Interesting initiative from within Europe, already signed by 225.000 people. Out of 450 million is still a small number.

I also notice a peculiar data point in terms of proportion: Although The Netherlands only has 19 million inhabitants at this point, 42.000 and counting have already signed.

Jack Posobiec also signed ..... even though he is not a EU citizen. (allowed)

For Dutch citizens, given the referendum result on the EU constitution: ticking the box: I am a EU citizen may be a difficult matter, as the label EU citizen is simply put upon everybody in contravention of the referendum result, and it is an unqualified declaration i.e. it should have read: for the purposes of this matter or something akin.

If you wish to support this initiative, please do sign.

https://www.save-europe-act.com/#section-signers

Alexander Hamilton’s system in the 1791 Report on Manufactures is essentially an argument for building a strong, diversified national economy through active state support of industry. Below are a couple of points to consider based on the 1791 report:

Lens:

1. Declaration of Independence: Equal station
2. Realization that the war debt was a huge problem, both politically (union wise) compare Articles of confederation to Constitution, but also a death knell on the fledgling USA economy.

Main points:

1. Independence vs dependence:

Till that point, the British empire has done everything it could to frustrate if not destroy local development of industry. See steelworks and the restrictions placed upon it.

So, dependence on Europe for essential manufactured goods, especially military supplies was a nono.. Economic independence is part of political and national security.

We see in Trump admin policies and measures this is one of the main items: think steel for the Abrams tank, ships, etc. It was imported and frankly second rate. Strategic vulnerability.

Buy American!

2. Farmers and manufacturers:

Manufacturers add value, multiply production, and expand national income just as farmers do. The advantage of agriculture is, it feeds the populace (autarky) and produces (especially back then) much of the raw materials needed for industrial production ( clothing, leather, wood, flax, linen, etc, etc)

Transposed into our time, Trump: I love our farmers. Deal for the farmers. Also think the crackdown on meat packaging, egg pricing, milk etc. There is a complete food processing industry which relies heavily on imported and chemical shit, but perhaps we will see a break up on these monopolies later to improve health.

Think FSOC ( link below)

in U.S. law [economic security is] to mean the condition of having secure and resilient domestic production capacity, combined with reliable access to the global resources necessary to maintain an acceptable standard of living and to protect core national values.

Read that again, as it contains 4 important objectives.

3. Resilience:

Hamilton believes agriculture, manufacturing, commerce, and finance reinforce one another and create a more resilient society. But, this does especially relate to financial matters.

This is especially apparent when one reads the letter of the chairman of the FSOC - page 4:

U.S. financial system reliably provide the resources necessary to enable the real economy to support domestic production capacity, Americans’ standard of living, and our core national values.

Again we encounter: Americans' standard of living.

But read carefully: it says: REAL ECONOMY.

4. Division of labor increases productivity:

Do one thing good, improve upon it. That's the rational. a healthy economy also provides ample opportunity to develop skills and growth in capacity and capability. So, it is not .gov providing the jobs, but creating the environment in which jobs and business can prosper.

It is interesting to see Trumps focus now on trade jobs.

5. Protective tariffs:

This is one of the means to create a playing field that facilitates domestic economic growth.

Where before you could see de-industrialization, focus on gig and service related jobs, now it is on building stuff. The producing stuff comes after.

Think steel industry. By these tariffs, domestic steel production has a chance to rebirth itself, regain strength and provide jobs, which then lead to a living wage.

6. Immigration of people and capital.

Hamilton believes skilled immigrants, foreign capital, and banking systems are essential to rapid development. Banks expand “active capital,” while immigrants bring industrial skills and labor.

Here we have to make a few comments.

• Trump secured about 18-22 trillion dollars in investments. Even it it were only 10-15 it would be top of the line. An asshat like Carney announcing to have secured 8 billion is in comparison a pittance. I guess a child's hand is easily filled.
• Immigration of labor in them days was not: open borders for everyone he felt like it to come in. No. That would defeat the ideas that lead to the declaration of independence.As Washington noted in his farewell address: "moral, virtue" sustains this republic. So, most immigrants would come from nations which peoples already birthed the young Republic: English, Welsh, Irish, Scotts, Dutch, Flemish, German, Norse, etc.
• The Louisiana purchase was in the works and showed enormous potential for growth ( Trump: settled the wilderness, raised skyscrapers)

Transposing these two considerations in our time, Hire American added to Buy American is only logical. USA has sufficient amount of skilled workers to have a strong self sufficient labor market.

And if immigration is desired, it should be USA policy to seek what is needed, not what is Rules Based International Order (RBIO) requires. Independence here means: pursuit of national interest.

Resume.

Hamilton in short argued to have:

• capital formation, • domestic demand, • industrial clustering, • immigration / retention/ development of skilled labor, • machinery, • supply chain depth, • strategic independence.

And this is important: to remain independent! only then is there a place to be free.

Potential overlapping interests:

When looking at 3 big powers, USA, China (CCP/ROC), Russia ( Imperial, Soviet, Federation) there is a strong overlap in interests and diverging from RBIO.

It is interesting to consider the story written by Isaac Asimov: Foundation. Trantor had become only one big governmental structure, dependent on exterior production and agriculture. This was basically a sign of incoming destruction and demise.

a people, a nation in its own right pursues its own destiny, not because magically the state is sovereign, but the individual people are. And if the state does not pursue the interest of its people, it will die.

In the EU, this is posited as a given: live with it: managed decline., while the system extorts the remaining wealth, and destabilizes the fabric of society by mass immigration of cultures incompatible with the original peoples.

This post is not so much about explaining the concepts behind it as well as pointing to resources to read/ listen to.

Let's just first say to for us anons, it is quite necessary to be in the know about BTC, its weaknesses but also its potential and strengths

1. Softwar - Major Jason P Lowery.
2. if you are not a reader but a listener: listen to this, he talks you through it: https://rumble.com/v2oxgxp-softwar-bitcoin-as-non-lethal-warfare-with-jason-lowery-wim315.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=60720e23-deb6-439e-95bb-aae779f41b4b
3. Congressional testimony of Adm. PACCOM: https://rumble.com/v78ynow-the-u.s.-military-is-using-bitcoin-to-protect-the-dollar.html

Note, that wrestling control of national money tokens from the control of the parasites, and to become truly sovereign as a nation, is not an easy tasks. It takes more than just a different piece of paper, or in case of BTC, a different medium. It is a complete set of different policies, mental attitudes, philosophical views.

For those who wish to read a bit more but are total newbies on this front, I would recommend to read:

1. https://greatawakening.win/p/19Ba3g4NTq/stacking-staking-and-the-energy-/
2. https://greatawakening.win/p/19Ba3jTZ2a/stacking-staking--energyrevoluti/

For those who already have some more detailed knowledge: the follwing might be interesting to consider:

1. https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASZHlLQBx/btc--hormuz/

u/#q4510

https://www.jointab.us/find-your-seat

This site shows were there are vacant seats.

If there are vacant seats in 3144 counties .... how many of us would it take to push counter the BS that is going on? And could it be that if there are more of us involved, there is less change of free reign for these ass hats? Perhaps a tad more oversight by based frogs?

Would this be a fitting next step to be part of the: "taking back our country?" Would be nice before coming independence day, would it not?

And, should the case be you can't do it yourself, perhaps you know of someone you trust who could.

I am trying to piece a few things together but have not seen it discussed anywhere.

The word is, some ships are allowed through the strait, but these ships then pay in BTC.

Since it is reported that 3200 ships are "waiting", I am wondering, given the peculiar price movements since the "double cease fire", there is another play at work.

https://www.cointribune.com/en/iran-imposes-a-bitcoin-toll-to-cross-the-strait-of-hormuz/

https://gcaptain.com/un-shipping-agency-says-3200-ships-trapped-west-of-hormuz-as-emergency-council-meeting-called/

But .... there also is something else:

https://c4ads.org/publications/

Peruse the articles .... Protean fleet. At least 10.000 ships. And the way it works is even more mindboggling than simply a BTC address with a segwit.

It seems to me, IF 2 or more million is paid in BTC to pass, then the traces of such a payment should be visible. The thing is, it is not paid in Pounds Sterling ( auch for the CoL) but who is the recipient?

What if this actually fills US coffers, only to be used as a backstop?

I mean, if Scott Bessent is the originator of the '92 Pound Sterling attack, throwing it out of the EMS, making Soros billions, clearly this man knows more about such things than many "experts", especially with more than a year prep.

I am not saying it is ..... But ... something peculiar is going on, and I can't even formulate my question really. The ups and downs are way too ..... precise. Today I calculated it would be a 1000 up. Nice. I also calculated the 71500 level as a short exit. Nice. Thanks and all. But is it never been this precise. It feels off.

