In the days leading up to Milton's landfall, there was all the screaming:

"They are modifying Milton!"

"They are trying to attack Florida!"

(despite no evidence of such massive abilities and energy inputs to create or direct hurricanes like that)

Then, FINALLY, we see clear evidence of the well documented, somewhat reliable and effective weather modification methodology - cloud seeding - taking place 150 miles offshore, as a weakening mechanism, forcing Milton to dump its rain and took the juice out of the rotation right before landfall.

"Prayers Answered!"

"God stopped the Cat 5!"

Of course I don't discount divine providence, since nothing good or bad occurs apart from God's providence. But immediate causation and direct intervention is another matter. If your trajectory of reactions to unfolding events over the past week was like the above, you need to consider whether you are being played by misdirection campaigns; particularly the specific idea many are now pushing that <super secret government tech that somehow has its mil specs leaked online> can make and steer the most devastating storms on Earth. That is thermodynamically impossible, and basically functions as cover from the data driven fact that we currently have an overworked magnetosphere and the sun controls the weather more than any mainstream modeling will acknowledge ... the current low latitude auroras are proving that among other things. This is a bigger deal than a historic hurricane, it is another data point painting the picture of potentially worse disastrous events in the coming years and decades.

P.S. On the topic of cloud seeding, on the one hand it is very well documented as tested and proven to work. On the other hand, there is incentive to be low key about its usage, because in order for cloud seeding to work it must rob Peter to pay Paul, whether robbing from some other time or some other space. So there could be unintended geopolitical consequences, if rainfall among surrounding territories of sovereign nations are impacted.

A superficial analysis I see out there is that Elon talked about sustainability and modest climate change concerns, because that would bring in more of the green nutjobs for votes. By the same token, Trump praised A.I. to bring in more votes of the younger generation who are both consciously accepting of and targets of A.I. algorithms.

I'm not so sure its just campaign buzzwords for votes.

Elon brought in what appeared from his language as the soft sale for Technocracy's closed system utopia. This is when he emphasized terminology such as leaning into "sustainability", which alludes to a whole cluster of ideas about humanity's relationship to natural resources and industry. This by all appearances is an attempt to soften up MAGA more to the Closed System paradigm that comes ultimately from the "Science of Limits" of Thomas Malthus (British empire stooge using science to justify imperial policies), and underpins much of the climate and environment dogma in the present day. I don't think it matters that much that Musk tries to be careful he is more "modest" in his vision of phasing out traditional energy and resource industries. Its the same end point, just more palatable for his audience.

He wants to slow the phase change, however we will be stupid to forget Elon's high tech socialist tendencies, his praise for Singularity and hope for universal consciousness, and so on. Elon has a spiritual relationship to the saving benefits of tech, but this optimism relies on fallacious linear and exponential mathematics to frame the issue in terms of human populations being inherently problematic to the balance of nature. Bad assumption 1 is that our inputs and resources are limited, scarce, and under threat of destruction by the very existence of human manufacturing and industry. Bad assumption 2 is that humans (at least the classes of people below the Technocracy) are at their base consumption units and their access to energy and resource utilization must be somehow managed from top down. More conservatives will be accepting of Musk's vision because it looks way less radical and self defeating when comparing to the suicidal policies in the EU for example.

There is, ultimately, a collectivist goal for these various Technocrats, as they continue to unleash "sustainable" technologies that solve for the population problems and bring about new conveniences (accompanied by data collection at every turn) we end up relying on for society to function.

What is missing in their whole program? A classic understanding of human nature and the power of the mind. Cultivating on the one hand un-tethered industry/manufacturing/energy mining, and on the other hand an expansionist mindset that acknowledges the dignity and ingenuity of man & the human spirit, knowing creativity & reason in alignment with a moral order can overcome natural limits at every turn, w/o sacrificing our liberties, volition, or well being. Musk still lives and breathes in the Techno socialist agenda of limits which is why he believes his own "sustainable" tech is saving society from capitalism's over-consumptionist destruction of pristine, fragile, resource scarce nature. He sees a future of collective consciousness undergirded by "sustainable" infrastructure, perhaps where we will be so immersed in each other's consciousness that one day we can't conceive of the collective benefits of say Musk public transport systems without conceiving of the collective benefits of universally adopted Musk Neuralink type biologic and psychic augmenters.

Obviously A.I. is key for all this.

