Thank you for reading this. I say it all the time, but it's true: I'm humbled and amazed that people follow what I write.
I've not really had the occasion to look into the details of the HECM program - it just hasn't applied to me or a loved one. That said, my 50,000 ft. impression is that they can be expensive in terms of the costs bundled into the transaction, but that they can also be a good move if you know what you are getting into and know that if the worst comes you'll have help (kids) keeping the house unencumbered in terms of taxes, upkeep, etc. The lender is not going to have a house as a sole vehicle of recourse and let you encumber it or deteriorate its value.
Thanks for reading. You're a major contributor here - I've hit the "big time" when you're reading. :-)
I'm honored. Thanks, again, for reading and letting me know I'm "connecting."
Enjoy time with your wife. Life is short!
Thank you, sir. Or ma'am?
My ambition is to explain certain phenomena in our world: the Great Reset; the Southern Border Crisis; the stolen election; and so on.
I am beginning by examining the economic forces, because: (1) the forces are easily identifiable if you look hard enough; and (2) many of the participants in these malign "projects" are acting out of response to localized economic forces being brought to bear upon them - not out of a desire to bring a particular end result into being.
So - yes - a long-winded translation of the Great Reset. :-)
I'm grateful and humbled that you appreciate the series. I don't believe anything I've written has been called legendary before, so that's a first. Thank you for reading, commenting and letting me know there are people out there really "getting it." ...I honestly thought this work would be too boring for most people.
I didn't mean to suggest that with my previous answer - I do think gold and silver would be valuable.
Most of the other Parts are shorter (and perhaps a little easier to digest, too).
Honored that you would read this.
Thank you. I am always surprised and humbled that anyone cares to read what's on my mind.
On a side note, my wife is quite pleased with this project, as it spares her from having to listen to me! :-)
Land. Also businesses that are inherently local and not effectively subject to scaled operations. ...More on our options later.
Thank you. I know that some of these recent Parts are long and taxing. I try to make them entertaining where I can, if that's any help at all.
If it is of interest, Part 7 of the Simon Lectures can be found here https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZE4bONBX/
More to come. Both in terms of The Lectures, and other topics. I've been occupied, sorry to be absent.
For those of you who may wonder, life has kept me busy. I have a few things to share - I'll try to do that in the next few days. Over and out.
I wasn't planning on tying this particular piece into the series, in the sense of it being an official Part. It was just a post I thought the community should hear. I understand it is controversial - my opening said as much. I'm not offended by its removal.
In terms of its definition, the concepts are large and really require a breakdown on a concept-by-concept basis - turning it into another Series I am publishing! Which was not the intent, so I left it as brief as possible and therefore not well defined.
The Series WILL reach religious topics. I am debating the first insertion of such a topic in Part 7 (which is halfway complete).
Thanks for reading. I'm always humbled that anyone does!
When each of us manages our free will, we choose whether or not, and to what extent, we are participants in satan's activities.
Thank you.
Unfortunately, these days, you don't have to do much looking to find satan.
Just posted this: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZDhA2VBS/
If it is worth, please consider a sticky.
Ever yours, simon_says
Chaos,
Thank you. Will view.
May I ask: do you have links to the two websites?
I'm listening.
You're not making sense.
Every general and admiral is in on it? It's as though you've never heard of unauthorized conduct - ring-fenced by compartmentalization. Candidly, I think you are well aware, and I doubt your motives.
To ask why I think hacking "probably occurred" and then to respond to the findings with "no one doing anything about it" is just a straight-up non-sequitur.
I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps you can explain yourself. Go ahead - I'm listening.
Why talk of hacking computers? Because hacking computers probably occurred. And is illegal. And demolishes the fabric of our republic.
"Hacking humans" is another terms for political persuasion. I may think that people make choices for poor and ill-informed reasons, but that's the process.
As for the paper ballot record - what we've seen of it so far indicates fraud. No ballot counts on any of the chain-of-custody documents in AZ. None of the boxes sealed. All of the dividers between batches resting at the bottom of boxes, with ballots on top. No timestamps or datestamps or any log data (machine no.; batch no.; ballot no., etc.) on 140,000+ images. No record of actually having received about that same number of ballots. No indication that those votes ever originated from paper ballots to begin with.
And no one is permitted to look at the router logs.
This is exactly what you'd find in the case of digital stuffing accompanied by physical stuffing of ballots in the warehouse.
That's why we talk about hacking computers.
On to some speculation.
I've always assumed that the ultimate and final escape hatch in all of this is China. If a stage is reached where the evidence of what happened can no longer be suppressed, then the evidence will reveal orchestration by China. This would permit the guilty domestic actors to say "We were hacked by China! Who knew? We're just as outraged as you!"
Although I haven't followed the Italy-did-it theory as closely as I should, I note that Italy is a part of China's Belt and Road Initiative. China damn near owns vast tracts of Italy.
Italy would be a logical place to stand-up another Hammer / Scorecard instance. It could be operated by Chinese agents without us having to re-locate the technology to China proper - we're not that stupid (I hope). We probably re-located an instance at that defense contractor (Leonardo, I believe) that is mentioned so often. Packet data would be diverted to the hypothetical Italian Hammer / Scorecard instance so that it could be situated to execute a MITM exploit.
Or perhaps Hammer was running at the CIA facility in Frankfurt, and Scorecard running at Leonardo. Before I do any research on this, I'd love your thoughts.
Wow. This page is getting confusing to navigate.
(1) Chaos - I know you posted something last night concerning whether moving Hammer to Ft. Washington referred to physically moving servers from Reno to Ft. Washington, or whether it meant "rebuilding" the software on a brand new set of servers in Ft. Washington. You asked for a link or some sort of reference on that point. For whatever reason, I can't find that post on this page right now. I'm sure it's here - I'm just missing it.
Anyhow, if you listen to the first audio clip I sent you - "pt. 1" - you'll hear Blixseth state that $5M were spent on new servers and that the new system (Ft. Washington) is orders of magnitude faster than the old one (Reno). I'd ignore the actual price cited by Blixseth and actual performance numbers he stated. He's clearly not a technologist, and neither of those figures are likely correct. The point is that the government spent money on servers and the new servers were faster.
Bringing Hammer in-house does not mean moving machines. It meant getting the latest technology - not just machines, I'd imagine, but O/S level sorts of technologies to dynamically allocate resources to certain solution spaces as they become more probable, etc. In other words, it would be a ground-up technology transfer that would result in Hammer running on the "latest" technology and therefore operating with much more power.
(2) MITM. You also wrote about this, Chaos. Sorry this reply is dissociated from your post. I suspect that our NSA is deep in our communication infrastructure. As I understand it, they are always capturing every packet being transferred and storing that information. This is what you refer to as "splicing" I think: (a) packet data is received at a piece of network equipment, say, a router; (b) a duplicate of the packet data is created and stored or sent to a chosen destination; and (c) the original packet data is routed according to ordinary routing principles. When Hammer receives data pursuant to a splicing arrangement, it is being used to passively listen. ...I think you and I are on the same page on that?
I think the NSA can also dynamically rewrite routing tables across our network nationally. So, at the "flip of a switch" data packets intended to be routed to a given IP can be routed to a different machine. This allowed the government to divert any given communication session so that Hammer could be interposed in the communication stream. Does that make sense to you, Chaos?
(3) Protective Order. I haven't read what you linked to. If we are on the same page about the necessity of going to a court (as opposed to an executive) to lift a protective order, then great. No need to say anything more on that point.
Hopefully it was worth the read! :-)
Thanks for reading.