Many of you will probably have listened to Promethean Action to get a better handle on what is going on. It is not a new idea. Actually, the idea was already promulgated in a series of Books called: Coin's Finance School by William Harvey. From one book in the series: The People's Money, Harvey writes:

The question now is : Shall it be an English or an American policy?

A CHOICE OF POLICIES.

These men are seeking to rivet upon us the gold policy of England, with nothing but gold to be the primary money of this country. They have by their gold policy got us in debt to England to an amount that over in requires $200,000,000terest to be paid in gold, to pay which all annually our balance of trade is consumed; all our annual gold production (about $40,000,000) and our surplus stock of is drawn on for the deficiency. Their policy has driven the administration to go to the pawn-brokers of England to get gold to sustain this and this is the system these men have to fasten organized perpetually on this country. Why do they take such an active interest? It is because it promotes their selfish interests. If Andrew Jackson were alive and president, this would suddenly be reversed and every American heart would beat with responsive pride.

Writing on the globalist policies, Robert Ingraham states in his book: The Moderns Anglo-dutch Empire:

Under this new Empire globalist regime, national food self­sufficiency has been destroyed in dozens of countries, by a lack of investment, and a policy of shifting out of food production into producing “cash crops” for export. Across the globe, millions of peoples’ basic right of access to food is now determined by a handful of international cartels, and the policies of the WTO.

Of course, back then in the 1990, the countries that fall under this label Ingraham described, now all are invading by willful policy choice of the EU politicians, our ancient homelands. An these choices flow from international discussion platforms, to destroy nation states.

An guess what? As an example, The Netherlands is the world's second largest agricultural exporter. An guess what? Under the guise of SdG, sustainable development goals and climate change, the dutch government is forcefully divesting from agriculture. in the MSN, they are even badmouthing and creating fear for hobby holders of chickens and Pfas eggs. Instead dutch politicians want to create a tri-state-city, changing the lowlands into a high population density multi-culti low IQ controllable city. An where there is still green, there are windmills and solar farms, a colonial capital.

These people are stupid!

But if that goes for the second largest exporter. How about the premier one, The Unite States of America? Have you taken stock of what is going on, despite POTUS efforts to change the game?

Yes. Food production is big corporate.

Another facet here, is the ongoing digitization. This means, your business is being construed such that you only have to click at the "agreement to all the terms and conditions. No negotiation, no consideration. This is your hail Mary, hoping things will work out.

Harvey writes in the above mentioned book:

They are going to find out another thing: It is, that we are financially independent of Europe. Our forefathers sought to erect a government here that would be free from the class-legislation of that we justly term plutocracies. Over there the many are the slaves of the few who rob them by legislation.

Let that sink in. Again. Let that sink in. Consider then, that legislation is no longer the preferred venue for control, but international rules base order. Haven you taken a look at the digital control grid? They even want to put open source software under control. Yes, that means bitcoin too.

Now think of what POTUS is doing to restore US Sovereignty!

It is like Q said: Sometimes to have to look back. ......

Elie Habib built World Monitor, a platform that fuses global data, like aircraft signals and satellite detections, to track conflicts as they unfold.:

Read the story on the development and background of the developer here: https://www.wired.com/story/world-monitor-elie-habib/

I have not tried it, still investigating. But, this could be an interesting addition to several other osint services.

world-monitor: https://www.worldmonitor.app/

can be downloaded and used on your own computer or online.

Trump shut down the Cali climate hoaxers with this return.

But ..... when you would research Milankovitch cycles, it is often difficult to find the clear visual.

This video shows that visual. I would encourage to watch it, and to take special note to certain periods: like 12.000 years before the year 2000 AD, or if you want, to 4000 years ago.

Enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C0XhWtVoh0

P.S. I would recommend to download it and save it.

You can use: yt-dlp for it.

download code: yt-dlp -f 301 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C0XhWtVoh0

Ok, now the click bait has worked, let's consider a manner of speech we carelessly employ: 5D chess.

Before reading on, have you played 2D chess? If not, consider listening to Gotham Chess channel over at YT, and start with his oldest videos.

But, no matter whether you played or not, 2D is actually quite simple. There are 64 squares. 32 colored squares, and 32 white squares. Each square can only hold 1 piece.

As you see the board, you immediately surmise that the game is limited. It is limited in geographical space, but also in time. This means that a benefit to one player is the loss to the other player.

Each game has basically 3 parts. The opening, the middle part, usually a part where all kinds of pieces are removed from the board to create space and the upper hand, it is also called: piece exchanges. For instance, you could capture the horse of an opponent, but loose the Bishop with which you took it. That is an exchange. The final and third part is the check mate (hopefully) or the remise/stale mate.

Now imagine 3D chess. This means that there is an additional dimension to the game. No longer is there just horizontal and vertical and its derivative diagonal, but height is added. Compare it to a war on the field. The appropriation of the ability to fly, puts this 3rd dimension in practice. Now you can hoover over your opponent, and pin drop all kinds of ordinance on his head, in excess of the reach of land based weapons.

Let's add two more dimension, based on the first 3:

1. Time.

Time is linear and subsequent, like 1,2,3,4. or Today, tomorrow, next week.

#2. Timeline

This is divergent to 1. I won't go into all the rules here, but consider the fact that by playing this game: benefits and disadvantages are not immediately apparent. IT is even considerable more difficult to check mate. You could end up with 5 kings, or 1 king surrounded by 8 queens.

So, 5D chess is as far removed from 2D chess as the Newtonian mechanical physics from Quantum physics.

See this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGqhzaf9JuI

Real world 5D Chess Master

So, what does this all mean in relation to Trump when we call him 5D chess master?

Consider this video, from the 21st to the 30 minute mark. https://rumble.com/v6wyb1g-arrest-hillary-clinton-here-we-go-redacted-news-live.html

Did you notice? You can hear this interview moving seamlessly from battleground tactics to political strategy. And what is the end result?

1. Trump is held hostage to interests of the old guard. 2.Trump did a 180 to what he has always believed.
2. It is insane!

Although I enjoy listening to Macgregor's analysis when it comes to on the ground military matters, as soon as the talk moves to something else, he loses it. I would say, the world look indeed different from the position of a battle tank, say 20ft up when compared to 20.000 ft or 40.000 feet.

Let's consider tariffs or sanctions. This is what Macgregor had to say in February about that subject. https://youtu.be/XAKD32xBYJQ

2 months later, White House announces quite an interesting trade deal with China. Why? Because our Chess master has them by the balls. https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/05/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-secures-a-historic-trade-win-for-the-united-states/

The current situation: https://tariffcheck.org/countries/china

in others words: it is quite comfy: 30% USA, 10% CCP. Insane, Doug, insane!

When it comes to all these matters, we comprehend, they are all connected. IT seems our friend here has no clue as to their deep connection. He is perfectly capable of seeing the trees, but incapable of seeing the forest. Especially, if one neglects to consider the Q posts …..the wider story.

This bring me to the following:

Would you, if you had been serving in Washington’s Army back during the Revolutionary War, stayed with him for 30 more days, when asked, and crossed the Delaware?

If your answer is yes, then what would have been the reason for you to do so? What are the signs that wold have made you trust him this one more time?

And if so, where is your trust in your Commander in Chief now, whom you’d now rather impart being a hostage to the same old agenda, instead of trying to look at it from a wider perspective?

So, When Nathalie says: we are not tribal, we want to discuss the reality on the battle field, it seems like she is referencing Ukraine. And that may very well be. But realities on THAT battlefield differ from Douglas’ projections of its meaning in relation to the situation in the US. So, why does the interview always end up undermining trust in our CiC?

Because they know better? No. Because they lack both knowledge and loyalty. https://greatawakening.win/p/19BGcsWgQS/x/c/4eSmVKbNBPb

And of course these can be fear driven, e.g. for not being taken seriously by those Macgregor thinks are important to him.

Promises made Promises kept is not just a slogan or a political punchline. We are living through the manifestation or the realization of these promises made.

But what is trust? The equation to trust is quite simple: transparency + correctness = trust. I dare say: we were informed of what would happen, what the game is, we researched it. We see that Potus is doing what is correct.

And I think this is where they go wrong. But I do admit, as my GF would say: "Skipper, otherwise there is no story to tell".

What would you rather be:

1. A Conspiracy Practitioner

or

2. Conspiracy Theorist.

One comes with a Pepe batch and the other with nice cuffs.

Ruminating through Q posts, one comes away with the idea that everything is connected to everything.

Drops- points to connect.

The journalist in Jason Broune posed the question: What connects the dots.