In one sense it is clear that DJT is not completely on board with this world that Musk inhabits. But unfortunately there are warning signs. DJT is dropping the ball on his misinformed and seemingly unbounded enthusiasm about the future utility of A.I.: he appreciates the immense energy gap that needs to be filled to build out A.I. infrastructure throughout society to the degree that the Technocrats like Musk want. So much so that he made sure to point out our current energy resources and abilities are insufficient by half. Stressing this point dovetails the comprehensive adoption of A.I. by society with his MAGA platform policy of investing heavily in energy independence. A big part of this is also National Security, where he elsewhere has spoken often about building our own Iron Dome, which obviously depends completely on A.I. tech. This in spite of the fact that Israel's own Iron Dome has utterly failed its Proof of Concept, and that because of A.I.

So in context of this specific issue, where do you see this going?

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1707566809648353770.html

1/ 🧵How SURFACE CHARGE (zeta potential) on LNP DIRECTS WHERE in body it goes (LIVER then distribute, OR, DIRECTLY TO SPLEEN, or DIRECTLY TO HEART OR LUNGS) , AND WHY this explains multiple types of ADVERSE EVENTS, including the recent FATAL HEART STUDY that is being shared.

IDF and Mossad are indeed state of the art in border security and intelligence. Giving them the benefit of the doubt as a whole, there must have been at least some crazed, apocalyptic faction within one or both of those entities that purposefully allowed for this LARGE scale planning outside their borders and execution within their borders to proceed uninterrupted.

Meanwhile the neocons over here, with their histrionic outrage are implicitly rejoicing over the tragedy, since this is one big step closer to a decades old wet dream of invading / destabilizing Iran. It is good to recall Wesley Clark's statements back in the 2000s about having been privy to plans going back to the 90s to have multiple other nations on the neocon hit list, below Iraq, for invasion/destabilization: Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Libya, etc.

And their domestic allies and supporters? Mainly all the politically "conservative" Western evangelicals under the religious psy op of Dispensational / Second Coming madness, which is in perfect geopolitical alignment with British + Israeli Zionism, including the Israeli zealot faction who are on board with military violence as the means of ushering in their Messiah. How convenient.

Documented eyewitness accounts, FBI transcripts and records, and the like, demonstrate that two entities - Israel intelligence and Saudi intelligence - had some level of foreknowledge in the former case and significant levels of assistance and enabling in the latter case.

For 22 years, among who and how often are Israel Intelligence and Saudi Intelligence brought up and discussed regarding these documented connections? In MSM OR alt media

Compare to how often government inside job + no Al Queda terrorists / no planes / Larry Silverstein is talked about, in the Truther movements.

So it seems we never forget, except 2 minor things.

This statement was part of a social media post by a clinical doctor focused on longevity in the clinic, and replacing the core Rockefeller medicine model with a decentralized medicine model in healthcare.

It's a good point I think gets easily missed. And an example of a bigger issue. I've been thinking lately about the obvious situation where the mainstream space pushes their audience to one extreme on any topic with contention or unknowns, while much of so called alternative media space pushes their target audiences to other extremes.

An "awakened" public should not mean simply adopting a new dogma after rejecting the old dogma, just because it resonates with mounting suspicions and feelings of betrayal by any and every institution. It puts one in a space of being critical and skeptical of the MSM, but at the same time outsourcing one's critical thinking skills to non-MSM, "alernative media" sources.

Here's the doc's text in full:

The medium is the message.

The truth probably is discoverable, but the facts will be so dishonestly set forth in almost any media outlet that the public can be forgiven either for swallowing lies or failing to form an opinion. The reason for this is how the news is being delivered today. The products of modern science technology are not in themselves good or bad; it is the way they are used that determines their value.

The difference between you and the media today is that the public is too ignorant to explain why they're correct on topics, while the media is so smart they can collectively join forces online and make wrong sound good to most of the public. The medium was designed to dull the senses and cognition of the viewing audience. It has worked. The public is now a product of the media and not their customer. Advertisers are their chief customers. Public viewers are now quite cheap because of how the news is delivered in the technocracy. When viewers realized they have been made a cheap commodity, they can easily force the cost of their services higher to cause the financial collapse of the media.

Why should you care? Once we have surrendered our senses and nervous systems to the private manipulation of those in media who would try to benefit from taking a lease on our eyes and ears and nerves, we don't really have any rights left.