https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZDoC3E5gWMxs/
Long but very good documentary.
Provides solid reasons to doubt that the Twin Towers of the WTC would fall in the precipitous fashion they did, at close to free fall speeds, without additional help beyond the two planes (= the official story that heat from jet fuel melted/severely weakened steel beams). Building 7, Tower 1, and Tower 2 all fall into their own imprint (like they would in a controlled demolition). Puts together the best engineering/architectural analysis I've seen so far.
Also, the Israeli connections to September 11th attacks are astounding. I was not aware of much of this information until recently.
That part begins at 11:10:36. The Dancing Israelis:
Why were five Israelis arrested in Hoboken, New Jersey on 9/11? Why were they dancing? Why were they quietly sent back to Israel 44 days after their arrests?
The next section covers Bibi Netanyahu and some eyebrow raising statements he made regarding 9/11. starts at: 12:26:05
We should be skeptical of Bibi Netanyahu. It's probably a good thing that he is now out of power.
The September 11th attacks accomplished many goals of the Deep State:
The 9/11 false flag provided the justification (=excuse) Poppy Bush and his stooge of a son (W) needed to implement a police state in the United States. (The "Partiot" Act)
The September 11th attacks benefitted the Israeli deep state in dragging the US into middle eastern conflicts. Why is the US doing Israel's dirty work? Why are we sending our young men to die in the middle east to advance Israel's interests?
We must be watchful in our dealings with Israel. Just as Radical Islam is a problem, Extremist Zionism is also a problem.
What is the evidence connecting Osama Bin-Laden to the September 11th attacks? Important to also look into the CIA-Al Qaeda connection (not covered extensively in this video if I'm remembering correctly.) This is an area I am in need of further research.
Radical Islamic terrorism is certainly a problem. Just look at what's happening in France and Germany currently. But it is also used as a cover. It's important we keep this in mind. Sometimes attacks that we blame on "radical Islam" are a cover for false flags that are committed to advance the agenda of Radical Zionism. These false flags also are committed by American deep state traitors to coax American citizens into giving up their constitutional rights.
If the constitution didn't matter, they wouldn't need false flags like 9/11. We must cherish the constitution.
I hope the families of the victims of 9/11 one day see justice.
Sorry this post is a little long winded, but I like to be methodical when I'm trying to extract a dose of Hopium. I'm sadly doubtful by nature so it takes a lot for me to work up some Hope. I like to be thorough to make sure I'm not bull shitting myself.
So I was scrolling and I saw this:
NYT and other MSM outlets are trying to debunk claims that. . . Trump will be reinstated??
This kinda floored me. Of course, I don't know what's going to happen but. . . wow.
If it's so silly, why are they even trying to debunk it?
So the above link is from John Solomon's JusttheNews website. (I'd rather not share NYT articles on here, and John Solomon is actually a pretty decent guy and solid reporter)
Apparently the NYT has been going on and on about these claims that Trump says he will be reinstated by August.
Solomon's "JustheNews" gets a comment by Lewandowski about the NYT's latest hissy fit.
Lewandowski states:
"I can tell you as a person who talks to the former president on a very regular basis, I’ve never had that conversation with him so I’m not saying it’s dishonest, "I’m just saying that I’ve never heard it."
I took a double take with that: " I’m not saying it’s dishonest "
Maybe I'm overthinking this, but if the NYT was just being totally batshit and making up claims, wouldn't someone who is decently within Trump's inner circle respond with something like: "These accusations are outrageous. Of course ("former") President Trump isn't making such wild claims."
If someone is spreading a bunch of nonsense that would make you look bad wouldn't you want to extinguish that promptly and decisively? If something is definitely not going to turn out true, distance from it entirely, right? (think about how our sweet Kayleigh shut down the "suckers and losers" claim)
But he doesn't do that. He goes out of his way to tell us he can't say they are dishonest. He doesn't even say he thinks that's unlikely. He just tells us he's never heard it.
Unless Lewandowski is just completely zonked on valium or something and has no idea what's going on, there's some reason he's being careful with his words. A claim like this (Trump's reinstatement) doesn't just piss off Dems. It sounds pretty weird to normie Republicans too (Shapiro, Catturd, etc.)
Some other developments:
My vanilla liberal friends are starting to confront me with MSM articles talking about Trump and Flynn's "plans for a coup." Why are they obsessing about this stuff right now?
[Sorry I don't feel like linking to those articles, but with a quick search you can find them]
Also:
FAUCI is having one rough day. HOLY SHIT. I can't believe how fast that dam burst. (already lost a damn book deal I hear).
My Analysis:
We have seen a general pattern with the MSM for the past four years: They obsess over some claim Trump makes, or claims Trump's voters make. They go on and on about how silly it is. They DEBUNK it.
But then. . . their narrative falls apart. And then a little later we see some confirmation Trump might have been right after all. And then: BOOM we learn Trump was totally f*cking right -- and the MSM shit their pants.
Think about the lab leak hypothesis, or Trump's claim that Obama spied on his campaign, or that Comey was sending his cronies to spy on Trump in the White House, or Hunter and the laptop. The MSM was APALLED with all of this: "How could Trump stoop so low, and say something so outrageous" they more or less said. .
And then Trump turns out to be the one who was RIGHT ALL ALONG.
Long story short, I can't help but wonder if we're seeing this here. They're starting to obsess over some supposedly "crazy" stuff Flynn, the Q community, or Trump is saying. They're telling us how silly it all is ("muh. . .Trump cannot be reinstated in August. That's not how that works.").
Why on Earth are they focusing on this stuff ? Trump's not making any big public statements about it. These statements were allegedly made in private. Shouldn't they be focusing on the 'President" Biden's ambitious agenda or whatever they're hyping it as?
I think something's bothering them. They feel the need to "debunk" it. And if they're going out of their way to debunk something normies aren't even hearing about, they must be at least a little nervous.
But like the lab leak theory, maybe the dam will begin to break.
And maybe just maybe it's all true. Hope my way of presenting things is helpful for some of you. I know I'm giving myself hope.
WWG1WGA
Here's the link to the supposed "fact check": https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/05/20/fact-check-pfizer-moderna-j-j-tested-covid-19-vaccines-animals/5162426001/
I have no interest in taking any of these vaccines, but I want to avoid spreading falsehoods. I've been seeing some concerning posts that animal trials were skipped for the three major COVID vaccines. But this MSM "fact check" disputes this. Anyone have any more information? Is USAToday lying its ass off ??
Again, I'm avoiding these vaccines, but I want to make sure the info I share with my friends and family who have not taken the vaccine yet is accurate and legit.