1. Air America ( Mena Arkansas) -> Clinton Global initiative -> it takes a village
2. Made in America -> idem.
3. Basically: Iran-Contra scandal.
4. how about Fast & Furious -> gun running with the cartels. ...
5. Kashogi -> posing as a journalist. Killed. Outrage. But, he was a "merchant of death" (yes another movie)
6. What else brings in big bucks to fund black projects? Human trafficking + organ harvesting + prostitution + child labor.
7. Undercover for investigation + undercover for cointel ...Silo's.
8. SAP's.
9. Money flow. Enter the laundromat. Think Ronald Bernard. => Epstein = Laundromat? Seems to fill the position. His career? With whom did he work in finance?
10. Poppy fields in Afghanistan.
11. Big Pharma.

asking ai:

Jeffrey Epstein worked at Bear Stearns starting in 1976, where he quickly rose to become an options trader and a limited partner. He left the firm in 1981 due to disciplinary issues related to a violation involving loaning money to a friend, although he maintained connections with the bank

Yeah ... Epstein -> Wexner -> Bronfman -> NXVIM -> Victoria secret: you get the picture.

I am still wondering what misses Junkerman is doing in there .....But perhaps she decided it was enough and retired with some ugly Italian noble ....

The comparison between superbowl and puppy show ... may be understated ...

It reminds me of what Q often noted:

If Mueller is dirty, Rosenstein is dirty.

It made us discuss quite a lot, but in the end ... dirty they are. The swamp runs deep, indeed.

In the previous post I gave some pointers towards 3 matters of concern:

1. Energy-multiplier;
2. Money;
3. Dangers;

We have discussed that governments have a vested interest in this matter out of 1 simple consideration: The keep in tact the Bargain between the Individual and the Collective expressed in the State [BICS].

This posts will concern itself with a special kind of money: Bitcoin. At a certain point it may become it bit technical, but please, bear with me, as I hope it will increase your insights into what is going on. This post will also point towards broader movement.

Money-2:

As discussed in the previous post, we have used several instruments of money over time: Sea Shells, Stone (hard stone, rubies, diamonds, etc), Gold, Silver, Sticks, Paper.

The common denominator between them is that a society agrees on its value. For instance, during the Middle Ages, when silver coin was rare, sticks were used to pay taxes. The King would appoint certain assayers to create these sticks and these sticks were made credible by certain markings. Of course, counterfeiting those sticks was a sin of death.

When it comes to Sea Shells, not every sea shell was equal to the other. It required a special kind, a rare kind. A kind that was not easily found and hoarded. Every man had to learn to identify the right one. Of course, the other side of the equation was that honor requires to give the right kind of Sea Shell.

With Gold, Silver, Rubies and other precious stones, there were assayers. If you yourself were not capable of assessing the nature of a coin, or stone, then you could use such an assayer. You would then get a conclusion to the question: Is it true or not?

But, what happens when you entrust a piece of paper with a claim to value? Yes, a claim to value! Because, what is on paper is not the real thing, right? Consider a deposit slip you obtain when depositing money in a bank. A piece of paper denotes: The name of the bank and its location, the bank account number, the date and the amount deposited. And it also carries the signature of the cashier of the bank and your own, and perhaps a stamp.

How would a third party assess its truthfulness? See, this is where trust comes in. A deposit slip used to function as a letter of recommendation. A traveler could go from say: Rome to Paris, and open a credit line with the bank of choice based on that letter.

From this we can deduce that TRUST and CREDIBILITY go hand in hand when it comes to man itself. Since people were reasonably sedentary, although during the Middle Ages, a lot of traveling was done (: it was called pilgrimage), dishonorable business was severely punished.

During the time of the Hanse League, a merchant committing fraud faced the breaking of his merchant book: broken book, and was cast out. This meant, such a merchant could no longer effectively be trusted and do business. For all intends and purposes: he had to relocate, effectively he was exiled.

Theft was often punished with exile too. You could be exiled for a year from entering a city or a region. Or it could be for 100 years. It depended on the question: do you admit to the theft and are you willing to reconcile? If not, off you go.

It brings us to wonder about prison: hold for a price. It is a form of extortion, no doubt, but how is sitting in one place payment for a crime? The victim receives nothing of value in return for what has been taken without his permission. On top, such institutions are paid for with taxpayer money. Here you can see the struggle between virtue and lack thereof from a personal and societal point of view.

A little side step perhaps, but, if a foreigner wishes to enter into the US, he needs a visum. That visum contains language that hearkens back to this idea of virtue, of honor. This is of course based on the ideas expressed in the Declaration of Independence: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. But to keep a government in its place of being the safeguard, you need a virtuous, informed and engaged body politic. Subversion of that body politic equals waging war on the Constitution and the People.

So, we have here the direct relationship between money, people and government. Its basis, as Nicholas de Oresme indicated, is the balancing of trade between people. But, we also identified that trust and credibility go hand in hand. Every society that solves the issue of trust and credibility, will be successful. The opposite is also true. Such a society becomes a failed society and will show no coherence, adherence and life expectancy. It will erode and disappear.

By the way, it is interesting to consider the word: ad- and co-herence. The primary meaning is to glue, to stick together. Since it is derived from Greek, looking deeper into its meaning, it becomes clear that “herein” is split into 3:

1. adherence (stick together)
2. heredity (pass on from generation to generation)
3. heretic (choice, unorthodox)

It allows a society to breath, develop, and pick up new traditions over a longer time. What we have seen these last 60 years, is that changes come with tremendous speed. And it is quite a challenge to comprehend complex matters within a context of constant habbenings.

It also shows the truth of Trump’s words regarding the outsider (heretic), the disruptor, to wit:

“The more that a broken system tells you that you’re wrong, the more certain you should be that you must keep pushing ahead,” he said. “You must keep pushing forward.”

“Demand the best from yourself and be totally unafraid to challenge entrenched interests and failed power structures,”

“Following your convictions means you must be willing to face criticism from those who lack the same courage to do what is right, and they know what is right, but they don’t have the courage or the guts or the stamina to take it and to do it,”

“It’s the outsiders who change the world,”

With this in mind, let’s look at the appearance of a new way of doing business: The digital way.

Bitcoin

The parts

As the name suggests, the coin part relates to an instrument or medium of exchange between a vendor (seller) and a buyer and their mutual appreciation of value.

The “Bit” part of the name suggests that it relates to a digital version, as in our world computers run BI-numerical: on 1’s and 0’s. If you want to play around with it: go here

Encryption & Math

Simply put, how do you assay a bitcoin? Can it be trusted? And this is where a special kind of mathematics comes in: encryption. Q already hinted at a simple cipher: 4, 10, 20. Of course it was easy to crack. It really did not need special autists to make that happen. Junior Woodchucks Guidebook

At any rate, bitcoin has a far more sophisticated encryption: 256SHA. You can play around with it here.

Encryption, therefore, tells you the genuine article is in play. But there is more! It is not only your trading partner that tells you it is the genuine article, belief my blue eyes. No. What you are looking at is that ALL participants in the network tell you: it is genuine. Think about it. No longer do you have to rely on the word of someone you never met and shows up in your shop, but all kinds of people by means of their computers tell you: this is genuine.

And this happens in an instant: “This coin is a true bitcoin”. It is called confirmation or consensus. Because without it, no transaction will commence.

So, what you see here is an important part of the security arrangement: it is not a central authority that keeps the network safe, but the participating people at large. That is a complete break with everything we had before.

And it not only is a matter of moving the word of 1 towards the collective(decentralization) but it also means that fraud: like clipping gold and silver coins, or mixing metals like gold and copper, meaning devaluation, is out of the question.

Consider coin clipping. You can find a beautiful example here. Of course it is fraud. But can you notice it, when you are transacting, on the fly?

Or would you be able to discover that a gold coin or silver coin has been mixed, and thus debased? You could weigh it of course. But there are coins counterfeited to the exact weight of the original coin. They are difficult to spot.

You could use, of course some electronic device that measures the electronic conductivity. Or, you could assay it with litmus test. But these tests are not 100% correct.

What happens when you subtract 0.001 from 1? You get 0.099. In terms of bits, (0/1, yes or no) does 0.099 == 1? The answer is: no. 1 has to exactly meet the requirement of 1. In computer code this is written as: 1==1.

Math is also called: the language of God. I do not agree, but do agree that it is quite close from a cognition perspective.

This brings us to the electronic/digital fiat. You receive fiat. How do you know it is genuine? You do not know such. As a matter of fact, the electronic version of the Federal Reserve Note can be created in an instant at will. Or, as Doge discovered: there are 14 computers creating FRN’s in circulation.

This is fraud, and erodes trust. But not only trust: it erodes the value you think you have.

This is the brilliance of Trumps economic plan, to limit inflation or money debasement to max 1%. Its not perfect, but given the circumstance, he is doing a tremendous job. This put a certain client list in quite a different perspective, does it not?

Genesis of coins

Anyone can write a piece of paper and say it has value. But, when you try to buy goods and services with it, you will find that the vendor does not share your view. Why? Because of its use case.

In Europe, there was a time when money was scarce. People resorted to sticking a stamp on cardboard, and passed that as money, because stamps were valid for ever. So, someone, somewhere could steam it off the cardboard and stick it on an envelope/wrapper, and sent mail.

