I'm missing the bread references. What's the story here?
By studying photographs, I know that at least First Street NE/SE, Constitution Ave NW and First Street NW are fenced. Is the whole Capitol actually fenced all around?
Also I don't know where the razor wire fences are located. I've mostly seen fences without razor wire.
I've heard that SCOTUS is fenced as well, is that true?
It would be interesting to have an actual verified map of all fence perimeters.
If SCOTUS or Pence did what we (selfishly) wanted them to do, then...
- military would NOT have been the only way
- there would have been no CHECKMATE
- no CASTLE ROCK
- no RED 1..6
- no fence around the Capitol (owl in fence, when does a bird sing)
- no Great Awakening (Trump would be President-Select for half the country)
So... are SCOTUS and Pence traitors? Maybe... but their inaction are not proof of that. So far, their inaction are perfectly consistent with THE PLAN.
If the plan was to arrest Biden/etc on inauguration, the deep state would realistically be very aware of it.
Knowing this, why would they themselves deliberately walk into this trap?
You're telling me that Biden knows he's gonna get arrested if he goes to inauguration, and he still does it, and gets arrested? I don't see how that would make sense.
I also don't see how it would make sense that the plan is to make these arrests, and the deep state would not know about it.
It hit me while having a smoke outside.
Look at it this way:
- Pompeo announces speech
- Trump announces speech right after Pompeo
Now JUST BEFORE Pompeo starts his speech, there is this thing about Trump term having ended "right now" (assuming Zulu time).
What does it sound like to you?
To me, it sounds like they put all the conditions together for any actors to believe that shit was about to hit the fan... and then it did not.
- Pompeo's speech was kind of lame, just words, nothing special
- Trump's speech has been reported by a day
- the state.gov page was a "hack" or a "disgruntled employee" (yeah sure...)
Pretty much equates to telling everyone "hey we're gonna do it now, look!". And then crickets.
Why? My theory is that they wanted to see what would happen. Who would come out. Would there be any military movements. Would there be any surge in DS communications.
As an additional benefit, now if/when they do effectively trigger this for real, DS will be wary to put all their forces in the battle immediately — and thus exposing themselves — thus giving Trump some solid advance once shit really hits the fan.
Q uses a lot of [expressions in brackets] in his Q posts.
Besides regular emphasis, is there a specific significance to the use of brackets? There seem to be patterns e.g. some specific words (like "knowingly") being put in brackets, for instance. Sometimes he uses parenthesis () and sometimes brackets. Why not stick to parenthesis and why use brackets instead at specific places?
> A few examples
Inappropriate [sick] to you?
All [3] movies playing simultaneously?
They are afraid of you [reach][uncontrolled][anti-narrative][free-thought]
Mr. Russia collusion pusher himself now involved? [knowingly]
China seeking NK commitment to fire short [long] -range ballistic missile(s) pre_election?
I've heard here and there about the theory that the United States of America would legally be a Corporation, and also that this Corporation was about to be terminated in order to be replaced by the new one, hence the new "Biden inauguration" being impossible because it would apply to the old system only.
I'm very loosely paraphrasing. Simon Parkes talks about it in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSItoNIeZHI.
I've also heard about this earlier in some posts, but I don't remember exactly where. Then there's this article https://www.federaljack.com/slavery-by-consent-the-united-states-corporation/ but I'm not sure how much credit to give it.
Any information on this? Is it BS? If this is BS, why is Simon Parkes spreading it?
Last video is from Dec 26 — he made one on Dec 27 about Nashville but deleted it almost immediately ("sometimes a cigar is just a cigar")
From the ones I know, the RED_CASTLE / GREEN_CASTLE sequence wins hands down
Criteria are:
- ability to demonstrate that Q has advanced insider knowledge
- cleverness of the whole plan/sequence
- extent to which the plan has been successful in ripping Dems apart (on the regarded topic)
- badass-ness
