/1997/national-reporting/works/2.html

Staff of The Wall Street Journal - The Pulitzer Prizes

https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/staff-38

Staff of The Wall Street Journal - The Pulitzer Prizes [archive]

https://archive.is/vYI6n

1997 Pulitzer Prize Winners & Finalists - The Pulitzer Prizes

https://www.pulitzer.org/prize-winners-by-year/1997

1997 Pulitzer Prize Winners & Finalists - The Pulitzer Prizes [archive]

https://archive.is/8qIIp

How far they have fallen…

2
astutsa 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just listened to that same part this morning. Astonishing the corruption. Audio book is the way to go. The guy speaking talks so slow though! I turned up the speed to 1.5x and it sounds more normal.

21
astutsa 21 points ago +21 / -0

Who knows? Wrongful death lawsuits for decades?

From my reading it seems that this is the FAA legally being put on notice that they are breaking their own rules. No pilot that got the kill jab can be medically certified, according to FAA official regulations. They don't mess around with med certs, they are very serious about it.

The letter goes on to warn the FAA that they will be liable if they don't follow their own rules.

Only other way out would be for them to change their regulations, but, that would be a massive story. I'm not sure they can even do that without intervention from lawmakers.

I'm guessing somewhere there a room full of sweaty lawyers trying to figure out how to save their collective butts.

Sounds like they are in a bit of a bind. Letter is dated Dec 15th.
I'm wondering if it has something to do with all the cancelations?

view more: Next ›