This also highlights that there is a relationship between money and the Post/Mail. The UPU, the Universal Postal Union,currently a Special Agency of the UN focused on expanding the tax base by inducting all people into the confinement of the POSTAL CODE/ HOUSE NUMBER in order to deliver .gov services, allows for all kinds of stamps, but in essence, a stamp is a sovereign affair. Hence, you will find the face of a King or Prince on a stamp. And since a banknote is the same as the transmission of a message, you find the image of the King/ Prince on the banknote:

1. postal stamp
2. bank note

I am sure you are wondering about the dollar bill. Well, July 1st, 1775 saw the opening of the Benjamin Franklin Post office in Philadelphia. 1 year and 3 days later: 4th of July 1776 the declaration of Independence saw the light of day. This conforms to the standard represented in the Tsilio: no law comes into effect before 1 year and 3 days have passed.

This teaches us, that money is a sovereign affair. So, although the constitution entrusts Congress with regulating coin, weights and measures, and that States can only accept gold and silver in payment of debt, it says nothing about the power each individual has to coin its own money as a medium of exchange between two private parties. What you cannot do, is mint US-money and pass it on as such. That is counterfeiting! In essence: a trespass on the power granted and entrusted to the US.

The Federal Reserve Note, living under the ticker USD, not being a United States Dollar but identical to it [it is still not the same!!!], is a private debt note, an IOU. This system of the Federation of banks is in place to prevent local banks from over extending themselves by issuing to many IOU’s …. or at least, that was how it was sold. But how do you create an IOU? By means of paper, a little bit of wording, a number and two signatures. Comparisson

It is interesting to note, that in the earlier days, any gold and silver could be handed over to the US MINT to be changed into Constitutional money.

This means there are two main avenues to create new coins: By means of trade and [re-]minting or by means of mining and minting. But it also shows that each coin is only connected to the next by means of its originator: US MINT. It means that it is unknown what it is, besides the imagery on the coin or on the banknote.

How does it compare to Bitcoin?

In essence, Bitcoins are mined/minted by mining blocks. Each block is a cryptographic (256SHA) puzzle that needs to be solved. When it is solved, a block has been “found”.

A nice visual can be found here. Watch how blocks are formed and confirmed. From left to right at the top, you see the blocks being filled with transactions. And right on schedule, about every 10 minutes, that is a hard given, a block moves from the left side to the right side.

When a block is formed and found, the finders fee for such a block, currently 3,125 BTC, is given to the finder.

You may ask yourself: Where do these coins come from? Well, they already exist on the network. The exact amount of coins is 21 million from its inception. No more. Never more. There will never ever exist more than 21,000,000 coins. All these coins have the cryptographic make-up, to ensure no fraud happens.

And since only 3,125 coins are released to the world every 10 minutes, it follows, since every hours has 6 blocks of 10 minutes, and 24 hours in a day, that every day there are 450 freshly minted BTC. This goes of course until the next halving, somewhere in 2028. About that, we will pay attention to that later on.

And these coins are connected through the cryptographic-blocks. This forms a chain: a blockchain. Of course, any chain is as strong as its weakest link. By using the 256SHA encryption these links are nigh unbreakable with current technology. And then we have the community consensus safeguarding the whole.

Pretty neat, when you think about it.

Mining Blocks

As said: every 10 minutes or so, a new block is found. The network contains a certain metric and calculation method (literally: algorithm) to make sure that every 10 minutes a block can be found. It measures the hash-rate of the network. The hash-rate can best be understood as t

This series of posts are not directly related to Q.

However, our audience here in GAW consists of a diverse population.

1. Some of us are still deep into FIAT territory and have not yet read the tea-leaves.
2. Others have been stacking 3 metals: Gold, Silver and lead/brass for as long as they have been breathing.
3. And then there is a group who are deep into the Crypto Currency world, and are stacking BTC as if their lives would depend on it.

This post is not about disparaging anyone. This post is about explaining some of the tremendous insights I gained from studying this topic.

Let me preface this by a few comments on my expectations of the future. I believe in 2027 the background energy will change. From 1613 till 2027 we have experienced the Global Cycle of Planning, giving us the State, Industrial Revolution, Just in time delivery, calling 911. This is all about the bargain struck between the individual seeking refuge inside a group in exchange for protection and survival.

In February 2027 this background energy supporting the Global Cycle of Planning will change. It will switch from one energetic type to the next, which will be highly geared towards the individual. We will enter the Global Cycle of the Sleeping Phoenix.

This energetic support is not about what will happen, but about the POTENTIAL that it carries. Every human is in self-determination mode. Either choose to be a slave, obeying the overlords, go overboard in narcissism, or show what it really means to be man. It basically is a point of divergence. In that sense it MAY relate to Q posts in terms of: thinking for yourself, trust yourself, humanity is good, protect your DNA, ascension.

Energy revolution

Consider having a piece of land and farming it with your two bare hands. It becomes quite easy to comprehend that using tools and working together with other people will help in increasing the yield.

Cooperation and the use of tools can be seen as an energy revolution.

The thing is, the more people join, at a certain point the energy input yields less in terms of produce. During the middle ages in Europe, yields of 1:2 and maybe 1:3 were exceptional. Those times were typically: agricultural societies.

A new tool: the heavy plough brought an enormous improvement, so that more arrible land could be cultured and the food yield increased.

The same goes for black coal, or the use of oil and its derivatives. The amount of energy contained therein sparked already two industrial revolutions. One in the 18th century, and one in the 20th century.

I would add stone and cement too. There is a French scientist who posited an intriguing hypothesis on how to transport tons of stone: you create it on the spot. Talk about an energy revolution. Many Egyptologist are still hung on hordes of slaves sweating to cut, move and put in place stones weighing hundreds of tonnes.

Energy calculus

Till not so long ago, the only way to calculate something was using your own brain and perhaps an abacus and little tricks to arrive quickly at an outcome. There were mechanical devices invented that allowed for computation by dialing and turning a lever. There were books with examples of outcomes, rulers with presets.

Mathematics became more complex. The amount of brainpower and energy needed to make calculations in an ever increasing complex world increased. And the only way to satisfy that need was: throw more people at it. Think flying an aircraft and a navigator. Or trying to precision bomb from the air, or with artillery.

Enter the computer. Actually, it is nothing more than calculus that this machine does. I won't go into details of how that works, because I want this to be part of the painting of the background of this post, the environmental dimensions, so to speak.

But in essence: there is an energetic input, it does calculus, and there is an output. Quicker, more precise than any human could do.

Money

What is money? It is a big subject, and every one has their own view on what it is. But in essence, anything used in exchange for goods and services is money. It is an agreement between the parties of a particular exchange: value for value.

Trinkets can be money. The people in Mallaku experienced this first hand. Despite already being cultured, they accepted Western European trinkets in exchange for Nutmeg. To them, it was just a flower of an in abundance growing plant in their environment. A bit like: the grass under your feet. They soon got wind of the fact that this spice was very expensive, so, the next round trinkets no longer were accepted.

Why? From one perspective, it is simply a matter of the calculus of a better deal than the original. The greater the difference in value between one location to the next, the higher the value you as the seller can get.

In this high stakes arbitrage, eventually, both parties get to the point of wanting to extort the other, war ensues and there is a winner and loser.

In relation the the objects in such exchange, it all depends on the VALUE attached to that object put up for exchange by the recipient. And this always goes to "use-case". For what can it be used? Fill in the reasons for it yourself, vanity and survival/ killing often go hand in hand.

FIAT

Is FIAT money? I dare say: by your deeds ye shall be judged. From this I can surmise that you think it is. After all, you exchange your life force for this piece of paper. You use it to buy groceries and other necessities of life. And, slowly, more and more people are gaining understanding of the notion that FIAT is a scam. A trinket scam. Why? Because it is created out of thin air. It is actually created based on the declaration of will by a piece of paper.

When you put your signature on a piece of paper saying you agree to have a loan, you get in return another piece of paper saying: we owe you now. You are exchanging your IOU for that of a bank. As if that has more credibility to it.

The issue is, only people have credibility. Unfortunately, the facts of life are also that there are people who promise all kinds of things but never follow through on their word. And between the two extremes: those who follow through and those who do not, there is the bank and the government, hand in glove, to rob you of your life-force for what? For protection by the law.

And in order to secure such, you have become collateral to their IOU by becoming a PERSON, a corporation instead of a living being. You did not choose to do so, because they did not tell you. They simply set up the system that brought you into the state of indentured servitude for life within 3 days after your birth!

It is interesting to contemplate the words of Nicholas de Oresme from the 14th century in his book: Treatise on the Origin of Money:

For money is a balancing instrument for the exchange of natural wealth among men, as appears in the first chapter. It is therefore the property of those who possess such wealth.

