In 1986, Dwyer was wrongly convicted of receiving a bribe from a California firm that had been awarded a lucrative State contract.

Throughout Dwyer's trial and after his conviction, he maintained that he was innocent of the charges levied against him, he insisted that he had been framed. He was one of two who stood accused yet whilst his colleague, Asher, was being offered 1 year of incarceration – Dwyer faced 55 years and $300,000 + of fines.

Decades later, the prosecution's primary witness, William T. Smith, whose testimony was largely used to obtain Dwyer's conviction, admitted that he had lied under oath about Dwyer taking a bribe in order to receive a reduced sentence.

Dwyer was on the brink of uncovering a longstanding sex scandal at Penn State university, the very same college his son attended.

(Just a reminder that the political persecution of honest Republicans has been rife for decades)

Not a scam, turns out I've got two spare! :)

I thought it's taking place this month?

The directive was issued without warning. The Dept of Energy Security & Net Zero. Full steam ahead for the green grift. They'll be going after farmers.

..when you have to upgrade your iphone but you couldn't care less. the flashy gadgets don't sway me like they used to, the excitement isn't there and i can't shake the feeling that i'm helping tim apple's corrupt empire.

guess i'm on the right path

Somehow, many have been convinced that Trump is going to do a live chat with Putin. They're spreading it heavy and there's a countdown.

According to this Telegram:

https://t.me/truthsocialapplive

This is a phony account!

1. He was stabbed 17 times

2. The killer is said to have taken a morning train and travelled 50 miles to attend a constituent appointment, waited his turn too see Amess and then gutted him to death

3. He didn't flee, he sat there until police arrived

4. Government rushed to award Southend city status within hours of his death, a proposal made by Amess that's been largely ignored for years

5. Home Secretary, Priti Patel, and other admin officials are all in chorus about the same thing: banning anonymity on social media. How is that remotely linked to this assassination? A law that is essentially calling for online identification. Why is this their first priority?

It makes me question. Is this a seized opportunity or is this meticulously calculated?

It doesn't sit well with me.