1
seernewday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is the latest from Martenson - Peak Prosperity - Why Aren't Investigators Asking the Right Questions of the Right People? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JhA5wQ1y0I&list=WL&index=7

4
seernewday 4 points ago +4 / -0

Taxpayer money and U.S. government data on bird flu gain-of-function research is, in fact, being funneled to a Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) lab in mainland China, and;

· Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack lied under oath by claiming his department wasn’t colluding with the Chinese-military-connected CAS

For some background, Biden’s Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, in March of 2024 during an exchange with Congressman Ben Cline, dismissed any notion of U.S. government bird flu gain-of-function “collaboration” with CAS labs and claimed that U.S. data was “basically walled off,” meaning that the Chinese government couldn’t get its hands on it:

“It’s really not a collaboration per se… To my knowledge there is not [data] sharing...all of this is basically walled off, so everything we’re doing stays with us, it doesn’t necessarily go to the UK or to China.”

https://x.com/WhiteCoatWaste/status/1771203300081242442

Several weeks later, which I covered at the time, Congress wrote a letter requesting additional information from Vilsack’s department — a request, you’ll be shocked to learn, that was never honored by the Most Open and Transparent Administration in American History™.

Related: Congress Demands Oversight of US-Funded Bird Flu Gain-of-Function Research in CCP Lab

17
seernewday 17 points ago +17 / -0

Exactly... There are several other facts that scream cover up like

FBI Withholds Physical Evidence in Update on Trump Attempted Assassination Investigation

FBI Withholds Physical Evidence in Update on Trump Attempted Assassination Investigation Republished with permission from AbleChild Special Agent in charge of the FBI Pittsburgh Field Office, Kevin Rojek, provided remarks during a media call that simply raise more questions. For example, Rojek explains that the “FBI is now in possession of the subject’s autopsy and toxicology reports from the coroner’s office.” Great. When did the FBI obtain the autopsy and toxicology reports from the coroner? Is Rojek referring to the Butler County Coroner or the Allegheny County Medical Examiner? People often confuse these two entities. Specificity would be helpful. It matters. Next. Agent Rojek explains that “all reviewable evidence collected from the AGR roof and from the Subject’s body are consistent with the round fired by the Secret Service Sniper.” It is interesting that the FBI would use the word “consistent.” What the public needs to know is whether a projectile was recovered from the subject’s body and was there a rifling match between the projectile and the barrel of a sniper’s weapon? Providing the ballistics report would be helpful. Further, having a look see at the autopsy would also provide important information about which direction the projectile removed from the subject traveled. Specificity. Rojek explained that the FBI rendered “the scene safe and following our established evidence gathering procedures, the FBI contacted the Butler County Coroner’s office.” “Evidence gathering?” What evidence was gathered prior to the coroner determining time and cause of death? What evidence was touched, moved or removed by the FBI prior to the coroner arriving at the scene twelve hours after the shooting? Again, knowing why the FBI turned away the coroner at midnight would be helpful. Agent Rojek further explains that “the coroner removed the body from the scene and conducted a death investigation.” The coroner removed the body prior to his investigation? That seems odd. Wouldn’t the body be important in writing crime scene notes? What about photographs of the deceased on the roof? Agent Rojek also reports that the “toxicology revealed negative results for alcohol and drugs of abuse.” Really? What about other drugs, like prescribed psychiatric drugs? Did the ME conduct toxicology tests to determine whether the subject had been on one or more prescribed drugs? It is of interest, too, that there is no mention of the “white van.” Yes, that white van that police found by use of the police K9 unit. “officers searched the battered white vehicle from which they removed explosives after they were led across fields to its location by their K9 unit.” So. Why is there no mention of this white van by the FBI? More than one explosive device was found inside the van and there is a video of police combing through the van. Why is this van not mentioned by the FBI, even if it is just to say the van had nothing to do with Crooks. Of course, that would be a problem. Dogs sniffed out the van based on Crooks scent. Another automobile with explosives? It sure sounds like more than one subject or at least more than one automobile. So, no autopsy, no complete toxicology, no fingerprint or DNA data, and no ballistics report. Oh, and an extra automobile with explosives. Nobody wants to be Johnny Rain Cloud, but the FBI’s “updated” information only raises more questions that need to be addressed…questions that the FBI should have already answered. What’s the problem?

24
seernewday 24 points ago +24 / -0

We have known this from Martenson's investigation for weeks but good that it is being further confirmed... now about accountability!!!

1
seernewday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cause it helps communicate the diet question for all?

1
seernewday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Speaker Mike Johnson Weighs Adding SAVE Act to Spending Bill After Trump’s Request — Mitch McConnell Must be Furious

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson is reportedly considering the inclusion of the SAVE Act in the upcoming spending bill. This decision comes at the behest of former President Donald Trump, who has made it clear that election integrity is a non-negotiable priority. The SAVE Act, which mandates proof of citizenship for voter registration in federal elections, has become a rallying cry for many Americans who believe it is crucial to safeguarding the sanctity of the ballot box. President Trump has been unyielding in his support for the SAVE Act, going as far as to suggest that the government should shut down if the bill is not included in the Continuing Resolution (CR). Source: thegatewaypundit.com The U.S. government needs to address the continuation of government funding by September 30, 2024,

That means Democrats must vote to protect elections from illegal alien votes or be responsible for a shutdown.

