13
johndude 13 points ago +14 / -1

How many coincidences until it's mathematically impossible?

1
johndude 1 point ago +2 / -1

when you say "deport" can you give a quick explanation as to why?

3
johndude 3 points ago +3 / -0

Biden could be seen with his hands behind his back behind Pompeo

we're in complete fantasy land here...

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't really argue on these two things, especially number #1, without unlocking prior steps first. Usually, once these prior steps are unlocked, your two "counter-arguments" just fade away by themselves.

If someone actually asked me one of these, I'd tentatively reply the following:

  1. yes people can be that evil, have you heard about Rwanda, South Africa, Nazi Germany, and so on? with enough confidence in impunity, people become more evil than they would ever think
  2. nobody said the DS doesn't about the plan. of course they do

but again, if one asks these questions, it usually means one is not ready to accept any answer.

12
johndude 12 points ago +12 / -0

from what I've heard, attendance is going to be virtual but inauguration itself would take place at the Capitol as usual (just w/o audience)

2
johndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

how does it work on a high-level? what's the modus operandi?

3
johndude 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t think the news outlets get any benefits from Trump bashing. They are bleeding readership with that. It’s all about optics/narrative, at the expense of readership.

0
johndude 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’m suggesting that maybe this is a sign that some people at the CIA are on our side now.

0
johndude 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah ok but is that set in stone? Also, is that monolithic? When Pompeo was Director of the CIA, did he do nothing and just went along with CCP?

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kind of along these lines, yes.

Also, the CIA is probably (certainly) not monolithic, and I suspect internal wars rage there between DS and patriots.

By this logo I would assume patriots have taken an edge.

2
johndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

you're mistaking a graphic design committee where at most 5 people (all mid-level) are involved, for the entirety of the arcanes of the deep CIA

0
johndude 0 points ago +1 / -1

are you frankly not seeing it or am I missing something?

if 1. then I'd recommend you see an ophthalmologist

if 2. then please explain

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

you have some proof of what you advance wrt America Corp?

-4
johndude -4 points ago +1 / -5

... and yet you'll see, if/when this happens, people will say that

3
johndude 3 points ago +3 / -0

Noticed that as well. To me it’s obviously deliberate.

2
johndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Earth is round, mate. Planes don't go over the Antarctic because it'd be a death sentence for everyone on board in case of need for an emergency landing. They usually don't go over the Pacific for the same reason (they follow Alaska's coast relatively closely).

1
johndude 1 point ago +1 / -0

not sure if threads count, or only first-level tweets

4
johndude 4 points ago +4 / -0

yep, same thing. he had a few interesting things to say in the immediate aftermath of the election, but he started to annoy me with his so many "100% guaranteed" assertions where are patently wrong.

I'm still on the fence on whether it's some kind of humor/sarcasm on his side, or whether he's genuine in his belief. The former wouldn't surprise me so much given he's openly stated that he views his podcast/videos as a business, therefore he doesn't want to openly verse into Q (and thus be banned).

3
johndude 3 points ago +3 / -0

sounds to me like a running gag of his. I might be wrong, but knowing a bit about British humor, I can testify that it does look like it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›