Hehe community notes is indicating they got the wrong guy.
Here's the original video which is still interesting.
The embedding is just getting messed up. If you view it here it should play correctly.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1822890929855811931
I really don't get where we're going with this. That image clearly has something done to it, but there is video of the event and other images.
Sisson really didn't need to manipulate the photo, though I guess the original may have been more disappointing than photos the news crews have gotten pretty easily.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9DdAsQkghk
I guess it gets people looking at the details of the Detroit rally.
Interesting that it doesn't seem to show up on his main profile.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
Maybe there are still aspects of Trump's account that have specialized functionality from the Deep State ownership days. For example, someone from the Obama group may have to approve each tweet before it can post.
I think it's plausible, and agree that Sisson's original photo is definitely manipulated in some manner, but are you saying the entire event was fake, or that small elements of the photo were manipulated (people filled in for visual impact)?
E.g. are you saying these photos are fake as well?
IMO Sisson's photo was a manipulated shot of a real circumstance, where a good-sized crowd (1-2K people perhaps?) was masterfully arranged to create maximal visual impact.
All great questions. I don't know at this point. IMO sufficient pictures & video exist to indicate the event was real, and I think it's within the realm of plausibility to create such an event--even with Kamala's low approval ratings.
But Trump and the other posts on Truth have me wondering if we're experiencing another level of reveal as far as what's fake & real.
I'll admit I'm having doubts, but the explanation then becomes that all the other video and photos were fake as well, and that's a lot of media to fake...
Trump could also be implying the rally was fake in other ways. e.g. people being bussed in or paid to attend. Fake is a very general term.
u/Saigunx delivered the goods here:
https://www.twz.com/air-force-c-32-jets-are-going-incognito-under-new-security-policy
It's apparently been known for a while. Thing is the Biden administration hasn't been very prolific with their flying and their crowds have been minimal, so it's no surprise it went unnoticed.
Correct but the fact that the POTUS or VP is flying doesn't remove the plane's registration number. See the other posts here that show Cheney/Biden/Pence flying as AF2 callsign on planes with various registration numbers.
Here are some additional angles:
It's a fair question, but Detroit Free Press streamed the event.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9DdAsQkghk
I'm not dismissing the possibility that it's faked, but it'd be massively simpler to utilize the fact that in a major liberal city it'd be trivial to get the people for an event this size. The key is camera position (the hanger blocks the breadth of vision) and orienting the audience for maximal photographic effect.
Nearly 100% of the people in attendance would be in the shot chosen here.
If they're faking entire rallies now, then I'd say we're at a new phase of psychological warfare.
And just for a comparison: by this same reasoning, how come we don't have any crowd video of the Trump assassination attempt?
It's a fair point, but what exactly is your argument? That Biden as Commander in Chief instructed Kamala to fly a plane without registration, in contrast to what has been done by all the VPs before her?
What do you figure the purpose is of that?
I've seen 90003 & 80002 also. So there appear to either be multiple planes or they've cycled a few out over the years.
I cannot find any photos or videos of a Harris plane with a registration number on it yet...
Take a look at the FAA regulation doc though. That is truly the icing on the cake for this dig.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-45
There is an exemption for displaying the registration number if you are making a movie.
You're experiencing a reading comprehension error. I'll attempt to clarify.
-
I stated that the picture is from a real event and accurately depicts the crowd, with the camera being positioned inside or near the airplane hanger where the event was held.
-
I provided source video for this which you likely failed to examine.
-
You then imagined that I was stating that the entire crowd was inside an airplane hangar, and that I was making a comparison between Trump's crowd sizes. Perhaps even that I was implying his crowd's were smaller.
You're likely in a defensive and emotive state. Understandable. But simply empty your head of emotion and re-read my original post.
Also funny that Christine Pelosi (@sfpelosi) is using the term "bracket".
https://x.com/search?q=from%3Asfpelosi%20bracket&src=typed_query
For extra credit here are some Biden landings w/registration number (90003).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfJh5ofcqiY (Cyprus, May 21st 2014)
https://youtu.be/I-B6iP_JcMw?t=7 (Sharm el-Sheik, Jul 24th 2015)
https://youtu.be/wR6cc_IOdbA?t=55 (Berlin, Jul 31st 2015)
Vance (N917XA):
https://youtu.be/ayL44nqN9jk?t=153
Cheney (80002/illegible/90003):
https://youtu.be/WPRl2vQy58I?t=19
https://youtu.be/WLhLg8T_yeU?t=16
https://youtu.be/5YDBosPBRko?t=44
Kamala is the only one I see that never has a registration number.
https://www.unioeste.br/portal/central-de-noticias/66289-nota-de-pesar-31