0
forrestal 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol. No. I am a troll. You people are bonkers.

2
forrestal 2 points ago +3 / -1

All will be revealed. Look for ACB to play a huge role, and, by the end of it, for Roberts to be disgraced af minimum and likely in jail

5
forrestal 5 points ago +5 / -0

The pipeline is a good case study. That pipeline is owned by TC Pipelines LP - ticker: TRP. Take a look at that stock. The day the pipeline cancellation was announced it dropped about 4% and then recovered every bit of that and is actually trading higher then it was before inauguration. It’s actually higher than it was before Election Day. Does that tell you anything about how “real” that order was?

0
forrestal 0 points ago +1 / -1

There are some uncomfortable facts that even the people on the right side of this are going to have to come to terms with when this all over and I hope people are prepared for it.

0
forrestal 0 points ago +1 / -1

If only it were all that simple

3
forrestal 3 points ago +4 / -1

I wish I knew the answer to that. Like I’ve said elsewhere what happened (a physical infiltration of the capitol building) was not on the radar of the folks I work with. We were out of the loop for some reason? Was it meant to come out differently? Did POTUS actually just want a big rally with no entrance? I wish I knew and I won’t pretend I know things I don’t. We have several loyal reps who were there who as far as I know were not anticipating it. Was it just a poorly planned job? Infiltrated by enemies? I am still struggling with these questions but whatever the answers are it changed things and ops for my group. But we’re not going anywhere that’s for sure.

4
forrestal 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are 100% counterintelligence opps aimed at mimicking, replacing, discrediting the Q source(s). Most of them are aimed at overpromising to demoralize people and/or recruiting them to other movements that have no basis in fact. They are active here and all over

3
forrestal 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah I totally understand and appreciate that and I am thinking hard how I can verify or at least get some people comfortable. I can only do what I can do and honestly am careful as I nearly lost my job due doxxing. I’d be just as skeptical as anyone of anonymous sources and rightfully so. There are things I am working on that when they come to fruition I can show some things.

Forrestal has a personal connection that isn’t really important to anything here

2
forrestal 2 points ago +4 / -2

People can take it or leave it, and I understand and accept the skepticism. I’m not driving the car but I’m a cog in the wheel and want to share what I know / what I can for people who are looking around and rightfully asking “what the fuck.” I’ll keep sharing even if folks doubt me because I think what we’re doing is important.

0
forrestal 0 points ago +1 / -1

With Ruby the real answer is that the containers were uncounted ballots containers - opened and then uncounted. They sealed the boxes because they thought they were done for the night, then were told to open them back up and keep counting. The time/sun issue is that observers and media left while workers scanned the (already counted) ballots. Then came back when it was time to keep counting. The whole thing is on video and just never would have stood up. Believe me we all wanted it to. When we saw the short video we thought we had the golden ticket. But when we dug it just....it looked great for us but stacking all the video together it was clear. It wasn’t we thought and hoped. More questionable stuff should come out in the Senate trial but focus for us now is international ties and conspiracy with illegal and SUPER embarrassing stuff for the bad guys

0
forrestal 0 points ago +1 / -1

I hate to say shit like this but fuck I’ve had a few whiskeys. The Ruby Freeman thing was completely fake. Some people (who I know and respect and knew of real voter fraud) found a video that, when edited well looked great for the cause and got over zealous and put in the ether. There was a long convo internally about asking POTUS not to bring it up but I lost and other people won. It looked great, helped our energy. But there is a reason it was never even referenced in a single complaint filed in Georgia. I know this won’t endear me to some in the community but the truth is enough and as noble as intentions were I’m still pissed some people chose to go that route

4
forrestal 4 points ago +5 / -1

A thing I keep trying to explain to friends and Patriots is that the government is a mess. Even the good guys - no one trusts anyone, plans are kept secret from one group to another, maybe you rumors and you think it’s true, maybe you think it’s counterintelligence. I am the first to admit that the stuff I was working on didn’t even anticipate a 1/6 event (other than a rally/protest that was publicly out there). If another agency or team had something bigger that was news to us. If it was the good guys they failed. If it was the bad guys they succeeded in making many of scramble and figure out what the fuck we are doing and when.