He explains why it is detrimental to both Prince (government) and society when money is changed or, compounded profits are made by money changing. He called it worse than usury.

Why was the Hanse League during this time successful? Because it recognized the credibility of man, and used honest money. This tradition was the basis for the Old Exchange Bank of Amsterdam. It issued deposit slips that could be used as money. But while going about its business, it kept full reserve in silver. This caused the Dutch Silver Rider to be highly sought after ( high value) and highly trusted.

In fact, this harkens back to an even older tradition. Frysian coins were found in Novgorod, indicating that these silver coins were accepted in value and trusted as they were.

We now live in a world that is a far cry from this idea. Not the least pushed forward by another money changer mindfuck: communism and socialism, as it is commonly accepted that money depreciation at 2% a year (theft) under the guise of stability of prices is something that is of great value to you. That is why your 1969 Dollar bill currently buys the same thing as 2 cents back then. Better said: there is nothing for sale that is 2 cents. And no, you cannot use it as toilet paper, lest you want ass hole cancer. Come to think of it: In the Netherlands, a cigaret now does 75 cents, about $-0.9. I would presume it will get worse.

I would venture, you can appreciate the fact that it takes quite some energy to run around with silver and gold coins these days. Man has always used practical solutions in his own time. Perusing the book: The Bank in Europe, and studying the pictures in it, especially those with instruments (paper) it becomes quite evident that mediums of exchange, are adopted to satisfy demand from traders and travelers alike.

Think of: deposit slips, bank books, cheques, credit cards, pin transactions, Point of sales, and now digital wallets. It is all part of a change in how we are all doing business.

GOLD / SILVER

When you would pose the question: why should we value a medium of exchange in Gold and/ or Silver? The answer always comes down to: that has been the way of 6000 years of human history.

To which I would say: that depends on your sources. North American Indians could probably say that it would also go for their form of money: a special kind of sea shell.

Again we come down to that point of value and the underlying reasons.

We are able to imagine a world where neither gold, silver, paper is of value in terms of exchange. But, imagining such, would only focus on one particular issue. The real reason for value is YOU!

Another Revolution

From the perspective of the above, we are now witnessing a another energy revolution, one that goes beyond anything we have seen in the past.

In 1997, James Dale Davidson & Lord William Rees-Mogg, wrotethe book: The Sovereign Individual. They were thinking about the consequences of this digital revolution:

Lacking their accustomed scope to tax and inflate, governments, even in traditionally civil countries, will turn nasty. As income tax becomes uncollectable, older and more arbitrary methods of exaction will resurface. The ultimate form of withholding tax—de facto or even overt hostage-taking— will be introduced by governments desperate to prevent wealth from escaping beyond their reach

Now you can see a CBDC is undesirable for us, and why the EU is building the digital prison. Even going so far as insisting that onramps and off ramps KYC all their customers and share this information with the tax office. This digital revolution would upend the relationship, the bargain so to speak, between the individual and the collective, expressed in the State with its protection racket.

Now you see why the right to self-custody is overarching and an additional dimension to the right to property. There are many dangers now playing out right before our very eyes: legal, geopolitical, financial, regulatory, etc.

Next installment:

I would highly encourage you to read:

1. James Dale Davidson & Lord William Rees-Mogg, wrotethe book: The Sovereign Individual
2. Nicholas de Oresme: Treatise on the Origin of Money

In the next installment I will go into the nature of BTC specifically. And of course, I will also highlight some of the dangers now facing us in a following installment.

O this auspicious of days, this 4th of JULY, I extend to you my greetings and well wishes on YOUR 249th year of your Independence as a People. May it be blessed!

Happy Independence day from The Netherlands.

Ok, so, each country shows its big dick missiles.

Let's recap:

1. Trump lops 70 odd cruise missiles into Syria .... Lot's of damage, but eh ... hardly casualties. But, ff to today: AL Assad is gone.
2. MOAB on 3 Iranian locations => lot's of damage but empty.
3. Iran: shoots on a basis in Qatar: but empty.

I'm not saying this is not serious, but would it be ok to pose the question: what is being signaled here?

While harsh WORDS are being exchanged, what is really being done? Meanwhile, everybody goes out of their way to keep the balance. We learn about exchanging messages and warnings, emptying out certain locations.

It seems quite scripted.

Yeah, a live-fire shooting match, And each party shows off their goodies, to save face. But is someone expending ammo that is hard to come by? How do you disarm without telling them to disarm? Let them shoot their irreplaceable?

If expended, can it be used of more ...eh ... nefarious objectives?

Just some thoughts .... missed by a lot of people depending on the MSN and the vogue of the day.

This is going to be a read, so settle in and have a good cup of coffee and a smoke. The reason for its importance lies in the fact that NATO is now brought into the mix, in detail, and how each of these parties executed and participated in it as a GROUP i.e. conspiracy. And I promise you, the end has a twist.

With all the habbenings, one would be forgiven to think this is not important. I would say quite the opposite: this is important. The main reason is, that Q showed us certain mechanics without revealing classified information. He did point us towards: silent weapons for quiet wars.

Lifting the veil on things, usually through class action, can be very effective. Although the below is not yet a class action in the legal sense within the US, this case may become a cornerstone for much more, given the details revealed.

Preliminary note:

The Dutch legal system differs from that in the US. SO, although some legal ideas remains the same, the way these are treated is different. For instance, discovery in a civil procedure in the US is quite extensive, whereas in the Netherlands it is a drag. A claimant has to establish a rock solid case. When in the US an award for damages is granted, it may consist of a physical damage remedy and a remedy for psychological / emotional damages. Especially the latter potentially can entail 7 to 8 figures. In the Netherlands such remedies are unknown. Judges are very reluctant to award even $-10.000.

The process is as follows:

1. Summons and claim,
2. response by defendants,
3. response by claimants,
4. response by defedants,

If needed, certain elements can later be separated to added to the main case. For instance one defendant asserted the Dutch Leeuwarden Court (Gerechtshof, equal to Circuit Appeals Court) did did not have jurisdiction. Such an assertion became a separate topic for process.

The Claim

There are 7 claimants, claiming to have been mislead by lies perpetrated by the defendants alone and as a group, have suffered physical and emotional damages.

The Defendants

As reported in other posts, here, here and it is interesting to see the "fact-checkers" play literalists and begin high on denial: the following people have been summoned to appear before the court in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands in a civil case brought by lawyer: Arno van Kessel, seeking remedy for damages:

1. EVERHARDUS ITE HOFSTRA,
2. JAAP TAMINO VAN DISSEL, 3.MARIA PETRONELLA GERARDA KOOPMANS,
3. MARK RUTTE (previous Prime Minister, now Secretary General NATO),
4. SIGRID AGNES MARIA KAAG, (vice-PM + Minister),
5. HUGO MATTHEÜS DE JONGE (Minister public Health)
6. ERNST JOHAN KUIPERS,
7. DIEDERIK ANTONIUS MARIA PAULUS JOHANNES GOMMERS,
8. WOPKE BASTIAAN HOEKSTRA (Minister foreign affairs)
9. CORNELIA VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN (Minister Public Raods and infra; issue with authorizing mRNA tech.)
10. ALBERT BOURLA (CEO Pfizer),
11. PAUL JANSEN,
12. FEIKE SIJBESMA,
13. WILLIAM HENRY BILL GATES III (GAVI et all),
14. AGNES CATHARINA VAN DER VOORT-KANT (LAREB, compared to VAERS),
15. STAAT DER NEDERLANDEN (Dutch State),
16. GISELLE JACQUELINE MARIE-THÉRÈSE VAN CANN,

I won't go into all the details of the reason for hauling these people in court. The focus often times goes out to names more known by the public, like Bill Gates, and to a lesser degree: Marion Koopmans.

https://thenewamerican.com/world-news/covid-investigator-removed-from-who-team-after-china-ties-revealed/

This link shows there are interesting ties with the Wuhan LAB and thus CCP.

Conspiracy

The whole case rests upon one single topic: "Preferred Reality". It may also live under a different label. The effect is the same. You've probably heard something like: hearts and minds ... yeah ... It is easy to see how this relates to the Q-posts...

This is McCrystal: https://shs.cairn.info/journal-politique-etrangere-2013-4-page-161?lang=en

The world of StratCom and COIN though is so often about soft effects, operating in a grey zone of trying to make ‘perception becomes reality’ where success is hard to define let alone measure. Feeling at home and working in that grey zone is uncomfortable for most, requiring a particular mindset to be an effective StratCom practitioner.

Note the date. 2013. According to McCrystal, this was a relatively "New" operation. Personally, I do not think so. Political Ponerology has been practiced for a long time. The image is often much stronger: think: miracle of Mont Segur, Maid of Orleans, etc.)