1
seernewday 1 point ago +1 / -0

How China's fall to COMMUNISM is affecting us now - Forgotten History https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvKFNt47G0I - Another example of funding both sides

3
seernewday 3 points ago +3 / -0

They "aspire" and they rightly are getting kicked so hard they rightly wear their asses as hats... they self identify their treasonous!

1
seernewday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Operation Fast and Furious was part of Project Gunrunner and became a widespread public disaster for the Obama Administration, and especially Attorney General Eric Holder, ATF Director Kenneth E. Melson and others following the death of a border patrol agent and hundreds of others in Mexico. The ill-conceived concept was supposed to lead US and Mexican authorities to the criminal drug cartels who would receive these weapons, but what really happened? Written and hosted by Colin D. Heaton.

3
seernewday 3 points ago +3 / -0

We have often said the American people are in an abusive relationship with our government; meaning the priorities and important policies of the majority of Americans (specifically immigration, economic nationalism, Ukraine spending, and the core elements that have created the Trump/RFK Jr coalition), are not represented in the legislative outcomes of a UniParty congress.

In essence, the USA government, both parties, are deaf to the voices of American citizens. This is stunningly visible around the issue of congress using U.S taxpayer funds to support the Ukraine government and the Ukraine budget.

However, this is not just an American problem. We can see the same disconnect in Canada, Australia, the U.K. and parts of the EU including France and more recently, Germany.

In the Eastern German elections held Sunday, the AfD party (Alternate for Deutschland) won resounding victories. Essentially, the center-left party and the UniParty coalition, was disregarded. The election was won by pragmatic nationalists on the key issues of immigration, the economy and Ukraine policy.

(Wall Street Journal) […] Projections by public broadcaster ZDF showed the AfD getting around 33.4% of the votes in Thuringia and 31.4% in Saxony, with Scholz’s center-left SPD scoring under 8% in both states, with its two coalition partners trailing it. (more)

**In response there is an almost laughable reactive article in Politico, where they push the same favored MSM narrative of “far right, Nazis, surging again just like 1945,” etc. etc. blah, blah, blah. Laughably, they use language like, “The far-right Alternative for Germany just keeps rising despite efforts to stop it.”… I mean, seriously; have you ever seen a more perfect encapsulation of the disconnect. ** In order for the professional political leftists to continue what they do best, which is to destroy everything, they must pretend not to know things. In this example the entire media ecosphere pretends not to know that what they are seeing happen in all of these elections is a reaction to globalism being pushed by the governing body, while the citizens are against it.

In the USA you might say, Donald Trump is not the cause of the Republican party problems, he is our direct response to it. In Germany you can say the rise of the AfD is not the cause of the government problem, it is the citizens response to the problem they have with government.

BERLIN — Germany’s far right is here — and it’s here to stay.

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) on Sunday scored a stunning win in an eastern German state election, amid rising voter discontent at Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s center-left national government.

The AfD’s victory in Thuringia and strong second place in Saxony has prompted a new round of soul searching in Berlin, a year out from national elections which could see EU powerhouse Germany tilt to the right.

“Our country cannot and must not get used to this,” Scholz told Reuters after the results came in. “The AfD is damaging Germany. It is weakening the economy, dividing society and ruining our country’s reputation.”

In Thuringia, the AfD — which has been classified as extremist in some German states — gained a clear victory with nearly 33 percent of the vote. In the more populous state of Saxony, the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) eked out a victory with around 32 percent of the vote, with the AfD trailing close behind.

[…] Germany’s mainstream leaders have made a concerted effort to stop the rise of the AfD by warning voters of the party’s growing extremism, with some leaders even calling it a Nazi party.

State-level domestic intelligence authorities have classified the local branches of the party in both Saxony and Thuringia as extremist organizations aiming to undermine German democracy. Earlier this year, Saskia Esken, the co-chief of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), came out in favor of discussing a ban of the AfD — if only, as she put it, to “shake voters” out of their complacency. (read more)

You can just as easily replace “German far-right” with the USA version of “MAGA Republicans” and get the exact same scenario.

Both the AfD in Germany and the MAGA movement in the USA labeled as “domestic extremists” simply for wanting controls of immigration policy, sensible energy policy and a stopping of the insufferable war effort in Ukraine.

Apparently, the German government is shocked, SHOCKED, and didn’t see this coming. Yet, again, western media play along and pretend not to know things….>

3
seernewday 3 points ago +3 / -0

VERY REVEALING her interview with Mike Wallace Margaret Sanger Interview PLANNED PARENTHOOD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsrOPDdbTzM&list=WL&index=1

15
seernewday 15 points ago +15 / -0

President Donald Trump is calling on GOP lawmakers to prioritize the SAVE Act in upcoming budget negotiations. The SAVE Act aims to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to enforce stricter voter registration requirements. Under the proposed legislation, voters would need to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to vote in federal elections—a shift from the current law, which permits states to demand citizenship proof only for local and state elections. Trump is calling on Congress to include the SAVE Act in the next spending bill. This measure, according to Trump, is essential for ensuring electoral integrity and accountability. The President’s determination to include this measure is so strong that he’s willing to endorse a government shutdown if it’s not incorporated into the spending bill.