4
forrestal 4 points ago +5 / -1

I won’t say too much and really can’t touch on Cuomo and AOC (wish I could honestly). But a thing some people do not realize is the military is not a monolith with one voice and one view. Look at any civil military action in history and there are pockets that did not agree, that joined a resistance, that fought the good guys - and those guys have guns too! Why do you think at the last minute they tried to kick out anyone with Trump or Patriot or Q ties (btw realized it was way too many to actually take action so made a few token moves). 1/20 was as much a defensive employment about potentially disloyal armed factions as it was anything else

0
forrestal 0 points ago +1 / -1

Election fraud is being worked but is increasingly being seen (at least by group) as a lost cause because of the legitimacy issue. There are too many people who won’t accept any evidence regardless, and the evidence can be complicated to present.

The main angle we are taking now is linking a very chummy group of long,long-term politicians on both sides to very demonstrable scheme. I think we’ve had enough for a long time but it has to be air tight (after what Hillary did with the dossier no mistakes can be made in intelligence that blows up powerful people).

The problem with Biden always has been that he has serious serious allies in the senate on the Republican side. We need to neutralize and/or take down Graham and McConnell at the same time because they have so much influence. Do you know how many generals got their West Point or Naval Academy letters from McConnel or Graham? A LOT. These guys still feel some loyalty and need to be 100% convinced they are worth taking down

The real fact of the matter is everyone is government is compromised somehow, everyone has done something wrong, every one has some intelligence agency that has something on you, so no one can come completely clean without a little embarrassment.

3
forrestal 3 points ago +5 / -2

Haha fair point but in all honesty yes - the defense sector, which is where a lot of my colleagues have gone. They have the intel and the arms to pick the right sides if it ever all goes down for real and sometimes I think we are better deployed there if the folks in power aren’t going to move. All that said I am convinced they are and everything we have been doing is like a live drill. We’re ready. Pentagon turnover has to happen (which will be all nominal/ceremonial) and then we will be good to go.

1
forrestal 1 point ago +2 / -1

He’s lost faith or is a shill here to sow discord among the Patriots. If the former I don’t blame him. I’m upset about how a lot of this went down and just like any job you sit there and think “I could have done that way better”. But that’s why I wanted to post what I know - to acknowledge the good guys are still around and working harder then ever. If the latter then whatever, not worth anyone’s time

2
forrestal 2 points ago +4 / -2

Mattis had to get the same waiver. Austin is one of the good guys. I promise you.

3
forrestal 3 points ago +5 / -2
  1. Yes 100%
  2. No (from what I know). But it will be clear/open/public. If not I am resigning and going to private sector because it means those of us on the right side couldn’t pull it off and I’m not getting paid enough to fail again
2
forrestal 2 points ago +4 / -2

Mattis under Trump had to get the same waiver. I will say this. People overestimate the coordination of the Federal Government at the agency level. There are pockets fo appointees all volleying for the good guys and bad guys and it has never all been cleaned up and no, I mean no one, has the power to do that except the military. If the Joint Chiefs aren’t on your side nothing meaningful is happening. Lloyd Austen is one of the good guys (4 star general, ex-Central Command). He had to pay lip service to “rooting out extremism” in the military but that’s a nothing. Pay close attention to the fact that he is on the Board of Raytheon. They will play a key part

6
forrestal 6 points ago +8 / -2

I understand and like I said expect a healthy dose of skepticism. There is something I am a part of that is targeting pre Feb 28 (no mass arrest or indictment that I am aware of - but a piece of the puzzle that if it goes off will a signal that things are still moving). As soon as I know that is on track I will let folks know in advance d

4
forrestal 4 points ago +6 / -2

Wish I could relate more. From where I stand people I believe in are confident. As I know more I will try to share with the community. Hopefully soon

9
forrestal 9 points ago +10 / -1

I want to be crystal clear on Jan 6. I am not saying it was a “bad thing”. I am saying if it was planned by Patriots (and not a leftist psyop) then it did not go down as planned and the reaction to it led to a pivot of strategy). Anyone who went there with good intentions is a Patriot and a fighter and deserves our respect. I am simply saying that fall out from that led to shifts in timing, tactics and operations that likely disappointed a lot of people. What I am trying to do is relate what I know to explain that and say that the good guys’ machine is still chugging

1
forrestal 1 point ago +3 / -2

Jan 6 was a surprise to everyone I work with. Like I said elsewhere I don’t know it was planned and was supposed to go better or was a false flag that caught enough of our side up in it that they ended up being on display for it - but whatever it was it wasn’t supposed to go down like that and led to a lot of emergency meetings and late nights.

5
forrestal 5 points ago +7 / -2

I am not on the legislative side but frankly don’t think anything election related that goes through the legislative process will pass or last. No one is planning any contingencies for congressional acts enacted by this administration because they either won’t be legitimate or will not be enforced by agencies that are tasked to do so

view more: Next ›