Prefered Reality vs Reality

10.In the preferred reality, in addition to or above (supranational) the rule of law, there exist only intergovernmental organizations whose purpose is to safeguard the interests of the member states of the rule of law through international cooperation. Important players in this field are the United Nations and NATO. These intergovernmental organizations cooperate with private bodies referred to as NGOs in the subpoena. NGOs important to this case include the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Also these NGOs would, in the preferred reality, exclusively serve the interests of democratic legal states and their citizens.

In effect, here you see the blueprint of the structure. In the 20st century this was called: DUAL STATE. This is not a new matter. It has been going on since the dawn of government. For instance, here are some writers through the ages having written on the subject in question:

1. Plato
2. Aristotle
3. Socrates
4. St. Augustine
5. Federalists: Hamilton, Madison
6. Anti-Federalists: Patrick Henry, George Mason
7. Thomas Jefferson, (of course)
8. Nicolás Gómes Davila
9. Carl Schmidt

and many others I may add. In that sense you might put in: La Boetie, Max Stirner too.

11. In reality, however, the actual rulers and their executors are neither the people's representatives nor the courts. All the aforementioned other parties are not democratically controlled. As a result, the Dutch people, including c.s. have no substantial influence on governance. However, these organizations, supported by defendants, all participate in manipulating facts and events in such a way that the Truth is erased and replaced by a preferred reality. The Great Reset floats precisely on these powers and forces to which the actual rulers and their executors, including defendants, have - witness their conclusions - completely surrendered.

I would refer you to the JD Vance speech at the security summit in Munich where he plainly states: you are killing democracy by being deaf when your population speaks.

The ROLE of NATO:

Interestingly, as some of you may know, during the COVID-19-hoax the Dutch govenrment, lead by Mark Rutte, collapsed and became demissionary. Rutte plainly said: now we are untouchable and much more powerful. (this is now a rinse repeat, as the Schoof Cabinet collapsed, creating the same vacuum)

I remind the reader of the fact, that this Schoof Cabinet came into being under the condition that the PVV, 37 seat of 150 seat in parliament and winner of the elections) had to recant and give up all their positions on mass-immigration, Islamization, Green deal, NOX, Climate Change, NEXIT, etcetera.

One of the members of PVV, Fleur Agema became Health Minister. This is what she said in 2024:

https://youtu.be/31fnLauIYcQ

.... I, my ministry and others are working under the auspice of the NCTV.

What is that, NCTV, you ask?

National Coordinator Counterterrorism

There is quite some ambiguity there. Are they just coordinators? Andwhat are they coordinating? How to PREVENT terrorsim or inflicting their version of terrorism?

Terrorism is not known to have an official legal definition. So what is it? Consulting the website of another spook .org: https://www.aivd.nl/onderwerpen/terrorisme/

'The act, for ideological motives, of (preparing to commit) violence aimed at human life or causing socially disruptive damage, with the aim of instilling serious fear in (part of) the population, bringing about social change and/or influencing political decision-making.'

I would content: COVID-19 checks all the boxes. By their own admission!

Juicy

Do you know who Dick Schoof, the current Prime-Minister is?

According to wikipedia for the quick and dirty:

Hendrikus Wilhelmus Maria "Dick" Schoof is a Dutch politician and civil servant serving as the prime minister of the Netherlands of the Schoof cabinet since 2 July 2024. Schoof previously worked as secretary-general of the Ministry of Justice and Security from 2020 to 2024, as director-general of the General Intelligence and Security Service from 2018 to 2020, and as National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism from 2013 to 2018

He started his carreer at VNG, the dutch association of municipalities, who, of late, published a paper on how to combat dissenting citizens. On top, he worked at the department of education, where he helped kill the independence of the primary school system, thus creating the framework for indoctrination.

Then he was awarded a nice position at IND: theDutch immigration service, which he helped to fuck up.

You can't make this shit up. And they call me conspiracy theorist. hahahaha. the perfect candidate.

The claim of state sponsored terrorism is the claim Arno van Kessel is making:

7. In the program Wakker Nederland (WNL) on Sunday, April 15, 2018, General Major Field Officer also advisor to NATO since 2003, Mr. Van Kappen, confirmed the existence and purpose of the preferred reality. In doing so, he indicated that today the preferred reality is created project by project using large-scale information operations. With these information operations, facts and events are manipulated such that a preferred reality is projected onto the civilian population, including c.s. Van Kappen calls this "telefast reality". Van Kappen leaves no doubt that defendants participate in this. The reason for the existence of what Van Kappen calls the information operation is because of a strategic interest. Van Kappen did not explain exactly what strategic interest is being served, but confirmed by his statements a strategic interest to bring about large-scale social change. Van Kappen also acknowledged in this interview the existence of secret large-scale top-notch information operations to serve this covert strategic interest.It was also remarkable that Van Kappen left no room for misunderstanding that “all parties” take part in these what he calls information operations. By talking about the manipulation of facts and events, Van Kappen clearly confirmed that it is about turning true facts and events into disinformation with (among other things) the strategic goal of depositing a preferred reality with one's own population (including c.s.). As explained in the summons, this is, at its core, exactly the deception of which a large part of the Dutch population, including c.s., became the victim. In evidence of the foregoing, the recording of WNL on Sunday dated April 15, 2018 and a Wikipedia printout regarding Van Kappen's curriculum vitae are submitted as production 92.

However, since The Netherlands is a member of NATO, EU, WHO, UN, one wonders what else there is?

On June 14, 2022, EU commission president Ursula van der Leyen received what she called an “honorary doctorate” from Ben Gurion University in Israel. In her speech given in that context, Van der Leyen stated that Europe is the values of the Talmud. For this reason, according to Van der Leyen, Europe and Israel are connected friends and allies of each other. As production 99, c.s. submit a copy of the video recording regarding her confession during Van der Leyen's speech dated June 14, 2022.

Say what? Prima facie we have an admission of (Khazarian?) DEEP STATE central. O dear ..... Book reference in Q-post?

37. In the following, a number of views from the Babylonian Talmud regarding the view of Goyim (including c.s.) will be listed with location. This is possible because the Talmud was first translated from Hebrew (into Latin) by the Polish-Russian Catholic priest I.B. Pranaitis in the late nineteenth century. It was this priest Pranaitis who, in his book “Christianus In Talmude Judaeorum14” in 1892, exposed the true intentions behind the interpretation of the above-mentioned “teachers” in the Jewish faith as an attack on Christianity. A copy of the cover of this book as well as a statement of its location is submitted as production 103:

Goyim may be put to death without being punished for it (Sanhedrin 57a)

Goyim are gentiles and must all be killed (Soferim 15).

Sex with girls as young as three years old in which sexual intercourse takes place is permitted (Sanhedrin 54b and Kethuboth 11b)

It is permissible to steal from Goyim (Baba Mezia 24a)

Deceiving and lying to Goyim is permitted in order to outwit them thereby (Baba Kamma 113a)

`Jesus Christ was sexually immoral and the God he worshiped was a brick (Sanhedrin 107b)

This is not new. Anons knew. And this has been discussed at length in other places. You guessed it: Muh ..... anti-semitism. Wait for it.

40. The colors of this flag (vide production 104), according to the projection in preferred reality, are derived from the rainbow which in preferred reality is also the explanation for the name of this flag, namely the ‘Rainbow Flag’. The Truth, however, is that this flag has nothing to do with equal opportunity, diversity and inclusion. has to do with it. In reality, this flag involves a malicious and false interpretation of the spiritual meaning of the rainbow, which is important to Christians. This Christian meaning is explained in the Biblical book of Genesis. For Christians, the rainbow is the sign given from Almighty God confirming His promise that mankind will not experience another flood. The Divine rainbow that every human being can behold has seven colors, the main color of which is the Heavenly Light Blue that symbolizes the Heavenly Kingdom. The Rainbow Flag projected onto humanity in the preferred reality consists of six instead of seven15 colors in which the Divine Heavenly Light Blue is deliberately missing. In a symbolic sense, it thus depicts that the Tower of Babel will be completed and unspiritual man will succeed in his rebellion against Almighty God

Now he is digging his grave even deeper.

The Twist

Continues in the comments

heren is the link to the preliminary study. https://okstatepilotstudy.com/results/

this is especially interesting given the plethora of issues in commercial airline travelling.

or .... with military pilots

Trump mentioned to champion the death penalty for murdering police officers. We'll have to wait what the final draft of this proposal will look like. Timing also plays into this, as house cleaning is dirty business.

Although, I would concur in principle, as murder is a deed most reprehensible, I would put a cororally on that one:

1. actively bringing back jury nullification;
2. scrapping of all items in the Patriot Act;
3. an overhaul of the USC in relation to the Constitution, the supreme law.
4. overhaul of the judiciary aligning it strongly with the Constitution to protect rights of the citizens, not the government.

Why?