2
seernewday 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bank of America, Amalgamated Bank and Wells Fargo are criminally laundering hundreds of millions of dollars into political campaigns - via ActBlue and others like ActBlue.

Billions if you go back enough years.

Six State Attorney Generals publicly announced they have investigations opened. Along with the Secretary of State of Wyoming. In addition, and on top of, a national investigation has been opened.

Also, I ask Bank of America, Amalgamated and Wells Fargo: are you taking (laundering) large sums of money by chinese students and other chinese from drug sales? In particular from sales of fentanyl, cocaine and methamphetamines'. Via issuing mortgages, like TD Bank in Canada is doing, in Toronto, Vancouver and Ontario?

Complaints being sent in to federal bank regulators by numerous people and entities.

@BankofAmerica

@Amalgamatedbank

@WellsFargo @AskWellsFargo #BankofAmerica #Amalgamatedbank #WellsFargo @TDBank_US you all might want to read up on Smurfing, foreign monies, structured money laundering, knowingly dealing with drug cartels supported by the chinese.

https://x.com/PeterBernegger/status/1829930153851462067

2
seernewday 2 points ago +2 / -0

Another potential reason for Buffett's sudden stock selling could be the fear that a US regulatory probe into anti-money laundering surrounding fentanyl cash laundering at Toronto-Dominion Bank could be expanded to major US banks.

In a conversation with Sam Cooper, an investigative journalist behind the Substack "The Bureau," and David Asher, a former senior investigator for the State Department, Asher revealed, "And most of what we're seeing is coming from this TD Bank case, and there's a lot more. We'll see which one of the big four US banks gets named next." https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/why-warren-buffett-dumps-billions-worth-bank-america-stock

1
seernewday 1 point ago +1 / -0

FBI Withholds Physical Evidence in Update on Trump Attempted Assassination Investigation

FBI Withholds Physical Evidence in Update on Trump Attempted Assassination Investigation Republished with permission from AbleChild Special Agent in charge of the FBI Pittsburgh Field Office, Kevin Rojek, provided remarks during a media call that simply raise more questions. For example, Rojek explains that the “FBI is now in possession of the subject’s autopsy and toxicology reports from the coroner’s office.” Great. When did the FBI obtain the autopsy and toxicology reports from the coroner? Is Rojek referring to the Butler County Coroner or the Allegheny County Medical Examiner? People often confuse these two entities. Specificity would be helpful. It matters. Next. Agent Rojek explains that “all reviewable evidence collected from the AGR roof and from the Subject’s body are consistent with the round fired by the Secret Service Sniper.” It is interesting that the FBI would use the word “consistent.” What the public needs to know is whether a projectile was recovered from the subject’s body and was there a rifling match between the projectile and the barrel of a sniper’s weapon? Providing the ballistics report would be helpful. Further, having a look see at the autopsy would also provide important information about which direction the projectile removed from the subject traveled. Specificity. Rojek explained that the FBI rendered “the scene safe and following our established evidence gathering procedures, the FBI contacted the Butler County Coroner’s office.” “Evidence gathering?” What evidence was gathered prior to the coroner determining time and cause of death? What evidence was touched, moved or removed by the FBI prior to the coroner arriving at the scene twelve hours after the shooting? Again, knowing why the FBI turned away the coroner at midnight would be helpful. Agent Rojek further explains that “the coroner removed the body from the scene and conducted a death investigation.” The coroner removed the body prior to his investigation? That seems odd. Wouldn’t the body be important in writing crime scene notes? What about photographs of the deceased on the roof? Agent Rojek also reports that the “toxicology revealed negative results for alcohol and drugs of abuse.” Really? What about other drugs, like prescribed psychiatric drugs? Did the ME conduct toxicology tests to determine whether the subject had been on one or more prescribed drugs? It is of interest, too, that there is no mention of the “white van.” Yes, that white van that police found by use of the police K9 unit. “officers searched the battered white vehicle from which they removed explosives after they were led across fields to its location by their K9 unit.” So. Why is there no mention of this white van by the FBI? More than one explosive device was found inside the van and there is a video of police combing through the van. Why is this van not mentioned by the FBI, even if it is just to say the van had nothing to do with Crooks. Of course, that would be a problem. Dogs sniffed out the van based on Crooks scent. Another automobile with explosives? It sure sounds like more than one subject or at least more than one automobile. So, no autopsy, no complete toxicology, no fingerprint or DNA data, and no ballistics report. Oh, and an extra automobile with explosives. Nobody wants to be Johnny Rain Cloud, but the FBI’s “updated” information only raises more questions that need to be addressed…questions that the FBI should have already answered. What’s the problem?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›