This is an open question I don't have a definite answer only suspicions. But historical precedent and general trends in how corruption in government is handled and managed for popular consumption causes me to suspect the possibility this is all just throwing Hunter out to us as a "central casting role" to give the people proof that Something's Being Done. Whereas this could just be nothing more than an elaborate exit strategy for Joe and the 2024 race.
The amount of attention, investigation, and public disclosure happening concerning Hunter right now is remarkable, but there's also something about it that feels highly managed and deliberate. Consider the stark contrast to getting nothing at all wrt the whole Epstein nexxus. In fact it is also in stark contrast to the rest of the criminal connections of the Biden crime family, which is far and deep (does anyone have Ryan Dawson's Biden Crime family poster? Its huge).
So all that to say, I think its wise to pay more attention what is not being done, what everyone is silent on, than what appears to be getting done.
I realize that sounds Doomer since it could mean that what we often think are incoming BOOMs are actually more of the "Look Here, Not There" type strategy. But such is war against a civilian population that's partially waking up.
Thoughts?
Despite RFK Jr's impressive stances on Covid 19, I no longer see a reason to applaud his run for the presidency, as he predictably cow tows to all the standard Zionist narratives.
He's making absurdly false statements about poor little Israel getting singled out and beat up on.
He wants to maintain the special U.S.-Israel relationship seemingly at any cost, despite all the past and ongoing U.S. national security risks we KNOW Israel / Mossad is responsible for.
Especially irksome to both libertarians and conscientious progressives, he completely downplays the racism and apartheid being practiced in this racial state.
As far as U.S. politicians bought and paid for by Israeli lobby, he won't even go there of course.
He's clearly a thoughtful guy, able to analyze the major social and political issues of the day. For instance he makes reasonable commentary on the Ukraine war, but he wouldn't be the first presidential candidate to sound like a peace candidate until taking office then taking a war footing.
The stance on U.S.-Israel relations is a big deal, there is so much that needs to be exposed and dealt with there for America to truly be great again and not chained to these ongoing geopolitical nightmares. I balk even at candidate Trump, who as of yet seems silent on this. And yeah I say screw optics at this point.
If RFK denies this biggest and most obvious of elephants in the room, I can only conclude he is more interesting in winning than in making effective change for this country.
That's my take. Thoughts?
Today's news reminded me of this tasty bit from Doug Valentine's CIA as Organized Crime. Spread this, and watch the NPR defending libs squirm in explaining this one away.
NPR was badly embarrassed in 2000 when it was revealed that PSYOP (psychological operations) personnel from Ft. Bragg were working in its Washington, DC newsroom, apparently as interns.* Top managers were said to be unaware of the arrangement, which was blamed on people in its personnel department. However, based on NPR’s cozy relationship with the military and its penchant to spew pro-military propaganda (some say the P in NPR stands for Pentagon) media watchdogs, myself included, believed the PSYOP soldiers were penetration agents meant to influence news coverage.
In any event, on 30 December 2009, I listened in dismay, but not surprise, as an NPR “terrorism” expert condemned the suicide bombing that had killed seven CIA employees in Afghanistan a few days earlier.2 That particular act of terrorism, the expert said, was especially hideous because the murdered CIA officers were spreading economic development, democracy and love as members of a Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT).
No less disingenuous were the comments of CIA Director Leon Panetta, who said the deceased did “the hard work that must be done to protect our country from terrorism.”
Or fuel terrorism, as the case may be.
President Obama added his two cents, saying the fallen CIA officers were “part of a long line of patriots who have made great sacrifices for their fellow citizens, and for our way of life.”
“Our way of life” in the twenty-first century means Full Spectrum Dominance and a burgeoning precariat.
On New Year’s Day 2010 – the story of the martyred CIA officers having expired – Washington Post staff writers Joby Warrick and Pamela Constable ventured beyond the initial spin. Rather than cast the CIA officers as heroes, they hinted at the murderous activities they were involved in. Warrick and Constable said the CIA officers were secretly “at the heart of a covert program overseeing strikes by the agency’s remote-controlled aircraft along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.”
- J. Max Robins, “Military Interns Booted From CNN, NPR: How Did Army Officers Get Into The News Business?”, TV Guide, April 15-21, 2000.
Fox Hill, ultimate hellhole prison in the corrupt jurisdiction of the Bahamas.
I can only assume the "fact checkers" are already jumping on this as a damage control pivot to divert from any other implications of the Big Leak.
If by all appearances right now we see the military across the board consumed with NWO style social engineering and fabricated crises, what potential do we see a decisive military action to honor the constitution above all else, if the highest civilian court fails to honor the reality of mass election fraud?
I'm not interested in what the Juan O'Savins etc are out there saying based on their 'insider' sources, since that flat out cannot be trusted at all. I mean what do we know about key positions and mindsets and even precedent for a military intervention that would actually work to preserve the republic and not the infiltration of foreign interests and treasonous acts of those within?
I know of Brandon Straka of the WalkAway campaign, and Dr Simone Gold who championed HCQ. Who else are being treated as criminals and insurrectionists? What is their status? This isn't making news and we can't forget about them.
I'm glad Trump got to take a break at Mar a Lago but how is this going to be resolved, all the aftermath of injustice from the day he brought everyone together?
"Nearly 1 In 5 Defendants In Capitol Riot Cases Served In The Military"
link is to an NPR article if you can stomach it
LIke many thoughtful and focused frogs I've been thinking today and had a thought pop out of my thinking... I would guess that any predictions or expectations of what, when or how things will play out will by definition not be the actual case, even from the decodes and dot-connections by seasoned autists (though they may get close)...
Why - because those are scenarios already war-gamed and counter-measured by the DS in some form or another. Yes, they may be stupid relative to the long and patient game of the white hats, but they are not purely haphazard or purely reactionary. They clearly must have already theorized in similar ways how and when this will play out just like what's been discussed here and on other boards, they surely have ensured things will not happen in those ways, i.e. any of the ways we would expect or hope. Even these kinds of last minute appointments and re-orgs cannot be totally unexpected by the DS.
Both sides have leverage, and it is an extremely low probability that events surrounding tomorrow's inauguration will be extraordinary and highly disruptive. Not only because of DS insurance policies / leverage, but highly disruptive events are potentially more damaging wrt the fallout in society at large compared to immediate strategic successes.
We'd probably be better to assume that the white hates have already checkmated in this game in ways only they and the DS know, and the effects and disclosure will be a slow and minimally damaging rollout.
My view as of now is open to challenge but that's where I now stand. Thoughts?