1. To prevent the creation of a class of civil servants beyond the reach of the law, where the onus is on a charged person in relation to 18 USC 241/242. And given the fact, how much this clause is being used to protect rights, I am reluctant to cheers this on while surrendering my thought process.

2. Otherwise, your second amendment is rendered useless. Currently, the 2nd is already a catch 22: damned if you use it, damned if you don't. Yes, you may enjoy discharging a bullet downrange from time to time, but that is about it.

To those who say: I trust Trump, my answer would be: good for you. I also do trust him, as far as I trust any other human: History has shown governments to be most prone to being smartypants.

Be mindful, frens. Let not emotion come between you and critical thinking.

Frame of reference

As you will know: debts and slavery have been intricately connected over the course of history. Debt is used by traffickers to keep people under their thumb.

The tax systems in almost all countries are set up such that at the first of January, every new year, you start out as a debt slave, burdened by paying the tax debt.

Countries are no different. And when war ensues, debts become instruments of power. Who holds the debts, exerts tremendous power.

https://deepnewz.com/germany/germany-s-merz-seeks-bundestag-session-on-eur900-billion-debt-approval-march-10-0356848a

900 billion dollars in new debt. Is Germany allowed, based on international law i.e. European Stability Pact treaty to do so? The answer is no..

EMS-requirements

When this system EMS was set up back in '02, it was Germany and France who failed to live up to the requirements of the pact. The EMS is stringent, because the aim is to support the Euro as a strong currency.

There are two metrics:

1. % of debt in relation to GDP below 60%.
2. Yearly Deficit below 3%.

Since GDP is the figure of comparison, we have to look at Germany's GDP within the current time-frame.

GDP of about 5.7 trillion, The debt = 2.8 trillion. Grosso modo, just above, 60%, a violation.

Estimated Consequences

Now they want to add another 0.9 trillion, within the current economical climate of suffocation and decline.

What is more, the CDU wants to do this while being beyond the finish line, inorder to make sure, that any new future government (read AfD) cannot move beyond it. Of course, these tricks were done by the Biden Admin as well. Come to think of it, in the Netherlands the demissionary Cabinet of Rutte, fucked everybody over, while washing his hands clean by saying: the government can only be an accomplice if a successful strike at the freedom of the people by the state is committed.

Anyways, it becomes clear that the 5% NATO requirement, laid down by Trump, causes the EU-members/NATO-members, to take on more debt, beyond the stipulations of the stability pact, which is a nono to maintain the EURO. In the case of Germany, the debt would balloon to beyond 3.7 with a faltering economy, or north of 83%.

At any rate, the situation then will be worse than that in the 2000, when this EURO, European UNION project was started. To me, it seems to indicate the permanency of higher prices, and higher taxes, but, due to the mass-immigration into the EU: on the one hand: artificial shortages and net-congestion, but also: instability because certain things do not mix well.

In the case of Germany, it is remarkable to see that East Germany id strong AfD, and has less mass-immigration. The big mass-immigration centers in the West are strong CDU, LEFT. Although, AfD is making inroads through the Fulda Gap.

Final point:

Fun fact, this week, it came out that the Dutch minister of Defense was asked about whether the army had cash-money in case the lights go out. This, while that government is looking to digitize everything.

We all know what happens when you sell or buy a house. All that really happens is that the name of the title holder to the property changes.

Basically, the buyer will satify itself that the seller indeed has the title and the right to sell, wheras the seller will satisfy itself that the price for which the house is sold, is redeemed correctly.

Gold is no different. Selling and buying usually takes place on paper, one account is credited with more gold, the other account is debited with the same weight.

There is a chapter in the book: The Tower of Basel, that highlights the process in the case of Czech Gold holdings in several banks:

I will not post the story here. The link will provide you with it. But take not of this part:

BIS managers and directors were immensely proud of the bank’s innovative, new mechanisms for gold and foreign currency trades. But the principle behind earmarked accounts was not nearly as new as they believed. Few, if any, of the BIS directors had ever heard of the island of Yap, in Micronesia.

But centuries ago its inhabitants had invented a similar system, one based on large limestone discs. The discs, known as fei, were quarried on a neighboring island and brought back to Yap by boat. The discs, the islanders decided, represented substantial wealth—enough, for example, to pay for a daughter’s dowry. But the “currency” was extremely heavy and almost unmovable. So it stayed in its place, and only the ownership changed with the agreement of the buyer and seller. In fact the stone did not even need to be present on the island. The locals’ oral tradition tells of one disc that fell off the boat into the sea. Rather like the gold deposits at the BIS accounts in London or New York —or indeed any bank nowadays—the physical existence of the submerged fei was taken as a matter of faith. The islanders simply passed the ownership of the submerged disc back and forth—until 1899 when the Germans arrived and colonized the island of Yap.

The islands’ new rulers demanded that the inhabitants repair the walkways that linked the different settlements. The locals ignored their orders, and eventually the Germans decided that they must be fined. Painting a large black cross on the most valuable fei and declaring them to be the property of the government exacted the fine. It worked. The islanders quickly fixed the paths, the German officials removed the crosses, and the islanders once again had possession of their capital assets.

To the sophisticated financiers of the twentieth century, such an episode would have seemed charming but irrelevant. But as Milton Friedman later noted, it was very relevant indeed. Neither gold nor stone discs have any inherent value. Their worth is completely arbitrary, the worth that we give them. The painting of the Yap islanders’ stone discs had precise parallels in 1932 when the Bank of France decided to sell its dollars. The bank feared that the United States would not adhere to the traditional gold standard at $20.67 for an ounce of gold. It asked the Federal Reserve of New York to use its dollars held there to buy gold. As it was expensive and risky to ship the gold across the Atlantic, the Bank of France asked the New York Fed to simply store the Bank of France’s newly acquired gold at its account there. Friedman described what happened next:
In response, officials of the Federal Reserve Bank went to their gold vault, put in separate drawers the correct amount of gold ingots and put a label or mark on those drawers indicating that they were the property of the French—for all it matters they could just have done so by marking them “with a cross in black paint” just as the Germans did to the stones. This event—or arguably non-event—had serious consequences.

The French sale of dollars drove the exchange rate down, while the franc strengthened, even though nothing had actually happened. What was the difference, asked Friedman, between “the Bank of France’s belief that it was in a stronger monetary position because of some marks on drawers in a basement more than 3,000 miles away and the Yap islander’s conviction that he was rich because of a stone under the water a hundred miles or so away?” Evidently, not very much.

In other words, whatever gold is or is not there, or whether it is in your name or not. What counts is who controls it.

Hence the saying:

if you don't hold it, you do not own it.

And when the books open, or are audited, which in itself is a rather boring exercise, the physical equalization may be more easy than one might think, especially, when such entitlements are held in other locations within the US jurisdiction. However, should these be somewhere in The City of London, and elsewhere. .... it may cause tremendous leverage by the ones holding it.

Check the graph: https://www.coinglass.com/spot-inflow-outflow

Compare bracket nov with each other, and the price action.

The current weakness is remarkable.

I am wondering if a couple of items are coming together here:

there were 2 million in ETH stolen from a "cold storage".

At least, that is the narrative. On further inspection, it is not a cold storage, but a hot wallet with segregated witness accounts. The people operating such were duped into thinking they were acting on genuine transactions, releasing the funds, then the funds were transported via DEFI exchanges into other crypto's, and maybe FIAT currencies. The issue is, that it shows a weakness in the system, not of crypto itself, but those offering services.

The difference between a hot wallet and col wallet is het device on which the wallet-address lives: hot wallet lives on chain, a cold wallet on an electronic device or even on paper.

Since this happened only a little over 10 days ago, it does not explain the current price weakness sufficiently.

Doge effects:

1. It appears that the millionaire class within the federal employee class exploded in 2024.

Now that may are considered redundant or undesirable, lay-off are prevalent. Especially in the lawyer-up class funds would be needed to ensure legal counsel.

2. The shuttering of all kinds of programs and outlays is running in the billions.

We have always heard that BTC is used by criminals. And therefor, BTC need to be brought to heel. By that logic, since criminals also breath, ans breath is the basis on which actions follow, breathing should be outlawed or at least regulated.The preposterousness of such a position is immediately clear. However, killing off all criminals would indeed help in making the carbon footprint smaller.

It is quite a Cohencidence, isn't it? I can't proof it, yet. But would it not be an interesting side effect, to cut waste and fraud, and thus deficit spending and restoring confidence in the USD (FRN) on the one hand, and acquiring a strategic asset at a 20% - 40% lower price and then let it explode upwards, on the other?

Cornering the market.

In the past, certain financial institutions have been caught in this behavior, of corning the market. Here is a nice story: https://priceonomics.com/how-the-hunt-brothers-cornered-the-silver-market/

How do you corner BTC? Why would you?

As to the why, it is obvious. By declaring it a strategic asset by Trump policies, and out of Space Force comes Jason Lowery with some interesting views, and other western countries expressing the same interest, it follows that this location: BTC becomes a battlefield, as part of full spectrum domination.

