8
johndude 8 points ago +8 / -0

[UK] Priti Patel under fire as 150,000 police records accidentally lost

by qewbie
2
johndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Start with stuff like fine people hoax, drink bleach hoax...

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Keyword is “sparingly”.

The right button when disagreeing is “downvote” not “deport”.

Otherwise you’re just flooding mods with false alerts.

by Raken
2
johndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

As it is there is no way to confidently match the audio with the subtitles. We just don't understand 90% of the important (and incriminating) bits they're supposed to be saying.

Video is worth nothing as long as it remains the case.

39
johndude 39 points ago +39 / -0

Q being true is a no-brainer. The plan being true is a no-brainer. Question is will the plan succeed.

15
johndude 15 points ago +15 / -0

Saddest part is their followers/supporters believe them

I literally had a guy tell me that "a Biden administration would signify a return to more democracy and more democratic processes compared to Trump".

I don't see the slightest piece of evidence that would lead to such affirmation, but it doesn't matter. That's what CNN said, therefore it must be true somehow.

2
johndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

All supposed death camps were in soviet controlled territory where western officials were not allowed to observe until many years later, after which soviets could modify the camps.

Any resemblance with the 2020 election process would be purely coincidental.

The holocaust is the only event that is illegal to question in some areas

Same comment (think [online] areas)

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

only my uneducated opinion but seems pretty on topic as it directly comes from a Q drop, no?

2
johndude 2 points ago +3 / -1

I trust but I also try to not lose touch with the the external POV. Otherwise there’s too much of a risk of becoming Sanders fan club (but there’s still a waaaaay).

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Try CAPITO maybe?

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another solid redpill (trying to mimick Q styling just for fun)

Who were the [6] million?

How did they die?

Did they really die?

What was [fake] and what was real?

Why all the [gas]lighting?

Why the echo [chambers]?

2
johndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

We don’t say menacing. We like to say peopleacing. It’s more inclusive.

1
johndude 1 point ago +2 / -1

CNN tapes, best was last? I haven’t seen that then...

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very easy indeed. Just write wwg1wga anywhere in your bio. Simple as that. You won’t be able to get your account back, or even to defend your case.

-9
johndude -9 points ago +7 / -16

At the moment we’re not winning. We’re seeing some weak signal that undercover operations are happening (Scavino then Pompeo’s posts) but it’s almost purely based on faith. Not saying it’s bad btw. Just saying we can’t objectively speak about “winning” atm. From an external POV we’re losing badly.

20
johndude 20 points ago +24 / -4

At this point I don’t really care anymore whether there was (provable) fraud or not. Either way the media won’t care. Either way, everything they’ve been guilty of doing for the decades prior still remains. The fraud was just the icing on the cake. I still want them gone even if it’s proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that there was no fraud.

6
johndude 6 points ago +6 / -0

What makes you think he didn’t perfectly fulfill the mission he was given?

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

I disagree. She must have known from the start that she had no chance in succeeding (removing Trump from office before the end).

Therefore it must be about something else. Not saying 2024 necessarily. Something we don’t know.

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

my intent is not to "prove you wrong" dude — just saying that nothing tells us the original photo was cropped the exact same way

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

who told you the original photograph was centered like this?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›