Strong points, but if you want to contribute I would suggest a better and more concise delivery. Honestly.
People will read the first two lines and then hit the back button. I didn't, but most will.
People want hope and you didn't deliver that here although the effort was worthy. Just finger wagging in the end.
This fight of dark and light is not over and no one on this board is eager to give up on that. They WANT to contribute and they WANT to see it happen.
Give them info that shows some progress and a suggested call to action to amplify. Its an information war and we are here at the helm. The physical world of power is largely in place, but words can move mountains. Digital soldiers we are.
Keep up the positivity and peace be with you, Patriot.
You can assume I dont refute it if you want. The true reason is that I doubt your intentions are pure or arw simply unproductive to our greater cause and your arguments or perfect for boxed thinking.
Have a nice day.
So you don't question Wikipedia? Why shouldn't I write off what you say because you copy pasted from Wikipedia?
This board is for truth seekers and your intentions appear to be fixing "wrongthink". Everything you say aligns with intentions that I have no interest in engaging. If you want to understand what we are really after then just go look it up yourself and if you don't like what you see then move on. There's no reason for you to be here engaging if it doesn't jive with you.
You are now officially wasting both our time. Thanks for your input.
Looks like a copy pasta from some left wing site. You would know more about Q if you looked into on your own than have spoon fed interpretations. You have no reference to the concept of year deltas and and no overall acknowledgement that the result matters more than interpretation.
You are thinking on a lower plane. Realize it. Also, may I ask if you voted in this election and for whom? Just want to get an idea of who I am talking to here.
You seem to have been radicalized and accepted it hook, line, and sinker to the point you are unaware.
I venture to guess you have formed most of your opinions on what we are doing here based on what have been told by this media you apparently have allowed into your thoughts.
Actually the opposite. If simply trusted Q I would not be researching it and confirming it regularly which is the inherent part of the Q movement.
The evidence or proof is constantly being pursued and verified. Go look up Q proofs.
I think the fundamental issue here is that we are questioning what we've learn and what we've been taught where you seem to be trusting it.
I have already lived plenty of life under the pretenses of what I have been taught and I find that there is more to be experienced based on a different set of principles. It requires questioning the core of my environment. Intention dictates reality. I have no qualms taking Q drops and researching. Its my right and I will exercise it.
At the end of the day you will not get far on this board operating in your context as it is incompatible with our approach and objective.
How about we take the simple route and acknowledge that there is no concrete way to determine the world population without getting skewed figures and tainted sources.
By that measure I still would suggest that you are not open to alternative viewpoints. You are wasting your time here in this case.
We are mapping out information and connecting dots and in turn building a picture that reflects a potential scenario that makes .ore sense than what we've been told and taught for so long.
Its similar to taking you to an empty patch of land and telling you to discover what is here and you simply point to the one tree and just say "there's a tree". Our approach is more akin to suggesting that there is much more below the tree worth discovering.
How much have you really looked into Q and the Truth movement for that matter? Most of your questions reflect that you are coming in with a deeply influenced agenda and have not really reviewed it. Either that or your plane of logic and confirmation is too solidified to allow alternative viewpoints.
Until you can begin to entertain different theories your reality will be stuck and in turn shortchange the experience of others around you.
We reject that here. To be clear, we do NOT reject you, only your philosophy and agenda.
Their journalistic standards are based on imaginary sources such as "Anonymous" and are so incredibly skewed in their conclusions thst it is laughable. It's nearly all op-ed and they get so mad when we reject their reporting.
Obama legalized propaganda of this nature and everyone has been asleep at the wheel.
We are at minimum question the bullshit propped up by these liars and we are discovering some disgusting truths about those in power.
If this is inconvenient to your belief structure then I have two questions for you:
- Ask yourself what about your belief structure is so delicate that you are out to defend by coming all of the way onto our board, making a user profile, and engaging with us?
- What is the population of the world? Prove it.
This should be required content.
Q makes the most sense with this.