1, By corning the mining?

On a certain level that is true. There is a real possibility of operating more than 50% of the nodes and mining rigs by pooling. China is a location where 35% of the pool is located. as of Sept-24: it controls 55% of the mining hashrate.

https://mempool.space/mining
https://cointelegraph.com/news/chinese-bitcoin-miners-control-55-of-network

Since there are only 3 million coins left, and the system functions by means of mining, there is a real possibility to influence BTC, by providing more hash power than others, and thus the direction of the flow of equity value can be influenced.

If the USA policy is to upset and change this, by becoming the biggest contributor to the hashrate, it has a long way to go, and a lot of more energy at its disposal.

2. By corning the on/off ramps?

AML & KYC are implemented everywhere, so governments have a say in WHO and How Much is being pushed through the gates. The exchanges, including central exchanges, where "fiat for crypto" and "crypto for fiat" transactions take place, are nothing but gatekeepers for the government and I would venture a guess, especially in Europe, where it is now moving towards listing all assets anyone person has. Of course for tax purposes, but also for asset forfeiture purposes.

In many jurisdictions there are requirements to keep a book on all crypto transactions, and in some, you even need to make a choice how you want to be taxed: First in First out (FIFO) or Last in First out (LIFO). In a few years time, everybody will need an accountancy degree .....

However, in my talks with many small business owners, the administrative burdens associated with tax compliance, are the biggest hurdle in the adoption process. And this will feed into the next consideration

3. By cornering the Coins?

Since the hasrate is an ongoing dispute, and there is only a limited amount of coins, how can you keep people from owning BTC or how do you get into playing a major price influencer?

By booms and busts of course.

The major weakness I see with BTC, is the exchangeability for fiat in a low adoption environment in the real economy. One you have BTC, you need no fucking credit card. Why would you want to introduce a third party into your private affairs?

There are even parties who provide you with the option to use their platform and issue invoices. You do not need that. The only advantage they offer is the direct exchange for fiat.

Because the real economy adoption is still in its infancy, the dependency on the fictional economy (making money with money) moves the whole thing towards a tulip bulb madness, and thus vulnerability to major shenanigans by so called whales.

When you can exchange fiat for BTC and you can print at will, it follows that if you move enough money into BTC, the price will rise.

By creating this clout, you can then move into trading BTC with paper, thereby unduly influencing its price development, like with gold and silver. It is interesting to note that major exchanges are Chinese based, and linked to the Hong Kong Arbitration Agency.

If you could move people into BTC and then bust it. How quickly are people capable of replenishing their positions? There is an end to the treasury of individuals. But governments and government sponsored entities, have potentially unlimited funds. They could even suffer a self inflicted loss, but then at a lower price buy up all the finite coins.

If you can control the flow of coins, and the number of coins, you can control the price. If you can control the paper market, you control the price.

Conclusion:

I tend to think that the current weakness in price development may be a sign of several threads coming together, knowing that BTC is one of the battlefields where the game for Full spectrum Domination is played out.

Options without being investment advice:

However, the only strategy here is to HODL, and buy when and if you can, and look at it on a larger time-frame. Especially seek to engage with BTC on a p2p basis and DEFI, avoid central exchanges like the plague. And while the potential for trustless is interesting and can be desirable, it also predicts that negotiating room will diminish, especially when a lack of alternatives is present. Trust based systems are proven to work in the long run.

Also, seek a system where the stakes are not directly intertwined with State Strategic Objectives, like BCH, XMR, and others, if your objective is to have another way of exchanging goods and services. Once an assets becomes strategic to a state to control the net effect is distortion of the market. From a investment perspective it may be an interesting asset. Just remember, that States in general have one major objective: to take your shit. One revenue service in Europe had this slogan:

we can't make it more fun, but we can make it easier

Youtube progresses along the path of exchanging your personal and private information for their bullcrap.

Right now: it blocks all kinds of VPN - IP's, requires age verification and only wants to allow you to use videos on their platform if log-in is active. I noticed many embeded videos being blocked on this site due to a lack of being logged-in.

Potentially, for those on standard behavior with a handheld, it may be that you are logged-in to google services, and running around the whole day with that tracking device. For those who have a different security mentality, engaging by what you wish to share from YT, becomes a challenge.

There are two sides to it, as always. On the one hand we have those making the conscious decision to shut google out of our lives, using front-ends as much as possible, using a no-logs VPN, etc. The burden of not being tracked is thereby on those choosing not to pursue the easy way. From the below, it is easy to see how we can get the information if needed. However, before we want to invest time into such an enterprise, we would like to know whether such investment is worth our effort. Clearly, drop and run posts fail to provide any thought of an incentive.

On the other hand, we are becoming lazier and lazier with each generation, taking the easy road, unwilling to comprehend how we are fucking ourselves with our dependency/ enslavement to artifice. Interesting how the discussion has moved from they are spying on us to Elon Musk wants to superimpose transhumanism on us and the digital ID is the gateway. We have not even come to adaptation to they are spying on us. ....

Let alone that the algo's and clean up operations deprive us from historical records.

In the spirit of archive off-line. If there is anything you'd like to share, especially video, consider: downloading that video and hosting it somewhere else (rumble, odyssey, etc)

Another way forward would be to download a video with yt-dlp with time limits (start and finish, or download the whole video and extract that part you think is relevant with ffmpeg. (of course, you can use any video-editor to do the same if you are a GUI-person)

downloading videos [basic idea]

As indicated, yt-dlp is a very powerful downloader usuable for nearly any video platform. Though, in relation with youtube, there are some constraints, the basic code to download is this, where youtube.be can be youtube.com, and videonumber: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDYf2GPrgz8

1. identify download type and quality:
   yt-dlp -F youtube.be/[videonumber]

it will give you a list of dowloadable formats.

2. To actually download:
   yt-dlp -f [251 (audio highest quality)] youtube/be/[videonumber]

3. Extract relevant section with ffmpeg:
   ffmpeg -i input_file.mp4 -ss 00:01:30 -to 00:02:00 -c copy output.mp4

where:

• input_file.mp.4 equals the name of the file you downloaded. Any file can be renamed to something more easier to handle.
• -ss = start-time in hours: minutes: seconds.milliseconds
• -to = end-time in hours: minutes: seconds.milliseconds
• outputfile.mp4 is the name and format you extract the clip or clips to.

Of course, if you need other formats, you may need to re-author the output.

Depending on the OS you are using, you may adapt the tools. If on windows, you could opt to install WSL, allowing you to experiment with linux type solutions and command Line Interface.

After all, learning to code, in this day and age, will not only come in handy for yourself, but also if you wish to share matters of interest.

Whining of Nap & Doug. Not recommended. Repeat of: stupid, insane, dumb. https://youtu.be/jP3gBg-ERco

link to Scott Ritter interview, which I recommend to listen to.

https://youtu.be/zV8Xel7mlz8

##highlights:

1. Bibbi embarresment to put him in his place, off the table; no player
2. USAID -> Norwegian NGO's + SOROS NGO + howto permament bureaucracy. -> mission focus implementation. He goes into explaning how these meetings are done on the 7th floor of the state department. (CIA + FBI corruption)

From what I can gather, it seems correct. Especially when he says: when the American people find out how they have been lied to by congress. He compares it to parasites.

For those who have played the game HALO, or have seen the 2 Season tv-series: HALO, have perhaps encountered the images of the ship Bodegraven.

https://www.artstation.com/artwork/BXxRg6

So what, you say?

1. Well it just so happens that this is a human trafficking ship, and kids go missing. Some of the locals where the ships land, are implicated in abduction. Interestingly, the whole series is about child abduction, programming and augmentation/transhumanism.
2. It just so happens that Bodengraven is the name of a Dutch town in the Province South Holland: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=bodegraven&ia=web
3. This town is riddled with accusations of Satanic Ritual Child Abuse, implicating not only the mayor, but also high ranking civil servants:

• https://robscholtemuseum.nl/thothsfight-satanic-ritual-abuse-in-the-netherlands-the-bodegraven-case/
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMOYA6lGpgM
• https://www.vpro.nl/argos/media/afleveringen/2020/uitzending-27-juni-ritueel-misbruik.html

Interestingly, when considering this case, Joost Knevel is being picked on. Even the laying of flowers at graves is being prohibited, and actively dissuaded/ prosecuted. As soon as some attention is going there, the system responds like a nest of killer hornets.

I have no more accurate knowledge to share, just to point to these cohencidences between a tv series and real world occurrences.

Another year has passed in this Great Awakening Plan.

And we are well on the way. I often think on these words: stay with me, deplorables. You'll love the way this movie ends.

May your resolve be undiminshed, and you love for Freedom, supported by your love for virtue be shining bright!

From the Netherlands, with love!