https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZDoC3E5gWMxs/
Long but very good documentary.
Provides solid reasons to doubt that the Twin Towers of the WTC would fall in the precipitous fashion they did, at close to free fall speeds, without additional help beyond the two planes (= the official story that heat from jet fuel melted/severely weakened steel beams). Building 7, Tower 1, and Tower 2 all fall into their own imprint (like they would in a controlled demolition). Puts together the best engineering/architectural analysis I've seen so far.
Also, the Israeli connections to September 11th attacks are astounding. I was not aware of much of this information until recently.
That part begins at 11:10:36. The Dancing Israelis:
Why were five Israelis arrested in Hoboken, New Jersey on 9/11? Why were they dancing? Why were they quietly sent back to Israel 44 days after their arrests?
The next section covers Bibi Netanyahu and some eyebrow raising statements he made regarding 9/11. starts at: 12:26:05
We should be skeptical of Bibi Netanyahu. It's probably a good thing that he is now out of power.
The September 11th attacks accomplished many goals of the Deep State:
The 9/11 false flag provided the justification (=excuse) Poppy Bush and his stooge of a son (W) needed to implement a police state in the United States. (The "Partiot" Act)
The September 11th attacks benefitted the Israeli deep state in dragging the US into middle eastern conflicts. Why is the US doing Israel's dirty work? Why are we sending our young men to die in the middle east to advance Israel's interests?
We must be watchful in our dealings with Israel. Just as Radical Islam is a problem, Extremist Zionism is also a problem.
What is the evidence connecting Osama Bin-Laden to the September 11th attacks? Important to also look into the CIA-Al Qaeda connection (not covered extensively in this video if I'm remembering correctly.) This is an area I am in need of further research.
Radical Islamic terrorism is certainly a problem. Just look at what's happening in France and Germany currently. But it is also used as a cover. It's important we keep this in mind. Sometimes attacks that we blame on "radical Islam" are a cover for false flags that are committed to advance the agenda of Radical Zionism. These false flags also are committed by American deep state traitors to coax American citizens into giving up their constitutional rights.
If the constitution didn't matter, they wouldn't need false flags like 9/11. We must cherish the constitution.
I hope the families of the victims of 9/11 one day see justice.
An alternative view: If fire can cause buildings to collapse into their own bases at freefall speed, find another example.
It appears that the only buildings ever to do that were all in the WTC on 9/11. It has never happened anywhere else.
In the years before and after 9/11, buildings in NYC have been hit with aircraft and not fallen
Just as an FYI, when people state the argument about the planes being full of fuel, and it was this massive amount of fuel that would eventually weaken the steel causing it to collapse, well let's look at the facts.
No airline, none, fly their aircraft with full tanks unless needed! The tanks would hold enough for the journey of about 7 hrs (Boston to LAX) with the required amount of fuel needed for a diversion and minimum safe landing fuel.
Now about 2000lbs is used for the take off when the power setting is high. Most of the aircraft flew for around 1 hour before turning to attack the WTC. So fuel can be deducted for that.
I made a very rough calculation that when the aircraft hit the WTC it would have about a 3rd of it's maximum full on board, you can loose at least half of that in the initial fire ball on impact, which left very little fuel left to weaken steel beams even if aviation fuel could burn at the temperature needed to soften steel! It can't burn high enough to do that, you could light a supply of aviation fuel under a steel beam all day long and it would only produce about a quarter of the heat needed to soften the steel.
So the myth that the aircraft had full fuel on impact of the WTC is exactly that a myth. The further myth is that there was enough fuel left after the initial fire ball to flood down the stairs and elevator shafts to the ground floors and ignite, burn hot enough to weaken the steel and collapse the towers.
Just saying!